Question 1 Discuss what you would consider as the one most significant roadblock companies are likely to face in implementing the ANSI/AIHA Z10 standards in a typical manufacturing organization. What steps might the company consider to overcome this roadblock? Your response must be at least 75 words in length. Question 2 Since risk cannot be reduced to zero, the as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) concept is often applied. How can this concept be used to determine acceptable levels of risk? What might be some pitfalls to applying this concept? Your response must be at least 75 words in length. Question 3 Apply the concept of acceptable risk to a hazard prevalent at a place where you work or have worked. If you prefer, you could discuss a job with inherent hazards (e.g. fire fighter, steel erection connector, etc.). Make sure you address the concepts of zero, minimum, and acceptable risk in your discussion. Your response must be at least 200 words in length. Question 4 Management Leadership and Employee Participation has been said to be the most important section of ANSI/AIHA Z10. Why do you think this is the case? Support your discussion with examples from personal experience. Your response must be at least 200 words in length.

For this assignment, you will be putting together what you know so far about the evidence collected after Chelsie Vapolt's death:Evidence #1 Hair collected from victim's bathrobeEvidence #2 Hair collected from victim's night shirt under bathrobeEvidence #3 Hair collected from shirt found in Dave's closetEvidence #4 Cloth collected from victim's handEvidence #5 Shirt from Dave's closetEvidence #6 Pants found in Vapolts' laundry roomEvidence #7 Rock found in planterEvidence #8: T-shirt found in Vapolts' bedEvidence #9: Carpet in Vapolts' bedroomYou will need to refer back to:Hair Evidence - Chelsie VapoltUV Light Evidence - Chelsie VapoltKastle-Meyer Blood Evidence - Chelsie VapoltDNA Evidence - Chelsie VapoltEvidence Analysis QuestionsWhat species did you identify the Evidence #1 to be from? Using at least one structural/anatomical features, describe how you came to this conclusion. (You may wish to revisit the hair Softchalk)What species did you identify the Evidence #2 to be from? Using at least one structural/anatomical features, describe how you came to this conclusion. What species did you identify the Evidence #3 to be from? Using at least one structural/anatomical features, describe how you came to this conclusion. Based on the UV light test, which pieces of evidence contain body fluids? How did you reach this conclusion?Based on the Kastle-Meyer Blood tests, which pieces of evidence contain blood? How did you reach this conclusion? Why were the positive and negative controls included?Looking at the results of the DNA electrophoresis:Do any of the lanes match? Which ones?Explain why these lanes match. Use the following terms for full credit: restriction enzyme, fragment, positive charge.Based on your evidence analysis, who is your prime suspect? Is this the same prime suspect that you had last week? Which pieces of evidence support your hypothesis for who the prime suspect is? Does any of this evidence refute this?SubmissionYou will need to upload a .pdf with your responses to all questions. I would recommend using a word processor (such as Microsoft Word) or using Google Docs. GradingTo see how this assignment will be graded, scroll down to view the grading rubric. If no rubric is visible, click on the three dots in the upper right corner of this page, then click "Show Rubric". If you're reviewing this assignment using the Canvas mobile app, the rubric is included in the Grade tab.Note: While I am not specifically grading you on your spelling or grammar, scientific communication is an important skill. Please proofread and spellcheck before submitting to ensure that your ideas come across clearly. Up to 10% may be deducted for excessive grammar and spelling errors that affect the readability of your work.RubricCSI Part 2 - OnlineCSI Part 2 - OnlineCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHair Analysis6 ptsExcellentAll hairs identified and the structural/anatomical features that were used to support ID are clearly and correctly explained.4 ptsMinor Deduction3 ptsIncomplete0 ptsNo Marks6 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUV3 ptsExcellentBody fluids identified and method is clearly and correctly explained.1 ptsIncomplete0 ptsNo Marks3 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBlood5 ptsFull MarksBlood identified on evidence, and method and reasons for controls are clearly and correctly explained.3 ptsIncomplete0 ptsNo Marks5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDNA5 ptsFull MarksAll DNA matches are identified and explained. Explanation is thorough and correctly uses all terminology listed.4 ptsMinor Deduction3 ptsIncomplete0 ptsNo Marks5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrime Suspect3 ptsFull MarksHypothesis for prime suspect is supported by the evidence.1.5 ptsIncomplete0 ptsNo Marks3 ptsTotal Points: 22PreviousNext