In essence, the purpose of a program evaluation is to assess program outcomes. What are program outcomes? How do evaluators identify relevant outcomes for evaluation? Discuss the importance of evidence-based research in program evaluation.

MGTU 301 Paper #2Length: Paper: 3-4 double-spaced pages (excluding title and references pages)Due: Week 7 by Sunday Midnight (Assignments folder)Value: 175 PointsAccording to Peter Senge, learning organizations encourage a holistic approach to understanding and leading organizations called 'systems thinking.' Systems thinking stems from the tenets of system theory where each process integrates with all the others. Basically, it means the ability to see the big picture and to be able to see the interrelationships between what might, at first, seem to be completely unrelated. Systems thinking focuses on how the individual that is being studied interacts with the other constituents of the system. Rather than focusing on the individuals within an organization, it prefers to look at a larger number of interactions within the organization and in between organizations as a whole. Figure 2.4 (page 62) and 10.3 (page 188) in your textbook illustrate how four parts of a system integrate to help us evaluate, lead and change business process and functions for the better. For this paper, you are going to analyze your readiness for change, or that of an organization in which the change needs to occur. Paper GuidelinesPrepare and submit 3-4 page paper that briefly describes a change at school, work or another area of your life and apply the systems model. A well-constructed paper will reference 3 or more scholarly sources including at least 1 journal articles such as those assigned and retrieved from Brandman’s virtual library, and adhere to APA standards.Resourceshttp://www.mutualresponsibility.org/science/what-i... http://infed.org/mobi/peter-senge-and-the-learning... Figure 2.4 (page 62)and 10.3 (page 188) in your textbook Introduction/ Description In no more than one page, describe the situation or *business (can be current, past or future) in need of change. In the description, position yourself as the leader, and give a good summary of the situation. *examples of businesses that you might consider for this assignment:Current place of workFuture place of workDream jobChurch groupsSports teamsSpecial projects for schoolNeighborhood groups or organizationsAd-hoc committeesBoard membershipsClubs (i.e Book Club, Running Club)Social groups Application:Systems Thinking- Provide a thorough analysis of each of the four components of systems (Inputs, Target Elements of Change, Outputs and Feedback). Which of the four components is lowest? Why? Be specific. Prediction- How do you think this will affect the success of the particular change? Be specific. Reflection Analysis:Readiness: Who seems to be most ready, you (components 1 and 2) or the organization (components 3 and 4)?Recommendation/s: Given the readiness measure tells you, what do you recommend to improve your and/or your organization’s readiness? Evaluation Criteria: Grading RubricCriteriaExemplaryProficientDevelopingEmergingIncomplete Description20 - 19Clearly and concisely describes the situation. Positions self as leader. Identifies key items of concern and key players. Does not exceed 1 page18 - 17Clearly describes the situation. Positions self as leader. Identifies most key items of concern and key players. May slightly exceed 1 page16 - 15Description of the situation is incomplete and/or confusing. Positions self as leader but may not identify key concerns and/or key players. 14- 9Limited if any description of the situation.. May not position self as leader, identify key concerns and/or key players. 0Failed to complete assignment according to guidelines.Application55 - 50Analyzed business through the lens of each component of systems thinking. Draws valid predictions of the impact of each component of the situation.49 - 44Analyzed business through the lens of each component of systems thinking.Draws fairly valid conclusions of the impact of each question on the situation.43 – 38Analyzed the business through the lens of each component of systems thinking.May not fully analyze the impact of each question on the situation37-30Limited analyzation of the business through the lens of each component of systems thinking. Limited if any analysis of the impact of question on the situation.0Failed to complete assignment according to guidelines.Reflection Analysis50 - 45Reflected on your learning by describing the level of readiness as well as your recommendations for next steps. 44– 39Somewhat reflected on your learning by describing the level of readiness as well as your recommendations for next steps. 38 – 30Partially, reflected on your learning by describing the level of readiness as well as your recommendations for next steps. 29-20Limited if any reflection on your learning by describing the level of readiness as well as your recommendations for next steps. 0Failed to complete assignment according to guidelines.APA and Sources20 - 19Cites 3 or more scholarly sources including 1 journal articles. Accurately uses headers and adhere to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct. All sources listed in References are cited in paper18 -17Cites 2 scholarly sources including 1 journal articles. . Uses headers and adheres to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct with minor (1-3) errors. All sources listed in References are cited in paper16 - 15Cites 1 scholarly sources including 0 journal article. May use headers and somewhat adheres to APA standards; the work of others is cited but with numerous (4 – 10) errors. Sources listed in References and citations may not match14-7Cites 1-0 scholarly sources. Limited adherence to APA standards in the paper and Reference page; work of others may be cited but with multiple (11+) errors. Sources listed in References and citations do not match0Failed to complete assignment according to guidelines.Writing Mechanics30 - 27The paper is logical and well-written; spelling, grammar and punctuation are accurate. Paper is the required length of 3-4 pages of content, and includes correctly prepared title page.26 - 23The paper is logical and well-written but with minor (1 – 3) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 5% too long or short; includes a correctly prepared title page.22 - 19The paper is somewhat logical and well-written but with several (4 – 10) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 10% too long or short, and may not include a correctly prepared title page18-10The paper lacks clarity and may be confusing with numerous (11+) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 15% too long or short, and may not include a title page0Failed to complete assignment according to guidelines.

The Saudi Vision 2030 is a plan to diversify the economy and develop sectors such as education, infrastructure, and tourism. The government desires the encouragement of private investment in a number of sectors of the Saudi economy and emphasizes economic and investment activities and increasing non-oil industry trade between countries. What role do you consider foreign investors play in achieving this vision this and how should they deal with the exchange rate risks associated with investing in the Saudi economy?Search the SEU library or the Internet for an academic or industry-related article. Select an article that relates to these concepts and explain how it relates to doing business in Saudi Arabia.For your discussion post, your first step is to summarize the article in two paragraphs, describing what you think are the most important points made by the authors (remember to use citations where appropriate). For the second step, include the reference listing with a hyperlink to the article. Do not copy the article into your post and limit your summary to two paragraphs. Let your instructor know if you have any questions and enjoy your search.You are required to reply to at least two peer discussion question posts answers to this weekly discussion question and/or your instructor’s response to your posting. These post replies need to be substantial and constructive in nature. They should add to the content of the post and evaluate/analyze that post answer. Normal course dialogue doesn’t fulfill these two peer replies but is expected throughout the course. Answering all course questions is also required.