Description
Is there any reverse treatment if someone has an abnormality in telomerase activity?
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Yes, there are some inhibitors of telomerase activity
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
logistics final paper
Choose one of the 3 scenarios listed below and write a 3000 word paper (plus or minus 10%) that briefly describes the inci ...
logistics final paper
Choose one of the 3 scenarios listed below and write a 3000 word paper (plus or minus 10%) that briefly describes the incident. The final paper will be your opportunity to present a plan and objectives for providing logistic support to a fictional disaster situation. Although every situation encountered has its own unique requirements in order to successfully support the operation, there are basic actions taken pre-, intra- and post that should be followed. Incorporate what you have learned in policy, practice and possibly personal experience and develop an operational (tactical) plan- focused on logistics support- to ensure that disaster operations go smoothly. The goal of your paper should not to create the “perfect solution”; more it should be an examination/analysis of the situation at hand, and your role as a disaster logistician to assist the Incident Commander in supporting emergency operations. You may select one of the topics for your paper:A community of approximately 10,000 has been exposed to an unknown virus. It appears to be spread by contact. At present, only a small portion of the population is affected. Government leaders and health officials are contemplating community containment. Discuss how you, as the logistic chief, would supply and support emergency operations, what agencies would you seek support from, and establish points of distribution.Severe storms have ravaged your rural community of 10,000. Fortunately, there are few deaths but many are displaced. Being rural, access to the community is limited and made worse by the storms. Discuss your immediate actions post-incident, and present a plan for short term sustainment of operations and support to population. If a logistics pre-plan would be beneficial, include that in your discussion. Your rural community of 10,000 main employer- a large agricultural chemical processing plant- is struck by a large fire. Due to the nature of the chemicals, the fire may last for days. Emergency Management has decided to tell citizens to shelter in place versus to evacuate. The incident has drawn responders from a large area, and most arrive ill equipped for a sustained operation. Further complicating the issue is water runoff from fire suppression into the town’s only source of water. Discuss how you would support both the citizens and the providers while being aware of sheltering, along with limited movement because of the fire. Do not be concerned about the potential exposure- focus on the logistic support. readings : 1. Ciottone, Gregory – Disaster Medicine, 2nd Edition (2016) ISBN# 978 0 3232 8665 72. Tatham, Peter and Christopher, Martin- Humanitarian Logistics, 2nd Edition (2014) ISBN #978 0 7494 7087 63. Kovacs, Gyongi and Spens, Karen- Relief Supply Chain for Disasters; Humanitarian, Aid and Emergency Logistics (2012) ISBN 978-1-60960-824-8
Health Care Timeline
Details:Review the Topic Material, "Timeline for the History of Public Health and Epidemiology" to complete this assignmen ...
Health Care Timeline
Details:Review the Topic Material, "Timeline for the History of Public Health and Epidemiology" to complete this assignment. Using this resource as an example, create your own timeline in a Word document with significant dates that influenced and changed the health care delivery systems.Your timeline should begin where the timeline in the topic material above ends (1988).Your timeline should end with the most current and significant information that you can find. You are required to add a minimum of 10 significant dates to this timeline in order to receive a passing grade.Provide a detailed description for each significant date and event you add to the timeline.Use appropriate and scholarly sources in order to complete this assignment successfully, such as peer-reviewed literature and web sources that have .edu, .gov, and .org domain addresses. Wikipedia, and most .com sources are not considered to be of sufficient scholarly rigor.While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
NUR 641E Grand Canyon University W7 Psoriasis Disease Discussion
Choose a medical condition from the neurological, musculoskeletal, or integumentary system and explain the pathophysiology ...
NUR 641E Grand Canyon University W7 Psoriasis Disease Discussion
Choose a medical condition from the neurological, musculoskeletal, or integumentary system and explain the pathophysiology changes that may occur. What patient education would need to be included related to this disorder?
NURS 602 University of Alabama in Huntsville Quantitative Research Article Critique
1. Does the title succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?
2. Is the problem stated una ...
NURS 602 University of Alabama in Huntsville Quantitative Research Article Critique
1. Does the title succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?
2. Is the problem stated unambiguously, and is it easy to identify?
3. Does the problem statement build a cogent, persuasive argument for the new study?
4. Does the problem have significance for nursing?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hypotheses or research questions
1. Are research questions and/or hypotheses explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified? Can you infer the research question from the text? If so, what is it?
2. Are questions and hypotheses appropriately worded, with clear specification of key variables and the study population?
3. Are the questions/hypotheses consistent with the literature review and the conceptual framework?
1.
2.
3.
Literature Review
1. Is the literature review up to date and based mainly on primary sources?
2. Does the review provide a state-of-the-art synthesis of evidence on the problem?
3. Does the literature review provide a sound basis for the new study?
1.
2.
3.
Method, Protection of human rights
1. Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants? Was the study externally reviewed by an IRB/ethics review board?
2. Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants?
1.
2.
Research Design
1. Was the most rigorous possible design used, given the study purpose?
2. Were appropriate comparisons made to enhance interpretability of the findings?
3. Was the number of data collection points appropriate?
4. Did the design minimize biases and threats to the internal, construct, and external validity of the study (e.g., was blinding used, was attrition minimized)?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Population and Sample
1. Is the population described? Is the sample described in sufficient detail?
2. Was the best possible sampling design used to enhance the sample’s representativeness? Were sampling biases minimized?
3. Was the sample size adequate? Was a power analysis used to estimate sample size needs?
1.
2.
3.
Data Collection and Measurement
1. Are the operational and conceptual definitions congruent?
2. Were key variables operationalized using the best possible method (e.g., interviews, observations, and so on) and with adequate justification?
3. Are specific instruments adequately described and were they good choices, given the study purpose, variables being studied, and the study population?
4. Does the report provide evidence that the data collection methods yielded data that were reliable and valid?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Procedures
1. If there was an intervention, is it adequately described, and was it rigorously developed and implemented? Did most participants allocated to the intervention group actually receive it? Is there evidence of intervention fidelity?
2. Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the staff who collected data appropriately trained?
1.
2.
Results, Data Analysis
1. Were analyses undertaken to address each research question or test each hypothesis?
2. Were appropriate statistical methods used, given the level of measurement of the variables, number of groups being compared, and assumptions of the tests?
3. Was the most powerful analytic method used (e.g., did the analysis help to control for confounding variables)?
4. Were Type I and Type II errors avoided or minimized?
5. Were problems of missing values evaluated and adequately addressed?
6. Is information about statistical significance presented? Is information about effect size and precision of estimates (confidence intervals) presented?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Findings and Interpretation
1. Are the findings adequately summarized, with good use of tables and figures?
2 Are interpretations well-founded and consistent with the study’s limitations?
3. Does the report address the issue of the generalizability of the findings?
4. Do the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further research—and are those implications reasonable and complete?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Researcher Credibility
1. Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?
1.
Summary Assessment
2. Despite any limitations, do the study findings appear to be valid—do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?
3. Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?
2.
3.
5 pages
Qualitative Research Article Critique.edited
The purpose of the research was to offer a description for the practice of nursing where these care providers deliver care ...
Qualitative Research Article Critique.edited
The purpose of the research was to offer a description for the practice of nursing where these care providers deliver care in an anticipated manner ...
6 pages
Discussion 5 Case 4.edited
“An 82-year-old man recently returned to the long-term care facility after hospitalization for open reduction internal f ...
Discussion 5 Case 4.edited
“An 82-year-old man recently returned to the long-term care facility after hospitalization for open reduction internal fixation of the right hip. He ...
Similar Content
American Red Cross Strategy Business Plan
The purpose of this assignment is to conduct market analysis to set goals and formulate action and communication plans for...
PUB 655 Grand Canyon University Public Health Question
WRITE A response EITHER AGREEING/ DISAGREEING FOR FUTHER ELABORATING ON THE SUBJECT POSTED BY CLASSMATE.PLEASE:- minimum o...
The Interview: The medical interview serves several functions, health and medicine homework help
The Interview:The medical interview serves several functions. It is used to collect information to assist in diagnosis of ...
help find the average statistics (find for 18 year old male) for the charts below please
attached in doc...
Nursing Theory Paper
This assignment requires to write a 700 to 1050 word paper NOT INCLUDING the title or reference page that explains how a f...
