Description
Sandy creates her best pieces of art late in the day.
- prepositional phrase modifying an adverb
- adverb modifying other adverbs
- prepositional phrase modifying other prepositional phrases
-
preposition with compound objects
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!
It is an prepositional phrase modifying an adverb
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Really great stuff, couldn't ask for more.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
voting rights
TOPIC: Should felons who have completed their sentence (Incarceration, Probation, and Parole) be allowed to vote?Pick a c ...
voting rights
TOPIC: Should felons who have completed their sentence (Incarceration, Probation, and Parole) be allowed to vote?Pick a controversial ethical topic or moral issue. Decide what your position is on the topic and prepare to explain why. Pick one or more ethical theories to justify your beliefs about the topic.Conduct quality research on the topic and present that research. A good topic of choice will feature at least five professional sources from the ERAU Hunt Library database. REF: (5-9 mandatory, can use additional sources)Phelps, M. S. (2013). The paradox of probation: Community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law & Policy, 35(1-2), 51-80. doi:10.1111/lapo.12002Burmila, E. M. (2017). Voter turnout, felon disenfranchisement and partisan outcomes in presidential elections, 1988-2012. Social Justice Research, 30(1), 72-88. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/10....http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2O16-O512/felony... ; Turney, K., Wildeman, C., & Schnittker, J. (2012). As fathers and felons: Explaining the effects of current and recent incarceration on major depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(4), 465-481. doi:10.1177/0022146512462400Massoglia, M., Firebaugh, G., & Warner, C. (2013). Racial variation in the effect of incarceration on neighborhood attainment. American Sociological Review, 78(1), 142-165. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.era...Unbiased articles and academic studies are best. Examples are scholarly periodicals, journals, books, research forums and Internet periodicals by reputable organizations. You may also use reputable news media (Newsweek, Time, government publications, and web sites), but these do not count toward your total references requirement (five required). Do not use encycopedias, dictionaries, Wikipedia, and popular forums or Internet web sites.Create a 10-minute slide style presentation using PowerPoint with accompanying audio or refer to the Presentation Guide for other available software options. Present both sides of the issue fairly, then justify your viewpoint. End with at least three ethical discussion questions about the topic for the class to discuss. Include a slide that lists your references in APA format (see the presentation outline section). Make sure your PowerPoint features an appropriate number of slides and presents the information as clearly as possible. Avoid including slides with too many words, lack of clarity, and poor grammar. Use illustrations where appropriate. Utilize the notes section of the slide for large chunks of text or supporting information.Your presentation must follow this outline:Title Slide - This first slide must include the presentation title, your full name, and the date.Body - The next slides will contain an explanation and summary of both sides of the issue. Use your research to objectively (your opinion will come later) present the facts and opinions of bother sides fairly. In your slides, cite (current APA format) the research you use, including citations. Your explanation and summaries should be in depth, thus taking up several slides (should be 3+ slides). Use the notes section of the slide if you feel the slides are becoming crowded with too much text. Relate any principles, concepts, or information from your textbook into your presentation.Reference Slide - This next slide must list all sources in current APA format.Opinion Slide - This next slide is your opinion. Present your own opinion about the controversy. You must explain why you believe what you do. Also, tie your opinion to one or more of the ethical approaches discussed in the textbook. State this ethical approach on the slide and explain why the approach is the right. Ex. "Utilitarian approach focuses on consequences of abortion, more infant deaths vs. reduced back-alley deaths; deontology approach, does a fetus have rights vs. rights of mother; etc. Use the text or another professional source to support your stance. Be sure to properly cite your sources accordingly.Conclusion and Discussion Questions - Provide a summary of your presentation and close your presentation with three discussion questions for the class about the topic. Think about these questions. Your questions must be ethically challenging and tough. You want your questions to really make your peers think about the topic and invoke a great deal of discussion. These questions will serve as the basis for our class discussion in Module 7.
3 pages
Tools Final
Majority of the people in the logistics field are mandated with different duties and responsibilities. They should be will ...
Tools Final
Majority of the people in the logistics field are mandated with different duties and responsibilities. They should be willing to work in different ...
Information Management and Patient Records Health Law Paper
Please complete the following REVIEW QUESTIONS from your textbook. You do not have to write out the questions. However, yo ...
Information Management and Patient Records Health Law Paper
Please complete the following REVIEW QUESTIONS from your textbook. You do not have to write out the questions. However, your answers should be in complete sentences. All Chapters should be submitted in ONE DOCUMENT and in MS WORD FORMAT.Chapter 13: Information Management and Patient RecordsChapter 14: Patient Consent, Rights, and ResponsibilitiesChapter 15: Health Care EthicsChapter 17: End-of-Life IssuesChapter 18: Legal Reporting Requirements
You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date.
This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOU ...
You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date.
This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. Learning Objectives:Students will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of both personal and universal significance. Their writing should demonstrate that they can construct cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.Assessment:Students should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument. Your assignment is to read any ONE of the following four articles:The Frivolity of EvilHow and How Not to Love MankindWhat We Have to LoseRoads to SerfdomThen, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author's main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers' insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are rather long and complex. The author likes to make extensive use of his rather copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com handy as you work your way through your chosen article. The purpose of this essay assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to discuss, analyze, and evaluate complex philosophic arguments. I am confident that the reading assignments, tests, and discussion boards will have prepared you for this final, and no doubt challenging, essay assignment.Note: I only allow one attempt on this assignment. Students who do not fully address all of the components of the assignment as stated in the instructions as well as the grading rubric below will have to be content with the grade they earned. Please use MLA format.Your paper will be graded according to the following rubric:Grading Rubric:The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading. 1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material: The student has correctly grasped a philosophical problem or question, has explained it accurately, and on the basis of a substantially correct interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used correctly. The essay shows evidence of the student's independent thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Short (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising no more than 10% of the body of the paper), when appropriate, to support the writer's analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. The use of block quotations will result in a severe point deduction. 95 points2.Essay has clear and coherent argument: There is a clearly stated thesis, and support for this thesis in the body of the paper. Each paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph before it. The argument presented is persuasive. The insights of two other philosophers are incorporated into the analysis. 95 points3.Essay fulfills assigned task: The essay addresses the entire assigned question or topic, elaborating on important ideas in satisfactory depth, but without bringing in anything extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and provides clarity for the paper. Important terms are clearly and accurately defined. Each paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Short (one sentence) quotations are occasionally used, when appropriate, to support the writer's analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. No more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations. 40 points4.Essay obeys standards for good persuasive writing: the writer shows that he or she is comfortable using philosophical language, and the prose is clear, not awkward. The structure of the sentences reflects the relationships between/among the ideas discussed. 40 points5.Essay is technically correct: The essay has been carefully and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in complete sentences, with punctuation that does not mislead the reader. There are no mistakes in spelling, grammar, word choice, and punctuation. 30 points
Write 6-7 pages about “The Deadly Choices at Memorial” by Sheri Fink published in the New York Times
Read: “The Deadly Choices at Memorial” by Sheri Fink published in the New York
Times on August 25, 2009. The full tex ...
Write 6-7 pages about “The Deadly Choices at Memorial” by Sheri Fink published in the New York Times
Read: “The Deadly Choices at Memorial” by Sheri Fink published in the New York
Times on August 25, 2009. The full text of the article can be found here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/magazine/30docto...
Write: A 5-8 page paper critically evaluating the decisions made by the staff at
Memorial Hospital in New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Your analysis of
the events documented in this piece should contain your own opinions regarding whether
or not you believe the actions of the staff were justifiable or ethically acceptable. The
paper MUST also be informed by some of the major ethical theories that we discuss in
class and can be found in your reading assignments. All opinions should be backed up by
strong, logical arguments. All outside resources must be cited using either MLA, APA,
or Chicago Manual of Style format.
To help prepare for this paper, consider asking yourself some or all of the following
questions after reading the piece:
Who, if anyone, is to blame for the actions that took place in the hospital?
Did the doctors have the right to administer deadly amounts of morphine to
patients who, according to the professionals, could not be rescued?
How would you evaluate the intentions of the doctors at Memorial? Did they
have the best interest of the patients in mind when making the decisions?
Should the doctors’ intentions matter when evaluating the ethics of these
decisions?
How, in your opinion, would a consequentalist/utilitarian, deontologist, and virtue
ethicist evaluate the actions of the doctors?
Grading: Your papers will be evaluated using the following rubric:
Organization: 20%
Development of well-supported arguments: 30%
Use of outside sources: 30%
Technical Writing: 20%
For tips on how to write a philosophical paper, read this article:
https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/cbagnoli/www/paperguid... Note; Use MLA reference.
Similar Content
ENG 315 Strayer University Block Business Letter Discussion
Write a Block Business Letter from the perspective of company management. It must provide bad news to the recipient and f...
UCI Interest Groups Active in American Government & Politics Discussion
Answer the following four questionsDescribe some different types of interest groups that are currently active in American ...
Discuss Characteristics of Heroes, assignment help
: Consider what it means to be a hero today and the traits and behaviors of King Arthur, Don Quixote, and Sundiata in the ...
American Military University Incident Command System Project
Your Final Project should demonstrate your grasp of the concepts covered in the course, and on an issue of particular inte...
UCF Google to Buy Fitbit for $2.1 Billion by Wakabayashi Article Questions
bringing in topical (recent) news stories related to the course content ; reading the article and thinking about how it co...
World civilizations since 1500 movie review
Movie Review Guidelines The Downfall.docxthe movie is called "down fall" (2004 movie) i can provide you with a link where ...
Grand Tour Advertisement.edited 1
Welcome for an ultimate experience across South Africa, Kenya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Qatar at $6000 per person. This pri...
Exam Part 1 And Part 2 New
The Open Door Notes: This constituted of several notes written by John Hay. John Hay was the Secretary of State of the Uni...
Memorandums
This year’s sales grants have been approved. After having an outstanding year and meeting the department sales projectio...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Cant Hurt Me - Master Your Mind and Defy the Odds
by David Goggins
The Goldfinch
by Donna Tartt
Broke Millennial: Stop Scraping by and Get Your Financial Life Together
by Erin Lowry
I Cant Make This Up - Life Lessons
by Kevin Hart
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass
by Frederick Douglass
One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest
by Ken Kesey
The Old Man and the Sea
by Ernest Hemmingway
Robinson Crusoe
by Daniel Defoe
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
voting rights
TOPIC: Should felons who have completed their sentence (Incarceration, Probation, and Parole) be allowed to vote?Pick a c ...
voting rights
TOPIC: Should felons who have completed their sentence (Incarceration, Probation, and Parole) be allowed to vote?Pick a controversial ethical topic or moral issue. Decide what your position is on the topic and prepare to explain why. Pick one or more ethical theories to justify your beliefs about the topic.Conduct quality research on the topic and present that research. A good topic of choice will feature at least five professional sources from the ERAU Hunt Library database. REF: (5-9 mandatory, can use additional sources)Phelps, M. S. (2013). The paradox of probation: Community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law & Policy, 35(1-2), 51-80. doi:10.1111/lapo.12002Burmila, E. M. (2017). Voter turnout, felon disenfranchisement and partisan outcomes in presidential elections, 1988-2012. Social Justice Research, 30(1), 72-88. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/10....http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2O16-O512/felony... ; Turney, K., Wildeman, C., & Schnittker, J. (2012). As fathers and felons: Explaining the effects of current and recent incarceration on major depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(4), 465-481. doi:10.1177/0022146512462400Massoglia, M., Firebaugh, G., & Warner, C. (2013). Racial variation in the effect of incarceration on neighborhood attainment. American Sociological Review, 78(1), 142-165. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.era...Unbiased articles and academic studies are best. Examples are scholarly periodicals, journals, books, research forums and Internet periodicals by reputable organizations. You may also use reputable news media (Newsweek, Time, government publications, and web sites), but these do not count toward your total references requirement (five required). Do not use encycopedias, dictionaries, Wikipedia, and popular forums or Internet web sites.Create a 10-minute slide style presentation using PowerPoint with accompanying audio or refer to the Presentation Guide for other available software options. Present both sides of the issue fairly, then justify your viewpoint. End with at least three ethical discussion questions about the topic for the class to discuss. Include a slide that lists your references in APA format (see the presentation outline section). Make sure your PowerPoint features an appropriate number of slides and presents the information as clearly as possible. Avoid including slides with too many words, lack of clarity, and poor grammar. Use illustrations where appropriate. Utilize the notes section of the slide for large chunks of text or supporting information.Your presentation must follow this outline:Title Slide - This first slide must include the presentation title, your full name, and the date.Body - The next slides will contain an explanation and summary of both sides of the issue. Use your research to objectively (your opinion will come later) present the facts and opinions of bother sides fairly. In your slides, cite (current APA format) the research you use, including citations. Your explanation and summaries should be in depth, thus taking up several slides (should be 3+ slides). Use the notes section of the slide if you feel the slides are becoming crowded with too much text. Relate any principles, concepts, or information from your textbook into your presentation.Reference Slide - This next slide must list all sources in current APA format.Opinion Slide - This next slide is your opinion. Present your own opinion about the controversy. You must explain why you believe what you do. Also, tie your opinion to one or more of the ethical approaches discussed in the textbook. State this ethical approach on the slide and explain why the approach is the right. Ex. "Utilitarian approach focuses on consequences of abortion, more infant deaths vs. reduced back-alley deaths; deontology approach, does a fetus have rights vs. rights of mother; etc. Use the text or another professional source to support your stance. Be sure to properly cite your sources accordingly.Conclusion and Discussion Questions - Provide a summary of your presentation and close your presentation with three discussion questions for the class about the topic. Think about these questions. Your questions must be ethically challenging and tough. You want your questions to really make your peers think about the topic and invoke a great deal of discussion. These questions will serve as the basis for our class discussion in Module 7.
3 pages
Tools Final
Majority of the people in the logistics field are mandated with different duties and responsibilities. They should be will ...
Tools Final
Majority of the people in the logistics field are mandated with different duties and responsibilities. They should be willing to work in different ...
Information Management and Patient Records Health Law Paper
Please complete the following REVIEW QUESTIONS from your textbook. You do not have to write out the questions. However, yo ...
Information Management and Patient Records Health Law Paper
Please complete the following REVIEW QUESTIONS from your textbook. You do not have to write out the questions. However, your answers should be in complete sentences. All Chapters should be submitted in ONE DOCUMENT and in MS WORD FORMAT.Chapter 13: Information Management and Patient RecordsChapter 14: Patient Consent, Rights, and ResponsibilitiesChapter 15: Health Care EthicsChapter 17: End-of-Life IssuesChapter 18: Legal Reporting Requirements
You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date.
This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOU ...
You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date.
This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. Learning Objectives:Students will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of both personal and universal significance. Their writing should demonstrate that they can construct cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.Assessment:Students should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument. Your assignment is to read any ONE of the following four articles:The Frivolity of EvilHow and How Not to Love MankindWhat We Have to LoseRoads to SerfdomThen, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author's main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers' insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are rather long and complex. The author likes to make extensive use of his rather copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com handy as you work your way through your chosen article. The purpose of this essay assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to discuss, analyze, and evaluate complex philosophic arguments. I am confident that the reading assignments, tests, and discussion boards will have prepared you for this final, and no doubt challenging, essay assignment.Note: I only allow one attempt on this assignment. Students who do not fully address all of the components of the assignment as stated in the instructions as well as the grading rubric below will have to be content with the grade they earned. Please use MLA format.Your paper will be graded according to the following rubric:Grading Rubric:The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading. 1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material: The student has correctly grasped a philosophical problem or question, has explained it accurately, and on the basis of a substantially correct interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used correctly. The essay shows evidence of the student's independent thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Short (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising no more than 10% of the body of the paper), when appropriate, to support the writer's analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. The use of block quotations will result in a severe point deduction. 95 points2.Essay has clear and coherent argument: There is a clearly stated thesis, and support for this thesis in the body of the paper. Each paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph before it. The argument presented is persuasive. The insights of two other philosophers are incorporated into the analysis. 95 points3.Essay fulfills assigned task: The essay addresses the entire assigned question or topic, elaborating on important ideas in satisfactory depth, but without bringing in anything extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and provides clarity for the paper. Important terms are clearly and accurately defined. Each paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Short (one sentence) quotations are occasionally used, when appropriate, to support the writer's analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. No more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations. 40 points4.Essay obeys standards for good persuasive writing: the writer shows that he or she is comfortable using philosophical language, and the prose is clear, not awkward. The structure of the sentences reflects the relationships between/among the ideas discussed. 40 points5.Essay is technically correct: The essay has been carefully and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in complete sentences, with punctuation that does not mislead the reader. There are no mistakes in spelling, grammar, word choice, and punctuation. 30 points
Write 6-7 pages about “The Deadly Choices at Memorial” by Sheri Fink published in the New York Times
Read: “The Deadly Choices at Memorial” by Sheri Fink published in the New York
Times on August 25, 2009. The full tex ...
Write 6-7 pages about “The Deadly Choices at Memorial” by Sheri Fink published in the New York Times
Read: “The Deadly Choices at Memorial” by Sheri Fink published in the New York
Times on August 25, 2009. The full text of the article can be found here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/magazine/30docto...
Write: A 5-8 page paper critically evaluating the decisions made by the staff at
Memorial Hospital in New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Your analysis of
the events documented in this piece should contain your own opinions regarding whether
or not you believe the actions of the staff were justifiable or ethically acceptable. The
paper MUST also be informed by some of the major ethical theories that we discuss in
class and can be found in your reading assignments. All opinions should be backed up by
strong, logical arguments. All outside resources must be cited using either MLA, APA,
or Chicago Manual of Style format.
To help prepare for this paper, consider asking yourself some or all of the following
questions after reading the piece:
Who, if anyone, is to blame for the actions that took place in the hospital?
Did the doctors have the right to administer deadly amounts of morphine to
patients who, according to the professionals, could not be rescued?
How would you evaluate the intentions of the doctors at Memorial? Did they
have the best interest of the patients in mind when making the decisions?
Should the doctors’ intentions matter when evaluating the ethics of these
decisions?
How, in your opinion, would a consequentalist/utilitarian, deontologist, and virtue
ethicist evaluate the actions of the doctors?
Grading: Your papers will be evaluated using the following rubric:
Organization: 20%
Development of well-supported arguments: 30%
Use of outside sources: 30%
Technical Writing: 20%
For tips on how to write a philosophical paper, read this article:
https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/cbagnoli/www/paperguid... Note; Use MLA reference.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents