Community development work integrates theory and practice.Identify a social problem in Australia today and present relevant theories and principles ofcommunity development which apply to this issue.Discuss the appropriate direction for change and possible evidence‐based solutions.An “Australian social problem” might be i.e. homelessness, domestic violence, childabuse and neglect, unemployment, ageing population, etc.Please consider which sections of the population are disproportionately affected andhow change might come about.

Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation EssayNote: Please review the source guidelines below very carefully. If you do not choose from the provided sources below, this will cause a grading delay and you will need to resubmit the assignment.For this assignment, you will write your evaluation essay. You are required to submit only your >nal draft for this assignment (though we encourage all students to take advantage of the additional feedback a draft can provide). Use the grader’s feedback and the rubric to make revisions to your draft before submitting the >nal. Your second draft will be graded. Now that you have completed Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment.First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley's novel. You may focus most of your attention on this >rst critique. If the author of your critique is not speci?ed, focus on the publication of the critique.Choose from among these sources:Romantic Circle's Critiques:Critique 1 Critique 2 Critique 3 Critique 4 Critique 5 Critique 6Professor Naomi Hetherington’s critiqueThe questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now it’s time to write it down!Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:Evaluate the critic/author:Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have? (If you are using a valid source, you should be able to >nd these easily)Find the thesis of the article:What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?Evaluate the thesis:Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you >nd points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.Evaluate the support:Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide suacient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classi>cation, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary critic’s thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essay’s thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the >rst critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis.For instance, if the >rst critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the >rst critic's thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the >rst critic believes the novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue your own view of the >rst critic's thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical-- if that's the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second critic’s thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics.In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement in both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen; the novel, Frankenstein; and/or the study guides.Using proper MLA style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein?You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement:(Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support).OR(Critic)’s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support).More speci>c thesis examples:John Smith uses "Frankenstein Critique Essay" to adequately argue that Victor's mother created the Mrst monster by coddling Victor as a boy.ORJohn Smith's "Frankenstein Critique Essay" does not effectively argue that Victor's mother created the Mrst monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible. The guidelines for this assignment are:Length: This assignment should be a minimum of 3 typed pages or at least 750 words.Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information:Your >rst and last nameCourse Title (Composition II)Assignment name (Evaluation Essay, Writing Assignment 4)Current DateFormat:Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.Rubric: Grading Rubric for the Critical AnalysisLast modi>ed: Monday, July 22, 2019, 1:07 PM MLA-style source documentation and Works CitedYour last name and page number in the upper- right corner of each pageDouble-spacing throughoutStandard font (TimesNewRoman, Calibri) Title, centered after heading1” margins on all sidesSave the >le using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txt Once you have >nished with your essay and are ready for it to be reviewed by a grader, submit your assignment using the Draft or Final upload links for this assignment.Please note that drafts are optional.Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay

Psychology is a contemporary science. Listed below are several recent papers. For the first part of this assignment, choose two papers to briefly summarize in a paragraph each, focusing on the contribution each makes to psychological knowledge in general.The second part of the paper should be a discussion of the contributions and limitations of the field of psychology in our general knowledge. In addition, please discuss the follow;What can we expect to learn in the future?What are the possible problems we may face with psychology in the future?This paper should be 2-3 pages in length and use APA formatting (cover page, paper body formatting, citations, and references: see Rasmussen's APA guide in the Resources tab, or by clicking here. Prior to submitting your paper, be sure you proofread your work to check your spelling and grammar. If you use any outside sources, please site those sources in APA citation format.Ponder, J. D., & Haridakis, P. (2015). Selectively social politics: The differing roles of media use on political discussion. Mass Communication & Society, 18(3), 281-302. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.940977Edlund, J. E. (2016). Invited editorial: Let's do it again: A call for replications in Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research. Psi Chi Journal Of Psychological Research, 21(1), 59-61.Edlund, J. E. (2016). Invited editorial: Let's do it again: A call for replications in Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research. Psi Chi Journal Of Psychological Research, 21(1), 59-61.Wolters, C. A., & Hussain, M. (2015). Investigating grit and its relations with college students’ self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Metacognition And Learning, 10(3), 293-311. doi:10.1007/s11409-014-9128-9.Paper discusses psychological issues from both papers intelligently and methodicallyGrading RubricFFCBA01234Did not SubmitNo PassCompetenceProficiencyMasteryNot SubmittedNo identification psychological issues from 1st paperIdentifies the psychological issues from the 1st paper, but lacks explanation of basic features.Identifies the psychological issues from the 1st paper, but explanation is underdeveloped.Identifies the psychological issues from the 1st paper, fully explains contribution to psychology.Not SubmittedNo identification psychological issues from 2nd paperIdentifies the psychological issues from the 2nd paper, but lacks explanation of basic features.Identifies the psychological issues from the 2nd paper, but explanation is underdeveloped.Identifies the psychological issues from the 2nd paper, fully explains contribution to psychology.Not SubmittedNo noticeable attempt to define contributions and limitations.Correctly defines one key contributions or limitations; attempts to define another.Correctly defines at least one each contribution and limitation.Correctly defines both contributions and limitations.Not SubmittedNo identification of future problemsAttempts to identify future problems, with minimal supporting information.Identifies future problems, with minimal supporting information.Fully identifies future problems with psychology.