Access over 20 million homework & study documents

Case study gmo

Content type
User Generated
Type
Study Guide
Rating
Showing Page:
1/12
1
Beef Hormones & GMO’s
“Are We What We Eat?”
IMAN 625
Spring 2012
B. Ellis
E. Kang
J. Missun

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/12
1
Introduction and Background
Since the 1950s, the United States (U.S.) has been using growth hormones in beef
production because the hormones “allow animals to grow larger, leaner and more quickly on less
feed (Hanrahan & Johnson, 2010),” thus reducing production costs. The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have approved hormone-
injected beef and uphold their stand that eating hormone-fed beef has no adverse physiological
affect on humans (Hanrahan & Johnson, 2010). However, the European Union (EU) has a
different opinion. The EU has been banning the use hormones in their livestock since 1981
(Hanrahan & Johnson, 2010). Since the early 1980’s the U.S. and EU has engaged in a long
standing disagreement over the EU’s decision to ban hormone treated beef. There have been
several rulings that have been decided by the World Trade Organization (WTO); however, the
EU continues to ban the import of hormone treated beef from the U.S.
The EU has specific concerns with the genetically modified organisms (GMO's) that are
being introduced to foods that are processed and distributed to the public. Cinnamon Carlarne
from the University of Arkansas explains that the EU is concerned over GMO's due to a new
unknown biotechnology and the variables that are associated with introducing the GMO's to
human food (Carlarne, 2007). She also discussed in detail why the “U.S. accepted the use and
marketing of GMO products(Carlarne, 2007). The EU has a very stringent management for
controlling the use and trade of GMOs (Carlarne, 2007). Because of the recent concerns over
GMO’s, the EU and the U.S. have opposing regulatory rules. The WTO ruled in the fall of 2006
that “Europe’s genetically modified regulations contradict international trade rules(Carlarne,
2007).

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/12

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 12 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
 Beef Hormones & GMO’s “Are We What We Eat?” IMAN 625 Spring 2012 B. Ellis E. Kang J. Missun Introduction and Background Since the 1950s, the United States (U.S.) has been using growth hormones in beef production because the hormones “allow animals to grow larger, leaner and more quickly on less feed (Hanrahan & Johnson, 2010),” thus reducing production costs. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have approved hormone- injected beef and uphold their stand that eating hormone-fed beef has no adverse physiological affect on humans (Hanrahan & Johnson, 2010). However, the European Union (EU) has a different opinion. The EU has been banning the use hormones in their livestock since 1981 (Hanrahan & Johnson, 2010). Since the early 1980’s the U.S. and EU has engaged in a long standing disagreement over the EU’s decision to ban hormone treated beef. There have been several rulings that have been decided by the World Trade Organization (WTO); however, the EU continues to ban the import of hormone treated beef from the U.S. The EU has specific concerns with the genetically modified organisms (GMO's) that are being introduced to foods that are processed and distributed to the public. Cinnamon Carlarne from the University of Arkansas explains that the EU is concerned over GMO's due to a new unknown biotechnology and the variables that are associated with introducing the GMO's to human food (Carl ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4