Reading and critically analyzing academic research in journal articles is an important part of learning and applying scholarly research for multiple applications within your discipline. The first four weeks of this course discussed the various components of research design. Your final assignment is an academic research-article critique. The purpose of this critique is to ensure that you know how to read and critically assess research for use in your own research, understand social problems in society, support decision making in public policy, or to influence one’s own individual research.For this final assignment, read and critically review one of the journal articles listed below:“Experiences of Intimate Partner and Neighborhood Violence and Their Association With Mental Health in Pregnant Women”“An Investigation of the Influence of the Spatial Distribution of Neighborhood Violent Crime on Fear of Crime”“Military Service and Lifetime Arrests: Examining the Effects of the Total Military Experience on Arrests in a Sample of Prison Inmates”“Gender Differences on the Road to Redemption”“Afterschool School Triathlon Training for 11- to 14-year Old Girls: Influences on Academic Motivation and Achievement”“The Effect of Social Support, Gratitude, Resilience and Satisfaction with Life on Depressive Symptoms Among Police Officers following Hurricane Katrina”“Economic Sanctions and the Dynamics of Terrorist Campaigns”“‘Gimme Shelter’: The Role of Democracy and Institutional Quality in Disaster Preparedness”“Subcultural Boundary Maintenance in a virtual community for body modification enthusiasts”“A Snapshot on the Daily Sedentary Behavior of Community Dwelling Older African American Women”“Institutional Factors and Processes in Interagency Collaboration: The Case of FEMA Corps”Next, apply the methods detailed in Using a Scientific Journal Article to Write a Critical Review (Links to an external site.) to critique the article you selected. At a minimum, the critique should include the following information:Introduction (about two pages): Summarize the article you chose, including the purpose of the study, the methodology utilized, the results obtained, and the conclusions drawn by the author(s) utilizing questions posed in the reading. Utilize questions posed in the “Analyze the Text” section of Using a Scientific Journal Article to Write a Critical Review (Links to an external site.) to develop this section.Body (about five pages): Highlight the quality of the research article (both the strengths and weaknesses) as expressed through each section of the paper (i.e., introduction, methods, results, discussion, overview). Use questions posed in the “Evaluate the Text” section of “Using a Scientific Journal Article to Write a Critical Review (Links to an external site.)” to develop this section. Follow the “Evaluate the Text” prompts and include the following:Critique whether the researcher used the appropriate and ethical application of research methods in relation to their research goals.Assess whether the application of quantitative methods approaches, qualitative methods approaches or a combination (mixed methods) was appropriate in the article research.Interpret data and empirical findings in the research through an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses.Examine the role of the research design in the article by defending or critiquing the research method based on your assessment.Support the impact of the research by determining if it benefits social policy, theoretical knowledge, or both.Conclusion (about three pages): Discuss the significance of the research. Utilize questions posed in the “Establish the Significance of the Research” section of Using a Scientific Journal Article to Write a Critical Review (Links to an external site.) to develop this section.The Academic Research-Article Critique paperMust be 10 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)Must include a separate title page with the following:Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedFor further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.), refer to the Ashford Writing Center resources.Must use at least 2 scholarly sources in addition to the course text. One of these sources must be from the Ashford University Library.The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Independent Project Find two primary peer-reviewed journal articles (No meta-analysis or review articles) that examine the same hypothesis, using different study designs. For example, one article may use a cohort design and the other a case-control study, or randomized clinical trial, or cross-sectional, etc.. For each article: State the research objective Describe the study design, including their target population, sampling methodology, sample size, recruiting methods, inclusion/exclusion criteria, etc. Summarize the results, including univariate and multivariate findings, if applicable. What variables did hey control for, and were the findings different after controlling for confounding variables than before they controlled for them? State the article’s conclusions as they relate to the original (null) hypothesis. Discuss the study’s strengths and limitations, including sources of bias or possible confounding. How did they account for these issues, and how might they have affected the results (bias toward vs. away from the null hypothesis)? Were their conclusions generalizable to the overall population? Why or why not? Finally, compare the two articles. Did they reach the same or different conclusions? If different, what may have contributed to the discrepancy (chance, methodology, bias)? Which study had the superior methodology, and why? Which one are you more likely to believe? How would you design the ideal study to examine this hypothesis?

Breast Cancer and Blood Pressure ScreeningA 40-year-old married African American woman presents for an annual physical examination. When asked about the most recent mammogram, the patient reports that she gets anxious about the procedure and therefore did not follow through with last years’ mammogram. She states she does breast self-exams occasionally. The patient has no history of breast lumps and no family history of breast cancer. She has two young children, whom she did not breastfeed. She remains sexually active, does not use tobacco, recreational drugs, or drink alcohol. The patient is not physically active. Her physical exam is normal except for slightly elevated blood pressure.Would you recommend a mammogram for this patient? Why or why not?What is the recommendation for the patient’s slight elevation in blood pressure? Are any interventions necessary? If so, what are they?What individual model to promote healthy behavior would you choose and what strategies would you suggest?What community model to promote healthy behavior would you choose and what strategies would you suggest? use 3-4 nursing articless less than 5 years oldCriteriaRatingsPts The recommendations using the AHRQ tool were appropriate to the case study. Expected outcome(s) and results are listed. Interventions listed for patient were realistic and achievable20 ptsThe paper meets APA criteria. There is an introductory paragraph that outlines the paper's discussion points. Paper must be grammatically correct, i.e. correct spelling, sentence structure, and grammar.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation and Formatuse:U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (Links to an external site.)CDC National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) (Links to an external site.)Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP) (Links to an external site.)Electronic Preventive Services Selector (ePSS) (Links to an external site.): a tool designed to help providers discover the latest preventive services appropriate for their patients. You will be using this tool to complete this week's case studies.The website will mention several devices that can use the ePSS system. Go to Web, and click on "Search for Recommendations."On the "Search for Recommendations" page, you will be able to enter patient details. Then click "Show Recommendations" button.The recommendation page will display all grades of recommendations for the patient details you provided. Within each grade, you will see the title of the recommendation displayed followed by risk information and detail icons. When you have found the appropriate recommendation you are looking for, click on the "Details" icon to the left.Under the specific recommendation page, you will see four or five sub folders in the middle of the page (General, Rationale, Clinical Considerations, Others, and Tools). Click on "Clinical Considerations" and "Others." You will see the majority of the considerations that need to be considered when planning care for a patient.