Week 2 - Discussion Forum 2 4 4 unread replies. 4 4 replies. Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated. Ethics and Moral Development [WLOs: 1, 2, 3] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3] Prepare: Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, review the Week 2 required resources that focus on ethics and morals. This will assist you in examining your own development of ethical and moral responsibilities.Read the articles: A Global Ethics for a Globalized World Virtue Ethics and Modern Society Classical Stoicism and the Birth of a Global Ethics: Cosmopolitan Duties in a World of Local Loyalties Responsibilities of an Educated Person (Links to an external site.) [Blog post] by jwood00 Moral Education for a Society in Moral Transition (Links to an external site.) Decision Procedures for Ethics: DEAL Carrying on Without Resolution (Links to an external site.) Reflect: Take a deeper look at your own life and determine which experiences have inspired ethical and moral reasoning. Were there any huge influences in this process? Write: For this discussion you will address the following prompts: Explain what it means to be ethical as it relates to personal, academic, and professional growth. Provide at least one ethical dilemma you have encountered, and describe how the issue was resolved. Describe how your general education courses have influenced your ethical values. Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length, which should include a thorough response to each prompt. You are required to provide in-text citations of applicable required reading materials and/or any other outside sources you use to support your claims. Provide full reference entries of all sources cited at the end of your response. Please use correct APA format when writing in-text citations (see In-Text Citation Helper (Links to an external site.)) and references (see Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.)). Respond to Peers: Review your classmates’ posts, and respond to at least two of your peers by Day 7. In each response, provide comments that prompt further critical thinking and insight on your classmate’s perspective on ethical values as they relate to their personal, academic, and professional lives. Each participation post should be a minimum of 75 words.

Everything needed is attached including Rubric, the two essays needed to expand on, and milestone two example as to how it needs to be written. Please take information from both essays to put together this one. InstructionsFor this milestone, take your case report from PSY 622 and prepare a psychological assessment report that demonstrates use of objective testing data. How do classic and contemporary psychology theories support the claims you have made in your diagnostic consultation?Make sure your assessment report accounts for the many possible avenues for gathering evidence in legal situations. You will likely rely on memory in some way, so make sure to discuss any limitations that you will bring to your assessment report. If possible, include measures that you learned about in your previous courses as protective mechanisms against the use of memory. Also, make sure you explain why you are using the assessments you selected. This information is often very important should the report be used in a legal proceeding.Note: Do not simply cut and paste your assessment choices from PSY 622. Incorporate the feedback given to you in that course and expand or change your assessment choices in order to best fit the current scenario. Remember you were hired by a law firm to create the final report.Consider this: How reliable is your memory?Imagine you’re in court as a defendant. It’s June 20th. The prosecutor asks you what you did on June 6th. You’re asked to account for every minute of the day – your whereabouts, your behaviors, who you were with, how long you were with them…It’s difficult to remember days that aren’t significant to you. While the date in question isn’t significant to you, it’s significant to the prosecutor. What if you were on trial for a murder you didn’t commit? How could you prove you didn’t commit it when you can’t remember what you did that day? Lapse in memory can seem like a tactic for the guilty. Guilty parties often suffer from situational “amnesia” regarding days, environments, or individuals associated with the crime. One of the best examples I can think of that represents this phenomena is the interview of young medical student, Philip Markoff - the Craigslist Killer – to Boston PD Detectives.The detective interviewing Markoff asks him if he’s ever been to any hotels in downtown Boston. Markoff says “yes” but cannot remember the last time he was at any hotels in the area [where the crimes took place]. After probing, he says he may have walked through a hotel at some point that year. Detectives asked what hotel it may have been, he couldn’t recall. They asked if he might have walked through the lobby of one of the hotels without really remembering. He responded “maybe...I don’t remember.” Detectives present Markoff with a photograph of him walking through lobby of one of the hotels in downtown Boston around the date and time the last victim was murdered. Detectives ask Markoff to explain where he may have been going or what he may have been doing. Markoff states that he may have gone to a Cheesecake Factory restaurant at some point, but he can’t recall for sure when or if that was where he was going. Detectives say, “no specific memory, huh?” Markoff replies, “I don’t really remember.” Detectives move past the date of the potential dinner at the Cheesecake Factory and say, “what would have brought you in there to walk through it?” [the lobby]. He responds, “I don’t remember.” So, “you have no clear memory of being there in the last couple of weeks?”, detectives ask Markoff. “I don’t remember, no….no clear memory,” he responded. The entire Markoff interview is maddening. His “loss of memory” in such an exaggerated manner suggests probable culpability, but what if he was innocent?Human memory is not as reliable as we would like to believe. Consider controversial topics such as testimony based on “repressed memory” or eyewitness report from the memory of a child. This week you will be asked to describe how you would account for memory errors when creating reports for others. How would you account for the memory errors of others?

There are ten questions. . Use at least 13 sentences for each answer, but do not use more than 20 sentences for an answer.1. Explain how Plato argues that social justice is better than, and more important than, retributive justice. Why can’t retributive justice, by itself, maintain peace and order in a society?2. Describe how Socrates argues that people who want justice to control their lives would not want to live in a democracy. 3. Explain why, according to The Republic, a democratic country will sooner or later be controlled by a demagogue who wants to run the country like a tyranny. 4. Explain how Plato’s Allegory of the Cave suggests that only philosophy can rescue a person from being controlled by one’s own culture and its customs.5.Define what ‘dualism’ is. Then explain how Descartes proves that he knows for certain that he is a thinking mind, with more certainty than he knows he has a body.6. Describe how Descartes’s philosophy tries to show why religion should be able to accept the knowledge that science learns about the natural world.7. Explain whether this maxim is morally right according to Kant’s categorical imperative: “I should let my friend help me cheat on this exam, so I can get a good grade in this class.”8. Pick one human right. For that right, explain how Kant’s Categorical Imperative can show that this human right is morally correct. Be sure to include an explanation why violating that right must be morally wrong.9. Describe why Utilitarianism’s formula, “What is morally right is what makes a society the happiest” could be used for ranking societies from “most moral” to “least moral.” Then raise one objection to this effort to rank societies this way, heard from anti-colonialism.10. Describe how Appiah hopes to protect small cultures from assimilation into empires by promoting multiculturalism and his “cosmopolitanism.”make it sample not hard to understand