Redo Flexable Benefits for 2d time
User Generated
fgnprlyhi
Business Finance
Description
Unformatted Attachment Preview
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
This question has not been answered.
Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
11 pages
Cultural Clusters
are family loyalty that is very strong in countries • The people in these areas are also very sensitive • The countrie ...
Cultural Clusters
are family loyalty that is very strong in countries • The people in these areas are also very sensitive • The countries in this culture that our ...
Income flows versus cash flows
2.3 INCOME FLOWS VERSUS CASH FLOWS. The text states, “Over sufficiently long time periods, net income equals cash inflow ...
Income flows versus cash flows
2.3 INCOME FLOWS VERSUS CASH FLOWS. The text states, “Over sufficiently long time periods, net income equals cash inflows minus cash outflows, other than cash flows with owners.” Demonstrate the accuracy of this statement in the following scenario: Two friends contributed $50,000 each to form a new business. The owners used the amounts contributed to purchase a machine for $100,000 cash. They estimated that the useful life of the machine was five years and the salvage value was $20,000. They rented out the machine to a customer for an annual rental of $25,000 a year for five years. Annual cash operating costs for insurance, taxes, and other items totaled $6,000 annually. At the end of the fifth year, the owners sold the equipment for $22,000, instead of the $20,000 salvage value initially estimated. (Hint: Compute the total net income and the total cash flows other than cash flows with owners for the five-year period as a whole.)
HRM 560 - Diagnosing Change
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALSRequired Resources Hodges, J., & Gill, R. (2014). Sustaining Change in Organizations. Thousand O ...
HRM 560 - Diagnosing Change
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALSRequired Resources Hodges, J., & Gill, R. (2014). Sustaining Change in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Assignment 2: Diagnosing Change (A VIDEO) (I HAVE TO RECORD IT IN 7-MIN) Worth 140 points Using the organization that your professor has preapproved, synthesize the organization’s readiness for change. Evaluate whether or not to implement your new program, policy, practice, or procedure. Use a tablet, smartphone, laptop, desktop, or traditional video recorder to record a maximum of a seven (7) minute dynamic video on the topics detailed below. Note: If you are using a tablet or smartphone, you will need to email the video file to yourself, then save it to a computer in order to upload to Blackboard. You may want to upload your video to a file sharing service, such as Dropbox, if your email will not let you send a large video file. Dropbox is accessible from all smartphones and tablets from the Dropbox app. Once you are ready to upload your video to Blackboard, click here to view the "Student Video Assignment Submission" video tutorial in the "Creating a Presentation for Your Course" playlist. Please use the following naming convention in the popup window for your video once it is finished uploading: Title: Your First Name, Your Last Name – Managing Organizational Change Tags: HRM560, Organizational Change Description: First Name, Last Name – HRM560 Assignment 2 (Date Uploaded ex. 11-14-2014) Prepare and present a video that is a maximum of seven (7) minutes. Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Formulate three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change. Provide results of the diagnostic analysis Explain the results Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.In addition, write a one-page summary of your report to be submitted on our next class meeting. Note: If you choose to submit a video presentation, please also submit a one (1) page summary of your presentation. If you choose the written paper, your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Evaluate an organization’s readiness for change. Analyze diagnostic models relevant to various aspects of the change management process. Use technology and information resources to research issues in managing organizational change. Write clearly and concisely about managing organizational change using proper writing mechanics. Click here to view the written paper grading rubric for this assignment. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 140 Assignment 2: Diagnosing Change Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely described the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Partially described the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Satisfactorily described the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Thoroughly described the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. 2. Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Partially analyzed in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Satisfactorily analyzed in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Thoroughly analyzed in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. 3. Formulate three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely formulated three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Partially formulated three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Satisfactorily formulated three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Thoroughly formulated three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. 4. Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Did not submit or incompletely defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Partially appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Partially proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Partially defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Satisfactorily appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Satisfactorily proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Satisfactorily defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Thoroughly appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Thoroughly proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Thoroughly defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. 5a. Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change. Provide results of the diagnostic analysis. Weight: 5% Did not submit or incompletely assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Did not submit or incompletely provided results of the diagnostic analysis. Partially assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Partially provided results of the diagnostic analysis. Satisfactorily assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Satisfactorily provided results of the diagnostic analysis. Thoroughly assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Thoroughly provided results of the diagnostic analysis. 5b. Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change. Explain the results. Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Did not submit or incompletely explained the results. Partially assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Partially explained the results. Satisfactorily assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Satisfactorily explained the results. Thoroughly assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Thoroughly explained the results. 6. Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely interpreted whether or not the organization is ready for change. Did not submit or incompletely substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. Partially interpreted whether or not the organization is ready for change. Partially substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. Satisfactorily interpreted whether or not the organization is ready for change. Satisfactorily substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. Thoroughly interpreted whether or not the organization is ready for change. Thoroughly substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. 7. Clarity / Coherence in Presentation and writing mechanics Weight: 5% More than 6 errors present. Information is confusing and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. 5-6 errors present. Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. 3-4 errors present. Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. 0-2 errors present. Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. 8. Met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option. Weight: 5% Did not submit or incompletely met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option. Partially met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option. Satisfactorily met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option. Thoroughly met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option.
