Access Millions of academic & study documents

Introduction Research Study.edited

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Psychology
School
University of Connecticut
Type
Homework
Showing Page:
1/8
1
Cross-Cultural Attitudes Towards Corporal Punishment
Brienda Brew
Central Connecticut State University
November 29, 2021.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/8
2
Introduction
Corporal Punishment is the application of physical methods to correct or control a child's
behavior by use of pain but without injuring the child (Engulu & Harris, 2017). Is corporal
punishment beneficial or detrimental? Corporal punishment is a topic that is highly debated
nowadays (Lee, 2000). Physical punishment results in negative conduct in youngsters (Gershoff
& Font 2016). When it comes to corporal punishment, many individuals have strong feelings
either for it or against it (Barrish, 1996), depending on their own experiences. Proponents of
physical punishment feel that it aids youngsters in understanding that they have made a mistake
and that it will prevent them from repeating the error (Engulu & Harris, 2017; Barrish, 1996;
Flynn, 1994; Gershoff & Font, 2016; Lee, 2000; McCormick, 1992). People who are opposed to
physical punishment feel that there are several other methods of informing a kid that they have
made a mistake and that they may remedy it without resorting to harsh discipline (Flynn, 1994;
Gershoff, 2010; Larzelere & Kuhn, 2005).
Studies have shown that physical punishment has long-term consequences for children,
such as fighting, aggressiveness, disorderly conduct, or bullying; and anxiety disorder and
alcohol abuse in adulthood (Gershoff & Font, 2016; McMillan et al., 1999). A study by
Mulvaney & Mebert (2010) revealed that people who experienced corporal punishment in
childhood had a higher likelihood of poor mental health. Parents, schools, and other
organizations continue to practice corporal punishment in the United States (Barrish, 1996;
Flynn, 1994; Gershoff & Font, 2016; Gershoff, 2010).
A wide variation exists in the attitude towards spanking (Engulu & Harris, 2017).
Previous research studies have established consistent gender, religious, and ethnic differences in
people’s perspectives towards this form of punishment. Asians, African Americans, religious

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/8

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 8 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1 Cross-Cultural Attitudes Towards Corporal Punishment Brienda Brew Central Connecticut State University November 29, 2021. 2 Introduction Corporal Punishment is the application of physical methods to correct or control a child's behavior by use of pain but without injuring the child (Engulu & Harris, 2017). Is corporal punishment beneficial or detrimental? Corporal punishment is a topic that is highly debated nowadays (Lee, 2000). Physical punishment results in negative conduct in youngsters (Gershoff & Font 2016). When it comes to corporal punishment, many individuals have strong feelings either for it or against it (Barrish, 1996), depending on their own experiences. Proponents of physical punishment feel that it aids youngsters in understanding that they have made a mistake and that it will prevent them from repeating the error (Engulu & Harris, 2017; Barrish, 1996; Flynn, 1994; Gershoff & Font, 2016; Lee, 2000; McCormick, 1992). People who are opposed to physical punishment feel that there are several other methods of informing a kid that they have made a mistake and that they may remedy it without resorting to harsh discipline (Flynn, 1994; Gershoff, 2010; Larzelere & Kuhn, 2005). Studies have shown that physical punishment has long-term consequences for children, such as fighting, aggressiveness, disorderly conduct, or bullying; and anxiety disorder and alcohol abuse in adulthood (Gershoff & Font, 2016; McMillan et al., 1999). A study by Mulvaney & Mebert (2010) r ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents