CompetencyEvaluate consequence-based moral theories.InstructionsCreating the perfect bossYour company, Ye Old Paper Mill, recently experienced some organizational chart changes, mostly related to management positions. After posting low profits and even lower employment satisfaction scores, the CEO decided it was time for a change. The CEO, who prefers consequentialist views when it comes to ethical decisions, approached you, along with the rest of the human resources department, and tasked the team with weighing consequentialist ethical theories and selecting which theory would be best for potential managers. For this assessment, you will draft a proposal that addresses the following questions:What are key features of consequentialist theories?What are the differences between the consequentialist theories?How does happiness and pleasure factor in to these theories? Remember employee satisfaction is at an all-time low.What are the pros and cons of each view for the company if the majority of its employees would follow one of the particular theories?Would it be possible for a manager, who follows a different ethical perspective, to effectively manage subordinates who follow a particular consequentialist theory?Select and defend which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company.Your properly formatted proposal will need to include the following sections:Introduction: Explain why you are sending this proposal. Provide an overview of the issue and discuss the task from the CEO.Address the questions listed above with applicable support and researchConclusion: In this part, you will wrap up the proposal and select and defend which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company.Proper Proposal Formatting: This a professional document and needs to be structured as a proposal and not as an essay. You will still need to supply both in text and full citations for the sources of your information. If you need further assistance with how to structure a proposal, click on this link. Grading Rubric008090100No PassNo PassCompetenceProficiencyMasteryNot SubmittedAn inadequate or inappropriate identification of the key features of consequentialist theories and differentiation between the theories.Identifies the key features of consequentialist theories and provides differentiation between the theories with basic supporting evidence.Identifies the key features of consequentialist theories and provides differentiation between the theories with supporting evidence.Identifies the key features of consequentialist theories and provides thorough differentiation between the theories with strong supporting evidence.Not SubmittedAn inadequate or inappropriate explanation of how happiness and pleasure factor in to these theoriesExplains how happiness and pleasure factor in to these theories with some supporting informationExplains how happiness and pleasure factor in to these theories with strong supporting information.Explains how happiness and pleasure factor in to these theories with well-integrated, strong supporting information.Not SubmittedAn inadequate or inappropriate assessment of the pros and cons of each view for the company if the majority of its employees would follow one of the particular theories.Assessment of the pros and cons of each view for the company if the majority of its employees would follow one of the particular theories, minor issues present.Developed assessment of the pros and cons of each view for the company if the majority of its employees would follow one of the particular theories.Thorough and detailed assessment of the pros and cons of each view for the company if the majority of its employees would follow one of the particular theories.Not SubmittedAn inadequate or inappropriate selection and defense of which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company.Selects and defends which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company with basic supporting evidence.Selects and defends which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company with supporting evidence.Selects and defends which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company with strong supporting evidence.Not SubmittedDocument attempts to utilize proposal formatting, but with major errors. Missing parts of the required pieces.Document uses proposal formatting, but has items out of order, inconsistent professional tone, or pieces missing.Document utilizes proposal formatting, with a few errors or pieces missing. Professional in tone.All elements of a properly structured proposal are present: Professional in tone.

Common Respiratory ComplaintsA 75-year-old man with a history of hypertension, diabetes, environmental allergies, and colon polyps presents to the office with a complaint of persistent dry hacking cough that does not improve with over-the-counter treatment with antitussives and allergy medications. The man reports that he has had the cough for three months and is tired of the coughing spells he experiences. His medical history reveals that he started taking lisinopril six months before this appointment, has taken an over-the-counter allergy medication for several years, had his last colon polyps removed six years ago, and his blood pressure today is 145/70. Other medications include metformin XR 500 mg daily, aspirin 81 mg once daily, and loratadine 10 mg daily. The physical exam is negative for any issues other than his mild neuropathy from long-term diabetes. The cough is noted to be dry and hacking as the patient has described. The man is not in acute distress.Case Questions:Using OLDCARTS, what questions would have been asked as part of the medical history?What physical aspects would have been completed as part of the physical exam and why? Include the diagnostics that you would order and rationale.Based on the medical history and physical exam, what is the most likely cause of his cough?What other possible diagnoses should be considered and why?Are there any other tests that should be completed before producing a diagnosis? Why or why not?What is the treatment for this patient, including education?

1) Work with your preceptor to assess the organization for required resources needed for the strategic plan if the change proposal were to be implemented. Review your strategic plan and determine what resources would be needed if the change proposal were to be implemented. Write a list of at least four resources you will need in order to implement your change proposal.The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.----2) While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a review (750-1,000 words) that includes the following sections:Title pageIntroduction sectionA comparison of research questionsA comparison of sample populationsA comparison of the limitations of the studyA conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further researchPrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.----3)Write a reflection journal (250-300 words) to outline what has been discovered about your professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week there will be a specific focus to use in your reflection. Integrate leadership and inquiry into the current practice. Please make sure to address all areas in your writing.Topic Focus: Population Health Concerns and Health Disparities