econ Stata task

timer Asked: Jan 19th, 2021

Question Description

Requirement in the pdf.

Only bid if you can guarantee B score or higher (80%+)

Thank you

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1 ECON 104 Assignment 1 In this assignment, you will estimate the effect of an effort to increase voter turnout through encouraging phone calls. Voters were randomly assigned to get (or not) an encouraging phone call. As can be seen by examining the data, not everyone assigned to get a call (treat real = 1) actually answered and listened to the call (contact = 1). Due to the randomization, the analysis in this assignment should generate a “gold standard” estimate of the effect of getting assigned to receive a phone call on voter turn out. The data is from: Arceneaux, Kevin, Alan Gerber, and Donald Green. “Comparing Experimental and Matching Methods Using a Large-Scale Voter Mobilization Experiment.” Political Analysis, 2006, 14, 37-62. This study was intended to assess the effectiveness of get-out-the-vote efforts. In the experiment, the authors attempted to deliver the following message to those selected for treatment: “Hello, may I speak with (name of person) please? Hi. This is (caller’s name) calling from Vote 2002, a nonpartisan effort working to encourage citizens to vote. We just wanted to remind you that elections are being held this Tuesday. The success of our democracy depends on whether we exercise our right to vote or not, so we hope you’ll come out and vote this Tuesday. Can I count on you to vote next Tuesday?” For this homework, use the dataset on Canvas that corresponds with the first letter of your last name. The dataset includes the following variables (among others): • vote02: Voted in 2002 – the outcome of interest • treat real: Assignment to the treatment group • contact: Answered the phone call and responded to the question “Can I count on you to vote next Tuesday?”, regardless of their answer • newreg - Newly registered voter 2 • busy - Whether the phone line was busy when the call was made • age - Age of the individual in years • female - Gender of the individual • vote00 - Voted in 2000 (prior to treatment) • vote98: Voted in 98 (prior to treatment) • state: State of residence 1 for Iowa and 0 for Michigan • comp mi: Value of 1 for - competitive district in Michigan (Michigan A in the paper) • comp ia: Value of 1 for - competitive district in Iowa (Iowa A in the paper) 1. How many individuals were assigned to the treatment and control groups in your data? How many individuals in the treatment group actually received and listened to the call? 2. Provide evidence that the randomization worked by comparing the means of the sample characteristics in the treatment and control groups. Please create a clean table that includes columns with the means for each group, the difference between the two groups, and the p-value of the difference. The table should be comprehensible on its own. 3. Is the table you produced in question 2 consistent with the randomization being correctly implemented? Why or why not? Explain. 4. Estimate the difference in the voting rates for the treatment and control group. How big an effect did getting assigned to get a phone call have on the probability of voting. Is the difference statistically significant? Do you think the difference is large in a practical sense? Explain your answer. 5. Create a carefully labeled table where each column corresponds to a regression. The first column contains the parameters of a the regression vote02i = β0 +β1 treat reali +ui . In each following column you should add one more covariate (control variable) to the regression. 3 6. What effect does adding covariates have on your estimate of the treatment effect? What does this tell you about the relationship between the covariates and being assigned to the treatment group? 7. Will comparing the voting rate of the treatment and control groups generate an unbiased estimate of the causal effect of getting assigned to get an encouraging call on the probability of voting? Why or why not? Explain. 8. Please attach all of the code you wrote to generate your results. ...
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

This question has not been answered.

Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors