Herzing University Week 6 Managed Care Effects on Consumers Discussion
Unit 6 Assignment - Managed Care Effects on ConsumersSubmit AssignmentDue Sunday by 11:59pm Points 100Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadThe Human Resources Department at your new job is now offering managed care plans. As a consumer, you want to research how the new plans would affect type of services you would receive.InstructionsComplete aspects of a research plan to help determine the impact of managed care on consumers.Develop a thesis statement to address how managed care impacts consumers. Create an outline of the effects of managed care on consumers. Your overall analysis (or tone of your assessment) of the effect of managed care can be either positive or negative. The outline should have three major points/topics and at least 3 supporting sub-topics under each main topic.Select one of your main topics and write a paragraph summary (minimum 300 words) explaining how the effects of managed care have significantly impacted the physician-patient relationship, the physician's ability to carry out ethical obligations, and the quality of patient care.Be sure to review the resources provided in Supplemental Resources to help prepare you for the assessment.Submit all three parts of this assessment in the same document.RubricUnit 6 Assignment - Managed Care Effects on ConsumersUnit 6 Assignment - Managed Care Effects on ConsumersCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic10.0 ptsLevel 5Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.9.0 ptsLevel 4Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.8.0 ptsLevel 3Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.7.0 ptsLevel 2Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.6.0 ptsLevel 1Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.0.0 ptsLevel 0Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views10.0 ptsLevel 5Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).9.0 ptsLevel 4Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.8.0 ptsLevel 3Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.7.0 ptsLevel 2Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified.6.0 ptsLevel 1Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches.0.0 ptsLevel 0Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.18.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.16.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.14.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.12.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P20.0 ptsLevel 5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.18.0 ptsLevel 4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.16.0 ptsLevel 3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.14.0 ptsLevel 2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.12.0 ptsLevel 1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.0.0 ptsLevel 0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion20.0 ptsLevel 5Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.18.0 ptsLevel 4Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.16.0 ptsLevel 3Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.14.0 ptsLevel 2Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.12.0 ptsLevel 1States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.0.0 ptsLevel 0States an illogical conclusion from findings.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications10.0 ptsLevel 5Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.9.0 ptsLevel 4Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.8.0 ptsLevel 3Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.7.0 ptsLevel 2Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.6.0 ptsLevel 1Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.0.0 ptsLevel 0Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English languageconventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0PreviousNext