Description
what is a living things
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
- Living Things may refer to: Life, all objects that have self-sustaining processes (biology) Organisms, contiguous living systems (such as animals, plants, fungi, or micro-organisms)
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
SCI 200 SNHU Nuclear Planning Presentation
SCI 200 Project Part One: Second Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In previous modules, you identified an issue, dev ...
SCI 200 SNHU Nuclear Planning Presentation
SCI 200 Project Part One: Second Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In previous modules, you identified an issue, developed a research question, and examined sources that could help you explore the issue. You also
considered the scientific principles related to your topic, and how you might communicate your findings to a specific audience. Building on these elements, you
will formulate a hypothesis related to your issue. Then, applying what you learned about the process of science, you will explain the next steps that natural
scientists would take to support or refute your hypothesis. What kind of evidence would they look for? What kind of tests they need to conduct? Throughout
this course, you explored a variety of specific cases in which natural scientists addressed issues, tested hypotheses, and developed solutions to problems. Many
of their solutions have become key discoveries that we rely on today for health, safety, and other practical uses. So, as you consider your hypothesis and the
next steps a scientist would take, reflect back on these examples. This reflection is the final piece of your planning document, and you will use it to develop your
presentation in Module 8.
Prompt: You will build on the elements you composed in your first draft and develop your hypothesis. After you have your hypothesis, explain what steps a
natural scientist would take to either refute or support your hypothesis. By the end of Module Six, you will fine tune the entire planning document to be
submitted to your instructor.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction: At this point, you should have received feedback from your instructor. For this second draft, review and make any necessary revisions or
adjustments to the following elements:
a. Describe the issue in the natural sciences that you have selected to investigate. Why is this issue significant? (You identified this issue in Module
One, but how would you revise this piece now that you have received instructor feedback and investigated your sources?)
b. Describe at least three science resources that you could use to investigate the issue you selected. Your sources must be relevant to your issue
and must be of an academic nature appropriate for the issue. In your description, consider questions such as: What are the similarities and
differences in the content of your sources? What makes them appropriate and relevant for investigating your issue? What was your thought
process when you were searching for sources? How did you make choices?
c. Based on your review of science resources, develop a specific question related to the issue you selected. In other words, what would you like to
know more about?
II. Body: You should also receive instructor feedback about this section and continue to consider your evidence. For this second draft, review these sections
and make any necessary revisions or adjustments to the following elements:
a. Identify an audience that would be interested in your issue and the question you developed. For example, who would benefit most from hearing
your message, or who could best help in addressing the issue?
b. Describe how and why you can tailor your message to your audience, providing specific examples. For example, will your audience understand
scientific terminology and principles, or will you need to explain them? How will you communicate effectively with your audience?
c. Identify the natural science principle(s) that apply to your question and issue. For example, if your issue is global climate change, the principle
you might identify is that the sun is the primary source of energy for Earth’s climate system.
d. Explain how the principle(s) you identified apply to your issue and question. In other words, how are the natural science principle(s) you
identified relevant to your question and issue?
III. Conclusion: In this section, you will conclude your research investigation by discussing future directions for research related to your question.
Specifically, you should:
a. Formulate a hypothesis that addresses the question you developed. Make sure your hypothesis is based on your investigation of your question.
b. Explain how a natural scientist would go about collecting evidence to support or refute the hypothesis you formulated. In other words, what
would the next steps be if a natural scientist were to continue researching your hypothesis? Make sure to support your response with the
natural science resources that you selected.
IV. Provide a reference list that includes all of the science resources you used to investigate your issue and question so far. Apply feedback from your
instructor to ensure that your list is formatted according to current APA guidelines (or another format, with instructor permission).
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: The second draft of your planning document should be 3–5 pages, double spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. You should use current APA guidelines (or another format approved by your instructor) for your citations and reference list. Part 2 Draft Basic scientific literacy is essential for understanding real-world applications of the natural sciences. As a consumer and voter, you will be faced with issues that require a basic understanding of science. For example, you might ask yourself the following questions: How can genetically modified foods affect my health?
Should scientists be held liable for not predicting earthquakes that led to human casualties, as they were in Italy in 2012? Is anthropogenic climate change real?
Is fracking a concern where I live? Because of the prevalence of natural science issues such as these, it is important to understand basic natural science concepts
and how they impact our daily lives.
The project for this course has two parts. In part one, you conducted a research investigation that examined an issue in the natural sciences. You identified
appropriate resources for investigating the issue you selected, used these resources to develop a question related to the issue, and applied natural science
principles to the issue and question. In addition, you identified an audience who would be interested in the selected issue. In Part Two, you will develop a
presentation for the audience you identified in Part One. In your presentation, you will explain how scientific thinking has impacted you and your audience,
supporting your claims with evidence.
Part Two of this project addresses the following course outcomes:
● Illustrate the impact of scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences
● Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of the natural world
● Utilize empirical evidence in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary scientific issues on individuals and society
Prompt
Referring to your research investigation, create a presentation that explains how scientific thinking has impacted you and discusses the impact of your selected
issue on your audience.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Provide a brief overview of the scientific background of your issue and question. How does the issue relate to the natural sciences?
II. Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about
the response to your question or the outcome of your hypothesis? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
III. Describe the empirical evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your audience. Support
your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
IV. Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate?
1
V. Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the issue. In other words, how did thinking like a scientist to research,
develop a question, and formulate a hypothesis affect what you thought about the issue you selected? How did scientific thinking change the lens
through which you viewed the issue? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
VI. Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience’s
potential knowledge of current natural science (or lack thereof), and what is specifically important to the audience.
Project Part Two Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your presentation should have approximately 5–7 slides in Prezi, PowerPoint, or another comparable presentation tool. Make sure
to include your speaker notes so that your instructor knows what you would say if you were actually giving the presentation. Note: If using Prezi, include a
separate Word document with notes. If using PowerPoint, include speaker notes.resources: Omri, A., Mabrouk, N. B., & Sassi-Tmar, A. (2015). Modeling the causal linkages between nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth in developed and developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1012-1022. Layne, J. (2021, February 5). 22 Intense Pros and Cons Nuclear Energy. Ablison. https://www.ablison.com/nuclear-energy-pros-and-co... Energy, J. (2021, April 15). Pros and Cons of Nuclear Energy: Safety, Cost, & Efficiency. Just Energy. https://justenergy.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-nucle...
Columbia Southern Use of Personal Sampling Pumps with A Sampling Train Research Paper
Unit III JournalInstructionsResearch the use of personal sampling pumps with a sampling train and the alternate use of pas ...
Columbia Southern Use of Personal Sampling Pumps with A Sampling Train Research Paper
Unit III JournalInstructionsResearch the use of personal sampling pumps with a sampling train and the alternate use of passive sampling badges. Discuss what you believe to be the pros and cons of using each method to evaluate personal exposures to chemical hazards in the workplace. Also, discuss the pros and cons of placing the sample directly onto a worker (personal sample) versus collecting a stationary sample in the work area (area sample).Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.AssignmentUnit III Scholarly ActivityWeight: 10% of course gradeGrading RubricInstructionsAfter your initial review of the operations and safety data sheets (SDS), you have determined the sampling you want to perform at Acme Automotive Parts (AAP). The table below lists hazards you want to sample and the sampling/analytical methods you decide to use. You can access the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) methods at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/default.html and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) methods at https://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/toc.html.Hazard Possible Method Occupational Exposure Limits (OEL)Manganese Fume (Welding) NIOSH 7302 5 mg/m3 (OSHA Ceiling)Copper Fume (Welding) NIOSH 7302 0.1 mg/m3 (OSHA 8-hour TWA)Lead Fume (Welding) NIOSH 7302 0.05 mg/m3 (OSHA 8-hour TWA)1,2,4 trimethylbenzene (Paint) OSHA 1020 25 ppm (ACGIH 8-hour TWA TLV)Toluene (Paint) OSHA 111 50 ppm (ACGIH 8-hour TWA TLV)Xylene (Paint) OSHA 1002 100 ppm (OSHA 8-hour TWA)Metal Working Fluids NIOSH 5524 0.5 mg/m3 (NIOSH 10-hour TWA REL)Noise (throughout plant) None 90 dBA (OSHA 8-hour TWA)Choose one hazard from the welding area, one hazard from the paint area, and the metal working fluids, and prepare one paragraph for each hazard (three paragraphs in total) answering each of the following questions:Which sampling media will you be using?What flow rate will you use? How will you calibrate the sampling train? Calculate the minimum sampling time you will require to be able to detect concentrations at the OELs listed in the table. Show your work in calculating the sampling times.Will you collect personal or area samples? Explain why.Are there any compounds listed in the method that might interfere with your sample?Are there any special storage or shipment requirements for your samples?Prepare one paragraph that concludes how you would evaluate noise exposures in the facility. Discuss what type of sampling instrument you would use, how you would perform calibration, whether you would use personal or area samples, and which areas at the facility you would include in the evaluation.Your assignment must be a minimum of two pages in length, not including title or reference pages. Your assignment must use at least two references. One must be gathered from the CSU Online Library; the other may be your textbook. All references and in-text citations must be formatted according to APA standards.
UCLA Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Bromination of Aromatic Compounds Lab
Hello I need help with an Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Report Scaffold for Organic Chemistry. It is due Tuesday nig ...
UCLA Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Bromination of Aromatic Compounds Lab
Hello I need help with an Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Report Scaffold for Organic Chemistry. It is due Tuesday night (04/13) at 11:59 pm (pacific time). I have included all necessary information including:- Report scaffold instructions- Report Scaffold Rubric- Class data set that will be used to answer "class data" questions- The entire in-lab that will be used to answer the "individual data" questions. - The General Lab procedure manual
Purdue University Global Out of Control Grass Fire Discussion
only needs to be about 150 words no apaDiscussion Topic 1: Out of Control Grass FireYou are the Director of Emergency Serv ...
Purdue University Global Out of Control Grass Fire Discussion
only needs to be about 150 words no apaDiscussion Topic 1: Out of Control Grass FireYou are the Director of Emergency Services for your community. The temperature outside is over 100 degrees, the humidity is only 17%, and the Santa Ana winds have begun to blow. At 10:15 a.m. a grass fire is reported and the local fire department is responding. As these first units arrive on scene they realize that the fire is out of control, and that homes are being threatened.The on-scene commander quickly calls for additional fire units and for the police to begin evacuating homes that are being threatened. By 1:30 hours the fire has grown 10 times its original size and continues out of control; several houses are in immediate danger, and all local resources are now exhausted.What steps would you take and when would you call for mutual aid? Additionally, at what point would you request federal assistance? Discuss the options available to you as the Director of Emergency Services. Provide a thorough explanation for your choices.
CHEM 116 Prince Mohammad University Molecular Polarity Lab Report
i have Chemistry lab, it;s just word documnet with a link to website you will do some expermint and just write your obesrv ...
CHEM 116 Prince Mohammad University Molecular Polarity Lab Report
i have Chemistry lab, it;s just word documnet with a link to website you will do some expermint and just write your obesrvations nothing to complecated or anything.
SUNY Empire State College Newton Laws Lab Report
I need help getting this lab done. there is a similar lab on this website however its slightly different.
SUNY Empire State College Newton Laws Lab Report
I need help getting this lab done. there is a similar lab on this website however its slightly different.
Similar Content
oops i paid you early
please still help me! this is Valdeezy...
Planetary Observation Astronomy Lab Report
Title PageIntroduction Give a brief history of three of the Planets of the Solar System (I would pick Saturn, Mars, Venus....
Free Fall and Air Drag Mass Acceleration Physics Worksheet
Physics worksheet ...
Always, Sometimes, or Never True
Solutions are homogeneous mixtures of two or more substances. Compounds are combinations of elements. Water is a...
true false chemistry
A covalent bond would occur between a sodium atom and a chlorine atom.TRUEThe name for PCl5 is phosphorus pentachlori...
GMU Equivalent Resistance with 3 Resistors Lab Report
Lab 2 Equivalent resistance with 3
resistors
Associated video: Resistors connections
Goal
How to measure equivalent resis...
Newton
Explain newton’s first law of motion:Newton’s first law of motion states that, an object will remain or stay at rest, ...
Cas
(1) A brief written component for discussing the use and value of utilizing certificate authorities A digital certificate ...
Cellorganelles
There are several organelles that are found in both animal and plant cells. These organelles are the cell membrane, nucleu...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
SCI 200 SNHU Nuclear Planning Presentation
SCI 200 Project Part One: Second Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In previous modules, you identified an issue, dev ...
SCI 200 SNHU Nuclear Planning Presentation
SCI 200 Project Part One: Second Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In previous modules, you identified an issue, developed a research question, and examined sources that could help you explore the issue. You also
considered the scientific principles related to your topic, and how you might communicate your findings to a specific audience. Building on these elements, you
will formulate a hypothesis related to your issue. Then, applying what you learned about the process of science, you will explain the next steps that natural
scientists would take to support or refute your hypothesis. What kind of evidence would they look for? What kind of tests they need to conduct? Throughout
this course, you explored a variety of specific cases in which natural scientists addressed issues, tested hypotheses, and developed solutions to problems. Many
of their solutions have become key discoveries that we rely on today for health, safety, and other practical uses. So, as you consider your hypothesis and the
next steps a scientist would take, reflect back on these examples. This reflection is the final piece of your planning document, and you will use it to develop your
presentation in Module 8.
Prompt: You will build on the elements you composed in your first draft and develop your hypothesis. After you have your hypothesis, explain what steps a
natural scientist would take to either refute or support your hypothesis. By the end of Module Six, you will fine tune the entire planning document to be
submitted to your instructor.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction: At this point, you should have received feedback from your instructor. For this second draft, review and make any necessary revisions or
adjustments to the following elements:
a. Describe the issue in the natural sciences that you have selected to investigate. Why is this issue significant? (You identified this issue in Module
One, but how would you revise this piece now that you have received instructor feedback and investigated your sources?)
b. Describe at least three science resources that you could use to investigate the issue you selected. Your sources must be relevant to your issue
and must be of an academic nature appropriate for the issue. In your description, consider questions such as: What are the similarities and
differences in the content of your sources? What makes them appropriate and relevant for investigating your issue? What was your thought
process when you were searching for sources? How did you make choices?
c. Based on your review of science resources, develop a specific question related to the issue you selected. In other words, what would you like to
know more about?
II. Body: You should also receive instructor feedback about this section and continue to consider your evidence. For this second draft, review these sections
and make any necessary revisions or adjustments to the following elements:
a. Identify an audience that would be interested in your issue and the question you developed. For example, who would benefit most from hearing
your message, or who could best help in addressing the issue?
b. Describe how and why you can tailor your message to your audience, providing specific examples. For example, will your audience understand
scientific terminology and principles, or will you need to explain them? How will you communicate effectively with your audience?
c. Identify the natural science principle(s) that apply to your question and issue. For example, if your issue is global climate change, the principle
you might identify is that the sun is the primary source of energy for Earth’s climate system.
d. Explain how the principle(s) you identified apply to your issue and question. In other words, how are the natural science principle(s) you
identified relevant to your question and issue?
III. Conclusion: In this section, you will conclude your research investigation by discussing future directions for research related to your question.
Specifically, you should:
a. Formulate a hypothesis that addresses the question you developed. Make sure your hypothesis is based on your investigation of your question.
b. Explain how a natural scientist would go about collecting evidence to support or refute the hypothesis you formulated. In other words, what
would the next steps be if a natural scientist were to continue researching your hypothesis? Make sure to support your response with the
natural science resources that you selected.
IV. Provide a reference list that includes all of the science resources you used to investigate your issue and question so far. Apply feedback from your
instructor to ensure that your list is formatted according to current APA guidelines (or another format, with instructor permission).
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: The second draft of your planning document should be 3–5 pages, double spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. You should use current APA guidelines (or another format approved by your instructor) for your citations and reference list. Part 2 Draft Basic scientific literacy is essential for understanding real-world applications of the natural sciences. As a consumer and voter, you will be faced with issues that require a basic understanding of science. For example, you might ask yourself the following questions: How can genetically modified foods affect my health?
Should scientists be held liable for not predicting earthquakes that led to human casualties, as they were in Italy in 2012? Is anthropogenic climate change real?
Is fracking a concern where I live? Because of the prevalence of natural science issues such as these, it is important to understand basic natural science concepts
and how they impact our daily lives.
The project for this course has two parts. In part one, you conducted a research investigation that examined an issue in the natural sciences. You identified
appropriate resources for investigating the issue you selected, used these resources to develop a question related to the issue, and applied natural science
principles to the issue and question. In addition, you identified an audience who would be interested in the selected issue. In Part Two, you will develop a
presentation for the audience you identified in Part One. In your presentation, you will explain how scientific thinking has impacted you and your audience,
supporting your claims with evidence.
Part Two of this project addresses the following course outcomes:
● Illustrate the impact of scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences
● Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of the natural world
● Utilize empirical evidence in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary scientific issues on individuals and society
Prompt
Referring to your research investigation, create a presentation that explains how scientific thinking has impacted you and discusses the impact of your selected
issue on your audience.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Provide a brief overview of the scientific background of your issue and question. How does the issue relate to the natural sciences?
II. Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about
the response to your question or the outcome of your hypothesis? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
III. Describe the empirical evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your audience. Support
your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
IV. Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate?
1
V. Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the issue. In other words, how did thinking like a scientist to research,
develop a question, and formulate a hypothesis affect what you thought about the issue you selected? How did scientific thinking change the lens
through which you viewed the issue? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
VI. Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience’s
potential knowledge of current natural science (or lack thereof), and what is specifically important to the audience.
Project Part Two Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your presentation should have approximately 5–7 slides in Prezi, PowerPoint, or another comparable presentation tool. Make sure
to include your speaker notes so that your instructor knows what you would say if you were actually giving the presentation. Note: If using Prezi, include a
separate Word document with notes. If using PowerPoint, include speaker notes.resources: Omri, A., Mabrouk, N. B., & Sassi-Tmar, A. (2015). Modeling the causal linkages between nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth in developed and developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1012-1022. Layne, J. (2021, February 5). 22 Intense Pros and Cons Nuclear Energy. Ablison. https://www.ablison.com/nuclear-energy-pros-and-co... Energy, J. (2021, April 15). Pros and Cons of Nuclear Energy: Safety, Cost, & Efficiency. Just Energy. https://justenergy.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-nucle...
Columbia Southern Use of Personal Sampling Pumps with A Sampling Train Research Paper
Unit III JournalInstructionsResearch the use of personal sampling pumps with a sampling train and the alternate use of pas ...
Columbia Southern Use of Personal Sampling Pumps with A Sampling Train Research Paper
Unit III JournalInstructionsResearch the use of personal sampling pumps with a sampling train and the alternate use of passive sampling badges. Discuss what you believe to be the pros and cons of using each method to evaluate personal exposures to chemical hazards in the workplace. Also, discuss the pros and cons of placing the sample directly onto a worker (personal sample) versus collecting a stationary sample in the work area (area sample).Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.AssignmentUnit III Scholarly ActivityWeight: 10% of course gradeGrading RubricInstructionsAfter your initial review of the operations and safety data sheets (SDS), you have determined the sampling you want to perform at Acme Automotive Parts (AAP). The table below lists hazards you want to sample and the sampling/analytical methods you decide to use. You can access the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) methods at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/default.html and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) methods at https://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/toc.html.Hazard Possible Method Occupational Exposure Limits (OEL)Manganese Fume (Welding) NIOSH 7302 5 mg/m3 (OSHA Ceiling)Copper Fume (Welding) NIOSH 7302 0.1 mg/m3 (OSHA 8-hour TWA)Lead Fume (Welding) NIOSH 7302 0.05 mg/m3 (OSHA 8-hour TWA)1,2,4 trimethylbenzene (Paint) OSHA 1020 25 ppm (ACGIH 8-hour TWA TLV)Toluene (Paint) OSHA 111 50 ppm (ACGIH 8-hour TWA TLV)Xylene (Paint) OSHA 1002 100 ppm (OSHA 8-hour TWA)Metal Working Fluids NIOSH 5524 0.5 mg/m3 (NIOSH 10-hour TWA REL)Noise (throughout plant) None 90 dBA (OSHA 8-hour TWA)Choose one hazard from the welding area, one hazard from the paint area, and the metal working fluids, and prepare one paragraph for each hazard (three paragraphs in total) answering each of the following questions:Which sampling media will you be using?What flow rate will you use? How will you calibrate the sampling train? Calculate the minimum sampling time you will require to be able to detect concentrations at the OELs listed in the table. Show your work in calculating the sampling times.Will you collect personal or area samples? Explain why.Are there any compounds listed in the method that might interfere with your sample?Are there any special storage or shipment requirements for your samples?Prepare one paragraph that concludes how you would evaluate noise exposures in the facility. Discuss what type of sampling instrument you would use, how you would perform calibration, whether you would use personal or area samples, and which areas at the facility you would include in the evaluation.Your assignment must be a minimum of two pages in length, not including title or reference pages. Your assignment must use at least two references. One must be gathered from the CSU Online Library; the other may be your textbook. All references and in-text citations must be formatted according to APA standards.
UCLA Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Bromination of Aromatic Compounds Lab
Hello I need help with an Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Report Scaffold for Organic Chemistry. It is due Tuesday nig ...
UCLA Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Bromination of Aromatic Compounds Lab
Hello I need help with an Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Report Scaffold for Organic Chemistry. It is due Tuesday night (04/13) at 11:59 pm (pacific time). I have included all necessary information including:- Report scaffold instructions- Report Scaffold Rubric- Class data set that will be used to answer "class data" questions- The entire in-lab that will be used to answer the "individual data" questions. - The General Lab procedure manual
Purdue University Global Out of Control Grass Fire Discussion
only needs to be about 150 words no apaDiscussion Topic 1: Out of Control Grass FireYou are the Director of Emergency Serv ...
Purdue University Global Out of Control Grass Fire Discussion
only needs to be about 150 words no apaDiscussion Topic 1: Out of Control Grass FireYou are the Director of Emergency Services for your community. The temperature outside is over 100 degrees, the humidity is only 17%, and the Santa Ana winds have begun to blow. At 10:15 a.m. a grass fire is reported and the local fire department is responding. As these first units arrive on scene they realize that the fire is out of control, and that homes are being threatened.The on-scene commander quickly calls for additional fire units and for the police to begin evacuating homes that are being threatened. By 1:30 hours the fire has grown 10 times its original size and continues out of control; several houses are in immediate danger, and all local resources are now exhausted.What steps would you take and when would you call for mutual aid? Additionally, at what point would you request federal assistance? Discuss the options available to you as the Director of Emergency Services. Provide a thorough explanation for your choices.
CHEM 116 Prince Mohammad University Molecular Polarity Lab Report
i have Chemistry lab, it;s just word documnet with a link to website you will do some expermint and just write your obesrv ...
CHEM 116 Prince Mohammad University Molecular Polarity Lab Report
i have Chemistry lab, it;s just word documnet with a link to website you will do some expermint and just write your obesrvations nothing to complecated or anything.
SUNY Empire State College Newton Laws Lab Report
I need help getting this lab done. there is a similar lab on this website however its slightly different.
SUNY Empire State College Newton Laws Lab Report
I need help getting this lab done. there is a similar lab on this website however its slightly different.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents