Paper Menu Selection
Question Description
- Evaluate the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface.
- Determine why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.
- Suggest at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.
- Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
- Explain and describe the process of menu selection and organization.
- Analyze and evaluate interface design models.
worth 80 points
Despite being a fairly old technology, menu-driven interfaces are very common in user interface design. Menu-driven interfaces consist of a series of screens which are navigated by choosing options from lists.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:
4.Suggest alternatives for menu-driven interface design and explain how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
·Use technology and information resources to research issues in human-computer interaction.
·Write clearly and concisely about HCI topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 80 | Assignment 2: Menu Selection | |||
Criteria | Unacceptable Below 70% F | Fair 70-79% C | Proficient 80-89% B | Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Evaluate the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface. Weight: 20% | Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface. | Partially evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface. | Satisfactorily evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface. | Thoroughly evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu- driven interface. |
2. Determine why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age. | Did not submit or incompletely determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age. | Partially determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age. | Satisfactorily determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age. | Thoroughly determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age. |
3. Suggest at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment. Weight: 20% | Did not submit or incompletely suggested at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment. | Partially suggested at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment. | Satisfactorily suggested at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment. | Thoroughly suggested at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment. |
4. Suggest alternatives for menu-driven interface design and explain how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces. Weight: 25% | Did not submit or incompletely suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; did not submit or incompletely explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces. | Partially suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; partially explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces. | Satisfactorily suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; satisfactorily explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces. | Thoroughly suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; thoroughly explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces. |
5. 3 references Weight: 5% | No references provided | Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. | Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. | Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% | More than 6 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present |
This question has not been answered.
Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!
Brown University
1271 Tutors
California Institute of Technology
2131 Tutors
Carnegie Mellon University
982 Tutors
Columbia University
1256 Tutors
Dartmouth University
2113 Tutors
Emory University
2279 Tutors
Harvard University
599 Tutors
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2319 Tutors
New York University
1645 Tutors
Notre Dam University
1911 Tutors
Oklahoma University
2122 Tutors
Pennsylvania State University
932 Tutors
Princeton University
1211 Tutors
Stanford University
983 Tutors
University of California
1282 Tutors
Oxford University
123 Tutors
Yale University
2325 Tutors