Investing Abroad Directly Starbucks Corporation Case Study Questions
Choose any Multinational Enterprise (other than Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Nintendo, Hyundai, CEMEX, ZARA, ZAPPOS) that enga ...
Investing Abroad Directly Starbucks Corporation Case Study Questions
Choose any Multinational Enterprise (other than Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Nintendo, Hyundai, CEMEX, ZARA, ZAPPOS) that engages in FDI and complete the questions below for your company of choice. Provide a copy of the articles used to complete the questions. and please use International business terminology in your answer. Thanks.
Please Choose your topic
The recruitment of key personnel such as recruitment specialists, sales managers, and scientists is now well under control ...
Please Choose your topic
The recruitment of key personnel such as recruitment specialists, sales managers, and scientists is now well under control and almost complete. Your company needs three more scientists, and an executive recruiter offers you the opportunity, within budget, for providing you with the means of acquiring these badly needed personnel. The dilemma is that the executive recruiter will headhunt or steal these three scientists from your competitors. He will also use false pretenses to gain entry to these organizations over the phone. You do not know if his methods are ethical or even legal, but you are fairly certain that he will be successful in his quest for making his sale of scientists to your organization.Your discussion with your coworkers and the CEO should address the following questions:What are the ethical considerations that will factor into your discussion with coworkers and the CEO whether to utilize the executive recruiter’s services?What are the ethical guidelines you will provide to the executive recruiter if your organization utilizes his services?What will you do to further ensure that your organization will be in legal compliance while using the executive recruiter’s services?Do you agree or disagree with at least two others in the discussion on their suggestions for handling the situation? Explain your rationale.
Similar Content
4 questions in APA format include references
You are conducting an initial family counseling session with the Robertsons. The family includes Dan Robertson (the father...
Central State University Management Role and Challenges Question
Explain the concept of managing up and the tactics that could be used to accomplish this.Why is managing up important in ...
Ethics and the SEC, business & finance homework help
At this point you have examined three years of financial statements for your firm. You have also determined their sustaina...
Media Relations in Sports Discussion
Media Relations in SportAssignment 2Please read Chapter 3 in the text “History and Growth of Sport Communication” and ...
fibroids, health and medicine homework help
need a word document on fibroidsapa format...
MGT401 SEU Strategic Management Worksheet
Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia
Ministry of Education
Saudi Electronic
University
المملكة العربية السعودي...
Related Tags
Book Guides
The Call of the Wild
by Jack London
The Splendid and The Vile
by Erik Larson
The Chosen
by Chaim Potok
I Cant Make This Up - Life Lessons
by Kevin Hart
One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest
by Ken Kesey
Fear - Trump in the White House
by Bob Woodward
Killers of the Flower Moon
by David Grann
Divergent
by Veronica Roth
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
11 pages
Cultural Clusters
are family loyalty that is very strong in countries • The people in these areas are also very sensitive • The countrie ...
Cultural Clusters
are family loyalty that is very strong in countries • The people in these areas are also very sensitive • The countries in this culture that our ...
Income flows versus cash flows
2.3 INCOME FLOWS VERSUS CASH FLOWS. The text states, “Over sufficiently long time periods, net income equals cash inflow ...
Income flows versus cash flows
2.3 INCOME FLOWS VERSUS CASH FLOWS. The text states, “Over sufficiently long time periods, net income equals cash inflows minus cash outflows, other than cash flows with owners.” Demonstrate the accuracy of this statement in the following scenario: Two friends contributed $50,000 each to form a new business. The owners used the amounts contributed to purchase a machine for $100,000 cash. They estimated that the useful life of the machine was five years and the salvage value was $20,000. They rented out the machine to a customer for an annual rental of $25,000 a year for five years. Annual cash operating costs for insurance, taxes, and other items totaled $6,000 annually. At the end of the fifth year, the owners sold the equipment for $22,000, instead of the $20,000 salvage value initially estimated. (Hint: Compute the total net income and the total cash flows other than cash flows with owners for the five-year period as a whole.)
HRM 560 - Diagnosing Change
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALSRequired Resources Hodges, J., & Gill, R. (2014). Sustaining Change in Organizations. Thousand O ...
HRM 560 - Diagnosing Change
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALSRequired Resources Hodges, J., & Gill, R. (2014). Sustaining Change in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Assignment 2: Diagnosing Change (A VIDEO) (I HAVE TO RECORD IT IN 7-MIN) Worth 140 points Using the organization that your professor has preapproved, synthesize the organization’s readiness for change. Evaluate whether or not to implement your new program, policy, practice, or procedure. Use a tablet, smartphone, laptop, desktop, or traditional video recorder to record a maximum of a seven (7) minute dynamic video on the topics detailed below. Note: If you are using a tablet or smartphone, you will need to email the video file to yourself, then save it to a computer in order to upload to Blackboard. You may want to upload your video to a file sharing service, such as Dropbox, if your email will not let you send a large video file. Dropbox is accessible from all smartphones and tablets from the Dropbox app. Once you are ready to upload your video to Blackboard, click here to view the "Student Video Assignment Submission" video tutorial in the "Creating a Presentation for Your Course" playlist. Please use the following naming convention in the popup window for your video once it is finished uploading: Title: Your First Name, Your Last Name – Managing Organizational Change Tags: HRM560, Organizational Change Description: First Name, Last Name – HRM560 Assignment 2 (Date Uploaded ex. 11-14-2014) Prepare and present a video that is a maximum of seven (7) minutes. Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Formulate three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change. Provide results of the diagnostic analysis Explain the results Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.In addition, write a one-page summary of your report to be submitted on our next class meeting. Note: If you choose to submit a video presentation, please also submit a one (1) page summary of your presentation. If you choose the written paper, your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Evaluate an organization’s readiness for change. Analyze diagnostic models relevant to various aspects of the change management process. Use technology and information resources to research issues in managing organizational change. Write clearly and concisely about managing organizational change using proper writing mechanics. Click here to view the written paper grading rubric for this assignment. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 140 Assignment 2: Diagnosing Change Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely described the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Partially described the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Satisfactorily described the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Thoroughly described the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. 2. Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Partially analyzed in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Satisfactorily analyzed in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Thoroughly analyzed in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. 3. Formulate three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely formulated three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Partially formulated three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Satisfactorily formulated three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Thoroughly formulated three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. 4. Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Did not submit or incompletely defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Partially appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Partially proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Partially defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Satisfactorily appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Satisfactorily proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Satisfactorily defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Thoroughly appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Thoroughly proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Thoroughly defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. 5a. Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change. Provide results of the diagnostic analysis. Weight: 5% Did not submit or incompletely assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Did not submit or incompletely provided results of the diagnostic analysis. Partially assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Partially provided results of the diagnostic analysis. Satisfactorily assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Satisfactorily provided results of the diagnostic analysis. Thoroughly assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Thoroughly provided results of the diagnostic analysis. 5b. Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change. Explain the results. Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Did not submit or incompletely explained the results. Partially assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Partially explained the results. Satisfactorily assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Satisfactorily explained the results. Thoroughly assessed the organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Thoroughly explained the results. 6. Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely interpreted whether or not the organization is ready for change. Did not submit or incompletely substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. Partially interpreted whether or not the organization is ready for change. Partially substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. Satisfactorily interpreted whether or not the organization is ready for change. Satisfactorily substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. Thoroughly interpreted whether or not the organization is ready for change. Thoroughly substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. 7. Clarity / Coherence in Presentation and writing mechanics Weight: 5% More than 6 errors present. Information is confusing and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. 5-6 errors present. Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. 3-4 errors present. Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. 0-2 errors present. Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. 8. Met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option. Weight: 5% Did not submit or incompletely met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option. Partially met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option. Satisfactorily met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option. Thoroughly met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option.
Investing Abroad Directly Starbucks Corporation Case Study Questions
Choose any Multinational Enterprise (other than Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Nintendo, Hyundai, CEMEX, ZARA, ZAPPOS) that enga ...
Investing Abroad Directly Starbucks Corporation Case Study Questions
Choose any Multinational Enterprise (other than Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Nintendo, Hyundai, CEMEX, ZARA, ZAPPOS) that engages in FDI and complete the questions below for your company of choice. Provide a copy of the articles used to complete the questions. and please use International business terminology in your answer. Thanks.
Please Choose your topic
The recruitment of key personnel such as recruitment specialists, sales managers, and scientists is now well under control ...
Please Choose your topic
The recruitment of key personnel such as recruitment specialists, sales managers, and scientists is now well under control and almost complete. Your company needs three more scientists, and an executive recruiter offers you the opportunity, within budget, for providing you with the means of acquiring these badly needed personnel. The dilemma is that the executive recruiter will headhunt or steal these three scientists from your competitors. He will also use false pretenses to gain entry to these organizations over the phone. You do not know if his methods are ethical or even legal, but you are fairly certain that he will be successful in his quest for making his sale of scientists to your organization.Your discussion with your coworkers and the CEO should address the following questions:What are the ethical considerations that will factor into your discussion with coworkers and the CEO whether to utilize the executive recruiter’s services?What are the ethical guidelines you will provide to the executive recruiter if your organization utilizes his services?What will you do to further ensure that your organization will be in legal compliance while using the executive recruiter’s services?Do you agree or disagree with at least two others in the discussion on their suggestions for handling the situation? Explain your rationale.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents