InstructionsAs a financial advisor, you are assigned a new client who is considering investing in one of two stocks, A or B.The table below shows information about the performance of stocks A and B last year. Return Standard Deviation Stock A 15 % 8.3% Stock B 14% 2.1% As a financial advisor, are there factors other than return and risk that should be considered in making this decision? Based on these factors, what stock would you recommend to the client? What reasons will you convey to your client to justify your decision in recommending this stock? How will this recommendation impact the client?

Hi,I need step by step solutions for all the questions in the attached word document. SPSS is required to complete the assignment.

InstructionsIn this assignment, you will test for a significant difference between the average resting heart rate of males and the average resting heart rate of females in your heart rate data. You have observed that the mean rates are not exactly the same but are they significantly different? You may use either of the two methods for testing a hypothesis illustrated in Realizeit: compare the two confidence intervals or use the data analysis tool to run a two-sample test with unequal variances as shown in the topic of testing two-samples.StepsWrite the null hypotheses being testedRun the analysis either by using data analysis and the two-sample test or by comparing the two confidence intervalsInterpret your data to determine if the resting male heart rate is the same as the resting female heart rate. Remember we are looking for whether the difference is a significant one, not just whether they are not the same.Additional Instructions:Your assignment should be typed into a Word or other word processing document, formatted in APA style. The assignments must includeRunning headA title page withAssignment nameYour nameProfessor’s nameCourseRubricMA320 Unit 6 AssessmentMA320 Unit 6 AssessmentCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentMA320-CO325.0 ptsLevel 5Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.22.5 ptsLevel 4Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.20.0 ptsLevel 3Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.17.5 ptsLevel 2Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.15.0 ptsLevel 1Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisMA320-CO330.0 ptsLevel 5Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.27.5 ptsLevel 4Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.25.0 ptsLevel 3Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.22.5 ptsLevel 2Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.20.0 ptsLevel 1Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology10.0 ptsLevel 5Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.9.0 ptsLevel 4Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.8.0 ptsLevel 3Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.7.0 ptsLevel 2Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.6.0 ptsLevel 1Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication3.5 ptsLevel 2The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA5.0 ptsLevel 5In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.4.0 ptsLevel 4In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.3.5 ptsLevel 3In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 - 4 minor APA errors.3.0 ptsLevel 2In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.2.0 ptsLevel 1The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements0.0 ptsLevel 0There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 75.0PreviousNextSubmission Submitted!Dec 16 at 11:37am (late)Submission DetailsDownload db.jpgComments: