Access Millions of academic & study documents

Gung Ho

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Management
School
Columbia University
Type
Homework
Showing Page:
1/4
Running Head: GUNG HO 1
Gung Ho
Name
Institution Affiliation
Course
Date

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/4
GUNG HO 2
Gung Ho
Hofstede’s cultural dimension shows the effect of a society’s culture on the value of the
members of the society and how such values affect the members’ behaviors. The theory uses a
structure that is derived from factor analysis, and that shows how different cultures differ in
various aspects. There are four dimensions developed to analyze the different cultural values.
The dimensions are individualism-collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, power distance, and
masculinity-femininity. The masculinity-femininity is a task orientation versus person
orientation, while the power distance is the strength of social hierarchy within society.
Individualism is where individuals in a society are expected to take care of themselves and
immediate family members (Hofstede, 2017). Uncertainty avoidance is having no consideration
about the future and concentrating only on the present where a high uncertainty avoidance index
makes people maintain rigid codes of beliefs and principles. The weak uncertainty avoidance
index societies have a more relaxed tendency where practices count more than principles.
Comparison of scores
The scores in the four dimensions of the two countries differ in various ways. On power
distance, the score is 54 and 40 for Japan and America, respectively. That shows the Japanese
belief in a hierarchy of power more than Americans do. The score on individualism is 46 and 91
for Japan and the United States, respectively. Therefore, the Americans are inclined more
towards their families and themselves and not others outside their circles. The masculinity score
for both countries is 95 and 62 for japan and the United States, respectively (Hofstede, 2017).
The score for uncertainty is 92 and 46 for japan and America respectively, which means Japan
has depended on the already established codes of belief and behavior and does not tolerate new
ideas and behaviors.
Similarities and differences between the United States and Japan
The case of Japan and the United States is very different in terms of the cultural
dimensions, and this makes the two countries differ on how they perform their duties. In
individualism dimension United States scores higher than Japan, meaning that American people
tend to value families more, and that makes them not be loyal to their companies, which will
expect a high output in production. The score for japan is 46 while the United States score 91.
Therefore, japan is more oriented to their work and are loyalists to their places of work compared
to the Americans. The score for masculinity japan scores highest with a value of 95 while the
United States scores 62. The Japanese are more oriented towards achievement, assertiveness, and
material rewards for success, and this makes them more inclined towards their job (Howard,
1987). The Americans differ with the Japanese in that they care for the weak. It is evidenced
from the film that when one member of the American workers suffer, they all grieve, unlike the
Japanese who want them to go back to work and let the man deal with his situation alone.
The belief in the hierarchy of power is almost the same as that of Japan in that they all
have leaders in their workplace. However, the difference occurs in how the members of the
society handle the leadership. The leaders in American society are supportive of their team
members, unlike the Japanese leaders who are so harsh to their team members and would not like
to get an opinion from them. The Americans believe in consensus for agreement and
consultation, while the Japanese believe in punishment and tough dealing when an individual
fails. The Americans are aware that the future is unknown, and that makes them accommodate

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/4

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 4 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Running Head: GUNG HO 1 Gung Ho Name Institution Affiliation Course Date GUNG HO 2 Gung Ho Hofstede’s cultural dimension shows the effect of a society’s culture on the value of the members of the society and how such values affect the members’ behaviors. The theory uses a structure that is derived from factor analysis, and that shows how different cultures differ in various aspects. There are four dimensions developed to analyze the different cultural values. The dimensions are individualism-collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, power distance, and masculinity-femininity. The masculinity-femininity is a task orientation versus person orientation, while the power distance is the strength of social hierarchy within society. Individualism is where individuals in a society are expected to take care of themselves and immediate family members (Hofstede, 2017). Uncertainty avoidance is having no consideration about the future and concentrating only on the present where a high uncertainty avoidance index makes people maintain rigid codes of beliefs and principles. The weak uncertainty avoidance index societies have a more relaxed tendency where practices count more than principl ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4