paper should be 4-5 pages long, APA style, not including title page or reference page. You should have at least 2 cited peer reviewed sources, if not more. Your research paper should include a combination of detailed explanation and screenshots. Your research paper should include detailed descriptions of the web browser forensic tool you used and web browser. In addition you should described your methodology in detail on what you did and end with your analysis and results and conclusion. Your research paper should include an introduction, background (which should be a discussion on your web browser forensic tool and web browser), methodology (this is your approach on what you did, a brand new website you visited that serves as your analysis, etc) your analysis (this is your web browser tool in action with screenshots), findings (this is what you found using your web browser forensic tool), conclusion, references.

A common skill for a cybersecurity analyst is the evaluation of current scholarly articles. Analyzing the findings within those articles develops skills that will help protect data. Evaluating privacy laws and regulations helps the analyst form baselines for policies within organizations. Choose one of the following articles to After reading your selected article, address the following critical elements: I. Analyze the issues within the article related to privacy. II. Describe the regulations or laws within the article that play a role in the protection of privacy. III. Explain your opinions on the conclusion of the article. Consider these questions:                                    - Is the conclusion comprehensive?                                     - Do you agree with the conclusion?                                     - Are there areas that could be improved upon? Privacy, Notice, and Design particular, the design of built online environments can constrain our ability to understand and  respond to websites' data use practices or it can enhance agency by giving us control over  information. This Article is the first comprehensive theoretical and empirical approach to the design of privacy policies.      Privacy policies today do not convey information in a way understandable to most internet users. This is because they are created without the needs of real people in mind. They  are written by lawyers and for lawyers, and they ignore the way most of us make disclosure decisions online. They  also ignore the effects of design, aesthetics, and presentation on our decision-making. This Article argues that in addition to focusing on content, privacy regulators must also consider the ways that privacy policy design-the artistic and structural choices that frame and present a company 's privacy terms to the public-can  manipulate  or coerce users into making  risky privacy choices. ? The Surveillance Gap: The Harms of Extreme Privacy and Data Marginalization  We live in an age of unprecedented surveillance, enhanced by modem technology, prompting some to suggest that privacy is dead. Previous scholarship suggests that no subset of the population feels this phenomenon more than marginalized communities. Those who rely on public benefits, for example, must turn over personal information and submit to government surveillance far more routinely than wealthier citizens who enjoy greater opportunity to protect their privacy and the ready funds to secure it. This article illuminates the other end of the spectrum, arguing that many individuals who may value government and nonprofit services and legal protections fail to enjoy these benefits because they reside in a "surveillance gap." These people include undocumented immigrants, day   laborers, homeless persons, and     people   with  felony   conviction histories suffering collateral consequences of their convictions. Members of these groups often remain outside of the mainstream data flows and institutional attachments necessary to flourish in American society. The harms that surveillance gap residents experience can be severe, such as physical and mental health injuries and lack of economic stability, as well as data marginalization and resulting invisibility to policymakers. In short, having too much privacy can be as injurious as having too little.     The sources of the surveillance gap range from attempts to contain and control marginalized groups to data silos to economic exploitation. This article explores the boundaries of the surveillance gap, evaluates how this emerging concept fits within existing privacy paradigms and theoretical frameworks, and suggests possible solutions to enhance the autonomy and dignity of marginalized people within the surveillance gap. ? Privacy and Cybersecurity Lessons at the Intersection of the Internet of Things and Police Body-Worn Cameras Prepared for the North Carolina Law Review symposium on    police body-worn cameras ("BWCs"), this Article shows that    BWCs can be conceptualized as an example of the Internet of    Things ("Io T"). By combining the previously separate literatures    on BWCs and loT, this Article shows how insights from each    literature apply to the other.    Part I adopts the loT definition of (1) a sensor connected to the    Internet that (2) stores and/or processes data remotely, typically    in the cloud. Applied to BWCs, the camera is a sensor, and the    video footage and related data are stored outside of the original    camera, often in the cloud.    Building on this equivalence of BWCs and loT, Part II examines    lessons from the substantial IoT literature for BWC privacy and    cybersecurity. Part I systematically examines leading industry    standards and Federal Trade Commission guidance that could be    used to develop applicable criteria for good practice for BWCs.    Analysis   of  this  literature suggests  three  themes   for    operationalizing these best practices. First, police departments    can and should learn from the Io T literature to improve privacy    and cybersecurity for BWCs. Second, police departments should    use their bargaining power to demand security and privacy best