Purpose of the AssessmentThe purpose of this assignment is to write a critical literature review on the topic of “21stCentury Leadership.”It is essential that you are able to critically review literature as this is a key component of master’s level work.This assignment also requires you to read and analyse a range of academic materials, again a key component of master’s level study.It is important that you can demonstrate your ability to read widely and that you are able to discuss, analyse and critically analyse the research that you use in your work.As a masters level business student it is also essential that your knowledge is up to date in relation to key business issues and that you can reach evidence based conclusions in your writing. This means that all of your writing is supported by quality academic material and is correctly Harvard Referenced.Assessment TaskUsing 21st Century leadership as a basis for your literature review, outline the key academic themes on this topic. Using good quality academic sources you should outline the following:What are the predicted key competencies for 21st century leaders? How are these similar or different to classical leadership capabilities?What are the underlying causes of changes to leadership competencies?Compare, contrast, synthesise and critically analyse the academic research on this topic.Present an overall, evidence based conclusion on the topic.You must write a 2,500 word critical literature review on this topic. You must use good quality academic sources to give an overview of 21st Century Leadership, such as academic journals and quality practitioner materials and sources. You must discuss and critique the sources that you use in order to reach evidence based conclusions.You are required to use good quality academic sources throughout your work to support your arguments.A critical literature review requires you to look at good quality research on your chosen topic to give an overview of the research in this area. This will require you to discuss academic definitions, identify key themes in the literature, and discuss the potential applications and implications of the literature and to show that you understand the quality of the sources that you are using.Complete your discussions with an overall conclusion which is based on and referenced with quality academic material.Your work must be fully Harvard referenced and include a separate reference list at the back of your work.You can access support for critical writing, writing literature reviews and master’s level writing, referencing and other academic guidance on the skills hub:http://skillshub.northampton.ac.uk/Assessment BreakdownYou work will be marked against the level 7 marking criteria.

How can you, as a counselor, avoid becoming "stuck" in a particular theoretical framework? Identify specific ways that you can ensure you continue to grow. What are some trends you are interested in learning about now that you understand counseling theory?This discussion question is informed by the following CACREP Standard: 2.F.5.a. Theories and models of counseling.

Guide for a Selected Chronic ConditionGoal:Design a study guide that will assist you and your peers to translate relevant clinical guidelines and evidence-based research into evidence-based practice to promote health and prevent chronic health problems.You must choose one of the conditions below:Congestive Heart FailureYour study guide must include:Definition, etiologyOccurrence/epidemiologyClinical presentationDiagnostic testingDifferential diagnosisNon-pharmacological and pharmacological management and follow upPlease use the attached template below to completed your assignment.Submission Instructions:The study guide is to be clear and concise and will provide a quick reference for a specific chronic disease.Include your resources and guidelines used for the elaboration of the study guide.Students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, misspelling, and references should be current (published within the last five years).Grading Rubric Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.Essay/Paper RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues/Problems4 pointsDistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.3 pointsExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.2 pointsFairIdentifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.1 pointPoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.4 pointsAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems4 pointsDistinguishedPresents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.3 pointsExcellentPresents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.2 pointsFairPresents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.1 pointPoorPresents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.4 pointsDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding4 pointsDistinguishedProvides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.3 pointsExcellentProvides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.2 pointsFairProvides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.1 pointPoorProvides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.4 pointsUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature4 pointsDistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.3 pointsExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.2 pointsFairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.1 pointPoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.4 pointsWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines4 pointsDistinguishedDemonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.3 pointsExcellentDemonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.2 pointsFairDemonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.1 pointPoorDemonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.4 points