Harvard referencing. Minimum of 7 references. Students will need to research and utilise their own culturally responsive approaches to complete the essay. The essay must follow the standard structure of introduction, body and conclusion. Students’ essays in addressing the critical evaluation will need to define key terms used and focus on Indigenous Australia:’critically evaluate’ - What is the aim of critical evaluation? Consider both positive and negative evaluations e.g. What do/does the approach/es contribute to the field? What are the limitations of the writer’s approach/conclusions? In light of your analysis and evaluation, how should others view this text? What are the practical implications of the research?’culturally responsive approaches’ - What is ’culture’? What is ’culturally responsive’? What is an ’approach’? Is it just something in the classroom? Is it in the whole school? Is it in the school system? Is it something in the school community? Is it something in the broader community? Is there more to the issue of being ’culturally responsive’?’working with children, families and communities’ and ’in a school context’ - What do you mean when you use the term ’communities’? Does the meaning change in the context of Indigenous Australia? Does the term family/ies differ in different contexts? How do schools and teachers work with families and communities? What school contexts are there?It is suggested that students research Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars.

Please use the reference summary that's attached.Based on the research you have done on your individual topics, you are to write a 4-6 pages present your findings to the class in a well-crafted original presentation. Your presentation should cover the components listed in the rubric below. Discussion questionsIn addition to your presentation, you will post a discussion question about your topic for your classmates. Your question should be open-ended and thought-provoking to ensure a rich discussion. Throughout the week, each student should monitor the comments generated by his/her discussion question and respond to the comments accordingly. Your final presentation will be graded according to the following criteria: CategoryExcellentGoodFairPoorPresentation(20 points)Interesting and original presentation that holds audience attention(20 points)Interesting presentation that holds audience attention most of the time (17 points)Delivery not terribly interesting, but able to maintain interest of the audience some of the time(14 points)Delivery not interesting at all; audience attention often lost or not engaged (11 points)Topic statement & significance(10 points)Clearly explains topicExplains why topic is important in modern society (10 points)Clearly explains topic and why topic is important to society, but some minor aspects are missing (8 points)Explains topic and why topic is important, but some major aspects are missing (6 points)Topic is unclear ORthere are several factual errors(4 points)Traces history of topic and its impact on society(10 points)Effectively traces history of the topic and its impact on society(10 points)Traces history of topic with minor omissions(8 points)Traces history of topic with major omissions(6 points)Poor or no effort at tracing history of topic(0 points)Incorporation of relevant data and research(10 points)Incorporates relevant references to at least 5 scholarly sources(10 points)Incorporates relevant references to 3-4 scholarly sources(8 points)Incorporates relevant references to 1-2 scholarly sources(6 points)No references to scholarly sources(0 points)Cross-cultural comparison(5 points)Clear and well-stated comparison of how topic impacts at least one other culture(5 points)Cross-cultural comparison made, but with some details missing(3 points)Cross-cultural comparison implied, but major details missing(1 point)No cross-cultural comparison made(0 points)Policy Issues(5 points)Clear and well-stated illustration of how policy impacts chosen topic(5 points)Impact of policy on chosen topic mentioned, but with some details missing(3 points)Policy impact implied, but major details missing(1 point)No mention of policy impact(0 points)Discussion of future trends and how technology in this area will impact society in future(10 points)Excellent and thorough discussion of future trends and impact(10 points)Good discussion of future trends and impact, though some minor points missing(8 points)Fair discussion of future trends and impact, but lacking in clarity and/or major points missing(6 points)Unclear or no discussion of future trends and impact(0-4 points)Citations(5 points)*reference list must be provided somewhere in the presentationCorrect use of in-text citations and reference list(5 points)Mostly correct use of in-text citations and reference list(4 points)Several errors noted for in-text citations or reference list(2 points)Many omissions of citations and references(1 point)Mechanics(5 points)No misspellings or grammatical errors in materials(5 points)A few minor misspellings and/or mechanical errors in materials(4 points)Several misspellings and/or mechanical errors in materials that do not detract from the presentation(3 points)Several misspellings and/or mechanical errors in materials that detract from the presentation(2 points)

Discuss how the courts and laws structured differently for adults and juveniles. Analyze determinate factors of when an adult or juvenile may be eligible for rehabilitative services. Assess when a juvenile may be processed as an adult. Analyze the value of adult incarceration and adult and juvenile rehabilitative services, how have these goals changed over time?