Graph the function C(x) from 0 ≤ x ≤ 3000

Assignment DetailsStatistics and related graphs are commonly used in the news, advertising, and debates to illustrate and support a specific viewpoint. These statistics and graphs can often be used to mislead or misrepresent the actual data.Choose 1 of the graphs below, and discuss the following in your main post:Why do you consider the graph misleading?What should be changed or added to the graph to make the information accurate?Respond to 2 classmates who chose a different graph than you. In your response, consider finding something different that you would change or why you think the graph was set up the way that it was.(Stephanie, 2014)For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.ReferenceStephanie. (2014, January 24). Misleading graphs: Real life examples [Images]. Retrieved from https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com...Discussion Board Reminders: Must have three posts: A Main Post and two replies to peers.First post: Either your main post or a reply to others must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week.Second and third post: Must be posted on a different day from the first post.Connect to Content: At least one post must refer to course learning materials. See the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards for help with connecting to the content.Engaging in Class Discussions: For more information on making the most of your class dialog, review the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards. Grading RubricAssignment CriteriaProficient DescriptorPointsQuality of Main Post30 Points TotalStudent’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirements: Responds completely to all of parts of discussion question (8 points)Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (8 points)Delivers a thoughtful response demonstrating insights and reflections (7 points)Connects to both key content concepts and personal experiences (7 points)/30 pts.Response to Peers24 PointsTotalResponds to a minimum of 2 peers (12 points per response):Substantive response (6 points)Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include (6 points):Provides additional resourcesConnects to key conceptsShares personal or professional experiencesContributes new information or perspectivePresents a competing viewpoint/24 pts.Support from Learning Resources3 PointsTotalAt least one post refers to course learning resources./3 pts.Professional Writing3 pointsResponse is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors.Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others./3 pts.Total/60 pts.