Description
Describe what reliability means in terms of research and why it is important. How does a researcher ensure that reliability is maintained in instruments and between raters?
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
reasech.docx this is your answer how much pay me reliability is the degree to which an assessment tool produces stable and consistent results.
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
This is great! Exactly what I wanted.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
5 pages
Case Study Analysis1.edited
The case involved a sixty-seven-year-old gentleman whose chief complaints are arms and legs tremors. His son presents him ...
Case Study Analysis1.edited
The case involved a sixty-seven-year-old gentleman whose chief complaints are arms and legs tremors. His son presents him at the HCP and explains that ...
Review the scenario and answer the associated questions.
Review the scenario and answer the associated questions. Answers must be thorough and substantive. Brief answers will not ...
Review the scenario and answer the associated questions.
Review the scenario and answer the associated questions. Answers must be thorough and substantive. Brief answers will not receive any points. Correct grammar and spelling are required. The following case study (Rinehart-Thompson) at hypothetical St. John Hospital illustrates numerous issues that the HIPAA privacy rule presents and which HIPAA-covered entities must address on a daily basis. As you conclude Chapter 9 and the HIPAA privacy rule requirements, use this case study to identify the issue(s) presented on each date, determining how each situation should be handled in order to comply with the HIPAA privacy rule. Case Scenario From May 26-30, Mary Jones was hospitalized in St. John Hospital, located in Johnson County, with depression and a drug overdose (documented by the physician as a possible suicide attempt). She also had Type I diabetes and a previous above-knee amputation of the right leg, with a prosthesis. During her hospital stay, she had several sessions with her psychiatrist, Dr. Bridges. On July 18, Ms. Jones contacted the HIM Department at St. John Hospital to request a copy of her medical records from her May hospital admission. The chart was copied for her by ReadyChart, the record copying service utilized by St. John Hospital. On August 7, Ms. Jones returned to the HIM Department at St. John Hospital, extremely upset that her May records indicated a possible suicide attempt. She wanted Dr. Bridges to change the incorrect records to reflect that the overdose was accidental. Dr. Bridges refused, stating that Ms. Jones didn’t know what she was talking about. On September 14, Ms. Jones was readmitted to St. John Hospital with an infection of the prosthetic site. She was treated with an antibiotic regimen. On October 5, St. John Hospital received a call from Mercy Hospital. Ms. Jones was in the emergency department there, with a severe infection of her prosthetic site. The nurse in the Mercy Hospital emergency department asked for faxed copies of medical records from Ms. Jones’ September admission at St. John, as she was being prepared for immediate surgery. On October 15, Ms. Jones decided to go to another psychiatrist. She called St. John Hospital HIM Department and asked that her medical records from her May hospital admission be mailed to Dr. Lyon, as she has an appointment scheduled with him this coming January. Ms. Jones stated that she had also changed jobs in September, and her new health insurer was Liberty Life and Health. On October 30, Ms. Jones requested a copy of her medical records from her September admission. The new HIM manager in charge of correspondence, Don Day, stated that he was aware of a state statute that prohibited the release of medical records to patients without prior written approval of their attending physician. This has not been the practice at St. John Hospital. Mr. Day was concerned about the hospital’s longstanding violation of state law. He suggested that correspondence requests (in which records would be released directly to patients) be suspended until the state law could be researched further. On November 10, Ms. Jones received a brochure and samples from Comfort Healthcare, a pharmaceutical company that manufactures ointment for patients with prostheses. Ms. Jones called the St. John Hospital registration desk to complain. Jessica Carter, a candy striper, took Ms. Jones’ call. On November 12, Liberty Life and Health submitted a request to Dr. Lyon’s office for copies of Ms. Jones’ medical records from her May St. John Hospital admission and from Dr. Lyon’s office. On November 17, A case worker from the Johnson County Children’s Services called the HIM Department at St. John and requested Ms. Jones’ medical records from her May hospitalization. Children’s Services had received a complaint that Ms. Jones had an “episode” on May 26 and there was concern that her children were being subjected to ongoing abuse. As a result, it was initiating an investigation. On November 20, the physical therapy department at St. John Hospital is performing a correlational study to determine the effects of two different types of treatment that the physical therapy department has used with its above-knee amputation patients during the past two years. Ms. Jones received treatment from the St. John physical therapy department during her September admission. On November 21, Dr. King, an orthopedic surgeon, presented a seminar to the state association of orthopedic surgeons on above-knee amputation techniques. He had performed Ms. Jones’ procedure one year ago, and he showed slides that compared her condition before the procedure, immediately after, six months later, and one year later. Task: Based on the HIPAA privacy rule issues discussed in Chapter 9, identify the issue or issues presented on each datein the above case scenario. There are 12 dates mentioned in the scenario.
4 pages
Nursing Science Computer Science
The foundation of knowledge model is an approach that suggests that all humans are organic information systems who can acq ...
Nursing Science Computer Science
The foundation of knowledge model is an approach that suggests that all humans are organic information systems who can acquire, process, disseminate ...
5 pages
Pulmonary Embolism And Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Pulmonary embolism is a medical condition where a blood clot clogs a blood vessel in the lungs. Mostly, the state is cause ...
Pulmonary Embolism And Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Pulmonary embolism is a medical condition where a blood clot clogs a blood vessel in the lungs. Mostly, the state is caused by clots that flow from ...
Aspen University Assessing and Treating Patients With Bipolar Disorder Case Study
Bipolar disorder is a unique disorder that causes shifts in mood and energy, which results in depression and mania for pat ...
Aspen University Assessing and Treating Patients With Bipolar Disorder Case Study
Bipolar disorder is a unique disorder that causes shifts in mood and energy, which results in depression and mania for patients. Proper diagnosis of this disorder is often a challenge for two reasons: 1) patients often present as depressive or manic but may have both; and 2) many symptoms of bipolar disorder are similar to other disorders. Misdiagnosis is common, making it essential for you to have a deep understanding of the disorder’s pathophysiology. For this Assignment, as you examine the patient case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with bipolar disorder.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the Medication Resources indicated for this week.
Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for the assessment and treatment of patients requiring bipolar therapy.
The Assignment: 5 pages
Examine Case Study: An Asian American Woman. Diagnosis-Bipolar Disorder. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.
Introduction to the case (1 page)
Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1 page)
Which decision did you select?
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #2 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #3 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Conclusion (1 page)
Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of five academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. You should be utilizing the primary and secondary literature.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
RubRiC
Excellent
Point range: 90–100Good
Point range: 80–89Fair
Point range: 70–79Poor
Point range: 0–69Introduction to the case (1 page)
Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
The response accurately, clearly, and fully summarizes in detail the case for the Assignment.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the specific patient factors that impact decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
The response accurately summarizes the case for the Assignment.
The response accurately explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient.
7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient.
0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.
16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains the decision selected.
The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected.
The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.
The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.
The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided.
14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided.
0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the decision selected.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing.
Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing.
Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.
16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains the decision selected.
The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected.
The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.
The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.
The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided.
14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided.
0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains in detail the decision selected.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing.
Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing.
Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
NSG 426 UP Wk 1 Legal Issues Facing Nurses Integrity in Practice Discussion
Assignment ContentResearch common legal issues in health care in one of the legal case studies from the Nurses Service Org ...
NSG 426 UP Wk 1 Legal Issues Facing Nurses Integrity in Practice Discussion
Assignment ContentResearch common legal issues in health care in one of the legal case studies from the Nurses Service Organization.Select a legal case study of interest or area in which you have experience from the website Nurses Service Organization.Analyze the legal case study. Ensure you include the following:Summarize the legal issues present in the case.Brainstorm risk-mitigation techniques that the hospital could have employed to prevent the situation.Determine actions the nurse could have taken to improve the outcome.Cite at least 3 evidence-based, peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years to support your positions.Format your assignment as one of the following:10- to 15-slide presentation875-word paper using Level 1 headings for key pointsInclude an APA-formatted reference list.
Similar Content
Florida International University Nursing Case Discussion
...
STU Internalizing Disorders Questions
Why do we have such a difficult time believing that children can be depressed?
Identify your culture (Hispanic), then exp...
Florida Southwestern State College Technology And Social Media Essay
Technology and social media are tools to fulfill some of humanity’s deepest cravings: relationships. Social media allows...
CU The Obesity Management in People with Diabetes PICOT Essay
Target locations: Community and Healthcare Facility that provides a wide range of skilled nursing specialty care in a vari...
Broward College SWOT Discussion
Assignment Details
Describe how a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis can directly assist wi...
Environmental policies in Texas Discussion
Locate current or proposed legislation, city rules, or ordinances that have the potential to affect the environment in you...
Public Health Preparedness 112 B
Public health is no longer only about promoting health as well as preventing diseases anymore. The security of the patient...
Difference Between Good And Bad Bacteria
The human body is home to trillions of bacteria. They live on the skins, digestive and respiratory tracts. Some of these b...
Lipids.edited
2. my favorite recipe containing a sustainable amount of fat is sesame-crusted ◆ Then boil the brown rice by putting the...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
5 pages
Case Study Analysis1.edited
The case involved a sixty-seven-year-old gentleman whose chief complaints are arms and legs tremors. His son presents him ...
Case Study Analysis1.edited
The case involved a sixty-seven-year-old gentleman whose chief complaints are arms and legs tremors. His son presents him at the HCP and explains that ...
Review the scenario and answer the associated questions.
Review the scenario and answer the associated questions. Answers must be thorough and substantive. Brief answers will not ...
Review the scenario and answer the associated questions.
Review the scenario and answer the associated questions. Answers must be thorough and substantive. Brief answers will not receive any points. Correct grammar and spelling are required. The following case study (Rinehart-Thompson) at hypothetical St. John Hospital illustrates numerous issues that the HIPAA privacy rule presents and which HIPAA-covered entities must address on a daily basis. As you conclude Chapter 9 and the HIPAA privacy rule requirements, use this case study to identify the issue(s) presented on each date, determining how each situation should be handled in order to comply with the HIPAA privacy rule. Case Scenario From May 26-30, Mary Jones was hospitalized in St. John Hospital, located in Johnson County, with depression and a drug overdose (documented by the physician as a possible suicide attempt). She also had Type I diabetes and a previous above-knee amputation of the right leg, with a prosthesis. During her hospital stay, she had several sessions with her psychiatrist, Dr. Bridges. On July 18, Ms. Jones contacted the HIM Department at St. John Hospital to request a copy of her medical records from her May hospital admission. The chart was copied for her by ReadyChart, the record copying service utilized by St. John Hospital. On August 7, Ms. Jones returned to the HIM Department at St. John Hospital, extremely upset that her May records indicated a possible suicide attempt. She wanted Dr. Bridges to change the incorrect records to reflect that the overdose was accidental. Dr. Bridges refused, stating that Ms. Jones didn’t know what she was talking about. On September 14, Ms. Jones was readmitted to St. John Hospital with an infection of the prosthetic site. She was treated with an antibiotic regimen. On October 5, St. John Hospital received a call from Mercy Hospital. Ms. Jones was in the emergency department there, with a severe infection of her prosthetic site. The nurse in the Mercy Hospital emergency department asked for faxed copies of medical records from Ms. Jones’ September admission at St. John, as she was being prepared for immediate surgery. On October 15, Ms. Jones decided to go to another psychiatrist. She called St. John Hospital HIM Department and asked that her medical records from her May hospital admission be mailed to Dr. Lyon, as she has an appointment scheduled with him this coming January. Ms. Jones stated that she had also changed jobs in September, and her new health insurer was Liberty Life and Health. On October 30, Ms. Jones requested a copy of her medical records from her September admission. The new HIM manager in charge of correspondence, Don Day, stated that he was aware of a state statute that prohibited the release of medical records to patients without prior written approval of their attending physician. This has not been the practice at St. John Hospital. Mr. Day was concerned about the hospital’s longstanding violation of state law. He suggested that correspondence requests (in which records would be released directly to patients) be suspended until the state law could be researched further. On November 10, Ms. Jones received a brochure and samples from Comfort Healthcare, a pharmaceutical company that manufactures ointment for patients with prostheses. Ms. Jones called the St. John Hospital registration desk to complain. Jessica Carter, a candy striper, took Ms. Jones’ call. On November 12, Liberty Life and Health submitted a request to Dr. Lyon’s office for copies of Ms. Jones’ medical records from her May St. John Hospital admission and from Dr. Lyon’s office. On November 17, A case worker from the Johnson County Children’s Services called the HIM Department at St. John and requested Ms. Jones’ medical records from her May hospitalization. Children’s Services had received a complaint that Ms. Jones had an “episode” on May 26 and there was concern that her children were being subjected to ongoing abuse. As a result, it was initiating an investigation. On November 20, the physical therapy department at St. John Hospital is performing a correlational study to determine the effects of two different types of treatment that the physical therapy department has used with its above-knee amputation patients during the past two years. Ms. Jones received treatment from the St. John physical therapy department during her September admission. On November 21, Dr. King, an orthopedic surgeon, presented a seminar to the state association of orthopedic surgeons on above-knee amputation techniques. He had performed Ms. Jones’ procedure one year ago, and he showed slides that compared her condition before the procedure, immediately after, six months later, and one year later. Task: Based on the HIPAA privacy rule issues discussed in Chapter 9, identify the issue or issues presented on each datein the above case scenario. There are 12 dates mentioned in the scenario.
4 pages
Nursing Science Computer Science
The foundation of knowledge model is an approach that suggests that all humans are organic information systems who can acq ...
Nursing Science Computer Science
The foundation of knowledge model is an approach that suggests that all humans are organic information systems who can acquire, process, disseminate ...
5 pages
Pulmonary Embolism And Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Pulmonary embolism is a medical condition where a blood clot clogs a blood vessel in the lungs. Mostly, the state is cause ...
Pulmonary Embolism And Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Pulmonary embolism is a medical condition where a blood clot clogs a blood vessel in the lungs. Mostly, the state is caused by clots that flow from ...
Aspen University Assessing and Treating Patients With Bipolar Disorder Case Study
Bipolar disorder is a unique disorder that causes shifts in mood and energy, which results in depression and mania for pat ...
Aspen University Assessing and Treating Patients With Bipolar Disorder Case Study
Bipolar disorder is a unique disorder that causes shifts in mood and energy, which results in depression and mania for patients. Proper diagnosis of this disorder is often a challenge for two reasons: 1) patients often present as depressive or manic but may have both; and 2) many symptoms of bipolar disorder are similar to other disorders. Misdiagnosis is common, making it essential for you to have a deep understanding of the disorder’s pathophysiology. For this Assignment, as you examine the patient case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with bipolar disorder.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the Medication Resources indicated for this week.
Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for the assessment and treatment of patients requiring bipolar therapy.
The Assignment: 5 pages
Examine Case Study: An Asian American Woman. Diagnosis-Bipolar Disorder. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.
Introduction to the case (1 page)
Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1 page)
Which decision did you select?
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #2 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #3 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Conclusion (1 page)
Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of five academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. You should be utilizing the primary and secondary literature.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
RubRiC
Excellent
Point range: 90–100Good
Point range: 80–89Fair
Point range: 70–79Poor
Point range: 0–69Introduction to the case (1 page)
Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
The response accurately, clearly, and fully summarizes in detail the case for the Assignment.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the specific patient factors that impact decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
The response accurately summarizes the case for the Assignment.
The response accurately explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient.
7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient.
0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.
16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains the decision selected.
The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected.
The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.
The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.
The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided.
14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided.
0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the decision selected.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing.
Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing.
Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.
16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains the decision selected.
The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected.
The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.
The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.
The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided.
14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.
Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided.
0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains in detail the decision selected.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing.
Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing.
Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
NSG 426 UP Wk 1 Legal Issues Facing Nurses Integrity in Practice Discussion
Assignment ContentResearch common legal issues in health care in one of the legal case studies from the Nurses Service Org ...
NSG 426 UP Wk 1 Legal Issues Facing Nurses Integrity in Practice Discussion
Assignment ContentResearch common legal issues in health care in one of the legal case studies from the Nurses Service Organization.Select a legal case study of interest or area in which you have experience from the website Nurses Service Organization.Analyze the legal case study. Ensure you include the following:Summarize the legal issues present in the case.Brainstorm risk-mitigation techniques that the hospital could have employed to prevent the situation.Determine actions the nurse could have taken to improve the outcome.Cite at least 3 evidence-based, peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years to support your positions.Format your assignment as one of the following:10- to 15-slide presentation875-word paper using Level 1 headings for key pointsInclude an APA-formatted reference list.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents
