Academic Communication 2 QCD210 Exam (Rhys: 27/1/2021)

Anonymous
timer Asked: Jan 27th, 2021

Question Description

1st Feb, 2021 1pm-4pm Australia Sydney time

You are required to write two annotated bibliography entries - 350 words each- using the structure, organisation and language features you were shown during the semester.
Sample file attached, read that one and analyse it. there will be 2 articles in the exampl.
Will send acess after hire, update me daily for the revision progress

Unformatted Attachment Preview

The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: www.emeraldinsight.com/0951-354X.htm International students’ experiences in a flipped classroom environment An Australian perspective Jasvir Kaur Nachatar Singh, Swati Nagpal, Susan Inglis and Jubin Jacob-John Flipped classroom environment 1303 Received 14 November 2018 Revised 26 February 2019 Accepted 11 March 2019 Department of Management, Sport and Tourism, College of Arts Social Sciences and Commerce, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore undergraduate international students’ experiences in a flipped classroom environment in an Australian university. Design/methodology/approach – In total, 32 in-depth interviews were conducted with undergraduate international students at one Australian university by three researchers. Findings – The learning experiences of international students in a flipped classroom environment include increased flexibility in learning; enhanced engagement with content and; more confident participation in faceto-face workshops. In addition, the analysis further illustrates that international students intrinsically develop soft skills (e.g. increased confidence and communication skills), learning skills (e.g. research and critical thinking) and employability skills (e.g. time management and accountability). Research limitations/implications – These findings focus only on the positive learning experiences of undergraduate international students in one Australian university. Originality/value – The study contributes to the literature by identifying learning experiences of undergraduate international students in a flipped classroom environment and the connection with their development of soft skills, learning skills and employability skills. Keywords Australia, Flipped classroom, Undergraduate international students Paper type Research paper Introduction Presently, with the wave of technological innovations, Australian educational institutions are revolutionising teaching and learning delivery to domestic and international students through the flipped classroom mode (Graham, 2013). International students are defined by Paige (1990) as individuals who temporarily reside and study in a country other than their country of citizenship. There were 621,192 international students in Australia in 2017 (Department of Education and Training, 2018a) and international education generated revenue of $30.3bn to the economy, an increase of 8.1 per cent from earnings recorded at $ 28.6bn in 2016–2017 (Department of Education and Training, 2018b). Given that international education is a profitable business to the Australian economy it is imperative that we understand how learning from a traditional mode to a flipped learning model impacts international students’ study experiences in the Australian context. The traditional mode of learning can be thought of as didactic and transmission-based, where students passively accept course material through lectures, which is then reinforced in tutorial classes (Schwartz, 2014). Strayer (2012) defines the flipped classroom approach as moving the instructional (passive) aspects of the subject content delivery outside of class time, whilst promoting active student engagement with the content in class time. This includes case studies, problem solving exercises and role plays, empowering students to be active learners and to move towards an inquiry-based learning environment (Hmelo-Silver, 2004). International Journal of Educational Management Vol. 33 No. 6, 2019 pp. 1303-1315 © Emerald Publishing Limited 0951-354X DOI 10.1108/IJEM-11-2018-0362 IJEM 33,6 1304 The underpinning theoretical understanding for inquiry-based learning is active learning. Active learning is conceptually defined as “involves students in doing things and thinking about the things they are doing” (Bonwell and Eison, 1991, p. 2). Active learning is then linked to a range of learning activities, such as “instructional strategies, teaching methods and any pedagogical approach that is intended to activate or develop the students’ thinking in the learning process” (Hung, 2015, p. 82). There is limited evidence of qualitative studies that have specifically explored undergraduate international students’ learning experiences in a flipped classroom model (Abeysekera and Dawson, 2015; Smith and Hill, 2019). This paper is based on a research study located within an Australian university which focuses on understanding undergraduate international students’ flipped classroom learning experiences (Wanner and Palmer, 2015). This study further intends to add value to the international students’ learning experiences by deliberating on the skills development of international students in a flipped classroom environment. Literature review In the literature, international students’ learning experiences in the traditional mode are often considered to be negative. For example, scholars (Brown, 2008; Rao, 2017) have categorised international students as passive learners in the classrooms, mainly due to their low English levels and different learning styles. Brown (2008) revealed that insufficient comprehension of lectures, group discussions and daily interactions with other students and staff members can be due to their limited fluency in English. As a result, international students’ participation in the classroom is lower than domestic students and they are poor at reading and writing skills. The latest research by Rao (2017) echoes similar findings, where international students are deemed as non-participatory in discussions, uncooperative members of groups and lacked critical thinking and writing skills because of their limited English ability. It is important to note, however, that not all international students experience learning difficulties due to their low English proficiency. An Australian study by Robertson et al. (2000) revealed that different learning styles, such as dependence on rote learning as opposed to analytical and critical learning, also impedes international students’ learning ability. Trice and Jin (2007) as well as Zhou and Todman (2009) revealed that international students are generally satisfied with their learning experience because they often have positive academic interactions with their lecturers and course advisors. Understanding how the cultural backgrounds of international students impacts learning in a western environment is also an important consideration. Strang (2010) explored cultural factors and learning styles in his study of predictors of higher academic outcomes for 2,500 international business students in an Australian university. One such factor was a collectivist orientation, which may negatively impact on international student’s ability to work individually, but make group work easier for them. Central Queensland University (Owens, 2011) developed a transition programme for international students, orienting them away from the familiar “teacher-centred practice and examination-only assessment” towards reflective practice, understanding their own learning preferences and developing independent as well as collaborative learning skills and strategies. This initiative underlies the active learning approach where students “in these activating types of learning acquire more general and reflective competencies such as discussion skills, working in a team, finding information and working independently” (Vaatstra and De Vries, 2007, p. 338). Information and communication technologies are revolutionising teaching and learning approaches around the globe. Flipped classroom learning pays testament to the advances in technology in higher education teaching and learning scholarship (Graham 2013). Blended learning is a hybrid between the traditional learning model ( formal lectures, tutorials, disciplinary skills, field specific theoretical knowledge, concept based) and a technology-enabled model, to develop transferable skills through mainly applied and experiential learning (Vaatstra and De Vries, 2007). In addition, the changing needs of “digital native” (Prensky, 2001) students, who are technologically inclined, expect an engaging educational environment where they are able to learn through exploration, interaction and collaboration in a way that is applicable, active and fun, as opposed to the traditional way of teaching which is based on didactic face-to-face lectures ( Jukes et al., 2010). As a result, learning and teaching in higher education is increasingly geared towards flipped classroom learning (Sergis et al., 2018). Extant literature on the flipped classroom approach has mainly focussed on its design (Halverson et al., 2014; O’Flaherty and Phillips, 2015), comparative studies between traditional and flipped approach modes (DeLozier and Rhodes, 2017), and domestic student perceptions and satisfaction with the subject (Butt, 2014). For instance, recent research by McNally et al. (2017) established that participation by students in class activities improved when the flipped classroom teaching design uses a theoretical perspective to inform the teaching, combined with a practical application through integrated assessments. According to Jensen et al. (2015); however, it is still too early to conclude that the flipped model is positively related to improving learning outcomes or grades. There is evidence to show that this approach encourages good learning and teaching, primarily among domestic students, but not necessarily with international students. Studies comparing flipped classroom approaches to traditional learning in a face-to-face context (Foldnes, 2016) have had a specific focus on student satisfaction and learner preferences (Bliuc et al., 2007). For example, Smyth et al. (2012) claimed that domestic students preferred learning in a flipped mode, as opposed to a traditional classroom approach, as they learned more through online activities and face-to-face workshops. In other studies, however, students chose a traditional method of learning over a flipped approach due to clarity of instruction face-to-face (Chen and Jones, 2007). Nevertheless, the overall student perceptions of a flipped approach tends to be more positive than negative (Güzer and Caner, 2014). The reasons for this, however, are still underexplored. Research on positive perceptions of students and their satisfaction with the flipped classroom approach has also been highlighted in the literature. For instance, Smyth et al. (2012) found that a flipped classroom method benefited students in terms of greater flexibility and autonomy, as they could access the materials anywhere and at any time. Likewise, Butt (2014) found that students value a variety of different learning opportunities, integrating traditional face-to-face learning modes and the online component (Snowball, 2014). McNally et al. (2017) found that older and female students preferred online and face-to-face activities and discussions in a flipped classroom approach. Students were more involved with the course content and experienced more extensive interactions with other students (McNally et al., 2017). Most studies have explored domestic students’ perceptions of a flipped classroom approach (Strayer, 2012; Butt, 2014; Peterson, 2016), so there is a gap in understanding undergraduate international students’ learning experiences of the flipped classroom, which several scholars have identified (Bliuc et al., 2007; Foldnes, 2016; O’Flaherty and Phillips, 2015). McNally et al. (2017) and McPhee and Pickren (2017) studied international students in a flipped classroom mode, but these studies also included domestic students as their research participants. The learning needs of international, as well as domestic students, must be met to create an inclusive learning and teaching environment, appropriate to all students. Many Australian Universities are focussing on how to create an environment where all students have the opportunity to have positive learning experiences, whatever their background (La Trobe Learning and Teaching, 2014). For international students, this means recognising the potential impact of prior learning experiences and cultural backgrounds and providing an educational environment that is safe, non-discriminatory, flexible and promotes engagement in learning. To support the inclusive learning Flipped classroom environment 1305 IJEM 33,6 1306 environment, active learning enables students to acquire and apply knowledge and experience independently and also in groups where they are able to analyse and reflect on problems systematically (Vaatstra and De Vries, 2007). As there are limited studies exploring undergraduate international students’ experiences studying in a flipped classroom mode, the research question of this paper is: RQ1. What are the flipped classroom learning experiences among undergraduate international students? Methods Since this is an exploratory study (Creswell, 2013), a qualitative approach was adopted for the following reasons. First, little is known on the lived experiences of undergraduate international students with regards to their experiences of learning through a flipped delivery. Second, since the nature of qualitative research is naturalistic and interpretive (Creswell, 2013), the research is conducted in “natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or interpret phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them” (Denzin and Lincoln, 2012, p. 3). Based on the nature of this exploratory study, a semi-structured interview was chosen as a single method to elicit experiences, feelings, beliefs, thoughts and perceptions of international students (Tharenou et al., 2007). This methodology is conducive to investigate the experiences and perceptions of undergraduate international students in a flipped classroom environment. Participants We collected data from 32 undergraduate international students (12 males and 20 females) currently studying at an Australian university with a high percentage of international students. The University’s International Office emailed all undergraduate international students inviting them to participate in this study, and invitations were concurrently placed on university campus notice boards. Students recruited were currently enroled in undergraduate programmes, had attended at least one flipped subject and were willing to share their academic experiences. Further, research participants were also selected using the snowball sampling technique, as proposed by Minichiello et al. (2008), with the initial research participants asked to identify further research participants. There were 12 international students from the STEM disciplines and the remainder of the students were from humanities, business, accounting, law, tourism and communication. Table I outlines the demographic details of the undergraduate international students who participated in this research. The researchers ensured strict adherence to the ethical elements of research stipulated by the University’s ethics committee. We use codes in this paper to protect the identity of the research participants: UIS for undergraduate international student, followed by the interview number (i.e. UIS 1, UIS 2, etc.). Data collection Semi-structured in-depth interviews of 11–46 min duration were conducted between May 2017 and August 2017. All interviews were conducted in English on university premises and were audio-taped with a digital voice recorder and subsequently transcribed using a professional transcription service. Data analysis This study sought to interpret the participants’ lived social experiences by analysing their interview information using Van Manen’s (1990) method of thematic analysis. This method was used as it represents one of the most robust methods, focusing on “understanding the meaning of experience (by searching for themes) through greater interpretative engagement with the data” (Langdridge, 2007). Information Gender Female Male Nationality Vietnam India China Sri Lanka USA Canada Russia Bangladesh Italy The Netherlands Indonesia Malaysia France Mexico Norway German Romania Mongolia Zimbabwe Length of Candidature 1st year 2nd year 3rd year No. of UIS 20 12 6 4 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 7 19 To understand the lived experiences of research participants, an inductive research approach was adopted. Analysis commenced with coding the data, collating codes into possible themes and then generating a thematic map (Braun and Clarke, 2006). Upon reading the transcripts to understand the depth and breadth of the content, the first author started the coding process manually, choosing the shortest and then longer transcripts to assign keywords or phrases that described what the participant meant (Tesch, 1990) on the right-hand margin. Then, van Manen’s (1990) second approach was employed to analyse the data, that is, the selective reading or highlighting approach, to see which phrases represented the phenomenon under investigation. While coding, the author asked van Manen’s question “What statement(s) or phrases(s) seem particularly essential or revealing about the phenomenon or experience being described” (1990, p. 93). The next step was to group similar and redundant codes to reduce the list to a more manageable number (Braun and Clarke, 2006; Creswell, 2008). The process of thematic analysis is an iterative process (Braun and Clarke, 2006) as opposed to a linear process. The first author reviewed the list and returned to the data to see if any new codes emerged (Creswell, 2008; Tesch, 1990). The first author highlighted the quotes which supported the codes (Creswell, 2008; Tesch, 1990) with different coloured highlighters and reduced the codes to themes which answered the research question of this paper. In addition, the other authors were also involved in analysing, coding and interpreting the data, thereby increasing the reliability of the data (Tharenou et al., 2007). Since the analysis was conducted manually, the researchers delibierated on several ocasions and reached an agreement of the most common codes and themes that were prevalent in the analysis of the findings. Flipped classroom environment 1307 Table I. Demographic details of undergraduate international students IJEM 33,6 1308 Findings and discussion There were three key areas of learning experiences in a flipped classroom approach among undergraduate international students; flexibility in learning; engagement with online materials and participation in face-to-face workshops. Flexibility in learning A flipped classroom is where students are able to pre-engage with online material before attending the face-to-face workshops/laboratory and then undertake post-workshop/lab activities, such as assessed or unassessed quizzes and/or assignments (Strayer, 2012). Undergraduate international students in this research study were motivated to learn online when they could read documents, listen to podcasts, undertake quizzes and engage in forum discussions in their own time. A few students highlighted this: The best is that it is pre-recorded, I can access it any time, I can do it at my own convenience as I can read the document on my own later at any time I want. (UIS 1) I could do it in my own time. If I was tired, if I have to work, if I have to attend lectures, you just don’t get things done in traditional way of learning. But in blended learning environment, you can just have a rest and do it in your own time. I think that is very helpful. (UIS 20) Apart from managing time between studies and travel, many international students are also juggling their time between work and studies. In Australia, international students often work part time to support themselves financially (Forbes-Mewett ...
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

This question has not been answered.

Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors