INSTRUCTIONSCross-cultural communication was briefly covered earlier in the course. This type of communication focuses on the elements that impact communication across different cultures and how messages can be adjusted to reach audiences. “Culture is a dynamic, fluid, ever-changing, and complex force in the lives of individuals, groups, and communities” (Huff, Kline, & Peterson, 2015, p. 22). Communicators must understand this dynamic flow and address the nuances of culture in their work.Assignment InstructionsUnderstanding culture is a key part of communication. This week’s introduction outlined key components of understanding culture as it relates to communicating with your key audiences. Here are those elements:Objective Elements in CultureSubjective Elements in CultureLawsValuesRegulationsNormsLanguageBeliefsAttitudesIn this assignment, you will fill in the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association’s cultural competence checklist, located in this week's resources.Here is the link http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/Cultural-Competence-Checklist-Personal-Reflection.pdfAfter you have completed this assignment, you will comment on how your reflection helped you to better understand the elements of cross-cultural communication, awareness of your own cultural values, awareness and acceptance of cultural differences, development of cultural knowledge, and ability to adapt to cultural context.Total Assignment Length: Completed checklist, to 2-page reflection, not including title and reference pagesResources: Include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources to support your assignment.Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented this week. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to University's Academic Integrity Policy. Upload your document and click the Submit to Dropbox button.Reference:Huff, R., Kline, M. & Peterson, D. (2015). Culture, health promotion, and cultural competence. In R. Huff, M. Kline, & D. Peterson, Health promotion in multicultural populations (pp. 3-20). London, UK: SAGE Publications, Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781483368771.n1Due DateNov 3, 2019 11:59 PMHide RubricsRubric Name: Common Grading Rubric - 10 PointsCriteriaNot EvidentNeeds ImprovementMeetsExceedsContent per Assignment Instructions 30% of total0 pointsCompleted few parts of the assignment and/or did not address many questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.2.25 pointsCompleted some parts of the assignment and/or did not address several questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.2.55 pointsCompleted all required parts of the assignment and addressed most of the questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.3 pointsCompleted all required parts of the assignment and addressed all questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.Critical Thinking 50% of total0 pointsNo evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. No evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were generally not thoughtful, thorough, or well-reasoned.3.75 pointsLittle evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. Little evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were occasionally thoughtful and/or may not have been thorough or well-reasoned4.25 pointsSome evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. Some evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were mostly thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned.5 pointsStrong evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. Detailed evidence of analysis of assignment concept. Responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasonedIntegration of Resources 10% of total0 pointsResources are not scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of poor quality and/or not appropriate for the assignment.0.75 pointsSome resources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of good quality and/or appropriate for the assignment.0.85 pointsMost resources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of good quality and/or appropriate for the assignment.1 pointResources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed and were of excellent quality and/or appropriate for the assignment.Grammar/ Mechanics/APA Formatting 10% of total0 pointsNumerous misspelled words and grammatical errors. APA formatting not used.0.75 pointsFrequently misspells words and/or makes consistent grammatical errors. Numerous APA formatting issues.0.85 pointsOccasionally misspells words and/or some grammatical errors. Minor APA formatting issues.1 pointNo or very few misspelled words and/or no or very few grammatical errors. No APA formatting issuesOverall ScoreLevel 10 or moreLevel 26.75 or moreLevel 38.4 or moreLevel 49.25 or moreRubric Name: Common Grading Rubric - 5 PointsCriteriaNot EvidentNeeds ImprovementMeetsExceedsContent per Assignment Instructions 30% of total0 pointsCompleted few parts of the assignment and/or did not address many questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.1.125 pointsCompleted some parts of the assignment and/or did not address several questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.1.275 pointsCompleted all required parts of the assignment and addressed most of the questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.1.5 pointsCompleted all required parts of the assignment and addressed all questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt.Critical Thinking 50% of total0 pointsNo evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. No evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were generally not thoughtful, thorough, or well-reasoned.1.875 pointsLittle evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. Little evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were occasionally thoughtful and/or may not have been thorough or well-reasoned2.125 pointsSome evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. Some evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were mostly thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned.2.5 pointsStrong evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content. Detailed evidence of analysis of assignment concept. Responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasonedIntegration of Resources 10% of total0 pointsResources are not scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of poor quality and/or not appropriate for the assignment.0.375 pointsSome resources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of good quality and/or appropriate for the assignment.0.425 pointsMost resources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of good quality and/or appropriate for the assignment.0.5 pointsResources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed and were of excellent quality and/or appropriate for the assignment.Grammar/ Mechanics/APA Formatting 10% of total0 pointsNumerous misspelled words and grammatical errors. APA formatting not used.0.375 pointsFrequently misspells words and/or makes consistent grammatical errors. Numerous APA formatting issues.0.425 pointsOccasionally misspells words and/or some grammatical errors. Minor APA formatting issues.0.5 pointsNo or very few misspelled words and/or no or very few grammatical errors. No APA formatting issuesOverall ScoreLevel 10 or moreLevel 43.3 or moreLevel 24.2 or moreLevel 34.5 or more