Instructions: In 1500-2000 words, answer one of the following questions. Papers must use a recognized citation system – e.g. Chicago or MLA – and must be double-spaced throughout. Students need not use sources that are not course readings. But, if students make empirical claims in their papers, they should cite a legitimate source – e.g. an academic study.1. To fulfill the mandate of the Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, as of May 1, 2018, requires the installation of rear-view video systems in all passenger cars, trucks, multipurpose passenger vehicles, buses, and low-speed vehicles with a gross vehicle weight of less than 10,000 pounds. The purpose of the regulation is to reduce the risk of “back-over” crashes involving vulnerable populations (young children, the elderly, people with disabilities). The benefits of the regulation are estimated to be between $344-396 million (save 13-15 lives/year; prevent 1,125-1,332 injuries/year; and prevent $10-13/vehicle in damage). The costs of installing the cameras are estimated to be between $546-620 million. What is cost-benefit analysis? What reasons might government agencies have to use this decision procedure to evaluate policies/regulations? If the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration relied solely on cost-benefit analysis to decide whether to implement the regulation in question, what would it have done? Was the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration morally justified in passing the rear-view video system regulation? Why or why not? Be sure to defend your answer. The purpose of this assumption is to have you focus on the ethical dimension of the case.

Case Study: Abdullah sends an electronic contract via email to Reem's business email on Monday morning and she receives it Monday evening when is the actual time of dispatch?   

When working on your article critique, please keep the following requirements in mind. The article must be a scholarly journal article. The topic must be appropriate for the course or the audience. You should identify whether you are in support of the article’s premise or not and why. You should then apply a proper analysis, which is predicated upon some knowledge of the topic, and a review of the contravening arguments made by other researchers or experts. This is followed by you putting forth your critical evaluation of the premise(s) of the article and your position, supported by the literature. Some of the questions you should ask about the article include the following: What biographical data about the author of the article is important? What is the purpose, tone, and format of the article? How can the work be interpreted? Based upon your review of the literature, is there any information in the article that is inaccurate or incomplete? In what way was the article successful? Did the author succeed in what he or she was trying to accomplish? How does the author fail? What did you find in your review of the literature that brings you to that conclusion? Are there any historical, psychological, geographical, gender, racial, cultural, religious, or sexual considerations that have an impact on the article?