Showing Page:
1/2
Q. 1 Kodak enjoyed a market leader position in the past. Its business in
photography and camera related products was very profitable but gradually, it
started to lose its business to other new entrants. Critics claim that their negligence
to move with the new market trends has caused them to decline.
Discuss the factors behind Kodak’s failure particularly; related to technology
ignorance. Please relate it with the chapters you studied.
ANS. The greatest test looked by Kodak Company was the way that in a few business sectors,
computerized advances had enormously progressed while Kodak looked on and sat idle. When
the organization endeavored to find these advances, it experienced a significant difficulty since it
was a lot at the back to have the option to find the quickly evolving innovation. Moreover, the
technique utilized by the organization with an end goal to fit in the changing mechanical
occasions was in any case, ineffective. This could be ascribed to the way that seeking after a joint
endeavor with another association created clashing circumstances, and Kodak couldn't
coordinate effectively with the generally settled entertainer. Thusly, the main feasible choice for
Kodak was to separate the joint endeavor and work free of one another. Hence, Kodak lost a
critical market fragment that it had controlled previously. At endeavor by Kodak to acquaint
changes with be at standard with the quickly changing innovation made it a lot more
straightforward for the contender organizations to surpass the organization. Moreover, social
changes assumed an indispensable part in impacting authoritative changes and execution of
Kodak. There was a huge change in the customer inclinations and requirements, and this called
for changes to address these issues just as accomplish the ideal focuses of purchasers. The
buyers requested super advanced items for motivations behind imaging and furthermore to
address the issues of their status in the general public. The conditions as they were, basically
constrained Kodak to impact hierarchical changes with an end goal to oblige the changing
requirements of the purchasers. Kodak further, neglected to predict the chance of its items
being old fashioned by the development of the advanced innovation. Moreover, the organization
neglected to plan a suitable methodology to manage the arising rivals in different districts. It
ought to, in this manner, be noticed that when Kodak wandered into the improvement of the
arising advancements in the imaging area, different contenders were a long ways in front of the
organization.
Showing Page:
2/2
Q. 2 "Pressure for change originates in the environment; whereas pressure for
stability originates within the organization." Do you agree or disagree? Discuss for
kodak situation.
ANS.
Q. 3 Which strategies kodak couldn’t fix according to the class discussion? Write
them all.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Q. 1 Kodak enjoyed a market leader position in the past. Its business in photography and camera related products was very profitable but gradually, it started to lose its business to other new entrants. Critics claim that their negligence to move with the new market trends has caused them to decline. Discuss the factors behind Kodak’s failure particularly; related to technology ignorance. Please relate it with the chapters you studied. ANS. The greatest test looked by Kodak Company was the way that in a few business sectors, computerized advances had enormously progressed while Kodak looked on and sat idle. When the organization endeavored to find these advances, it experienced a significant difficulty since it was a lot at the back to have the option to find the quickly evolving innovation. Moreover, the technique utilized by the organization with an end goal to fit in the changing mechanical occasions was in any case, ineffective. This could be ascribed to the way that seeking after a joint endeavor with another association created clashing circumstances, and Kodak couldn't coordinate effectively with the generally settled entertainer. Thusly, the main feasible choice for Kodak was to separate the joint endeavor and work free of one another. Hence, Kodak lost a critical market fragment that it had controlled previously. At endeavor by Kodak to acquaint changes with be at standard with the quickly changing innovation made it a lot more straightforward for the contender organizations to surpass the organization. Moreover, social changes assumed an indispensable part in impacting authoritative changes and execution of Kodak. There was a huge change in the customer inclinations and requirements, and this called for changes to address these issues just as accomplish the ideal focuses of purchasers. The buyers requested super advanced items for motivations behind imaging and furthermore to address the issues of their status in the general public. The conditions as they were, basically constrained Kodak to impact hierarchical changes with an end goal to oblige the changing requirements of the purchasers. Kodak further, neglected to predict the chance of its items being old fashioned by the development of the advanced innovation. Moreover, the organization neglected to plan a suitable methodology to manage the arising rivals in different districts. It ought to, in this manner, be noticed that when Kodak wandered into the improvement of the arising advancements in the imaging area, different contenders were a long ways in front of the organization. Q. 2 "Pressure for change originates in the environment; whereas pressure for stability originates within the organization." Do you agree or disagree? Discuss for kodak situation. ANS. Q. 3 Which strategies kodak couldn’t fix according to the class discussion? Write them all. Name: Description: ...
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4