The third deliverable is a 7- to 10-page written product that details your approach, results, and interpretation of findings. This should be a formal, scholarly paper, one that adheres to the APA guidelines. In this document, be sure that you:1. Present your research question clearly.2. Explain why you selected your dataset and the statistical test you applied to that dataset.3. Detail whether your test has statistical power or not.4. Use one of the statistical tests covered in this course. 5. Visually display your results. 6. Detail how your findings might impact social change. 7. Ensure that your Final Project is 7–10 pages in length, in APA format. While you are required to use one of the statistical tests covered in this course, you should feel free to appropriately augment with tests you learned in RSCH 8210. For example, you may use a correlation matrix to test for multicollinearity in a regression model. Suggested MilestonesWeek 3: Topic of interest should be identified. Start searching for data. Week 6: Research question and dataset should be clearly identified.Week 10: Final analysis should be completed.Week 11: Finalize written draft and post oral presentation.

answer these two questions in a minimum of 250 words each 1. Messias (2014) outlined five epochs in the history of psychology. Consider the progression of these epochs and the factors that marked the end of one epoch and the beginning of the next. Which epoch do you believe to be the most significantly different from the one immediately prior? Why? How does this difference advance the field of psychology? Explain.2.Derrida, Brault, and Naas (1994) asserted a philosophy of psychoanalysis that claims “madness” is not necessarily a disease, but a cognitive process lacking reason. Do you agree? Why or why not? Does the philosophy of Derrida, Brault, and Naas affirm or refute Freudian principles? Explain.

Part 1: ResultsUse two video transcripts videos, one phone interview (See attached), and other data gathered from social change website or documents you might have. Code the transcripts and the interview and write up the results of your findings. You will include the following sections in your write-up:Data Sources—briefly describe each data source including location, duration of data collection, how data were recorded, and unusual circumstances.Two Scholars of Change videosOne phone interviewResources from other websitesInstrumentation—briefly describe the type of instrumentation you used for your data collection.Who developed each data collection tool and what is the date of publication?Where and with which participant group has it been used previously?How appropriate is it for current study and include whether modifications will be or were needed?Data Analysis—based on the data sources in “A.”, provide a detailed analysis to include the following:Report the process used to move inductively from coded units to larger representations including categories and themes.Describe the specific codes, categories, and themes that emerged from the data using quotations as needed to emphasize their importance.1st cycle—describe, give examples.2nd cycle—describe, give examples/moving from codes to categories.Identify themes—provide examples and illustrate your results with a figure or a chart.PART 2: TRUSTWORTHINESS AND SUMMARYTrustworthiness—summarize across the different data sources and respond to the following:o What themes are in common? o What sources have different themes? o Explain the trustworthiness of your findings, in terms of: - Credibility - Transferability - Dependability strategies - ConfirmabilitySummaryBased on the results of your analyses, how would you answer the question: “What is the meaning of social change for a graduate student?”Self-Reflection—Has your own understanding of you as a positive social change agent changed? Explain your reasoning.