Description
What evidence is there that the universe is expanding?
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
The strongest evidence for an expanding universe comes from the
cosmological redshift. A redshift is a change in the spectrum of light
as the distance between the source and the observer of the light
increases. Such a redshift has been seen in the spectrum of light from
distant stars. This means that the distance between those stars and the
Earth is increasing, indicating an expanding universe
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
PHA 6851 University Of Florida Forensic DNA And Serology
What is the role of the size standard? [3 points]What is the role of the allelic ladder? [3 points]What is the role of for ...
PHA 6851 University Of Florida Forensic DNA And Serology
What is the role of the size standard? [3 points]What is the role of the allelic ladder? [3 points]What is the role of formamide in a CE run? [3 points]What is the role of buffer in a CE run? [3 points]What controls monitor a CE run? [3 points]Review the CE plate set-up worksheet
SIM PATH 422 ASU Evaluating a Quantitative Research Design Essay
Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evide ...
SIM PATH 422 ASU Evaluating a Quantitative Research Design Essay
Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice. Study 3 - Patients’ and partners’ health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgeryStudy 4 - Striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fractureSuggested ReadingSchreiber, M. L. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 425-428. Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Wakefield, A. (2014). Searching and critiquing the research literature. Nursing Standard, 28(39), 49-57. doi:10.7748/ns.28.39.49.e8867LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.Qualitative Specific ResourcesLoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.Chapter1Chapter 2Chapter 3Additional Instructions:All submissions should have a title page and reference page.Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.Submission Options:Choose One:Instructions:Paper4 to 6-page paper. Include title and reference pages.Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation8 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation8 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Video Presentation5 to 8-minute video presentation.Attach reference page or include in video.Professional appearance and background.Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.TableTable with appropriate columns and headers.Include title and reference pages.Graphs or other illustrationsGraphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.PosterPoster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements. Evidenced-Based Practice- Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research StudyDescription: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of utilization in practice.research and itsCourse Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2) Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex health care environments.QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice BSN Essential III, IV, VII, IXAreaGold MasterySilver ProficientBronze AcceptableAcceptable Mastery not Demonstrate dEvaluatescredibility ofresearch articlethe componentsof theappropriateevaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing thecomponents ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018).Evaluates the purposeEvaluatescredibility ofresearch articlethe componentsof theappropriateevaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing thecomponents ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018).Evaluates the purposeEvaluates credibility of research article using most of the components (Greater than 3/4) of theevaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing most of thecomponents ofthe evaluation(greater than 3⁄4)in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purposeEvaluatescredibility ofresearch articleusing one-half ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing one-half ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purposeDoes not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationDoes not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationDoes not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationDoes not address section or statement using the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).statement using the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).statement using 3⁄4 of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).statement using one-half of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).includes less than one-half of the evaluationEvaluates the literature review using the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the literature review using the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the literature review using 3⁄4 of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the literature review using one-half of the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationEvaluates the sampling strategy using the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the sampling strategy using the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the sampling strategy using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the sampling strategy using one-half of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationEvaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the components inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the components inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). .Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using 3/4 of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using 3/4 of the componentsin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using one-half of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using one-half of the components .in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using one- fourth or less of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using one- fourth or less of the components in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP .Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP .Discusses study results in general but not how findings may or may not contribute to EBP .Discusses EBP in general but does not relate to the research study.Does not discuss results or how study findings can inform EBP.APA, Grammar, Spelling, and PunctuationNo errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.One to three errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.Four to six errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.Seven or more errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.References Provides two or Provides two Provides one Provides no more references. references. references. references.
22 pages
Exercise 14 Darwinian Snails
This lab exercise will investigate the major concepts of Darwin’s evolution by Natural Selection and a newer concept is ...
Exercise 14 Darwinian Snails
This lab exercise will investigate the major concepts of Darwin’s evolution by Natural Selection and a newer concept is known as evolution by ...
8 pages
Ph Scale Laboratory Report Final
Ph scale is used in order to determine if a specific substance is acidic, alkaline or neutral. This determination is done ...
Ph Scale Laboratory Report Final
Ph scale is used in order to determine if a specific substance is acidic, alkaline or neutral. This determination is done by measuring the ...
which of the following statements are correct?
You do a Chi-square test on these data by computing the term (observed - expected)2 / expected for each gamete type, ...
which of the following statements are correct?
You do a Chi-square test on these data by computing the term (observed - expected)2 / expected for each gamete type, and then finding the sum of these four terms. If you obtain a Chi-square value of 3.01, and the critical value for the number of degrees of freedom is 7.82, which of the following statements are correct?Select ALL answers that apply.Observations that deviate this much from the expected values would occur more than 5% of the time under independent assortment.The data prove independent assortment is true.Observations that deviate this much from the expected values would occur less than 5% of the time under independent assortment.The Chi-square value is less than 5% different from the critical value, which is consistent with the law of independent assortment.The data are consistent with the independent assortment.The data are inconsistent with independent assortment.
Capella University Week 9 Counteracting Medical Misinformation Essay
1.Write a 1– 2 page paper to support your decision, using the additional resource you found.
Capella University Week 9 Counteracting Medical Misinformation Essay
1.Write a 1– 2 page paper to support your decision, using the additional resource you found.
Similar Content
Crafton Hills Calculate and Include Error Bars About Plotted Average Lab Reports
calculations on two lab reports. One is on Hooke's law/Centripetal Force and the other is on Conservation of Energy....
Houston Community College Strict Vegan Dinner Meal Plan Discussion
Meal must be planned according to MyPlate website (www.choosemyplate.gov)----- 20 pointsExplanation of importance of meal ...
CHEM 151 College Canyons Wk 7 Chemical Reaction Space Filling Model Exercises
All the info is in the fie belowMake a new doc and write into it or print it out and send me pictures ...
DAC The Focal Distance for The Seismogram Lick Observatory Question
Step 1 > Download and build your X-Games Packet
Download and Printout: Figure x1 to Figure X6
Step 2> Download and P...
GEOG 01 San Jose State University Networks Discussion
Topic 1: NetworksNearly everything of significance that has been happening lately seems to be related to the existence of ...
Question 27
Which of the following is not a physical property?temperatureflammabilitycolordensity...
Skills Test Vibrating String
You will receive a zero mark for any numerical value without unit Note: The information in this subject outline was correc...
Lab Exercise 4
Lab Exercise 4.1: Identifying Genotypes and Phenotypes, Transmission of Autosomal 1. Fill out the table below for the form...
Chemistry Answer
T – 0oC = -1.86 (1.43g/(94.49 g/mol)(28.66 g x 1 kg/1000g)...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Sula
by Toni Morrison
Flowers For Algernon
by Alice Walker
Notes from Underground
by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
A Brief History of Humankind Sapiens
by Yuval Noah Harari
The Splendid and The Vile
by Erik Larson
How to Win Friends and Influence People
by Dale Carnegie
Rules Of Civility
by Amor Towles
Catch-22
by Joseph Heller
Fahrenheit 451
by Ray Bradbury
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
PHA 6851 University Of Florida Forensic DNA And Serology
What is the role of the size standard? [3 points]What is the role of the allelic ladder? [3 points]What is the role of for ...
PHA 6851 University Of Florida Forensic DNA And Serology
What is the role of the size standard? [3 points]What is the role of the allelic ladder? [3 points]What is the role of formamide in a CE run? [3 points]What is the role of buffer in a CE run? [3 points]What controls monitor a CE run? [3 points]Review the CE plate set-up worksheet
SIM PATH 422 ASU Evaluating a Quantitative Research Design Essay
Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evide ...
SIM PATH 422 ASU Evaluating a Quantitative Research Design Essay
Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice. Study 3 - Patients’ and partners’ health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgeryStudy 4 - Striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fractureSuggested ReadingSchreiber, M. L. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 425-428. Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Wakefield, A. (2014). Searching and critiquing the research literature. Nursing Standard, 28(39), 49-57. doi:10.7748/ns.28.39.49.e8867LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.Qualitative Specific ResourcesLoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.Chapter1Chapter 2Chapter 3Additional Instructions:All submissions should have a title page and reference page.Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.Submission Options:Choose One:Instructions:Paper4 to 6-page paper. Include title and reference pages.Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation8 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation8 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Video Presentation5 to 8-minute video presentation.Attach reference page or include in video.Professional appearance and background.Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.TableTable with appropriate columns and headers.Include title and reference pages.Graphs or other illustrationsGraphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.PosterPoster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements. Evidenced-Based Practice- Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research StudyDescription: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of utilization in practice.research and itsCourse Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2) Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex health care environments.QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice BSN Essential III, IV, VII, IXAreaGold MasterySilver ProficientBronze AcceptableAcceptable Mastery not Demonstrate dEvaluatescredibility ofresearch articlethe componentsof theappropriateevaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing thecomponents ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018).Evaluates the purposeEvaluatescredibility ofresearch articlethe componentsof theappropriateevaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing thecomponents ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018).Evaluates the purposeEvaluates credibility of research article using most of the components (Greater than 3/4) of theevaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing most of thecomponents ofthe evaluation(greater than 3⁄4)in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purposeEvaluatescredibility ofresearch articleusing one-half ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates theproblemstatement andresearch designusing one-half ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purposeDoes not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationDoes not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationDoes not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationDoes not address section or statement using the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).statement using the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).statement using 3⁄4 of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).statement using one-half of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).includes less than one-half of the evaluationEvaluates the literature review using the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the literature review using the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the literature review using 3⁄4 of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the literature review using one-half of the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationEvaluates the sampling strategy using the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the sampling strategy using the components of the evaluationin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the sampling strategy using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the sampling strategy using one-half of the components of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluationEvaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the components inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the components inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). .Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using 3/4 of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using 3/4 of the componentsin LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using one-half of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using one-half of the components .in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using one- fourth or less of the evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using one- fourth or less of the components in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP .Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP .Discusses study results in general but not how findings may or may not contribute to EBP .Discusses EBP in general but does not relate to the research study.Does not discuss results or how study findings can inform EBP.APA, Grammar, Spelling, and PunctuationNo errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.One to three errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.Four to six errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.Seven or more errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.References Provides two or Provides two Provides one Provides no more references. references. references. references.
22 pages
Exercise 14 Darwinian Snails
This lab exercise will investigate the major concepts of Darwin’s evolution by Natural Selection and a newer concept is ...
Exercise 14 Darwinian Snails
This lab exercise will investigate the major concepts of Darwin’s evolution by Natural Selection and a newer concept is known as evolution by ...
8 pages
Ph Scale Laboratory Report Final
Ph scale is used in order to determine if a specific substance is acidic, alkaline or neutral. This determination is done ...
Ph Scale Laboratory Report Final
Ph scale is used in order to determine if a specific substance is acidic, alkaline or neutral. This determination is done by measuring the ...
which of the following statements are correct?
You do a Chi-square test on these data by computing the term (observed - expected)2 / expected for each gamete type, ...
which of the following statements are correct?
You do a Chi-square test on these data by computing the term (observed - expected)2 / expected for each gamete type, and then finding the sum of these four terms. If you obtain a Chi-square value of 3.01, and the critical value for the number of degrees of freedom is 7.82, which of the following statements are correct?Select ALL answers that apply.Observations that deviate this much from the expected values would occur more than 5% of the time under independent assortment.The data prove independent assortment is true.Observations that deviate this much from the expected values would occur less than 5% of the time under independent assortment.The Chi-square value is less than 5% different from the critical value, which is consistent with the law of independent assortment.The data are consistent with the independent assortment.The data are inconsistent with independent assortment.
Capella University Week 9 Counteracting Medical Misinformation Essay
1.Write a 1– 2 page paper to support your decision, using the additional resource you found.
Capella University Week 9 Counteracting Medical Misinformation Essay
1.Write a 1– 2 page paper to support your decision, using the additional resource you found.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents