HC310 Herzing Week 3 Assignment 1 Patient Communication Presentation
Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationRe-submit AssignmentDue Mar 24 by 11:59pm Points 50Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadInstructions:The way health care providers communicate with patients is continually evolving. In today's society, patients demand timely information that is easily accessible. As a manager, you may play a role in the decision to modify how you and your staff communicate with your patient population.Assume the role of practice manager for a large, multi-specialty group practice. It has been proposed that you begin using email for patient communication. Develop a presentation using Prezi or PowerPoint, addressing the following:Audience: Physicians and office managersAdvantages and disadvantages of using e-mail communication for patient careProtection of privacy and confidentiality of patient informationConduct additional research to determine the preference of both health care providers, and patients, regarding e-mail or other forms of electronic communication. What does the research say?A minimum of three scholarly sources should be included in APA format.Submit Patient Communication Presentation - either PowerPoint (.ppt) or Prezi.If you use Prezi, a presentation link should be uploaded within a Word document, with your name, date, and course ID.Estimated time to complete: 3 hoursRubricHC310 Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationHC310 Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge10.0 ptsLevel 5Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.9.0 ptsLevel 4Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.7.0 ptsLevel 2Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.6.0 ptsLevel 1There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content10.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.9.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.7.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.6.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research10.0 ptsLevel 5Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.9.0 ptsLevel 4Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.8.0 ptsLevel 3Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.7.0 ptsLevel 2Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.6.0 ptsLevel 1Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes10.0 ptsLevel 5Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.9.0 ptsLevel 4Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.8.0 ptsLevel 3Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and is identified clearly.7.0 ptsLevel 2Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).6.0 ptsLevel 1Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.0.0 ptsLevel 0Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and minor errors do not impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 50.0PreviousNex