PHI 210RS – Module 7 Case Analysis Rubric Identify the moral issue(s) and the parties involved; discuss the case with respect to the principle of utility, taking care to identify the benefits and burdens that pertain to the parties affected. Rating Scale Exemplary: Proficient: Basic: Corresponds to an A- to A (90-100%) Corresponds to B- to B+ (80-89%) Corresponds to C- to C+ (70-79%) Novice: Not Attempted: Corresponds to D to D+ (60-69%) Corresponds to an F (0-59%) Students will complete the assignment with attention to the following criteria: Criteria Elements Analyzing case in terms of Care Ethics (identification of parties involved, benefits and burdens, and alternative possible actions or policies) 90% Mechanics of Writing 10% Total Not Attempted (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) Novice (does not meet expectations; performance is substandard) Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 0-53.99% 54-62.99% 72-80.99% 81-90% Paraphrases the information in the case without attempting an analysis or states opinions without attempting an analysis. Discusses irrelevant facts Attempts to provide an analysis of the case; connects analysis to facts of the case; is vague on one of the following: identifying the parties involved or the benefits and burdens at stake, or the alternative possible actions or policies at stake Provides a well-rounded analysis of the case; connects analysis to facts of the case; is successful in all three of the following: identifying the parties involved, the benefits and burdens at stake, and the alternative possible actions or policies at stake 0-5.99% Attempts to provide an analysis of the case, but does not connect analysis to facts of the case. Is vague on three counts: identifying the parties involved, the benefits and burdens at stake, and the alternative possible actions or policies at stake 6-6.99% 63-71.99% Attempts to provide an analysis of the case; connects analysis to facts of the case; is vague on two of the following: identifying the parties involved or the benefits and burdens at stake, or the alternative possible actions or policies at stake 7-7.99% 8-8.99% 9-10% Little to no evidence of proper writing mechanics The grammar of the case analysis greatly impedes understanding of content The case analysis needs a good deal of improvement with respect to grammar, spelling, and/or style The case analysis is mostly free of errors with respect to grammar, spelling, and/or style, but needs some improvement The case analysis is nearly perfect with respect to grammar, spelling, and style Score ___/90 ___/10 ____/100
Purchase answer to see full attachment