The film Abre Los Ojos ends after Cesar decides to wake up from his dream. We do not get to see what happens after he is told, “Open your eyes”, but suppose that he wants to know whether he is still dreaming. Chisholm might explain Cesar's situation as an example of the 'Problem of the Criterion'. Explain how Cesar's case illustrates this problem, and how the three responses to the problem discussed by Chisholm might relate to the film. Your discussion should address the following:- What is the Problem of the Criterion, and how is it relevant to Cesar's predicament at the end of the film?-What are the three different responses to the problem that Chisholm describes, and might each attempt to answer the question of how Cesar can know whether he is dreaming?-Which approach does Chisholm favor, and what might an objection to his approach look like?

The Assingment questions are in PDF that I have attached.Assignment 3: Final Case Study focusing on Four Recruitment ScenariosThis assignment will be due at the end of week 8. INSTRUCTIONS:Read the entire case study carefully and then respond to all questions in each of the four scenarios.Develop each answer to the fullest extent possible, including citations from outside resources, where applicable, to support your arguments.Submit your assignment as a separate MS Word document in your assignments folder. Do not type your answers into the case study document.Include a Cover Page with Name, Date, and Title of Assignment.Do not include the original question. Use the following format: Scenario 1: question 1, etc. Each response should be written in complete sentences, double-spaced and spell-checked. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins on all sides.Include page numbers according to APA formatting guidelines.Include citations in APA format at the end of each answer.You must submit to the assignment link by the due date (final day of class). A missing assignment will be assigned a grade of 0.Rubric:CriteriaGrade A5 pointsGrade B4.25 pointsGrade C3.75 pointsGrade D3.25 pointsGrade F-0 pointsCompletenessComplete in all respects; reflects all requirements. Response to each question is thorough and detailed and all parts of questions are answered.Complete in most respects. All questions are answered, and all parts of each question are answered.All questions are answered but responses may need clarification or more explanation of some aspects of the question.Did not respond to every question and/or all parts of the questions.Incomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements.Identification, analysis and evaluation of issues/challengesPresents a thorough analysis of all issues identified in the case scenarios. Makes appropriate and strong connections between the issues identified and the course materials. Adds relevant support and evidence to demonstrate critical thinking.Presents a thorough analysis of most issues identified in the case scenarios. Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the course materials that demonstrates critical thinking.Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified in the case scenarios. Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and the course materials. Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence.Presents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified in the case scenarios. Makes little or no relevant connection between the issues identified and the course materials. Supports diagnosis and opinions with few reasons and little evidence.Analysis and/or diagnosis of case scenario issues is missing. Rationale and or supporting evidence is absent or not relevant.Development of strategy/plan and actions/solutions.Detailed solutions, strategies or plans of action are proposed. Solutions, strategies, or action plans are realistic and contain thorough and well-reasoned justifications. Shows connection to course materials.In most instances, proposed solutions, strategies, or action plans are feasible, and based on well-reasoned justifications. They generally address the key issues and problems in the case scenarios. There is some use of course materials to support solutions.Some of the proposed solutions, strategies, or action plans are feasible, justified and address the key issues and problems in the case scenarios.Infeasible solutions, strategies or actions are proposed. They are not supported, or do not address the key issues and problems in the case scenarios.Solutions, strategies, or action plans are incomplete or missing for most or all the case scenarios. Writing Mechanics and use of language.Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including, but not limited to capitalization and punctuation and spelling. No errors found. No jargon used.Adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. One to three errors found.Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over three errors found.Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over ten errors found.Completely missing or incorrect.APA Guidelines for in-text citations and ReferencesThe paper correctly cites in-text and lists at least three course resources. All references are cited and all citations are referenced.The majority of in-text citations and the references are properly cited; formatting is inconsistent/inaccurate in a few cases, or there is a mismatch between a citation and a reference. Uses a minimum of three resources from course materials.References are cited but incorrectly or does not use three resources from course materials. Inconsistent or missing in-text citations; does not use sufficient resources.Completely missing or incorrect.Overall ScoreGrade A22.5 or moreGrade B20 or moreGrade C17.5 or moreGrade D15 or moreGrade F0 or more