Consultant’s Analysis Report on Enterprise SystemThroughout this course, you will be preparing a Consultant’s Analysis Report on Enterprise Systems for a project of your choosing that will culminate in the Final Key Assignment. You will not be developing any software or actually implementing a system, but you will work extensively with the concepts of good analysis of enterprise systems implementation. Additional information and the deliverables for each Individual Project will be provided in the assignment description for that project.Project Selection:The first step will be to select a project as the target for your analysis. This project will be used as the basis for each of the assignments throughout the course and should conform to the following guidelines:Nontrivial: The selected project should be large enough to allow reasonable exercise of the system analysis and design process.Domain Knowledge: You should be familiar enough with the organization or system category to allow focus on the planning tasks without significant time required for domain education.Accessibility: You should have good access to the people and other information related to the organization or system because this will be an important part of the process.Select an enterprise system project that fits these requirements and submit your proposal to your instructor before proceeding further with the assignments in the course. Approval should be sought within the first several days of the course. Your instructor will tell you how to submit this proposal and what notification will be given for project approval.Assignment:For the assignments in this course you will be developing a comprehensive document entitled Consultant’s Analysis Report on Enterprise Systems. Your first task in this process will be to select a project to use as the basis of your plan. You will also create the shell document for the final project deliverable that you will be working on during each unit. As you proceed through each project week, you will add content to each section of the final document to gradually complete the final project delivery. Appropriate research should be conducted to support the analysis in your plan, and assumptions may be made when necessary.The project deliverables are:Submit project proposal to instructor for approvalConsultant’s Analysis Report on Enterprise Systems ShellUse MS WordTitle pageCourse number and nameProject nameStudent nameDateTable of contentsUse autogenerated TOC.Separate pageMaximum of 3 levels deepBe sure to update fields of TOC so it is up-to-date before submitting projectSection headings (create each heading on a new page with TBD as content except for sections listed under "New content" below)Project OutlineSystem RequirementsArchitecture SelectionResources and TimelineSecurityFinal Analysis and RecommendationsNew contentProject OutlineGive a brief description of the project.Information from the assignment description may be used, but additional details should be provided based on assumptions about the company and project that you feel are appropriate. This section should include the reason for the new distributed system, approximate timeframe and budget to complete the project, and some major deliverables of the project.System RequirementsThis section should list the requirements of the system in sufficient detail to allow a design team to create the design document.Describe the functions the system should perform.Identify the method of delivery (Web, client software, etc.).List the types of target users.Provide any additional information you feel will affect the design of the system, such as projected load on the system, globalization, or regulatory issues regarding the information that will be handled in the system.The following are the project deliverables:Update the Consultant’s Analysis Report document title page with a new date and project name.Update the previously completed sections based on your instructor's feedback.Include the following new content:Architecture SelectionCompare and contrast at least 3 potential architectures for your system, and then select the one that applies the best to your project. In addition to hardware architectures you may also consider “The Cloud”.Describe the architecture that is appropriate for your distributed system based on the results of your analysis.Justify your architecture selection with a summary of your analysis results and conclusions.Be sure to update your table of contents before submission.

MBA 640, Managerial Accounting Course Project Each student should choose an organization with which she/he is familiar, such as the place of employment, business patronized, or other situation and describe how that organization either does or does not apply the course concepts on a day-to-day basis. The following course concepts should be discussed: •Critical success factors. •Four perspectives of balanced scorecard. •Value chain. •Customer delivered value. •Cost of controlling quality and cost of failing to control quality. •Theory of Constraints. Grading for the paper is based on the following: •Introduction and background describing organization 10% •Discussion of course concepts in context of chosen organization 65% •Conclusion, including degree to which organization incorporates concepts 10% •Quality of writing, including citing sources; and organization of project 15% The written paper is to be: typed double–spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman and 12-point font, a 10-page minimum, with correct spelling and grammar, proper citation, references, with a cover page and organized with headings. Business majors can also avail themselves of all Lynn University Library databases and the business specific databases such as: ABI/Inform, Business Insights: Essentials, Passport by Euromonitor, and Statista. Directions to access: Go to Lynn University Website: www.lynn.edu Click the Libraries Tab Click Databases Click on the « All Subject » dropdown= Business http://lynnlibrary.libguides.com/az.php?s=43296 Rubric for MBA 640 Course Project Learning Outcomes 4 3 2 1 0 Provide an introduction and background to company chosen. (10% of grade) Student provides a well-reasoned explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides a succinct yet complete summary of the company’s background. Student provides a well-reasoned explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides an incomplete summary of the company’s background. Student provides an adequate explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides a succinct yet complete summary of the company’s background. Student provides an adequate explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides an incomplete summary of the company’s background. Student does not provides an explanation as to why the company was chosen and does not provide summary of the company’s background. Analyze the company in the context of the critical success factors (15% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the critical success factors and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the critical success factors but only relates them adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the critical success factors and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the critical success factors and relates them adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the critical success factors and does not relates them to the company. Analyze the company in the context of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard. (15% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard but only relates them adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and relates them adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and does not relates them to the company. Analyze the company in the context of the value chain. (10% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the value chain and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the value chain but only relates it adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the value chain and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the value chain and relates it adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the value chain and does not relates it to the company. Analyze the company in the context of customer delivered value. (5% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the customer delivered value and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the customer delivered value but only relates it adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the customer delivered value and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the customer delivered value and relates it adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the customer delivered value and does not relates it to the company. Analyze the company in the context of the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality. (10% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality but only relates them adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and relates them adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and does not relates them to the company. Analyze the company in the context of the Theory of Constraints. (10% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the Theory of Constraints and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the Theory of Constraints but only relates it adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the Theory of Constraints and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the Theory of Constraints and relates it adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the Theory of Constraints and does not relates it to the company. Conclusion, including degree to which organization incorporates concepts. (10% of grade) Conclusion drawn is excellent. Conclusion drawn is above average. Conclusion drawn is average. Conclusion drawn is below average. No conclusion is drawn. Quality of writing, including citing sources; and organization of project. (15% of grade) Writing skills are at high level with almost no errors; organization is excellent. Writing skills are good with a few errors; organization is above average. Writing skills are adequate with many errors; organization is average. Writing skills overall are below average; organization is below average. Writing skills are poor with remediation required and project is not organized.