System Analysis and Design

Njvv
timer Asked: Oct 26th, 2020

Question Description

No limitations of words, just the questions and tasks must be answered

Please sir be careful in plagiarism

Unformatted Attachment Preview

SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP ` IN SEMESTER INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Module Code: COMP 10007.1 Module Name: System Analysis and Design Level: 1 Max. Marks: 100 Instructions to Student  Answer all questions.  Deadline of submission 24/11/2020:  The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage of the assignment which is 50 marks  Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the draft is submitted at least 10 days before (i.e: 14/11/2020) the final submission date.  Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 08/12/2020. Module Learning Outcomes The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully 1. Describe the information systems requirements 2. Understand the need for initial investigation and information requirement analysis. 3. Analyze and Apply the different phases of systems design Assignment Objective This is an individual assignment aimed to assess the students understanding on Information System environment and application of system analyses and designing techniques during system development. Assignment Tasks Task A: Detailed Proposal (10 marks) Submit a Detailed proposal for this assignment on or before 05/11/2020 which must include:  Chosen Organization and Information System (1 Mark)  Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of deliverables. (3 Marks)  General overview of proposed plan - initial understanding of solution to tasks. (3 Marks)  Timeline for completion and resources required for the given tasks. (3 Marks) The detailed proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available in Moodle. MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 1 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP Task B-Analysis of an existing organization from the perspective of a System Analyst You are requested to select an organization which uses information system to drive their business. You need to conduct a study through the Internet and available online resources’ of an organization you have selected. Plan your study in such a way to examine the business drivers of information system in the organization and explore the other business drivers which can be incorporated to enhance the business process. After conducting the study prepare the following: 1. Write a short description of the chosen organization/department and the information system currently used. Focus should be on the business processes accomplished through Information Systems in the organization. The student must write the description in their own words not exceeding 250 words with suitable citation of the organization and diagrams if applicable. (25 marks) 2. List the business drivers of the information systems based on the chosen organization and discuss any two of them. The discussion must focus on the role and impact of the business drivers in the information system in order to meet the objectives. The student must write the description in their own words not exceeding 250 words with suitable citation of the organization and diagrams if applicable. (25 marks) 3. Discuss the need for system analysis and design to improve the business processes of information system. Your answer must include the details of redesign of one existing business process in the chosen organization. (20 marks) 4. Analyze phase1: Identifying Problems, Opportunities and Objectives and Phase2: Determining Information Requirements and discuss the importance of both the phases in system development life cycle. The student must derive the analysis in their own words not exceeding 200 words with suitable citation and diagrams if applicable. (20 marks) MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 2 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP Rules & Regulations:      All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style. The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using CU Harvard Style and page numbers. Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of the faculty. Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle. Viva will be conducted after the assignment submission as per the dates informed earlier. Guidelines:  Assignment must be computer typed.  Font - Times New Roman  Font – Style - Regular  Font - Size - 12  Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline.  Report should have a Title Page. The Title Page should contain the following information. o Assignment Name o Class o Student name o Student ID  It should have a Table of Contents page  Use page numbers while preparing the report.  Marks will be awarded for the content written in your own words.  Copying from the Internet is not acceptable.  References should be listed on the last page following the CU Harvard referencing style guide.    Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable software or by pencil. Each student has to do the assignment individually. You can refer books in eLibrary or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources. Assessment Evaluation Criteria MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 3 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP Classification And % Range Outstanding 91-100 Excellent 81--90 Very Good Quality 71-80 Good (Acceptable) 61-70 Adequate/ Satisfactory 51-60 Weak /Poor (all learning outcomes not adequately met) 0-50 Reflection and critical analysis. Highly competent analytical skills and reflective practice, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values and principles and professional development planning. Strong analytical skills and reflective practice used, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Good use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Acceptable use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Adequate use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Little use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and/or professional development planning. Professional values and principles not reflected in the submission. and/or Insufficient/no use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and professional development planning Knowledge and Understanding/ Application of Theory Extensive knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts and /or outstanding application of theory in practice. Evidence of Reading Referencing and Bibliography Presentation, Grammar and Spelling Evidence of reading an extensive range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Accurate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent crossreferencing and links to supporting evidence Excellent knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts and /or excellent knowledge and understanding of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading a wide range of educational literature/research and where applicable, workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Appropriate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Good