PHL/320 Week 2 Peer Review Paper

Business & Finance
Price: $10 USD

Question description

Week 2 Paper Peer Review

Pair up with a member of your Learning Team for the Peer Review activity this week.

Exchange your Globalization Argumentative paper with your assigned peer by day 2.

Read your assigned peer's Globalization Argumentative paper.

Read Critical Thinking, the Long Version in Ch. 1 of Critical Thinking.

Use the list as a guideline to complete your review of your peer's paper, and provide feedback.

Post your feedback to the activity thread. For the sake of privacy, include the title of the paper and not the student's name in your response.



Here is the questions that needs to be answered

How well does the student

  • determine what information is or is not pertinent;
  • distinguish between rational claims and emotional ones;
  • separate fact from opinion;
  • recognize the ways in which evidence might be limited or compromised;
  • spot deception and holes in the arguments of others;
  • present his/her own analysis of the data or information;
  • recognize logical flaws in arguments;
  • draw connections between discrete sources of data and information;
  • attend to contradictory, inadequate, or ambiguous information;
  • construct cogent arguments rooted in data rather than opinion;
  • select the strongest set of supporting data;
  • avoid overstated conclusions;
  • identify holes in the evidence and suggest additional information to collect;
  • recognize that a problem may have no clear answer or single solution;
  • propose other options and weigh them in the decision;
  • consider all stakeholders or affected parties in suggesting a course of action;
  • articulate the argument and the context for that argument;
  • correctly and precisely use evidence to defend the argument;
  • logically and cohesively organize the argument;
  • avoid extraneous elements in an argument's development;
  • present evidence in an order that contributes to a persuasive argument?

The information did not contain any emotional claims or opinions. The information was well organized and the student met all the requirements for her own analysis. There were no flaws in the argument and facts were presented. The student provided strong evidence for the argument. References were also provided. Overall this was a well organized paper with the proper information and evidence while meeting all the requirements set by the instructor.

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
School: UC Berkeley
Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1821 tutors are online

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors