Description
text for only one or two scenes and has little impact upon the plot? 1.Round character2.Flat character3.Minor character4.Main character
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
a character that appears in the
text for only one or two scenes and has little impact upon the plot?
3.Minor character
Please appreciate my help, by selecting my answer as the best, and add me as your tutor, Thanks!
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
This is great! Exactly what I wanted.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Attribution Error Discussion
Wherever you go, you will be observing human behavior, and it is difficult not to make a judgment about people after obser ...
Attribution Error Discussion
Wherever you go, you will be observing human behavior, and it is difficult not to make a judgment about people after observing how they behave. You might consider three people on a crowded bus to be kind if you see them give up their seats so a mother can sit down with her two young children. You might consider a grocery store employee to be rude if you asked him where to find the milk and he rolled his eyes and sighed heavily before directing you to its location. These two judgments would be logical—kind in the first case and rude in the second—because that is the type of people they appeared to be.
However, social psychologists are more concerned with the external social conditions that influence behavior. Maybe only one of the people on the bus acted kindly and the other two gave up their seats because they did not want to be perceived as unkind by others on the bus. Perhaps the grocery store employee is usually kind, but he behaved rudely because he has been told to work an extra shift at the last minute and it means he will likely miss a friend’s birthday party. If you attribute someone’s behavior to her or his personality, your judgment may underestimate the social conditions that influenced the behavior. When explaining the causes of someone’s behavior, underestimating or discounting the social situation results in what social psychologists call an attribution error.
For your assignment this week, you will look at a scenario and consider how the cause of a person’s behavior may be explained better by situational influences than one’s personality or internal disposition.
Review the Learning Resources for this week and consider how the causes of a person’s behavior may be explained by situational factors.
Consider the following scenario for this Assignment:
Imagine that you have been summoned for jury duty in the United States. If you are selected to be on the jury, you will be hearing a rape case where a 23-year-old female alleges sexual assault. In order to select the jury (a process known by the Latin term voir dire), both the prosecutor and defense attorney question the jury pool to identify and dismiss for cause people who have strong opinions about the subject matter, who already know about the case, or who may be biased for or against either party to the trial. Attorneys may also dismiss members of the jury pool who they think will not be favorable to their case. These types of dismissals are called peremptory challenges and the attorneys have a limited number of them.
During the process of jury selection, you notice the prosecutors are using their limited peremptory challenges to dismiss most of the young women from the jury pool. You find this peculiar, given that young women would seem to be most favorable to the prosecution’s case.
Assignment:
Submit 1–2 pages, not including title page and reference page:
Informed by social psychology theory, explain why the prosecutor was reluctant to seat young women on the jury. Please provide a detailed explanation for this seemingly odd behavior.
Please APA
Possible references:
Sirin, C. V., & Villalobos, J. D. (2011). Where does the buck stop? Applying attribution theory to examine public appraisals of the president. Presidential Studies Quarterly, (2), 334.
Tausch, N., & Hewstone, M. (2010). Social dominance orientation attenuates stereotype change in the face of disconfirming information. Social Psychology, 41(3), 169–176. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1027/186...
Project: Poetry in Motion
Project: Poetry in MotionHow many times have you watched American Idol? It has become one of the most popular shows in the ...
Project: Poetry in Motion
Project: Poetry in MotionHow many times have you watched American Idol? It has become one of the most popular shows in the country. Families tune in week after week to see how each of the performers evolve andgrow and improve. Imagine that you are one of the contestants, and the audio you submitted to the Poetry in Motion Discussion was your audition tape. You have been accepted as a contestant. The next performance you will do will be on the American Idol stage with millions of people tuned in. Here is your assignment:Examine the review(s) your peer(s) provided in the Peer Review Discussion.Revise your poem to make it stronger, more focused, more concise. Carefully consider the structure, sound, and figurative language you have used to improve your poem.Listen to your “audition” recording to see what you did well and what you can improve.Make a “performance” recording that really shows off your poem. You can either audio or video record your performance.Write a paragraph or two that describes your inspiration and why you decided to perform your poem the way you did.To ensure success, examine the Poetry in Motion Rubric to see what your teacher is looking for before you submit your work.Post your recording and a text copy of your poem and your explanation paragraph to the Project: Poetry in Motion assignment link for grading.Congratulations! You have completed this Unit. Please continue with the course.
Morton College Psychology Personality PASS 2 Assessment Discussion
1. What song have you been listening to on repeat? I'm making you a class play list.2. How have you been doing? Share as m ...
Morton College Psychology Personality PASS 2 Assessment Discussion
1. What song have you been listening to on repeat? I'm making you a class play list.2. How have you been doing? Share as much or as little as you want.3. You are checking your email after a busy day. The following email catches your attention.Dear Psychologist,My name is Dr. Rob West, President and CEO of PsychBuilder Inc. located in San Jose, California. My company has developed a unique opportunity for you and your associates. PsychBuilder Inc. developed the first internet-based administration and scoring of the Personality Assessment Symptom Scale-2, the PASS-2. Psychologists have used the PASS-2 for psychological diagnoses and evaluations for a number of years. The PASS-2 is administered online, from any computer, iPad, or iPhone connected to the internet. The test usually takes approximately 40 to 60 minutes to administer. Results will be available to you and the patient online.Important to an entrepreneurial psychologist like you, this assessment bridges the gap between psychology and primary care. Numerous patients from family practice offices can be given the internet link (http://www.psychbuilder.org/) and a security code to complete the PASS-2. The test is designed to determine if the patient can benefit from psychotherapy, psychotropic agents, or other psychological services. While it is not a complete assessment, it can guide patients to you for further psychological consultation.After a patient completes the assessment, an email will be sent to you (based on the security code) and the patient within 24 hours, providing a secure link to review the results of the PASS-2. Patient contact information will be part of the administration process.The cost of the online administration is $25, to be paid by the patient. For this to be a successful venture, we ask you to promote this program to your referring physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in order to enhance their ability to identify, evaluate and provide needed treatment for their patients.We have great data on the PASS-2 for reliability and validity in identifying primary care patients who can benefit from psychological services. Unfortunately, many patients struggling with mental health issues in primary care settings are not properly identified or treated.Because of busy primary care practices, the PASS-2 can be completed at home, if the office does not have internet access for patient use.The physician, nurse practitioner, or physician’s assistant will offer patients this important opportunity via a specially designed 4 x 6 card. On that card, there will be information that explains the importance of completing this assessment, the cost, and that a licensed psychologist will review the results and contact the patient by phone within 3 to 5 business days.An important factor is that there is no cost to you, as the psychologist. You will receive a high quality report that offers diagnostic possibilities, suicide potential, and treatment planning options for new patients.I encourage you to review our web site at http://www.psychbuilder.com/. If you have further questions, feel free to contact me.Sincerely,Robert West, PhD, ABPPPsychologistWhat are potential ethical issues with this invitation?What clinical concerns arise for you in this scenario?What should you do with this email solicitation?What would you likely do with this email solicitation?
Brookhaven College Devices that Destroys Peoples Souls Response & Discussion
Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people's souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that pe ...
Brookhaven College Devices that Destroys Peoples Souls Response & Discussion
Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people's souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person. How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible? Why or why not?Please refer to the grading criteria in discussion #1 for this and all future posts.(complete after reading 2.2)
Similar Content
EDU 622 BU Week 2 Qualities of Best Practicing for Teaching Mathematics Summary
Reflect on “Chocolate Algebra” from this week’s reading assignment. Which of the identified qualities of best pract...
High School students and alcohol
Research and describe the effect of alcohol on high school students. Identify unique problems or considerations th...
three precedents that Washington established, history homework help
George Washington was aware that many of his actions would be regarded as precedents. Here are three precedents that Washi...
Research Based on Things Fall Apart
The assignment full details is attached. Please do exactly what needed; includes a professional writing with no grammar er...
Humanites
Module 01 Humanities Self-directed AssessmentCompetencyIdentify key traditions and ideas influencing our culture.Instructi...
FIT Poetry Message Analysis Paper
Midterm Paper Instructions I.The midterm paper will be a critical analysis of a piece of literaturea.Either a poem, short ...
NTSE Paper II (Questions for Social Science)
61. Match the following columns, related to Land degradation a) Jharkhand, Chattisgarh, M.P & Orissa i) generate huge quan...
Am A Compass
When a person asks me to describe myself, I would say I am a compass. The scientific purpose of the compass is guiding or ...
Milestone Revision 4
The social issue that I chose for this unit is race and ethnicity. The issue regarding discrimination due to race and ethn...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Attribution Error Discussion
Wherever you go, you will be observing human behavior, and it is difficult not to make a judgment about people after obser ...
Attribution Error Discussion
Wherever you go, you will be observing human behavior, and it is difficult not to make a judgment about people after observing how they behave. You might consider three people on a crowded bus to be kind if you see them give up their seats so a mother can sit down with her two young children. You might consider a grocery store employee to be rude if you asked him where to find the milk and he rolled his eyes and sighed heavily before directing you to its location. These two judgments would be logical—kind in the first case and rude in the second—because that is the type of people they appeared to be.
However, social psychologists are more concerned with the external social conditions that influence behavior. Maybe only one of the people on the bus acted kindly and the other two gave up their seats because they did not want to be perceived as unkind by others on the bus. Perhaps the grocery store employee is usually kind, but he behaved rudely because he has been told to work an extra shift at the last minute and it means he will likely miss a friend’s birthday party. If you attribute someone’s behavior to her or his personality, your judgment may underestimate the social conditions that influenced the behavior. When explaining the causes of someone’s behavior, underestimating or discounting the social situation results in what social psychologists call an attribution error.
For your assignment this week, you will look at a scenario and consider how the cause of a person’s behavior may be explained better by situational influences than one’s personality or internal disposition.
Review the Learning Resources for this week and consider how the causes of a person’s behavior may be explained by situational factors.
Consider the following scenario for this Assignment:
Imagine that you have been summoned for jury duty in the United States. If you are selected to be on the jury, you will be hearing a rape case where a 23-year-old female alleges sexual assault. In order to select the jury (a process known by the Latin term voir dire), both the prosecutor and defense attorney question the jury pool to identify and dismiss for cause people who have strong opinions about the subject matter, who already know about the case, or who may be biased for or against either party to the trial. Attorneys may also dismiss members of the jury pool who they think will not be favorable to their case. These types of dismissals are called peremptory challenges and the attorneys have a limited number of them.
During the process of jury selection, you notice the prosecutors are using their limited peremptory challenges to dismiss most of the young women from the jury pool. You find this peculiar, given that young women would seem to be most favorable to the prosecution’s case.
Assignment:
Submit 1–2 pages, not including title page and reference page:
Informed by social psychology theory, explain why the prosecutor was reluctant to seat young women on the jury. Please provide a detailed explanation for this seemingly odd behavior.
Please APA
Possible references:
Sirin, C. V., & Villalobos, J. D. (2011). Where does the buck stop? Applying attribution theory to examine public appraisals of the president. Presidential Studies Quarterly, (2), 334.
Tausch, N., & Hewstone, M. (2010). Social dominance orientation attenuates stereotype change in the face of disconfirming information. Social Psychology, 41(3), 169–176. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1027/186...
Project: Poetry in Motion
Project: Poetry in MotionHow many times have you watched American Idol? It has become one of the most popular shows in the ...
Project: Poetry in Motion
Project: Poetry in MotionHow many times have you watched American Idol? It has become one of the most popular shows in the country. Families tune in week after week to see how each of the performers evolve andgrow and improve. Imagine that you are one of the contestants, and the audio you submitted to the Poetry in Motion Discussion was your audition tape. You have been accepted as a contestant. The next performance you will do will be on the American Idol stage with millions of people tuned in. Here is your assignment:Examine the review(s) your peer(s) provided in the Peer Review Discussion.Revise your poem to make it stronger, more focused, more concise. Carefully consider the structure, sound, and figurative language you have used to improve your poem.Listen to your “audition” recording to see what you did well and what you can improve.Make a “performance” recording that really shows off your poem. You can either audio or video record your performance.Write a paragraph or two that describes your inspiration and why you decided to perform your poem the way you did.To ensure success, examine the Poetry in Motion Rubric to see what your teacher is looking for before you submit your work.Post your recording and a text copy of your poem and your explanation paragraph to the Project: Poetry in Motion assignment link for grading.Congratulations! You have completed this Unit. Please continue with the course.
Morton College Psychology Personality PASS 2 Assessment Discussion
1. What song have you been listening to on repeat? I'm making you a class play list.2. How have you been doing? Share as m ...
Morton College Psychology Personality PASS 2 Assessment Discussion
1. What song have you been listening to on repeat? I'm making you a class play list.2. How have you been doing? Share as much or as little as you want.3. You are checking your email after a busy day. The following email catches your attention.Dear Psychologist,My name is Dr. Rob West, President and CEO of PsychBuilder Inc. located in San Jose, California. My company has developed a unique opportunity for you and your associates. PsychBuilder Inc. developed the first internet-based administration and scoring of the Personality Assessment Symptom Scale-2, the PASS-2. Psychologists have used the PASS-2 for psychological diagnoses and evaluations for a number of years. The PASS-2 is administered online, from any computer, iPad, or iPhone connected to the internet. The test usually takes approximately 40 to 60 minutes to administer. Results will be available to you and the patient online.Important to an entrepreneurial psychologist like you, this assessment bridges the gap between psychology and primary care. Numerous patients from family practice offices can be given the internet link (http://www.psychbuilder.org/) and a security code to complete the PASS-2. The test is designed to determine if the patient can benefit from psychotherapy, psychotropic agents, or other psychological services. While it is not a complete assessment, it can guide patients to you for further psychological consultation.After a patient completes the assessment, an email will be sent to you (based on the security code) and the patient within 24 hours, providing a secure link to review the results of the PASS-2. Patient contact information will be part of the administration process.The cost of the online administration is $25, to be paid by the patient. For this to be a successful venture, we ask you to promote this program to your referring physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in order to enhance their ability to identify, evaluate and provide needed treatment for their patients.We have great data on the PASS-2 for reliability and validity in identifying primary care patients who can benefit from psychological services. Unfortunately, many patients struggling with mental health issues in primary care settings are not properly identified or treated.Because of busy primary care practices, the PASS-2 can be completed at home, if the office does not have internet access for patient use.The physician, nurse practitioner, or physician’s assistant will offer patients this important opportunity via a specially designed 4 x 6 card. On that card, there will be information that explains the importance of completing this assessment, the cost, and that a licensed psychologist will review the results and contact the patient by phone within 3 to 5 business days.An important factor is that there is no cost to you, as the psychologist. You will receive a high quality report that offers diagnostic possibilities, suicide potential, and treatment planning options for new patients.I encourage you to review our web site at http://www.psychbuilder.com/. If you have further questions, feel free to contact me.Sincerely,Robert West, PhD, ABPPPsychologistWhat are potential ethical issues with this invitation?What clinical concerns arise for you in this scenario?What should you do with this email solicitation?What would you likely do with this email solicitation?
Brookhaven College Devices that Destroys Peoples Souls Response & Discussion
Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people's souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that pe ...
Brookhaven College Devices that Destroys Peoples Souls Response & Discussion
Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people's souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person. How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible? Why or why not?Please refer to the grading criteria in discussion #1 for this and all future posts.(complete after reading 2.2)
Earn money selling
your Study Documents