Week 3 Dicussion Disruptive Innovation for APRN
This week, you will learn about the last competency—ethical decision making. You will learn about the ethical concerns o...
Discussion Responses 2
Hello, I find your discussion post very insightful and relevant to our subject of study. I concur with you that the 1984 O...
Theory Of Change And Program Portfolio 1 2 Page Paper Pr
The pages 109-138 focus on the fundamental aspects of an organization in terms of its culture and mission. The author’s ...
Week S Post
1. What is split ticket voting and what effect does it have on U.S. government? What type of government (divided or united...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Sense And Sensibility
by Jane Austen
Fast Food Nation
by Eric Schlosser
Brave New World
by Aldous Huxley
Anthem
by Ayn Rand
Blink
by Malcolm Gladwell
The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
by Stieg Larsson
The Lord of the Flies
by William Golding
Cant Hurt Me - Master Your Mind and Defy the Odds
by David Goggins
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
logistics final paper
Choose one of the 3 scenarios listed below and write a 3000 word paper (plus or minus 10%) that briefly describes the inci ...
logistics final paper
Choose one of the 3 scenarios listed below and write a 3000 word paper (plus or minus 10%) that briefly describes the incident. The final paper will be your opportunity to present a plan and objectives for providing logistic support to a fictional disaster situation. Although every situation encountered has its own unique requirements in order to successfully support the operation, there are basic actions taken pre-, intra- and post that should be followed. Incorporate what you have learned in policy, practice and possibly personal experience and develop an operational (tactical) plan- focused on logistics support- to ensure that disaster operations go smoothly. The goal of your paper should not to create the “perfect solution”; more it should be an examination/analysis of the situation at hand, and your role as a disaster logistician to assist the Incident Commander in supporting emergency operations. You may select one of the topics for your paper:A community of approximately 10,000 has been exposed to an unknown virus. It appears to be spread by contact. At present, only a small portion of the population is affected. Government leaders and health officials are contemplating community containment. Discuss how you, as the logistic chief, would supply and support emergency operations, what agencies would you seek support from, and establish points of distribution.Severe storms have ravaged your rural community of 10,000. Fortunately, there are few deaths but many are displaced. Being rural, access to the community is limited and made worse by the storms. Discuss your immediate actions post-incident, and present a plan for short term sustainment of operations and support to population. If a logistics pre-plan would be beneficial, include that in your discussion. Your rural community of 10,000 main employer- a large agricultural chemical processing plant- is struck by a large fire. Due to the nature of the chemicals, the fire may last for days. Emergency Management has decided to tell citizens to shelter in place versus to evacuate. The incident has drawn responders from a large area, and most arrive ill equipped for a sustained operation. Further complicating the issue is water runoff from fire suppression into the town’s only source of water. Discuss how you would support both the citizens and the providers while being aware of sheltering, along with limited movement because of the fire. Do not be concerned about the potential exposure- focus on the logistic support. readings : 1. Ciottone, Gregory – Disaster Medicine, 2nd Edition (2016) ISBN# 978 0 3232 8665 72. Tatham, Peter and Christopher, Martin- Humanitarian Logistics, 2nd Edition (2014) ISBN #978 0 7494 7087 63. Kovacs, Gyongi and Spens, Karen- Relief Supply Chain for Disasters; Humanitarian, Aid and Emergency Logistics (2012) ISBN 978-1-60960-824-8
Health Care Timeline
Details:Review the Topic Material, "Timeline for the History of Public Health and Epidemiology" to complete this assignmen ...
Health Care Timeline
Details:Review the Topic Material, "Timeline for the History of Public Health and Epidemiology" to complete this assignment. Using this resource as an example, create your own timeline in a Word document with significant dates that influenced and changed the health care delivery systems.Your timeline should begin where the timeline in the topic material above ends (1988).Your timeline should end with the most current and significant information that you can find. You are required to add a minimum of 10 significant dates to this timeline in order to receive a passing grade.Provide a detailed description for each significant date and event you add to the timeline.Use appropriate and scholarly sources in order to complete this assignment successfully, such as peer-reviewed literature and web sources that have .edu, .gov, and .org domain addresses. Wikipedia, and most .com sources are not considered to be of sufficient scholarly rigor.While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
NUR 641E Grand Canyon University W7 Psoriasis Disease Discussion
Choose a medical condition from the neurological, musculoskeletal, or integumentary system and explain the pathophysiology ...
NUR 641E Grand Canyon University W7 Psoriasis Disease Discussion
Choose a medical condition from the neurological, musculoskeletal, or integumentary system and explain the pathophysiology changes that may occur. What patient education would need to be included related to this disorder?
NURS 602 University of Alabama in Huntsville Quantitative Research Article Critique
1. Does the title succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?
2. Is the problem stated una ...
NURS 602 University of Alabama in Huntsville Quantitative Research Article Critique
1. Does the title succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?
2. Is the problem stated unambiguously, and is it easy to identify?
3. Does the problem statement build a cogent, persuasive argument for the new study?
4. Does the problem have significance for nursing?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hypotheses or research questions
1. Are research questions and/or hypotheses explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified? Can you infer the research question from the text? If so, what is it?
2. Are questions and hypotheses appropriately worded, with clear specification of key variables and the study population?
3. Are the questions/hypotheses consistent with the literature review and the conceptual framework?
1.
2.
3.
Literature Review
1. Is the literature review up to date and based mainly on primary sources?
2. Does the review provide a state-of-the-art synthesis of evidence on the problem?
3. Does the literature review provide a sound basis for the new study?
1.
2.
3.
Method, Protection of human rights
1. Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants? Was the study externally reviewed by an IRB/ethics review board?
2. Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants?
1.
2.
Research Design
1. Was the most rigorous possible design used, given the study purpose?
2. Were appropriate comparisons made to enhance interpretability of the findings?
3. Was the number of data collection points appropriate?
4. Did the design minimize biases and threats to the internal, construct, and external validity of the study (e.g., was blinding used, was attrition minimized)?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Population and Sample
1. Is the population described? Is the sample described in sufficient detail?
2. Was the best possible sampling design used to enhance the sample’s representativeness? Were sampling biases minimized?
3. Was the sample size adequate? Was a power analysis used to estimate sample size needs?
1.
2.
3.
Data Collection and Measurement
1. Are the operational and conceptual definitions congruent?
2. Were key variables operationalized using the best possible method (e.g., interviews, observations, and so on) and with adequate justification?
3. Are specific instruments adequately described and were they good choices, given the study purpose, variables being studied, and the study population?
4. Does the report provide evidence that the data collection methods yielded data that were reliable and valid?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Procedures
1. If there was an intervention, is it adequately described, and was it rigorously developed and implemented? Did most participants allocated to the intervention group actually receive it? Is there evidence of intervention fidelity?
2. Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the staff who collected data appropriately trained?
1.
2.
Results, Data Analysis
1. Were analyses undertaken to address each research question or test each hypothesis?
2. Were appropriate statistical methods used, given the level of measurement of the variables, number of groups being compared, and assumptions of the tests?
3. Was the most powerful analytic method used (e.g., did the analysis help to control for confounding variables)?
4. Were Type I and Type II errors avoided or minimized?
5. Were problems of missing values evaluated and adequately addressed?
6. Is information about statistical significance presented? Is information about effect size and precision of estimates (confidence intervals) presented?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Findings and Interpretation
1. Are the findings adequately summarized, with good use of tables and figures?
2 Are interpretations well-founded and consistent with the study’s limitations?
3. Does the report address the issue of the generalizability of the findings?
4. Do the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further research—and are those implications reasonable and complete?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Researcher Credibility
1. Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?
1.
Summary Assessment
2. Despite any limitations, do the study findings appear to be valid—do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?
3. Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?
2.
3.
5 pages
Qualitative Research Article Critique.edited
The purpose of the research was to offer a description for the practice of nursing where these care providers deliver care ...
Qualitative Research Article Critique.edited
The purpose of the research was to offer a description for the practice of nursing where these care providers deliver care in an anticipated manner ...
6 pages
Discussion 5 Case 4.edited
“An 82-year-old man recently returned to the long-term care facility after hospitalization for open reduction internal f ...
Discussion 5 Case 4.edited
“An 82-year-old man recently returned to the long-term care facility after hospitalization for open reduction internal fixation of the right hip. He ...
Earn money selling
your Study Documents