Unit 6 Assessment Research Paper Draft Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 65 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload InstructionsDevelop: Research PaperEvaluation Title: Research Paper DraftThe first draft is designed from the outline submitted on the Unit 6 Discussion Board. Please review peer comments and feedback as you write the paper. Consider the information presented in Unit 6.The completed paper will be formatted in APA and include: A title page in APA formatAn abstract in APA format8-10 pages of researched content.Introduction that includes: statement of the problem, definition of terms, claim statement significance of the study, thesisBody of the paper that includes: background for the research, presentation and analysis of the data, discussion of the research and dataConclusion statement: analytical summary, thesis reworded, recommendationsA Reference Page(s) in APA formatProvide in-text citations in APA format Submit the draft research paper along with the draft literature review.Estimated time to complete: 6 hoursRubric Unit 6 Assessment Research Paper Draft Unit 6 Assessment Research Paper Draft Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Topic 5.0 pts Level 5 Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points. 4.0 pts Level 4 Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points. 3.5 pts Level 3 Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points. 3.0 pts Level 2 Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused. 2.0 pts Level 1 Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable. 0.0 pts Level 0 Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Existing Knowledge, Research, and/or Views 10.0 pts Level 5 Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more). 5.0 pts Level 4 Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects. 4.0 pts Level 3 Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects. 3.0 pts Level 2 Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified. 2.0 pts Level 1 Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches. 0.0 pts 0 Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content EN304-CO2 10.0 pts Level 5 Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. 9.0 pts Level 4 Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. 8.0 pts Level 3 Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. 7.0 pts Level 2 Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. 6.0 pts Level 1 Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement. 0.0 pts Level 0 There is no evidence of a defined statement. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis 10.0 pts Level 5 Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 9.0 pts Level 4 Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 8.0 pts Level 3 Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 7.0 pts Level 2 Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. 6.0 pts Level 1 Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. 0.0 pts Level 0 Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion 10.0 pts Level 5 Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings. 9.0 pts Level 4 Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings. 8.0 pts Level 3 Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings. 7.0 pts Level 2 Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings. 6.0 pts Level 1 States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings. 0.0 pts 0 States an illogical conclusion from findings. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Limitations and Implications 5.0 pts Level 5 Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications. 4.0 pts Level 4 Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications. 3.5 pts Level 3 Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications. 3.0 pts Level 2 Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications. 2.0 pts Level 1 Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported. 0.0 pts 0 Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing 10.0 pts Level 5 The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 9.0 pts Level 4 The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. 8.0 pts Level 3 The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. 7.0 pts Level 2 The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 6.0 pts Level 1 The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. 0.0 pts Level 0 The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA PRICE-I 5.0 pts Level 5 The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. 4.0 pts Level 4 The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 3.5 pts Level 3 The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 3.0 pts Level 2 The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 2.0 pts Level 1 Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. 0.0 pts Level 0 There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references. 5.0 pts Total Points: 65.0

Instructions: Answer the Follow up Question only. My post is for better understanding the follow up question. Please proper cite any citation in text and reference*Follow up Question: Is it possible the Soviets had a legitimate concern about the Western powers threatening them?MY POST : Why the United States was unable to avoid entering a cold war with Soviet Union?The cold war was generally a conflict for world superiority. The conflict between soviet union and the united states was inevitable because America did not want to allow the idea of communism to spread.it was the competition between the two parties that accelerated the cold war and since neither the soviet union nor the united states was willing to give up and surrender, the conflict could not last as long as the two parties remained a threat to one another.The cold war was mainly rooted from the fear of communism. The United States was highly concerned with the expansion of communism especially when the Soviet Union began to control some part of Europe. The United States government was afraid that the Soviet Union would generate a revolution in the western European countries and which would eventually reach United States soil and therefore they had to fight it.Winston Churchill gave a speech in 1946 in Fulton town and made a point of concern on the danger that western democracies were in the process of being taken over by communism and came up with a solution through forming an alliance to fight for their interests.The danger of communism increased when it reached in the western hemisphere and imposed a new framework of rivalry between great powers, the democratic United States thus rose against the communist to eradicate the danger of communism spread. The threat of the spread of communism thus forced the United States to enter into a cold war with the Soviet Union and not to quit until they effectively fight communism spread.