Access Millions of academic & study documents

This Paper Will Focus On Any Topic That Relates To Terrorism

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Law
School
Virginia Commonwealth University
Type
Homework
Showing Page:
1/10
Running head: NEW TERRORISM 1
The Problematic Concept of ‘New Terrorism’
Name
Institution

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/10
NEW TERRORISM 2
The Problematic Concept of ‘New Terrorism’
Terrorism has been experienced in society since time immemorial. However, the
understanding of terror and terrorism has changed over time and has mainly received widespread
attention at the end of the 20
th
century and in the 21
st
. There is a school of thought which refers
to the current state of terrorism as ‘new terrorism.’ The basic argument of this school is that the
new wave of ‘religious terrorism’ has been revolutionary and largely distinct from what has
previously been termed as secular terrorism. The concept of new terrorism is a highly
controversial one and it requires extensive analysis and study. This paper focuses on debunking
the concept, tactics included in it, and arguments supporting and those opposing the notion as
well. Although proponents of ‘new terrorism’ advance the idea that contemporary terrorism has
been revolutionary, a comparison between the concept and traditional terrorism reveals more
similarities than differences and blurs the boundary between the two.
Background on Terrorism
The term new terrorism came into existence in the 1990s but advanced mainly after the
9/11 attacks on U.S soil. According to Walter Laqueur, historian, journalist, and political
commentator, the idea of ‘new’ was mainly confined within academy in the 1990s (Laqueur,
1999). The unprecedented attacks in 2001 pushed the idea of a new wave of terrorism which was
more violent and had different tactics to public domain and even policy developments.
Therefore, historically, new terrorism is a notion which is approximately two decades old and
was largely affected and propagated by 9/11 attacks and the war on terror that followed.
Proponents of this notion, therefore, generally believe that the current model of terrorism is the
new terrorism whose changes and differences from traditional terrorism will be discussed in this
paper.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/10

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 10 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Running head: NEW TERRORISM 1 The Problematic Concept of ‘New Terrorism’ Name Institution NEW TERRORISM 2 The Problematic Concept of ‘New Terrorism’ Terrorism has been experienced in society since time immemorial. However, the understanding of terror and terrorism has changed over time and has mainly received widespread attention at the end of the 20th century and in the 21st. There is a school of thought which refers to the current state of terrorism as ‘new terrorism.’ The basic argument of this school is that the new wave of ‘religious terrorism’ has been revolutionary and largely distinct from what has previously been termed as secular terrorism. The concept of new terrorism is a highly controversial one and it requires extensive analysis and study. This paper focuses on debunking the concept, tactics included in it, and arguments supporting and those opposing the notion as well. Although proponents of ‘new terrorism’ advance the idea that contemporary terrorism has been revolutionary, a comparison between the concept and traditional terrorism reveals more similarities than differences and blurs the boundary between the two. Background on Terrorism The term new terrorism came into existence in the 1990s but advanced mainly after the 9/11 attacks on U.S soil. According to Walter Laqueur, historian, journalist, and political commentator, the idea of ‘new’ was mainly confined within academy in the 1990s (Laqueur, 1999). The unprecedented attacks ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents