Case Analysis: Case Studies: Goodyear, philosophy homework help
In the Week Three Discussion, you
selected a current business problem from the following case categories:·Banking·Fuel and the Environment·GMOs·Factory Farming·Pharmaceuticals·Gender DiscriminationIn this written assignment, you
will present your work on the case analysis using selected components of an
argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good
Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y
Postigo, 2015). This written assignment will include a revised and polished
version of your discussion work, the presentation and support of two premises,
and an analysis of how your chosen ethical theory offers the best moral
solution to the business problem in your case analysis.Using the components of the
argumentative essay located in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A
Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo (2015),
your assignment should include the following:An introduction. This is the “Problem” portion of the essay that is covered in Section
9.1: The Argumentative Essay (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015).
This should be an improved version of the introduction in your initial post,
revised on the basis of your professor’s feedback and additional research. In
this introduction you will need to (a) identify the specific issue or problem
that you want to address and give an impartial presentation of the controversy,
(b) articulate briefly the characteristics of the economic system that serves
as the setting for the business, and (c) examine the laws that affect the
operations of the business. The introduction should be one paragraph of around
200 words in length.A thesis. Start a
new paragraph with a precise and clear sentence in which you state your moral
position with regard to the case that you presented in your first paragraph.
This is known as stating your thesis. (See the “Thesis” passage in “The
Argumentative Essay” in Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). The
thesis you state here should be an improved version of the thesis in your
initial post in the discussion, revised on the basis of your professor’s
feedback and your reading of “The Argumentative Essay” indicated above.A thesis is only one sentence, so
do not write a series of sentences, or a complex sentence with explanatory
clauses (e.g., “because…” or “since…” or “according to Dr. Mary Expert, an
economist with the Bureau of Labor statistics…”, or “a law that was ratified
with 80% votes in favor…”). An example of a precise and clear thesis is this:
“Factory farms are not morally justifiable” or, of course, the opposite point
of view: “Factory farms are morally justifiable.” Keep in mind that your thesis
in this assignment will be the basis for the argumentative essay of the Week
Five written assignment, so take your time when formulating this thesis.Ethical theory. In the same second paragraph as the thesis statement, identify the
ethical theory that supports your moral position. You may choose from
utilitarianism, duty ethics, or virtue ethics. Present the characteristics of
the ethical theory in a broad sketch, and include citations and references in
APA form. Then, apply your chosen ethical theory by explaining how it lends
itself to the moral position that you are defending.Two premises. Present at least two reasons in support of your thesis and these should
be presented in the form of a claim. These are called premises. Articulate each
premise in one clear and grammatically correct sentence. Review Section 9.1 of With
Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Foster, Hardy, and Zúñiga y
Postigo, 2015). Start a new paragraph for each.In the rest of the paragraph,
support your premise by presenting an analysis of how the ethical theory lends
itself to the best solution. This analysis includes articulating the
characteristics(s) of the economic system at work that support the claims in your
premises. It also includes examining the effects of the law(s) at work that
also support the claims in your premises.Comparative analysis. In the final paragraph, analyze how this application lends itself to a
solution that is superior to that offered by one of the ethical theories that
you did not select. To do this, provide a clear statement describing the moral
solution offered by this other theory. For example, if you chose utilitarianism
to apply to your case, then you can choose from either virtue ethics or
deontology for your comparative analysis. Explain in no more than three
sentences what moral solution would result from the application of this other
ethical theory. See the “Sample Case Analysis” for an illustration of how this would look like. Finally, analyze the
strengths of the moral solution presented by your chosen ethical theory in ways
that demonstrate how it is superior to the moral solution offered by the other
ethical theory.Once you receive your assignment
back from your professor, start working on revisions based on your professor’s
feedback. This is the first step in preparing your
Final Project and the details are presented on the Final Project’s prompt. You
will benefit from starting your Final Project as soon as you receive your
assignment back from your professor.Requirements for Your Assignment:·Your assignment should be 1000
words in length, excluding the title page and reference page(s).·Your examination should be both
thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought, so
give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise.·Your assignment should include
citations, as well as a list of references. Both must be in APA form.·You should draw from the sources
provided in your chosen case category in the discussion this week.·Also refer to Section 9.1: The
Argumentative Essay and the introduction to Section 9.2: Strengthening the
Argumentative Essay (intro only for the latter) from Hardy, J., Foster, C.,
& Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015).