Week Three Lecture
Advertising Message
Welcome to the world of advertising! How many of you think advertisers unfairly influence us and “make” us buy
items we do not need, cannot afford, and will not use? If you raised your hand or silently said “I do,” then you are
among a majority of people who think advertisers will lie to encourage sales and believe consumers are helpless
pawns in the corporate game of profitability.
Nothing could be further from the truth! Advertisers design catchy slogans, phrases, and songs to help us remember
the points about a particular item the organization thinks will appeal to us. Did advertisers create the need? No! Did
advertisers determine whether or not we wanted an item? Again, no! Although the psychology behind buyer
motivation is the focus for another course, advertisers only use what is known to appeal to a specific group of buyers
in hopes of affecting sales.
We are entering a world of bright lights, vivid colors, and every sensory perception will become aware when a
commercial is on that appeals to something we have decided we need. Why do we want a Mercedes? Good quality?
No, superior quality! But does it really cost $30,000 more to manufacturer a Mercedes than, say, a Ford? Most likely
not. Then why do we have a mental image of a Mercedes as a premium product? Why, advertisers, of course! Keep
in mind as we move throughout our course . . . advertisers work very hard to write messages and music that will
appeal to us and motivate us into action.
Our text discusses three message strategies: cognitive; affective; and conative, and how marketers determine which
strategy has the highest probability of producing the desired effect on consumer behavior (Clow & Baack, 2012).
For instance, Parker (2013) stated national universities tend to use more emotional, ego-based ads whereas regional
universities tend to use more informational and rational ads. National universities use the affective message strategy,
whereas regional universities use the cognitive message strategy. The key is to determine what type of message has
the great chance of impacting consumer behavior.
Media Selection
With all those ads running, how does an organization's message get through all the "clutter"? Clow and Baack
(2012) suggested the use of celebrities could capture and keep audience attention. In addition to incorporating the
seven principles (visual consistency, sufficient campaign duration, repeated taglines, consistent positioning,
simplicity, presentation of an identifiable selling point, and creation of an effective flow) (p. 191), the authors
suggested an effective manner of overcome the clutter is ad repetition and running ads on various types of media.
In our current economic downturn, media agencies are scrambling to meet the advertising needs of their customers –
customers who now may not have enough money to pay for the media contract still in effect (“Media Agencies,”
2008). Organizations must now deliver results from advertising on an increasingly decreasing advertising budget, a
stressful situation for the organization as well as the media agency. For example, KFC has set high standards for
their media agency and expect delivery (“Meet,” 2008).
With so many choices available, which media might be the most effective in attracting an organization’s targeted
market segment? According to Jeter (2003), an auto advertisement works 50% of the time. But which 50% is
working? And in which advertising medium? A common theory, although not supported by scientific methodology,
is some media work better than others. Vincent and Vincent (1996) claim television ads have a significant effect on
buyer motivating behavior, while magazines are most effective for creating brand awareness.
Nowak, Cameron, and Krugman (1993) declare a survey delivered by mail and telephone actually assist advertisers
in which media is most effective for an industry. Their findings indicate audience reach and specific targeting of a
desired market segment are most important when selecting an advertising media. Cost is secondary to audience
reach.
Yet, how does an advertising executive determine the "best" types of media? Kassaye and Vaccaro (1991/1992)
suggested that as the demographics and lifestyles of consumers change, the traditional selection of media must be
challenged and reformed. In addition, the cost of such advertising must be considered. Our text does a very good
job of discussing reach, frequency, opportunity to see, gross ratings, etc. Does it make sense to advertise in a daily
print newspaper if you are advertising about a product targeted toward a Generation Y consumer? Of course not!
Instead, advertising professionals must determine a venue where the targeted market segment congregates. Where
might a media venue be that offers the greatest opportunity of reaching Generation Y consumers? We will discuss
this issue in greater detail within our discussion forums. In conclusion, which media is “best”? In short, choose an
advertising media for an organization’s advertising message that has the greatest probability of being read, seen, or
heard by the organization’s targeted market segments.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment