UCF Addressing Overfishing Through Government Interventions Essay
Case Study – General Education / Process Writing Assignment (#GEA1) (20%):As part of the general education program in Intellectual and Practical Skills, this course will include the State’s Communication/Writing requirement of coursework. To meet this requirement students will demonstrate college-level writing skills through a single process writing assignment. “Process writing” is deep and meaningful and tightly aligned with the course’s student learning outcomes; particularly those of critical and analytical thinking, problem-solving, and creative thinking.This is a three-part assignment, but a coherently-themed whole. Feedback will be provided to students after each part of the assignment. The students will progressively explore parts of decision-making, incorporating deeper and increasingly meaningful arguments within the discipline as we move through the course. At each step students will delve deeper into the learning outcomes, reflecting more sophisticated responses as their body of knowledge grows.In this case, study students show how Microeconomics concepts can be used to understand current events in the news. Students are tasked with applying economic thinking and reasoning skills developed throughout the semester to analyze real-world examples and offer solutions to current issues. A detailed explanation of this assignment will be posted on Canvas.Assessment and Rubric for GEAs (Total 100%):● Economic Concepts 20% - Essay makes several logical economic arguments and analyzes each question using correct and appropriate economic analysis, terms, and concepts.● Graphical Analysis 20% - Analyzes policy issue with appropriate a supply and demand diagram● Policy Evaluation 20% – Description and explanation of the existing policy. Analysis and evaluation of issues/problems present a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective.● Creative Thinking and Problem Solving 20% - Finds solutions to difficult or complex issues. Supports recommendations and opinions with strong arguments● Organization and Written communication 20% - Essay demonstrates critical thought and problem-solving through a logical progression of ideas with mature and graceful while maintaining a clear structure that enhances the thesis. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are correct.This portion of the assignment also has two main parts. You should incorporate these with the previous draft to form a cohesive whole. Do not include section title/headers.Part I - (this draws on monopoly and antitrust regulation (Ch 15) to improve the argument made in the Rough Draft as well as describe an unintended consequence) Consider catch shares and the negative aspects of this government intervention. In addition to improving your paper based on the feedback you received, add to your previous discussion of catch shares using what you have learned about how monopolists make pricing and output decisions and how and why market power is a problem. Recall from the documentary how catch shares and monopoly are related. Include any other negative aspects of catch shares that you find through your own research.Part II - (this requires you to offer a creative alternate solution to the consequence you described above)Now put yourself in the role of a social advocate. Noting the problems you presented above, what solutions do you have to help protect society? Offer an alternative solution that addresses the issues you noted in the rough draft and avoids the problems you noted above. Be creative, you are not limited to possible government interventions but should also consider potential interventions from other groups in society.Note: This is the final part of the writing assignment. No section titles are necessary however you must submit a cohesive completed paper with title page, introduction, body, conclusion, a graph, and bibliography page. The paper should breakdown the fishing market and problems within it, evaluate the current solution and it’s limitations, and propose an original contribution/potential solution - use economic terminology throughout.This is a graded assignment. You should refer to the rubric before you begin writing as well as during the writing process: GEA1 Rubric.pdfThe body of the text must be at least 7, no more than 8, full pages: a revision of the first 4 pages already submitted (addressing all comments you received on the draft as well as integrating the draft with this new part) PLUS an additional 3 pages. It should be in written your own words and not a series of quoted texts. Your document must follow formatting rules (font, spacing, margins, etc), see GenEd Assignments.Only use in-line citations with the author and the year in parentheses at the end of the sentence; do not include citations in the footers. The full citation should be given on the bibliography page only.Make sure to include a title page and an updated bibliography page (both should be on their own pages and not share a page with the body of the text). Graphs/Charts/Figures/Bibliography should be at the very end of the text and are not included in page count.Submit your final assignment using Turnitin under assignments Case Study #GEA1 and #GEA1 (Duplicate) As part of the general education program in Intellectual and Practical Skills this course will include the State’s Communication/Writing requirement of coursework https://www.usf.edu/undergrad/fkl-for-faculty-and-staff/stategeneds.aspx. Communication courses develop and assess competency in college-level writing skills through multiple assignments. At least one assignment must include submission of a revision in response to previous feedback. To meet this requirement, in this course students will demonstrate college-level writing skills in two different types of writing assignments; 1. Free response questions embedded in the HW assignments 2. A Multi-Part Case Study. This course certifies as Creative Thinking and therefore the assignments will access a student’s ability to:* Perform critical and analytical thinking* Problem Solve* Provide effective written communication* Evaluate the limitations imposed on any new approach or solution within a discipline to propose original contributions to problems.* Break Down complex problems to examine, propose, and support potential solutions even if those solutions deviate from acceptable, mainstream solutions.Writing assignments for this course are NOT Collaborative You are not to work with another student on this assignment or third party (this includes current and former students, private tutors and aids through third party websites). Students are ONLY permitted to work with the course instructor, the course TAs, and the USF writing studio. Each student must provide individual work and is not permitted to share or discuss writing assignments with another student, current or former, all or in part. Plagiarism is strictly prohibited. Anyone, both current and former students, who do not follow this policy will be in direct violation of the USF honor code and reported. Case Study (click for assignment details) DUE: Pre-Assignment (mm/dd), Rough Draft (mm/dd), Final Draft (mm/dd) This is a multipart process writing assignment, but a coherently-themed whole. “Process writing” is deep and meaningful and tightly aligned with the course’s student learning outcomes; particularly those of critical and analytical thinking, problem solving, and creative thinking. Feedback will be provided to students after each part of the assignment. Students will progressively explore parts of decision-making, incorporating deeper and increasingly meaningful arguments within the discipline, as we move through the course. At each step students will delve deeper into the learning outcomes, reflecting more sophisticated responses as their body of knowledge grows. Your study must be 7 FULL pages of text (at least 7 no more than 8), double-spaced, 1" margins, and size 12 Times New Roman FONT. File type must be doc OR docx. Title/title page is not included in page count. Graphs, tables, figures, images, and references page should be included at the end of the text and are NOT to be included in the page length requirement.ALL Assignments must be submitted in Microsoft WORD format .doc or .docx file extension if you do not own it download here https://www.usf.edu/it/documentation/office365/per...Or you can use a campus computer. Mac Word compatible .pages format is NOT acceptable.Related Files: * GEA1 Rubric.pdf* Plagiarism.pdf Plagiarism is not acceptable and ignorance of what qualifies as plagiarism is not an excuse. Refer to this file for guidelines.* Citation Guide.pdf * Citation Reference: The Chicago Manual of style* Guide Writing Economics.pdf This file is not necessary but may help address some writing questions you may have throughout the term.USF WRITING STUDIO While these are individual writing assignments you are strongly encouraged to use the library's writing studio during each stage of the writing process. See here for details - http://www.usf.edu/undergrad/academic-success-cent... m'n