Description
How is a virtual classroom similar to a traditional classroom? How is it different?What is the benefit of combining web-based training with classroom training?
Give an example.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
I was struggling with this subject, and this helped me a ton!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Dilbert parody
The video is a Dilbert parody of some examples of why projects fail. After watching the video, please answer the following ...
Dilbert parody
The video is a Dilbert parody of some examples of why projects fail. After watching the video, please answer the following questions:What are your thoughts of the situations illustrated within the video?Have you ever experienced any of these situations?Please describe one such event? (Your example does not have to be a direct project management activity.)What was the end result?What could have occurred to alter the outcome?Were you personally impacted or affiliated with the project/activity?
33 pages
Capstone Portfolio Assignment
Millions of people every day must make informed decisions about organizations. To make the decisions these people need inf ...
Capstone Portfolio Assignment
Millions of people every day must make informed decisions about organizations. To make the decisions these people need information. Accountants ...
MGMT 371 ERAU The Effective and Ineffective Leadership Research Paper
Complete and submit the following to this assignment:Title PageTable of ContentsExecutive Summary - Brief summary of the p ...
MGMT 371 ERAU The Effective and Ineffective Leadership Research Paper
Complete and submit the following to this assignment:Title PageTable of ContentsExecutive Summary - Brief summary of the purpose of your research capturing the main points. In this summary, you will provide the audience with an overview of the entire research project without having to read the entire research project final submission. Order the points in your summary chronologically (where applicable) to match your research project outline. The summary should include the following:
An introduction: Start the summary by identifying your research project audience which is your professor and the board of directors. This introduction should capture the reading audience’s attention. Length: 1-2 paragraphsStatement of the purpose: Provide concise yet informative paragraphs offering only the important and essential information about your research project and an introduction of your approved leaders. A good way to do this is to provide a short synopsis of what makes the selected leaders effective or ineffective, in your opinion. Consider using a very brief referenced example for each leader. Length: 2-3 paragraphs.
You may consider providing a bulleted section comparing and contrasting your selected leaders at a high level. This is not a historical overview but an introduction of your research purpose.You may briefly introduce applicable theories, recent events, etc.Intended achievement for the research project: You may close with your intended achievement once you’ve completed your research. What message are you conveying to your reading audience? Length 2-3 paragraphs.1 Deliverables- Sections 1-2-3 2 Deliverables- Sections 4-5-63 Deliverables- Sections 7-8-9Conclusion- About 1 PageReferences (Compiled from Sections 1 - 3 deliverables)- At least 6-10 ReferencesIn 2.3 - Research Project: Leader Selection you will identify two leaders to research for the project. Select two historical leaders (non-political) with one having made a positive contribution in a leadership role (i.e., effective leader) and the other having made a negative contribution in a leadership role (i.e., ineffective leader).The leaders selected should be contemporary, non-political figures in history (post the year 2000).You are encouraged to select leaders along the lines of your perceived leadership self-assessment results from Module 1; which serves as an overview of your leadership style. You should select a well-known (non-political) leader that has plenty of data/research detail rather than simply selecting leaders that you have heard of or have researched in the past. You will use the Hunt Library and other reliable sources to assist in building your research project.Note: A minimum of two students can select the same leader. You must have the instructor’s approval before proceeding on your topic.In 4.3 - Research Project: Section 1 Deliverables you will submit an outline with references along with completing the first section of the eight major deliverables for the research project (related mainly to Chapter Two). This section's deliverables include:The Five Models of Personality and Traits of Effective or Ineffective LeadersLeader's Theory X and Theory YLeader EthicsReferencesIn 6.3 - Research Project: Section 2 Deliverables, you will complete the next section of the outline (related mainly to Chapter Three and Chapter Five) for the written research project assignment. This section's deliverables include:Leader MotivationContingency LeadershipInfluencing StylesReferencesIn 7.3 - Research Project: Section 3 Deliverables, you will complete the final sections of the outline (related mainly to Chapters Six and Chapter Nine) for the written research project assignment. This section's deliverables include:Leader CommunicationsCharismatic vs. Transformational LeadershipReferencesIn 8.3 - Research Project: Final Submission (PLG1), the final written deliverable is a compilation of your efforts from module weeks 2, 4, and 6, to include a title page, table of contents, executive summary, conclusion, and a complete list of your references. Ensure you have incorporated the feedback from your previous research project submissions in your final deliverable, applying any suggestion for changes.Title PageTable of ContentsExecutive Summary
An introductionStatement of the purposeIntended achievement for the research projectSection 1 DeliverablesSection 2 DeliverablesSection 3 DeliverablesConclusionReferences (Compiled from Sections 1 - 3 deliverables)Guidelines for completing your deliverables:Each non-political leader must be or have been a business or world leader from 2000 to the present.Provide three separate reasons (with referenced examples) to justify the reason the selected leaders were a positive (i.e., effective) or a negative (ineffective) leader.Identify, compare, and contrast at least two different leadership styles of each selected leader. Be sure to add applicable leadership theories and concepts introduced in this course.The written submission requires the components as outlined in the Research Project Content Outline section of this page. Review that section for complete details.You must include at least three outside references for each leader, for a total of six (6) references (minimum) for the research project final written submission. The textbook may be used as a reference, but it will not count toward the six (6) required sources.Review the Content Outline section to continue.Construct your research paper sections as the following:Title PageTable of ContentsExecutive SummaryFive Models of Personality and Traits of Effective Leaders or Ineffective Leaders (Chapter Two) - Discuss the personalities and traits of your leaders.Leader's Theory X and Theory Y (Chapter Two) - Discuss which of these theories your leaders possess or possessed.Leader Ethics (Chapter Two) - How ethical were your leaders?Leader Motivation (Chapter Three) - Discuss your leaders’ motivational style.Contingency Leadership (Chapter Four) - Discuss how your leaders fit into contingency leadership model or theory.Influencing Styles (Chapter Five) - Discuss how your leaders influenced people through power, politics, networking or negotiations.Leader Communications (Chapter Six) - Give examples of how your leaders communicated.Charismatic vs. Transformational Leadership (Chapter Nine) - Discuss whether your leaders practiced charismatic or transformational leadership.ConclusionReference pageDeliverables 1-3 attached
8 pages
Risk Management Plan
No matter how well the project management team plans and executes their duties, there is likelihood of unexpected occurren ...
Risk Management Plan
No matter how well the project management team plans and executes their duties, there is likelihood of unexpected occurrences. For instance, resources ...
GBA 335 Saint Leo University Reverse Discrimination Case Study
I’m sure everyone is familiar with the term “reverse discrimination”. In my business law class, we discuss the Bakke ...
GBA 335 Saint Leo University Reverse Discrimination Case Study
I’m sure everyone is familiar with the term “reverse discrimination”. In my business law class, we discuss the Bakke case wherein Mr. Bakke had the qualifications needed to get into medical school in California. However, in an attempt to make up for discrimination in education in the 1960’s and earlier (Bakke took place in the late 60’s), the school kept 16 of its 100 seats open for minority applicants only; the other 84 could be competed for by anyone. Bakke sued the school, and the Court ruled that he was the victim of reverse discrimination.Re: the case of Steelworkers v. Weber. In that case, the Court didn’t exactly define reverse discrimination. Rather, the Court set forth a set of factors to use to determine whether reverse discrimination had been committed, or if the employer, school, etc. was acting properly to make up for past discrimination.Please read the Court’s list of factors and discuss your thoughts on the Court’s opinion. provide ref
Similar Content
Timeline of The Evolution of Business in The United States Research Paper
Introduction to Business Handouts Handout for Assignment 1.1: The Business Environment Instructions: Complete the followin...
CMR 282 UCLA O Donovan & Sullivan Law Associates Law Firm Billing Summary
Submit the following files: 1-RSServRpt-3.xlsx1-VRPay-Oct30.xlsx1-BillingsOct4to8.xlsxAnalysis document (Microsoft Word)F...
Make a Memorandum to Clarify the Issue on Company's Loss of Stock Sales
Company owner Abel Terrio has reviewed the 2011 financial statements you
prepared for Jackson Company as the accountant, a...
BUS 599 SU Wells Fargo Ethical Issue Discussion
Choose one (1) public company (such as Wells Fargo, Chipotle, and others), that have experienced a current ethical miscond...
MGT 422 SEU Management Conflict of Interest Discussion
conflict of interest include 4 types or dimensions:
nOvert bribes and kickbacks
nSubtle bribes
...
Managerial Accounting, assignment help
All 5 problems...
Answer 2
Some of us are not aware of the fact that the truth that we believe about ourselves greatly impacts how view our inner wor...
Legacy Fruits And Juice Company
• To update the following areas of insurance for Legacy Fruits and Juice Company: • Important aspects to consider are ...
E027 Sabic Swot Analysis.edited
Saudi Basic Industries Corporation SABIC is a public company based in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 30% of its shares are traded i...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Dilbert parody
The video is a Dilbert parody of some examples of why projects fail. After watching the video, please answer the following ...
Dilbert parody
The video is a Dilbert parody of some examples of why projects fail. After watching the video, please answer the following questions:What are your thoughts of the situations illustrated within the video?Have you ever experienced any of these situations?Please describe one such event? (Your example does not have to be a direct project management activity.)What was the end result?What could have occurred to alter the outcome?Were you personally impacted or affiliated with the project/activity?
33 pages
Capstone Portfolio Assignment
Millions of people every day must make informed decisions about organizations. To make the decisions these people need inf ...
Capstone Portfolio Assignment
Millions of people every day must make informed decisions about organizations. To make the decisions these people need information. Accountants ...
MGMT 371 ERAU The Effective and Ineffective Leadership Research Paper
Complete and submit the following to this assignment:Title PageTable of ContentsExecutive Summary - Brief summary of the p ...
MGMT 371 ERAU The Effective and Ineffective Leadership Research Paper
Complete and submit the following to this assignment:Title PageTable of ContentsExecutive Summary - Brief summary of the purpose of your research capturing the main points. In this summary, you will provide the audience with an overview of the entire research project without having to read the entire research project final submission. Order the points in your summary chronologically (where applicable) to match your research project outline. The summary should include the following:
An introduction: Start the summary by identifying your research project audience which is your professor and the board of directors. This introduction should capture the reading audience’s attention. Length: 1-2 paragraphsStatement of the purpose: Provide concise yet informative paragraphs offering only the important and essential information about your research project and an introduction of your approved leaders. A good way to do this is to provide a short synopsis of what makes the selected leaders effective or ineffective, in your opinion. Consider using a very brief referenced example for each leader. Length: 2-3 paragraphs.
You may consider providing a bulleted section comparing and contrasting your selected leaders at a high level. This is not a historical overview but an introduction of your research purpose.You may briefly introduce applicable theories, recent events, etc.Intended achievement for the research project: You may close with your intended achievement once you’ve completed your research. What message are you conveying to your reading audience? Length 2-3 paragraphs.1 Deliverables- Sections 1-2-3 2 Deliverables- Sections 4-5-63 Deliverables- Sections 7-8-9Conclusion- About 1 PageReferences (Compiled from Sections 1 - 3 deliverables)- At least 6-10 ReferencesIn 2.3 - Research Project: Leader Selection you will identify two leaders to research for the project. Select two historical leaders (non-political) with one having made a positive contribution in a leadership role (i.e., effective leader) and the other having made a negative contribution in a leadership role (i.e., ineffective leader).The leaders selected should be contemporary, non-political figures in history (post the year 2000).You are encouraged to select leaders along the lines of your perceived leadership self-assessment results from Module 1; which serves as an overview of your leadership style. You should select a well-known (non-political) leader that has plenty of data/research detail rather than simply selecting leaders that you have heard of or have researched in the past. You will use the Hunt Library and other reliable sources to assist in building your research project.Note: A minimum of two students can select the same leader. You must have the instructor’s approval before proceeding on your topic.In 4.3 - Research Project: Section 1 Deliverables you will submit an outline with references along with completing the first section of the eight major deliverables for the research project (related mainly to Chapter Two). This section's deliverables include:The Five Models of Personality and Traits of Effective or Ineffective LeadersLeader's Theory X and Theory YLeader EthicsReferencesIn 6.3 - Research Project: Section 2 Deliverables, you will complete the next section of the outline (related mainly to Chapter Three and Chapter Five) for the written research project assignment. This section's deliverables include:Leader MotivationContingency LeadershipInfluencing StylesReferencesIn 7.3 - Research Project: Section 3 Deliverables, you will complete the final sections of the outline (related mainly to Chapters Six and Chapter Nine) for the written research project assignment. This section's deliverables include:Leader CommunicationsCharismatic vs. Transformational LeadershipReferencesIn 8.3 - Research Project: Final Submission (PLG1), the final written deliverable is a compilation of your efforts from module weeks 2, 4, and 6, to include a title page, table of contents, executive summary, conclusion, and a complete list of your references. Ensure you have incorporated the feedback from your previous research project submissions in your final deliverable, applying any suggestion for changes.Title PageTable of ContentsExecutive Summary
An introductionStatement of the purposeIntended achievement for the research projectSection 1 DeliverablesSection 2 DeliverablesSection 3 DeliverablesConclusionReferences (Compiled from Sections 1 - 3 deliverables)Guidelines for completing your deliverables:Each non-political leader must be or have been a business or world leader from 2000 to the present.Provide three separate reasons (with referenced examples) to justify the reason the selected leaders were a positive (i.e., effective) or a negative (ineffective) leader.Identify, compare, and contrast at least two different leadership styles of each selected leader. Be sure to add applicable leadership theories and concepts introduced in this course.The written submission requires the components as outlined in the Research Project Content Outline section of this page. Review that section for complete details.You must include at least three outside references for each leader, for a total of six (6) references (minimum) for the research project final written submission. The textbook may be used as a reference, but it will not count toward the six (6) required sources.Review the Content Outline section to continue.Construct your research paper sections as the following:Title PageTable of ContentsExecutive SummaryFive Models of Personality and Traits of Effective Leaders or Ineffective Leaders (Chapter Two) - Discuss the personalities and traits of your leaders.Leader's Theory X and Theory Y (Chapter Two) - Discuss which of these theories your leaders possess or possessed.Leader Ethics (Chapter Two) - How ethical were your leaders?Leader Motivation (Chapter Three) - Discuss your leaders’ motivational style.Contingency Leadership (Chapter Four) - Discuss how your leaders fit into contingency leadership model or theory.Influencing Styles (Chapter Five) - Discuss how your leaders influenced people through power, politics, networking or negotiations.Leader Communications (Chapter Six) - Give examples of how your leaders communicated.Charismatic vs. Transformational Leadership (Chapter Nine) - Discuss whether your leaders practiced charismatic or transformational leadership.ConclusionReference pageDeliverables 1-3 attached
8 pages
Risk Management Plan
No matter how well the project management team plans and executes their duties, there is likelihood of unexpected occurren ...
Risk Management Plan
No matter how well the project management team plans and executes their duties, there is likelihood of unexpected occurrences. For instance, resources ...
GBA 335 Saint Leo University Reverse Discrimination Case Study
I’m sure everyone is familiar with the term “reverse discrimination”. In my business law class, we discuss the Bakke ...
GBA 335 Saint Leo University Reverse Discrimination Case Study
I’m sure everyone is familiar with the term “reverse discrimination”. In my business law class, we discuss the Bakke case wherein Mr. Bakke had the qualifications needed to get into medical school in California. However, in an attempt to make up for discrimination in education in the 1960’s and earlier (Bakke took place in the late 60’s), the school kept 16 of its 100 seats open for minority applicants only; the other 84 could be competed for by anyone. Bakke sued the school, and the Court ruled that he was the victim of reverse discrimination.Re: the case of Steelworkers v. Weber. In that case, the Court didn’t exactly define reverse discrimination. Rather, the Court set forth a set of factors to use to determine whether reverse discrimination had been committed, or if the employer, school, etc. was acting properly to make up for past discrimination.Please read the Court’s list of factors and discuss your thoughts on the Court’s opinion. provide ref
Earn money selling
your Study Documents