Please read instructions and questions below (PDF File).Also the book name is: Reid, R. Dan and Nada R. Sanders, Operations Management: An Integrated Approach, 6th Edition. Wiley Publishing. 24 September 2015. (ISBN-10: 1118952618 or ISBN-13: 978- 1118952610).

ASSIGNMENT: Annotated Reading List10 pointsIn this assignment, you will be seeking to compare the functional duties that a manager has within an organization today with those of the past. According to our definition, managers are involved in planning, organizing, directing, and controlling.Your manager overheard you telling a colleague that you are taking a graduate-level organizational theory class at UMGC. He remembers his college course on organizational theory and realizes that he found the knowledge he learned extremely useful over the years. Experience has taught him that professional development is a lifelong endeavor. He wonders if there are new theories and ideas that may help him be a better manager. He has asked you to provide him with a list of articles and/or videos he could read/watch to refresh his memory with the older theorists and introduce him to the new theorists and schools of thought. He would like to see your take on the material so he asks that you guide him through your choices with a summary of their content. He would also like to read your choice as to what theory or theorists you find most relevant to today. Here are the points he wants you to address: Using OneSearch in the online library, conduct a search for at least 6 scholarly articles on management theory. The articles should reflect the evolution of management theory. Article selection should consider the major schools of thought and lead theorists representative of the school. Using the APA template format found here Annotated Bibliography create an annotated reading list. The articles should be summarized in at least one or two paragraphs as the format suggests. Give a two-paragraph summary of the schools of thought, how they have changed, and why. Conclude with a two to three paragraph discussion your selection of one theory and lead theorist that you feel is most relevant today. Give your reasoning for the selection. This should be supported with examples from class readings related to the modern organization. Follow APA style guidelines for the title page, citations and reference cited page. The paper should be double-spaced with 1-inch margins with 12 pt. font. Upload your assignment in the Assignment Folder. Additional Requirements and How to Prepare the Submission Submissions should be in proper business writing forms. If appropriate for the assignment APA formatting is required (in-text and reference list only). Read the grading rubric for the assignment Check the instructions to make sure all elements of the assignment have been covered. Third-person writing is required. Third-person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first-person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second-person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link: https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/gramma... . Contractions are not used in business writing, so the expectation is that students do not use contractions in assignments. Paraphrase and do not use direct quotation marks. This means you do not use more than four consecutive words from a source document, put a passage from a source document into your own words, and attribute the passage to the source document. Provide the page or paragraph number. Note that a reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa. Students are expected to use a variety as well as multiple course readings and research to support ideas, reasoning, and conclusions. Submit the final project into the appropriate assignment submission folder. Once submitted, the project is eligible for grading and students will not be permitted to make changes or make another submission. NOTE: All submitted work is to be your original work. You may not use any work from another student, the Internet or an online clearinghouse. You are expected to understand the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policy and know that it is your responsibility to learn about instructor and general academic expectations with regard to proper citation of sources as specified in the APA Publication Manual, 7th Ed. (Students are held accountable for in-text citations and an associated reference list only). Due DateSep 15, 2020 11:59 PMHide RubricsRubric Name: Annotated Reading List - 10% This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria ExcellentGoodDevelopingNeeds ImprovementFailingCriterion Score Selection of at least six scholarly articles that reflect the evolution of management theory and theorists with summary of each article 3 points Selection of more than six articles and summaries were used; selection showed an insightful understanding of the evolution of management theory. (2.39-3) 2.3 points Selection of six articles and summaries were used; selection showed a good understanding of the evolution of management theory but the choice of one article was not on point.(1.6-2.3) 1.5 points Selection of six articles and summaries were used; selection showed a general understanding of the evolution of management theory but the choice of two articles were off- point.(1.5-1.599) 1.3 points Attempt was made at a selection of less than 6 articles but the understanding of the evolution of management theory was not reflected well or article summaries were incomplete.(1.2-1.39) 0 points No attempt was made or minimal attempt was made (less than 3 articles or list with two summaries)(0- 1.19) / 3 Summary of each article selected reflects understanding of the theory and theorist discussed 3 points Summaries showed an excellent and thorough understanding of the articles offered and the theory/theorist it addresses. (2.39-3) 2.3 points Summaries showed a good understanding of the articles offered and the theory/theorist it addresses but one needed more detail.(1.6-2.3) 1.5 points Summaries showed a general understanding of the articles offered and the theory/theorist it addresses but needed more detail.(1.4-1.599) 1.3 points Summaries attempted only showed a cursory understanding of the articles offered and the theory/theorist it addressed. (1.2-1.39) 0 points Some articles had no summaries or summaries showed minimal detail of the article.(0- 1.19) / 3 Analysis of organizational theory history 1 point Analysis was insightful and thorough as to how and why changes occurred. All examples and conclusions were supported by research. (.90-1.0) 0.85 points Discussion was mostly complete as to how and why changes occurred. One or two points factors of change were under-develop. All examples and conclusions were supported by research.(.80-.899) 0.75 points Discussion was general as to how and why changes occurred. Overall the discussion was general and needed more depth. All examples and conclusions were present but support contained some opinion or was under supported by research.(.70-.799) 0.65 points Discussion attempt was poor because of lack of support from class material, and research. Examples were not always present and factors promoting the changes were weakly or incorrectly addressed.(.70-.799) 0 points No attempt was made to complete the discussion. Minimal discussion was made and/or incorrect.(0- .599) / 1 Use of Annotated Bibilography Template 0.5 points Format was followed with no mistakes (.45-.50) 0.425 points Format followed with less than 2 errors(.4-.4499) 0.375 points Format followed with less than 3 errors(.35-.399) 0.325 points Attempt was made to use template format but more than 4 errors(.3-.499) 0 points No outside reference material was used.(0-.299) / 0.5 Writing Mechanics 1.5 points Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. 0 to 2 errors noted.(.90-1.0) 0.85 points Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 3 to 6 errors noted.(.80-.899) 0.75 points Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 7 to 10 errors noted.(.70-.799) 0.65 points Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found.(.60-.699) 0 points Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible; or errors are too plentiful to count.(.3-.499) / 1.5 APA Style (7th ed.) 1 point Excellent use of APA format and style. Only one to 2 APA style or usage errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper; Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.(.45-.1) 0.425 points Good use of APA format and style. Attempts in-text citations and reference list but 3 - 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times.(.4-.4499) 0.375 points Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted throughout document with 5-6 errors noted; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 3 - 4 times in document.(.35-.399) 0.325 points Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to use APA citation when appropriate 5-6 times; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 5-6 times in document or presents a total of 1-2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper when requires APA citations are needed throughout the document.(.3-.499) 0 points No attempt at APA style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.(0-.299) / 1 Rubric Total Score Total / 10 Overall ScoreOverall ScoreExcellent9 points minimumGood8 points minimumDeveloping7 points minimumNeeds Improvement6 points minimumFailing0 points minimum