presentation, competently structured, using correct grammar and spelling, clear and easy to use links to supporting evidence Good knowledge or key principles and concepts and/or good knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading a good range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Generally well referenced with correct use of the appropriate referencing style Reasonable presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling, acceptable links to supporting evidence Acceptable knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading an appropriate range of educational literature/research and where applicable, relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. Generally accurate use of appropriate referencing style Adequate presentation and structure, acceptable grammar and spelling, adequate links to supporting evidence Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or satisfactory evidence of the application of theory in practice. Evidence of minimal reading of educational literature/research and where applicable relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. Appropriate referencing style used but may contain some inaccuracies. Weak presentation , satisfactory structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence Little evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or little evidence of the application of theory in practice Little or no evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant work place policies and procedures Little or no referencing, incorrect style, or very inaccurate use of appropriate referencing style Poor presentation, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence and/or and/or No evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or no evidence of application of theory in practice No evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant workplace policies and procedures and/or Unacceptable presentation, grammar and spelling, structure is very poor, links to supporting evidence Important Policies to be followed MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 4 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP 1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*:  MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled.  MEC also reserves the right to notify the appropriate law enforcement authorities of any unlawful activity and to cooperate thereafter in any investigation of such activity.  Faculty can conduct a viva to investigate and ascertain that the work submitted is student’s own work as per the guidelines for the same. A student can be given a maximum of 2 chances to attend the viva in such cases. It is expected that the student attends the viva during the first chance itself unless due to extenuating circumstances. If the student does not attend the viva in spite of being given 2 chances and fails to submit valid reasons, he/she will be awarded a fail in the module and this shall be counted as a case of academic integrity violation. All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below mentioned categories: 1. Plagiarism 2. Malpractice 3. Ghost Writing 4. Collusion 5. Other cases If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offence of academic integrity violation of plagiarism type a. First Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: i. Plagiarism a. If a student is caught first time in an act of academic integrity violation during his/her course of study in any assignment other than project work and if the type of violation is plagiarism, then the student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once as per the period allowed for re submission However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed. MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 5 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP b. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work within one week (5 working days) from the date he or she is advised to re-submit. c. Re-submission of the work beyond the allowed period of resubmission will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark. d. If the re-submitted work (within the allowed period of resubmission) is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment component will be awarded a zero mark. It shall also contribute to the total count of academic integrity violation for that student. e. If plagiarism is detected in UG Project work (Project 1, Project Planning and Project Design and Implementation), the above clauses do not apply, and the work will be summarily rejected. In these cases the student will be awarded a fail (F) grade and is required to reregister the module. ii. b. Malpractice / Ghostwriting / Collusion If a student is caught first time in an act academic integrity violation during his/her course of study for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and if the type of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail the module. Second Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: i. Plagiarism a. If any student is caught second time in an act of academic integrity violation during his/her course of study and if the type of violation is plagiarism, then the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work, and s/he will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism is detected. b. ii. The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion a. If a student is caught a second time in an act academic integrity violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and if the type of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail the module. b. c. The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: a. MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 If a student is caught a third time in an act of academic integrity violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester then the student shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, Page 6 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP b. c. d. once the academic integrity violation case is confirmed by Institutional Assessment Review Committee. The student shall be suspended for the immediate subsequent semester and can register for modules only after having served the suspension period fully. This is also applicable for semesters offered in block mode. During the suspension period, the student shall have to mandatorily complete a course on academic integrity/writing before s/he can register for any modules. During the period of suspension, the student shall be allowed to attempt supplementary examinations if s/he is eligible for the same. S/he shall also be allowed access to all college facilities permitted for a regular student except for registering the modules. d. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: a. e. f. If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of academic integrity violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, once the case is confirmed by Institutional Assessment Review Committee. b. The student shall be expelled from the college and all access to the college facilities and premises shall cease to exist. The documents shall be released only after getting the NOC (No Objection Certificate) from Registration Office. c. `On termination, the student shall not be refunded any fees paid for the academic semester in which academic integrity violation was observed. Other cases If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases” mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an Institutional Assessment Review Committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a hearing of the parties concerned if required and shall take appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence. Types/Variations of cases of Plagiarism and associated actions Type 1: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at different times) of one assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students. If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 7 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of violations. Type 3: Combination of Type 1 and Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at different times) of a group assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all the students of the group. If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of violation. Type 4: Variation of Type 1 and Type 2: In cases where the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable: a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. In such cases the group assessment component will be resubmitted. If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and the penalty will be applied for each student according to his / her history of violation. b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment component will be resubmitted - if the student is eligible for resubmission-. The policy will then be applied to that student alone. c. In both cases (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment). g. Types/Variation of Cases of Multiple Offences If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in different modules of the same semester, they will be considered as one offence and student will be penalized for each violation according to the type of the offence. If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in the same module of the same semester, then they will be considered as different offences and each will contribute to the overall count of AIV. The student then shall be penalized for each violation according to the count and type of each offence. MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 8 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP * For further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook. 2. Late Submission Regulations: It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments. As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days) for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of submission. Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. 3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the following shall apply.  Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions.  Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.  Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial, animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.  Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the commencement of research.  Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only for the intended purpose of research. MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 9 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP Student ID: Delivera bles Student Name: 0 1–3 4–7 8-10 No Submission Weak Submission Good submission Excellent submission Submit a work proposal for this assignment No Submission Organisation details are fairly appropriate, Understanding and deliverables are appropriate and aligned with the tasks timeline and resources are identified but with further scope of improvement. Organisation details are appropriate, Understanding and deliverables are excellently specified in alignment with the tasks timeline and resources are aptly identified Delivera bles Expectation 0 No submission Organisation details are not appropriate, Understanding and deliverables are not properly aligned with the tasks timeline and resources are not specified. 1-12 Weak submission 13 – 19 Good submission 20 – 25 Excellent submission Marks (25) Task B -1 (25 marks) Description of the organization/departm ent and functions of the information system used in the organisation No Submission Evidence of minimal understanding of the tasks with no proper reflection of the organisation and IS used. Evidence of proper literature underpinning and appropriate understanding of the task with fair reflection of the organisation and IS used. Delivera bles Expectation 0 No submission 1-12 Weak submission 13 – 20 Good submission Evidence of excellent literature underpinning and excellent understanding of the task with proper reflection of the organisation and IS used consistently across the task. 21 – 25 Excellent submission Marks (25) Task B-2 (25 marks) Business Drivers of No Submission Acceptable identification and analysis of the business driver and consistent with the organisation described in task B1 with further scope of improvement. . Excellent identification and analysis of the business drivers and consistent with the organisation described in task B1. Delivera bles Expectation Weak identification and analysis of the business driver and inconsistent with the organisation described in task B1. 1-9 Weak submission 10 – 16 Good submission 17 – 20 Excellent submission Task B-3 (20 marks) Need Weak demonstration on the need of System Analysis and business process reengineering Acceptable demonstration on the need of System Analysis and business process re-engineering with further scope of improvement. Excellent demonstration on the need of System Analysis and business process re-engineering consistent with the organisational need. Task A (10 marks) Expectation Session: the Organisation of 0 No submission System Analysis and Design in Business process reengineering. MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 No Submission Marks (10) Marks (20) Page 10 of 11 SAD-COMP 10007.1– FALL– 2020 – CW (Assignment 1) –All-QP Delivera bles Expectation Task B-4 (20 marks) Analysis of 0 No submission Phase1 and Phase2 of system development cycle. life No Submission 1-9 Weak submission 10 – 16 Good submission Weak analysis of Acceptable Phase1 and Phase2 Phase1 of system analysis and Phase2 17 – 20 Excellent submission of Excellent analysis of of Phase1 and Phase2 of system development life system development life cycle life cycle with clear cycle less demonstration of understanding with demonstration understanding. with underpinning. adequate and Marks (20) development of demonstration of less understanding and suitable underpinning of literature. Comments/Feedback: Total Marks Penalty Final Marks MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 11 of 11
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

This question has not been answered.

Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!

Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors