Description
This is the guide for how you do it : Client Presentation Assignment Sheet.docx
This is the sample : YouTube Sample Client Presentation.pdf
and this is the checklist : Client Presentation Check List.pdf
and this is my first paper you can use it to get some information and look at it Tumblr Final Draft.docx
Make sure that you follow everything
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Excellent! Definitely coming back for more study materials.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
2 pages
Dorothy Review
Teacher Attrition: The Relationship between Teacher’s Stress and their Retention The abstract contains good information ...
Dorothy Review
Teacher Attrition: The Relationship between Teacher’s Stress and their Retention The abstract contains good information about your study, but it ...
Discussion Question
Many consumer and health care advocacy initiatives are converging toward a mandate to provide public access to many types ...
Discussion Question
Many consumer and health care advocacy initiatives are converging toward a mandate to provide public access to many types of information about managed care organization (MCO) performance, costs, and quality. In fact, employers in the many parts of the country who are the major purchasers of health insurance are now requiring MCOs to make “health plan performance data” available to subscribers to facilitate their choice of plans.
Discuss and provide the rationale for your opinion on providing data in areas such as patient outcomes, compliance with national standards for preventive and chronic care, and comparative costs to the public.
What obligation, if any, does an employer, and/or MCO have to educate subscribers in how to interpret performance data? At whose expense should such education be provided?
What are the possible benefits or disadvantages to making such performance data available to the public?
University of Central FL Szabo v Reliable Car Parts Corporation Memorandum
In this final communication assignment, you will persuade and non-technical audience, a jury, that the statistical analysi ...
University of Central FL Szabo v Reliable Car Parts Corporation Memorandum
In this final communication assignment, you will persuade and non-technical audience, a jury, that the statistical analysis that you have done provides adequate evidence on the case they must determine. You must explain to a jury from the general population the case, how probability and statistics can inform it and what you found by doing your analysis all organized in a way and using language they will understand. Part of this will be explaining why this approach can be used with confidence in addressing this question. You will also demonstrate your ability to edit a professional document to assure it is clear, complete, and concise, following the direction provided in the Legal Memorandum Guide. Proofread and edit your pre-writing document for grammar and spelling PRIOR TO TURNING IT IN (you may use an external grammar tool to help with this. The Legal Memorandum Template is provided to make formatting the document easier. This example provides some insight into the appearance of the document. The document with the appendix is no less than 2.5 pages. Assignment Preparation Read the Legal Memorandum GuideYou will be expected to discuss the elements of this assignment accurately. There are several areas in which students have had difficultly in the past that you may want to make sure you are familiar with Be sure to make any claims based on your findings in a way that is accurate to what the statistical method allows you to know. Be sure you understand what a class-action lawsuit is. Be sure you are clear on the difference between the data and your evaluation of it. Be sure to clearly outline what you know about the data AND why what is provided is important. Be sure you clearly understand the specific car part you are discussing. If this is not a familiar product take the time to look up some information on it before writing about it so you can speak precisely. Problem DescriptionA series of seemingly related recent automobile failures have resulted in a class-action lawsuit (Links to an external site.), Szabo v. Reliable Car Parts Corporation being filed. The ‘class’ in this case is claiming that Reliable Car Parts manufactured a part that does not comply with mandated performance standards in place to assure safe operation of vehicles. The class was established as this part has been used by many manufactures in many models of vehicles for a decade, and therefore, involves hundreds of thousands of vehicles. They are claiming the failure of this part has led to serious engine failures resulting in needed vehicle repair or replacement, for which Reliable Car Parts should be financially responsible.The part is question is a shaft with a copper-lead bearing surface that is manufactured for use in fuel pumps. The use of copper lead as a bearing surface was considered a revolution in the performance capability of this part when it was introduced. However, after a decade in operation, the ability of this design to meet performance standards established for the safe operation of vehicles is being questioned. The established standards require these parts may not wear more than 3.5 microns over a useful life of 250,000 miles of vehicle operation with the fuel pump using this shaft. This standard has been established, as wear of the shaft bear surface exceeding this amount can result in catastrophic fuel pump failure in extreme weather conditions. Due to the significance of this litigation, the Judge involved with the case, The Honorable Faeza Hai, has brought you in as an expert witness, independent of either side of the litigation, to provide the jury with the clarity that can be brought to the question by an engineering review. At your request, she is providing you with data from a random sampling of 45 shafts of this design from a recent manufacturing run, which have been put through a test simulating 250,000 miles of wear. The result of this test was and She is requiring that you complete your work with a high level of confidence, therefore you have suggested using a confidence interval of .01. You are to provide the jury with which side of the litigation you would support and why in a written document that makes the determination clear and believable to them. The document you are to provide is to follow the court's template and their Legal memorandum guide. You will also copy the document to Miles Davis, Clerk of the Courts, Michah Bioano, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and Jay Grabow, Defendant’s Counsel.Data from Sample Testing Assignment Grading (be sure to review the assignment rubric)You will be expected to use the Legal Memorandum Guide and example to include all the required elements in your memorandum. A particular challenge of the assignment is the explanation of the method used for calculations; why it is appropriate, and which option was selected and why. Before turning in the work you will review the document for flow at the sentence, paragraph, and document level. You will need to complete a statistical calculation using the correct approach, arrive at the correct answer, and use the findings in a professional way to develop a recommendation.Clarity, conciseness, and accuracy - While clarity and conciseness are a concern for the entire document, the memorandum subject line (RE), the question presented, and the brief answer will be closely evaluated on the accuracy of your statements, and the clarity and conciseness of your document elements. (Be sure you understand the difference between liability and negligence.)Addressing your audience - Your document must be worded in a way where your audience will understand, believe, and be persuaded by what you say. Each of the elements must be worded in a way that is complete and coherent to an outside reader who is likely not an engineer or statistician. (Finding someone like that to review your document and tell you where they are not following your writing can help you with editing. An outside reader may review your document for problem areas but MAY NOT do your writing for you.)Completeness - All the elements shown in the Legal Memorandum guide must be included in the correct sequence and format. This assignment is being submitted through the similarity review to trigger checks for plagiarism and at the same time will be reviewed for grammatical correctness. Assignment Submittal. This is an individual assignment for which each student must upload a document in one of the allowed formats listed on the assignment. Documents submitted in alternative formats that cannot be opened and graded will receive a zero. RubricCA 3 P&S 2020FCA 3 P&S 2020FCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMemorandum Header contentThe first four elements of the memorandum - "To", "CC", "From", and "Date" - are completed correctly2.0 ptsAll four identified elements of the header are completed correctly1.5 ptsThree of the four identified elements of the header are completed correctly1.0 ptsTwo of the four identified elements of the header are completed correctly0.5 ptsOne of the four identified elements of the header is completed correctly0.0 ptsTThe memorandum header elements are not completed correctly or are left blank2.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe memorandum subject line (RE) descriptionThe memorandum subject line includes the case and a brief description of what you are doing for it.2.0 ptsThe memorandum subject line is complete and well written1.3 ptsOne element of the subject line is unclear0.5 ptsThe memorandum subject line is missing an element0.0 ptsThe memorandum subject line is missing2.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Question Presented" sectionThe "Question Presented" accurately states the full case. The statement is concise, grammatically correct and stated as a question. The statement does not extend to information beyond the question.4.0 ptsThe "Question Presented" is very well done in that is it correct, complete, clear concise, and stated as a question.3.4 ptsThe "Question presented" is weak in one of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, concise, or stated as a question.2.8 ptsThe "Question Presented" is weak in several of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, concise, or stated as a question.2.2 ptsThe "Question Presented" is significantly weak in many of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, concise, or stated as a question.0.0 ptsThe "Question Presented" is missing4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Brief Answer" sectionThe "Brief Answer" is very well done in that is it is a correct statement of the answer, it completely describes what is being answered without describing how the answer was arrived at, it is clear, it is grammatically correct, and it concise4.0 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is very well done in that is it correct, complete, clear and concise3.4 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is weak in one of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, or concise,2.8 ptshe "Brief" is weak in several of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, or concise.2.2 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is significantly weak in many of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, and/or concise,0.0 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is missing4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Facts" sectionThe "Facts" section completely and clearly presents the data that was provided in the project description. (This is the information you were provided before you engaged in solving the problem.) This information is presented in a way that a reader new to the topic and without and engineering or statistics background can follow and understand what you are presenting. (Present the information in a way that it flows logically for the reader. Include words that describe what the numbers represent when numbers are used.)8.0 ptsThe "Facts" section is very well done in that is it correct, complete, clear and concise6.8 ptsThe "Facts" section is weak in one of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, or concise,5.6 ptsThe "Facts" section is weak in several of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, and/or concise,4.4 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is significantly weak in many of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, and/or concise,0.0 ptsThe "Facts" section is missing8.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Discussion" sectionThe "Discussion" section provides a description of how the student used the data provided to address the problem, why the approach used allows you to know what you need to in order to provide substaintial input into how the case should be determined, what you found doing the calculations, and what the outcome is. This must be accomplished in language that the audience for this memorandum can understand. Statistical terms must be limited, and with a definition or description of their purpose in plain language. This section must include an a plain language description of what this type of calculation accomplishes.10.0 ptsThe "Discussion" section is very well done in that is it correct, complete, and clear (written to be understandable for an audience who are not engineers or statisticians).8.5 ptsThe "Discussion" section is weak in one of the following ways: it not correct, complete, clear, or in plain language (written to be understandable for an audience who are not engineers or statisticians).7.0 ptsThe "Discussion" section is weak in several of the following ways: it not correct, complete, clear, and/or in plain language (written to be understandable for an audience who are not engineers or statisticians).5.5 ptsThe "Discussion" section is weak in many of the following ways: it not correct, complete, clear, and/or in plain language (written to be understandable for an audience who are not engineers or statisticians).0.0 ptsThe "Discussion" section is missing10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Conclusion" sectionThe "Conclusion" section is included. This section synthesizes the entire memorandum and is clear, complete, concise, and uses language the audience will understand.5.0 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is very well done in that is it correct, complete, concise, and clear (written to be understandable for an audience not comprised of engineers or statisticians).4.25 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is weak in one of the following ways: it not correct, complete, concise, or clear, (written to be understandable for an audience not comprised of engineers or statisticians).3.5 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is weak in several of the following ways: it not correct, complete, concise, or clear, (written to be understandable for an audience not comprised of engineers or statisticians).2.75 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is weak in many of the following ways: it not correct, complete, clear, concise and/or in plain language (written to be understandable for an audience not comprised of engineers or statisticians).0.0 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is missing5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix is includedAn appendix is included that presents your calculations (typewritten). This presentation demonstrates you understand the method completely by approaching the problem correctly and obtaining the correct answer. The calculations are presented with all details included.5.0 ptsThe Appendix is included, correctly, and complete (with full calculations shown)4.0 ptsThe Appendix is included, but is weak in one minor way or it is incomplete3.0 ptsThe Appendix is included, but is weak in several ways and/or incomplete0.0 ptsThe Appendix is missing5.0 ptsTotal Points: 40.0PreviousNext
Chapter 2 Spirituality and The Stage Essay
Should be written in essay form, and should be 2 double spaced pages, 12 size font. Please do not change the page margins. ...
Chapter 2 Spirituality and The Stage Essay
Should be written in essay form, and should be 2 double spaced pages, 12 size font. Please do not change the page margins.Based on the information provided in Chapter 2: The John Muir Trail, what were the reasons for the rise of spirituality in the United States in the 1960s?Writing Style: should have an introduction, a body of the essay in which you make 3-4 points, and a conclusion. Please make sure to do a line-by-line edit of the essay to catch any spelling or grammatical errors, or any awkwardly written sentences.Content: You should make sure that you are clearly defining domestic religion, and referring to discussion points and examples from the reading, “Jewish comes up in you from the roots”.Analysis: analysis mean going beyond simply defining domestic religion. Rather, by referring to the reading, you should be able to analyze or critically discuss the broader historical, political, cultural, religious and economic factors that shape domestic religious practices.,,,PLEASE Do not use a reference and refer to examples from the article,,,
NUR 2214 Rasmussen College Debates with Older Adults Discussion
Your supervisor at Rasmussen Home Health Services is satisfied with the resources described in your annotated bibliography ...
NUR 2214 Rasmussen College Debates with Older Adults Discussion
Your supervisor at Rasmussen Home Health Services is satisfied with the resources described in your annotated bibliography and is eager for you to continue your work. As a next step, your supervisor wants you to develop and share the following items with them.Write an introduction about your in-service presentation topic.Create an outline that identifies and describes the important content areas for your in-service presentation topic.Write a conclusion.Provide an APA formatted References list that contains at least 2 credible references that you intend to cite in your presentation.
Similar Content
Resume and Cover Letter
For this assignment, write a cover letter and resume for a position advertised online on HireSMU or another job board, cho...
Exploring Current Issues in Human Resources
In this final project, you will explore a specific topic/issue related to human resources within a specific organization. ...
Please assist with healthcare question
Please assist with health care question. Need max of 250 words. Need references and in-text citations. Please attached ...
Visitation Paper
CNCO is a Latin American boy band formed on the first
season of La Banda.[1] The group is
composed of Joel Pimentel, Ric...
Purdue University Qualities of A Pleasing Design Social Science Discussion
I’m stuck on a Social Science question and need an explanation.Write:Write a 2-3 page (double-spaced) paper in which you...
PSY 355 BSU Legal and Illegal Psychoactive Drugs Discussion
From the beginning of recorded history people from all cultures have found ways to alter their consciousness by taking dru...
20200212173625writing Assignment 1
Proper communication is an essential element in any business enterprise. The success and failure of any economic organizat...
Question 5
A standardized test refers to examinations that are given then rated in a uniform manner determined before the tests. One ...
How Should We Live Our Lives
How Should We Live Our Lives? And, What Is the Highest Human Good? Plato was one of the most famous, esteemed deep thinker...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Cant Hurt Me - Master Your Mind and Defy the Odds
by David Goggins
The Goldfinch
by Donna Tartt
The Second Sex
by Simone de Beauvoir
Treasure Island
by Robert Louis
The Fault in Our Stars
by John Green
Macbeth
by William Shakespeare
Homo Deus
by Yuval Noah Harari
Cat on a Hot Tin Roof
by Tennessee Williams
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
2 pages
Dorothy Review
Teacher Attrition: The Relationship between Teacher’s Stress and their Retention The abstract contains good information ...
Dorothy Review
Teacher Attrition: The Relationship between Teacher’s Stress and their Retention The abstract contains good information about your study, but it ...
Discussion Question
Many consumer and health care advocacy initiatives are converging toward a mandate to provide public access to many types ...
Discussion Question
Many consumer and health care advocacy initiatives are converging toward a mandate to provide public access to many types of information about managed care organization (MCO) performance, costs, and quality. In fact, employers in the many parts of the country who are the major purchasers of health insurance are now requiring MCOs to make “health plan performance data” available to subscribers to facilitate their choice of plans.
Discuss and provide the rationale for your opinion on providing data in areas such as patient outcomes, compliance with national standards for preventive and chronic care, and comparative costs to the public.
What obligation, if any, does an employer, and/or MCO have to educate subscribers in how to interpret performance data? At whose expense should such education be provided?
What are the possible benefits or disadvantages to making such performance data available to the public?
University of Central FL Szabo v Reliable Car Parts Corporation Memorandum
In this final communication assignment, you will persuade and non-technical audience, a jury, that the statistical analysi ...
University of Central FL Szabo v Reliable Car Parts Corporation Memorandum
In this final communication assignment, you will persuade and non-technical audience, a jury, that the statistical analysis that you have done provides adequate evidence on the case they must determine. You must explain to a jury from the general population the case, how probability and statistics can inform it and what you found by doing your analysis all organized in a way and using language they will understand. Part of this will be explaining why this approach can be used with confidence in addressing this question. You will also demonstrate your ability to edit a professional document to assure it is clear, complete, and concise, following the direction provided in the Legal Memorandum Guide. Proofread and edit your pre-writing document for grammar and spelling PRIOR TO TURNING IT IN (you may use an external grammar tool to help with this. The Legal Memorandum Template is provided to make formatting the document easier. This example provides some insight into the appearance of the document. The document with the appendix is no less than 2.5 pages. Assignment Preparation Read the Legal Memorandum GuideYou will be expected to discuss the elements of this assignment accurately. There are several areas in which students have had difficultly in the past that you may want to make sure you are familiar with Be sure to make any claims based on your findings in a way that is accurate to what the statistical method allows you to know. Be sure you understand what a class-action lawsuit is. Be sure you are clear on the difference between the data and your evaluation of it. Be sure to clearly outline what you know about the data AND why what is provided is important. Be sure you clearly understand the specific car part you are discussing. If this is not a familiar product take the time to look up some information on it before writing about it so you can speak precisely. Problem DescriptionA series of seemingly related recent automobile failures have resulted in a class-action lawsuit (Links to an external site.), Szabo v. Reliable Car Parts Corporation being filed. The ‘class’ in this case is claiming that Reliable Car Parts manufactured a part that does not comply with mandated performance standards in place to assure safe operation of vehicles. The class was established as this part has been used by many manufactures in many models of vehicles for a decade, and therefore, involves hundreds of thousands of vehicles. They are claiming the failure of this part has led to serious engine failures resulting in needed vehicle repair or replacement, for which Reliable Car Parts should be financially responsible.The part is question is a shaft with a copper-lead bearing surface that is manufactured for use in fuel pumps. The use of copper lead as a bearing surface was considered a revolution in the performance capability of this part when it was introduced. However, after a decade in operation, the ability of this design to meet performance standards established for the safe operation of vehicles is being questioned. The established standards require these parts may not wear more than 3.5 microns over a useful life of 250,000 miles of vehicle operation with the fuel pump using this shaft. This standard has been established, as wear of the shaft bear surface exceeding this amount can result in catastrophic fuel pump failure in extreme weather conditions. Due to the significance of this litigation, the Judge involved with the case, The Honorable Faeza Hai, has brought you in as an expert witness, independent of either side of the litigation, to provide the jury with the clarity that can be brought to the question by an engineering review. At your request, she is providing you with data from a random sampling of 45 shafts of this design from a recent manufacturing run, which have been put through a test simulating 250,000 miles of wear. The result of this test was and She is requiring that you complete your work with a high level of confidence, therefore you have suggested using a confidence interval of .01. You are to provide the jury with which side of the litigation you would support and why in a written document that makes the determination clear and believable to them. The document you are to provide is to follow the court's template and their Legal memorandum guide. You will also copy the document to Miles Davis, Clerk of the Courts, Michah Bioano, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and Jay Grabow, Defendant’s Counsel.Data from Sample Testing Assignment Grading (be sure to review the assignment rubric)You will be expected to use the Legal Memorandum Guide and example to include all the required elements in your memorandum. A particular challenge of the assignment is the explanation of the method used for calculations; why it is appropriate, and which option was selected and why. Before turning in the work you will review the document for flow at the sentence, paragraph, and document level. You will need to complete a statistical calculation using the correct approach, arrive at the correct answer, and use the findings in a professional way to develop a recommendation.Clarity, conciseness, and accuracy - While clarity and conciseness are a concern for the entire document, the memorandum subject line (RE), the question presented, and the brief answer will be closely evaluated on the accuracy of your statements, and the clarity and conciseness of your document elements. (Be sure you understand the difference between liability and negligence.)Addressing your audience - Your document must be worded in a way where your audience will understand, believe, and be persuaded by what you say. Each of the elements must be worded in a way that is complete and coherent to an outside reader who is likely not an engineer or statistician. (Finding someone like that to review your document and tell you where they are not following your writing can help you with editing. An outside reader may review your document for problem areas but MAY NOT do your writing for you.)Completeness - All the elements shown in the Legal Memorandum guide must be included in the correct sequence and format. This assignment is being submitted through the similarity review to trigger checks for plagiarism and at the same time will be reviewed for grammatical correctness. Assignment Submittal. This is an individual assignment for which each student must upload a document in one of the allowed formats listed on the assignment. Documents submitted in alternative formats that cannot be opened and graded will receive a zero. RubricCA 3 P&S 2020FCA 3 P&S 2020FCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMemorandum Header contentThe first four elements of the memorandum - "To", "CC", "From", and "Date" - are completed correctly2.0 ptsAll four identified elements of the header are completed correctly1.5 ptsThree of the four identified elements of the header are completed correctly1.0 ptsTwo of the four identified elements of the header are completed correctly0.5 ptsOne of the four identified elements of the header is completed correctly0.0 ptsTThe memorandum header elements are not completed correctly or are left blank2.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe memorandum subject line (RE) descriptionThe memorandum subject line includes the case and a brief description of what you are doing for it.2.0 ptsThe memorandum subject line is complete and well written1.3 ptsOne element of the subject line is unclear0.5 ptsThe memorandum subject line is missing an element0.0 ptsThe memorandum subject line is missing2.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Question Presented" sectionThe "Question Presented" accurately states the full case. The statement is concise, grammatically correct and stated as a question. The statement does not extend to information beyond the question.4.0 ptsThe "Question Presented" is very well done in that is it correct, complete, clear concise, and stated as a question.3.4 ptsThe "Question presented" is weak in one of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, concise, or stated as a question.2.8 ptsThe "Question Presented" is weak in several of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, concise, or stated as a question.2.2 ptsThe "Question Presented" is significantly weak in many of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, concise, or stated as a question.0.0 ptsThe "Question Presented" is missing4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Brief Answer" sectionThe "Brief Answer" is very well done in that is it is a correct statement of the answer, it completely describes what is being answered without describing how the answer was arrived at, it is clear, it is grammatically correct, and it concise4.0 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is very well done in that is it correct, complete, clear and concise3.4 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is weak in one of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, or concise,2.8 ptshe "Brief" is weak in several of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, or concise.2.2 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is significantly weak in many of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, and/or concise,0.0 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is missing4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Facts" sectionThe "Facts" section completely and clearly presents the data that was provided in the project description. (This is the information you were provided before you engaged in solving the problem.) This information is presented in a way that a reader new to the topic and without and engineering or statistics background can follow and understand what you are presenting. (Present the information in a way that it flows logically for the reader. Include words that describe what the numbers represent when numbers are used.)8.0 ptsThe "Facts" section is very well done in that is it correct, complete, clear and concise6.8 ptsThe "Facts" section is weak in one of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, or concise,5.6 ptsThe "Facts" section is weak in several of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, and/or concise,4.4 ptsThe "Brief Answer" is significantly weak in many of the following ways: it is not correct, complete, clear, and/or concise,0.0 ptsThe "Facts" section is missing8.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Discussion" sectionThe "Discussion" section provides a description of how the student used the data provided to address the problem, why the approach used allows you to know what you need to in order to provide substaintial input into how the case should be determined, what you found doing the calculations, and what the outcome is. This must be accomplished in language that the audience for this memorandum can understand. Statistical terms must be limited, and with a definition or description of their purpose in plain language. This section must include an a plain language description of what this type of calculation accomplishes.10.0 ptsThe "Discussion" section is very well done in that is it correct, complete, and clear (written to be understandable for an audience who are not engineers or statisticians).8.5 ptsThe "Discussion" section is weak in one of the following ways: it not correct, complete, clear, or in plain language (written to be understandable for an audience who are not engineers or statisticians).7.0 ptsThe "Discussion" section is weak in several of the following ways: it not correct, complete, clear, and/or in plain language (written to be understandable for an audience who are not engineers or statisticians).5.5 ptsThe "Discussion" section is weak in many of the following ways: it not correct, complete, clear, and/or in plain language (written to be understandable for an audience who are not engineers or statisticians).0.0 ptsThe "Discussion" section is missing10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe "Conclusion" sectionThe "Conclusion" section is included. This section synthesizes the entire memorandum and is clear, complete, concise, and uses language the audience will understand.5.0 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is very well done in that is it correct, complete, concise, and clear (written to be understandable for an audience not comprised of engineers or statisticians).4.25 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is weak in one of the following ways: it not correct, complete, concise, or clear, (written to be understandable for an audience not comprised of engineers or statisticians).3.5 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is weak in several of the following ways: it not correct, complete, concise, or clear, (written to be understandable for an audience not comprised of engineers or statisticians).2.75 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is weak in many of the following ways: it not correct, complete, clear, concise and/or in plain language (written to be understandable for an audience not comprised of engineers or statisticians).0.0 ptsThe "Conclusion" section is missing5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix is includedAn appendix is included that presents your calculations (typewritten). This presentation demonstrates you understand the method completely by approaching the problem correctly and obtaining the correct answer. The calculations are presented with all details included.5.0 ptsThe Appendix is included, correctly, and complete (with full calculations shown)4.0 ptsThe Appendix is included, but is weak in one minor way or it is incomplete3.0 ptsThe Appendix is included, but is weak in several ways and/or incomplete0.0 ptsThe Appendix is missing5.0 ptsTotal Points: 40.0PreviousNext
Chapter 2 Spirituality and The Stage Essay
Should be written in essay form, and should be 2 double spaced pages, 12 size font. Please do not change the page margins. ...
Chapter 2 Spirituality and The Stage Essay
Should be written in essay form, and should be 2 double spaced pages, 12 size font. Please do not change the page margins.Based on the information provided in Chapter 2: The John Muir Trail, what were the reasons for the rise of spirituality in the United States in the 1960s?Writing Style: should have an introduction, a body of the essay in which you make 3-4 points, and a conclusion. Please make sure to do a line-by-line edit of the essay to catch any spelling or grammatical errors, or any awkwardly written sentences.Content: You should make sure that you are clearly defining domestic religion, and referring to discussion points and examples from the reading, “Jewish comes up in you from the roots”.Analysis: analysis mean going beyond simply defining domestic religion. Rather, by referring to the reading, you should be able to analyze or critically discuss the broader historical, political, cultural, religious and economic factors that shape domestic religious practices.,,,PLEASE Do not use a reference and refer to examples from the article,,,
NUR 2214 Rasmussen College Debates with Older Adults Discussion
Your supervisor at Rasmussen Home Health Services is satisfied with the resources described in your annotated bibliography ...
NUR 2214 Rasmussen College Debates with Older Adults Discussion
Your supervisor at Rasmussen Home Health Services is satisfied with the resources described in your annotated bibliography and is eager for you to continue your work. As a next step, your supervisor wants you to develop and share the following items with them.Write an introduction about your in-service presentation topic.Create an outline that identifies and describes the important content areas for your in-service presentation topic.Write a conclusion.Provide an APA formatted References list that contains at least 2 credible references that you intend to cite in your presentation.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents