In 1994, Mearsheimer wrote an influential article in which he argued that only realism explains the international system and dismissed other approaches to international institutions. After reading the lesson notes and all of the assigned articles from this week, please compose a post that addresses each of the three points below.Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of Mearsheimer’s perspective on international institutions, Evaluate the counterarguments offered by Pevehouse and Russett (2006), and Ruggie (1982), and Assess how relevant the realist paradigm is for making sense of international institutions and international regimes today. I look forward to reading your posts and providing feedback on the discussions. Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 500 words. reading sources:Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42(3): 485-507.EBSCO: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/logi...JSTOR: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787Mearsheimer, John. 1994. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 1994(5): 5-49.EBSCO: http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://search.eb...JSTOR: http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://www.jstor...Pevehouse, Jon, and Bruce Russett. 2006. “Democratic International Governmental Organizations Promote Peace.” International Organization 60(4): 969−1000.EBSCO: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy2.apus.edu/logi...JSTOR: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877853Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36(2): 379−415.EBSCO: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy2.apus.edu/logi...JSTOR: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706527

HIST 1302: Writing Assignment Please read all instructions carefully.You will have two choices to complete this assignment; these are general guidelines for all essays:any instances of plagiarism will result in a failing grade (if you are unsure what constitutes plagiarism, please contact Professor Welty)you must provide evidence in your essayo Please refer to evidence in the film and cite it by indicating the time in thefilm, which should be visible by pausing the stream. Cite the time in the film at the end of your sentence, as follows: (34:23). This should be the time in the film, not the time remaining.you must offer your own analysis in your essayas this is an academic writing assignment; please follow the following instructions:o avoid contractions (e.g., do not use don’t)o avoid being too colloquial and avoid slango use a person’s full name in his/her first mention and then use the last namesubsequentlyo write out numbers less than one hundred (including centuries: ‘eighteenth’not 18th century)o creativity is encouraged, but clarity is supreme▪ if you are uncertain what a word means, you should refrain from using it (or look up its meaning and then use it if appropriate)o avoid switching between verb tenses▪ for most historical writing, the past tense is most suitableo avoid large block quotationsyou will submit your essay via Blackboard (a hard copy is not required)your essay should be between 350 and 650 words—do not exceed this limit by morethan 10% (doing so will lower your grade)your essay’s heading must include: your name, the name of the assignment (Option#1 or #2), class & section number, the word count, and the date (you may include a title, but it is not required)o each element of your heading should be on its own line, beginning with your full name on the top left of your fist page (a title page is not required and should be avoided)you must upload a Microsoft Word file with the extension .doc or .docx or a PDF o if you do not comply with this, your essay will be given a zero the Vietnam series is currently available on Netflix if you prefer to use that platform. Option #2: Déjà Vu (1858-1961) – Episode 1 of The Vietnam War <-- Video for the essay This assignment requires you to watch a film that chronicles the origins of theconflict in Vietnam and US involvement in the region.In your first paragraph, write a concise summary of the entire film, identifying keypersons and most important events covered. Your reader should not be leftwondering if you viewed the film or not.In your second paragraph, you must discuss the history of Vietnam in the era ofWorld War I and II. Be certain to identify the key developments described in thefilm.In your third paragraph, explain the events leading up to the Geneva Accords, themeetings themselves, and what happened in the aftermath of this agreement. Be certain to describe the conflict that expanded in the second half of the 1950s, and underscore what was most important in this period of Vietnam’s history.In the fourth paragraph, you will reflect upon the film as a whole. Please identify two events and/or decisions that, had they been handled differently, might have improved the course of history in Vietnam. Be certain to suggest what might have been done differently.Please address the following questions in your fifth and final paragraph:o How would you evaluate the filmmaker’s presentation of the issues? Did thetreatment seem objective? Did you detect any bias? Please explain your evaluation.