Watch two restaurant management related films ("The Founder" and "The Restaurateur") available to stream through the OC library, and write a 500 word journal reflection comparing and contrasting the two films. Incorporate at least 10 course concepts/terms in your discussion (i.e. restaurant marketing, human resources, site selection, food and labour costing, quality, layout, servicescape, hospitality.

Option #1: WBS and Activity NetworkSelect a project with which you are familiar or one you identify through research, or a project that involves community engagement (e.g., your experience after being involved in a community service or volunteer work) and develop a WBS similar to Figure 6.6 in your textbook. Your WBS should contain no fewer Steps and sub-steps than the example. Develop an activity network for your project similar to those shown in Figures 8.2 and 8.3 of your textbook, but specific to your chosen project. Your WBS and activity network should be included in an appendix after your references page. The body of your paper should describe the project in no more than a half-page. Additionally, describe what a WBS and activity network are and how to develop them, and clarify your project in words to support your appendices. The appendices should include calculations, diagrams, and table. Submission RequirementsPrepare a 3- to 4-page paper (not including the required title and reference pages and the appendix with your WBS and network diagram) detailing and compiling the specifics of your information.Support your paper with a minimum of two current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library, in addition to any course textbooks or lecture material you decide to use.Format your entire paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).Be clear, concise, and focused. Be sure to organize your writing properly and include an introduction; headings/subheadings for the body of your work; analysis and recommendations (if applicable); a conclusion; list of references; and an appendix.Option #2: WBS and RACI MatrixSelect a project with which you are familiar or one you identify through research, or a project that involves community engagement (e.g., your experience after being involved in a community service or volunteer work) and develop a WBS similar to Figure 6.6 in your textbook. Your WBS should contain no fewer Steps and sub-steps than the example. Develop a RACI matrix for your project similar to that shown in Figure 6.9 of your textbook, but specific to your chosen project. Your WBS and RACI matrix should be included in an appendix after your references page. The body of your paper should describe the project in no more than a half-page. Additionally, describe what a WBS and RACI matrix are, how to develop them, and clarify your project in words to support your appendices. Submission RequirementsPrepare a 3- to 4-page paper (not including the required title and reference pages and the with your WBS and RACI diagram) detailing and compiling the specifics of your information.Support your paper with a minimum of two current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library, in addition to any course textbooks or lecture material you decide to use.Format your entire paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).Be clear, concise, and focused. Be sure to organize your writing properly and include an introduction; headings/subheadings for the body of your work; analysis and recommendations (if applicable); a conclusion; list of references; and an appendix.RubricPJM310 Mod 4 CTPJM310 Mod 4 CTCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationThis response includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationThis response includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationThis response includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceThis response includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent30.0 to >24.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the project management concepts.24.0 to >18.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts.18.0 to >12.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts.12.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the project management concepts.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides a strong critical analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omission in analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to provide analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is fairly well organized and well written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationProject is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not well organized or well written and/or is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error.8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors.4.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors.10.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0PreviousNext