Description
Need nonfiction or fiction work of short story at least two pages that is a romance. No plagarisim and pictures are ok as long as you reference them. Need in 7 hours please make sure grammar is correct.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
I use Studypool every time I need help studying, and it never disappoints.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational (or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy
Question:Paper B1: a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational (or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy.This ...
a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational (or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy
Question:Paper B1: a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational (or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy.This assignment gives you an opportunity to analyze a key IT-related organizational (or personal, if not in the job force) ethical issue, related to privacy subject to relevant laws, regulations, and policies. Both of the following sites provide sources, and an excellent backdrop for issues relating to privacy protection and the law.See EPIC Privacy Issues at: http://epic.org/privacy/ See List on left and/or: EFF Privacy athttps://www.eff.org/issues/privacy [see list in center on this page].This includes sub-topics discussing information privacy, privacy laws, applications and court rulings (case law is usually an extension of the basic law based on the facts from specific cases and real-world court decisions), and key privacy and anonymity issues. While the sites provide many interesting topics, be sure to focus on our class IT topics.Use the template below and the list of suggested workforce privacy topics from one of the sites above to produce a matrix to map a key organizational ethical (or personal, if not in the job force) issue and how this issue is affected by laws, regulations, and policies. Use the list of normative ethics principles below to help you complete the matrix. Choose any three (only three) of the following list of twelve (12) principles of normative ethics described below.Prepare the Ethical Issue matrix and include the following explanation (200 words) —double-space your narrative—below the matrix:Why I chose the dilemma;Why I chose the three principles; andAn analysis of the research used to identify the actions in the matrix.The completed matrix allows you to weigh the different issues involved and assign a rank as to the importance of the actions based on the effect on the stakeholders.Submit the matrix for grading to the LEO Assignments Module.Indicate appropriate APA in-text and source citations for all sources. In addition to critical thinking and analysis skills, your assignment should reflect appropriate grammar and spelling, good organization, and proper business-writing style.This assignment is directly related to Paper-B2. The ethical issue identified in this assignment will be used in your Paper B2 Assignment. Paper B2 asks you to write a policy that corrects the ethical issue described in Paper B1.Normative Ethics ListAutonomy: is the duty to maximize the individual's right to make his or her own decisions.Beneficence: is the duty to do good both individually and for all.Confidentiality: is the duty to respect privacy of information and action.Equality: is the duty to view all people as moral equals.Finality: is the duty to take action that may override the demands of law, religion, and social customs.Justice: is the duty to treat all fairly, distributing the risks and benefits equally.Non-maleficence: is the duty to cause no harm, both individually and for all.Understanding/Tolerance: is the duty to understand and to accept another viewpoint if reason dictates doing so is warranted.Publicity: is the duty to take actions based on ethical standards that must be known and recognized by all who are involved.Respect for persons: is the duty to honor others, their rights, and their responsibilities. Showing respect others implies that we do not treat them as a mere means to our end.Universality: is the duty to take actions that hold for everyone, regardless of time, place, or people involved. This concept is similar to the Categorical Imperative.Veracity: is the duty to tell the truth.A sample template for the matrix is shown below. To reconstruct the sample template, you may use the Table Tool in MS Word or copy and paste this template
Belhaven University Healthcare Finance Discussion
Who are some major non-hospital and non-physician sectors of the healthcare industry? What do they do? Give examples of ...
Belhaven University Healthcare Finance Discussion
Who are some major non-hospital and non-physician sectors of the healthcare industry? What do they do? Give examples of the organizations.
cloud Virtualization, writing homework help
Assume that your company has 1,000 desktops, for which your CIO wants to deliver an operating system and environment on de ...
cloud Virtualization, writing homework help
Assume that your company has 1,000 desktops, for which your CIO wants to deliver an operating system and environment on demand. Discuss which Microsoft desktop virtualization tools you would require and the corresponding cost.Provide information from your readings to support your statements. Your well-written essay should be 2-3 pages in length and should incorporate at least four academic sources
JS 151 San Jose State University Justice Studies Questions
Each answer must be detail and as long as they needed to be At approximately 3:10 a.m. on November 5, 2017, in San ...
JS 151 San Jose State University Justice Studies Questions
Each answer must be detail and as long as they needed to be At approximately 3:10 a.m. on November 5, 2017, in San José, California, police officers responded to a radio dispatch indicating that a man had hit his girlfriend with with a baseball bat. The woman had called 911 screaming into the phone, "My boyfriend is attacking me with a Louisville Slugger!" Because the girlfriend refuses to testify. At trial, the prosecution attempts to admit the 911 statement into evidence over the objections of the defense attorney. Does the 911 statement constitute hearsay? Is there an exception to the hearsay rule? If the trial judge declares the statement NOT hearsay, what will the defense ague? What will the prosecution argue? (hint: Crawford (attached)) How should the judge decide? (50 points) "Fast" Eddie Jones is cruising down the highway in his tricked-out Honda when he is pulled over by a police officer. The officer runs the plates and discovers an outstanding warrant for Eddie's arrest. The policeman immediately detains Eddie and conducts a search incident to arrest and finds a small amount of meth-amphetamine on Eddie's person. The database used by the policeman was out-of-date and needed to be updated. Had it been updated; the database would have NOT shown any outstanding warrants for Eddie. Eddie's lawyers file a motion to suppress the drugs found by the policeman. What will they argue? How will the prosecution likely respond? If you were the judge, how would you decide? (30 Points) When Khloe Kardashian was married to Lamar Odom, she witnessed a telephone conversation between Lamar and a well-known prostitute. She overheard Lamar make several incriminating statements concerning his "professional" relationship with the prostitute and the protestation ring she was involved. Khloe divorced Lamar shortly thereafter. Police, relying on information received from an unrelated witness, lawfully raided a popular Beverly Hills hotel and legally arrested several call-girls and several of their clients, including Lamar Odom. Prosecutors attempt to introduce the incriminating statements (communications) made by Lamar. Should the incriminating statements be allowed? Khloe is ready and willing to testify against Lamar. Pursuant to the California Spousal Privilege Statutes (Links to an external site.), should the judge allow it? (20 points)4. Chester led a youth-group that provided church sponsored recreational activities. He occasionally drove the church bus that transported the children to and from the church. In addition, Chester was one of several church staff members who monitored sleep-overs at the church. He also hosted sleep-overs at his home in Lodi. Each of the three victims testified to having been approximately seven to ten years old when they first met Chester at church, and to having become close to him through the youth-group. Each rode the bus with Chester, and spent the night at the church or at his home in Lodi. All remembered sitting on Chester’s lap while he touched them inappropriately, and some remembered performing fellatio on him, while others remembered him performing cunnilingus on them, and having sexual intercourse. Chester was charged with several counts of sexual assault of the Lodi-house girls. Before trial, Chester moved to suppress evidence of two other girls (now adults) that would testify that Chester began to sexually assault them when they were approximately eight years old. The assaults ranged from touching their breasts and vaginal area to sexual intercourse, which occurred at Chester’s then home in Oakley. According to the girls, they had been shown pornographic movies, and Chester had photographed the girls in the nude. One of the girls testified that she was fourteen years old the last time Chester had sexual intercourse with her at his Oakley residence. The other girl testified that at his Oakley home, when she was ten or eleven years old, Chester had undressed her and digitally penetrated her, performed cunnilingus on her and had her perform fellatio. Chester was never charged with any crime associated with the Oakley-house girls. The trial court allowed the testimony of the two Oakley-house girls pursuant to Rule 404(b), which provides: Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person to show that the person acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident. Chester was convicted on all counts of sexual assault regarding the Lodi-house girls. On appeal, Chester’s attorneys argue that the trial court errored in allowing the testimony of the Oakley-house girls. If you were a justice on the appellate court, would you have allowed this testimony? Why or why not?
Developing PICO Questions
In this Discussion, you generate a PICO question that corresponds to the Evaluation Plan Focus you developed last week.To ...
Developing PICO Questions
In this Discussion, you generate a PICO question that corresponds to the Evaluation Plan Focus you developed last week.To prepare:Develop a PICO question based on the Evaluation Plan Focus Assignment completed last week.Reflect on why it is important that this question be answered. Identify the “who cares?” factor.By Day 3Post a summary of key points (evaluation goal, viewpoint, and model) from your Evaluation Plan Focus Assignment. Post your PICO question. Explain why you developed this question, and why it is important to be considered.
Integration of Faith and Learning Critical Thinking Discussion
Integration of Faith & Learning 5 – Critical Thinking
“Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants i ...
Integration of Faith and Learning Critical Thinking Discussion
Integration of Faith & Learning 5 – Critical Thinking
“Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants in evil, but in your thinking be mature.” I Corinthians 14:20 (ESV)
On the doctoral journey, you will need to adjust your thinking and perspective. It is inevitable that your world view will be challenged. How you respond to those instances of challenging remains in your control. This may sound daunting and even seem to be unacceptable, but it is the inexorable result of engaging in "deep thinking" while becoming an academic. Remember, you are not just becoming a researcher, but you are also becoming a learned person (an academic) who will be charged with the responsibility of acting as a gatekeeper of knowledge and knowledge development. What distinguishes an infant academic from a mature academic? Explain. How does the above biblical challenge to move toward mature thinking parallel the increased responsibility for knowledge and knowledge development that comes with the earning of a doctoral degree? Explain.
Similar Content
South Carolina State University Hazing Prevention Discussion
Comprehensive Assignment – Submission of your Final Research ProposalYour final research proposal should consist of your...
University of California Irvine Street Gangs Discussion
Do you think that street gang formation and membership can be stopped? If so why and if not, why not?
...
University of California Santa Cruz Principles of Game Field Article Essay
Write a 250 words reflection on 2 articles, make sure that the essay demonstrates familiarity with the readings and appreh...
Campbellsville University Beta and Capital Budgeting Research Paper
Part 1: BetaVisit the following web site or other websites: https://finance.yahoo.com/1. Search for the beta of General M...
Central Michigan University Application Letter and Resume Discussion
Read the chapter, making note of the concepts, examples and points you find most interesting, confusing or noteworthy, as ...
Peer reviewed article 3 to 4 pages
I'm attaching 3 articles which is peer reviewed you have to read them carefully then answer to the Questions that I will p...
Cultural Traditions 1
The united states take pride in being a nation established by several immigrants and a nation that has absorbed many world...
1 To 5 Questions
1. Looking at the chart of vaccine-preventable contagious diseases, provide a prioritized list of required vaccinations fo...
Covid 19 Ppp Loan Fraud
A man in Georgia was sentenced to eighteen months in jail for receiving $ 285,742 via a PPP loan approved under the Covid-...
Related Tags
Book Guides
No Exit
by Taylor Adams
The Lost Man
by Jane Harper
The Elegant Universe
by Brian Greene
The Scarlet Letter
by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Where the Crawdads Sing
by Delia Owens
The President is Missing
by James Patterson, Bill Clinton
Heart of Darkness
by Joseph Conrad
A Separate Peace
by John Knowles
Divergent
by Veronica Roth
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational (or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy
Question:Paper B1: a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational (or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy.This ...
a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational (or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy
Question:Paper B1: a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational (or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy.This assignment gives you an opportunity to analyze a key IT-related organizational (or personal, if not in the job force) ethical issue, related to privacy subject to relevant laws, regulations, and policies. Both of the following sites provide sources, and an excellent backdrop for issues relating to privacy protection and the law.See EPIC Privacy Issues at: http://epic.org/privacy/ See List on left and/or: EFF Privacy athttps://www.eff.org/issues/privacy [see list in center on this page].This includes sub-topics discussing information privacy, privacy laws, applications and court rulings (case law is usually an extension of the basic law based on the facts from specific cases and real-world court decisions), and key privacy and anonymity issues. While the sites provide many interesting topics, be sure to focus on our class IT topics.Use the template below and the list of suggested workforce privacy topics from one of the sites above to produce a matrix to map a key organizational ethical (or personal, if not in the job force) issue and how this issue is affected by laws, regulations, and policies. Use the list of normative ethics principles below to help you complete the matrix. Choose any three (only three) of the following list of twelve (12) principles of normative ethics described below.Prepare the Ethical Issue matrix and include the following explanation (200 words) —double-space your narrative—below the matrix:Why I chose the dilemma;Why I chose the three principles; andAn analysis of the research used to identify the actions in the matrix.The completed matrix allows you to weigh the different issues involved and assign a rank as to the importance of the actions based on the effect on the stakeholders.Submit the matrix for grading to the LEO Assignments Module.Indicate appropriate APA in-text and source citations for all sources. In addition to critical thinking and analysis skills, your assignment should reflect appropriate grammar and spelling, good organization, and proper business-writing style.This assignment is directly related to Paper-B2. The ethical issue identified in this assignment will be used in your Paper B2 Assignment. Paper B2 asks you to write a policy that corrects the ethical issue described in Paper B1.Normative Ethics ListAutonomy: is the duty to maximize the individual's right to make his or her own decisions.Beneficence: is the duty to do good both individually and for all.Confidentiality: is the duty to respect privacy of information and action.Equality: is the duty to view all people as moral equals.Finality: is the duty to take action that may override the demands of law, religion, and social customs.Justice: is the duty to treat all fairly, distributing the risks and benefits equally.Non-maleficence: is the duty to cause no harm, both individually and for all.Understanding/Tolerance: is the duty to understand and to accept another viewpoint if reason dictates doing so is warranted.Publicity: is the duty to take actions based on ethical standards that must be known and recognized by all who are involved.Respect for persons: is the duty to honor others, their rights, and their responsibilities. Showing respect others implies that we do not treat them as a mere means to our end.Universality: is the duty to take actions that hold for everyone, regardless of time, place, or people involved. This concept is similar to the Categorical Imperative.Veracity: is the duty to tell the truth.A sample template for the matrix is shown below. To reconstruct the sample template, you may use the Table Tool in MS Word or copy and paste this template
Belhaven University Healthcare Finance Discussion
Who are some major non-hospital and non-physician sectors of the healthcare industry? What do they do? Give examples of ...
Belhaven University Healthcare Finance Discussion
Who are some major non-hospital and non-physician sectors of the healthcare industry? What do they do? Give examples of the organizations.
cloud Virtualization, writing homework help
Assume that your company has 1,000 desktops, for which your CIO wants to deliver an operating system and environment on de ...
cloud Virtualization, writing homework help
Assume that your company has 1,000 desktops, for which your CIO wants to deliver an operating system and environment on demand. Discuss which Microsoft desktop virtualization tools you would require and the corresponding cost.Provide information from your readings to support your statements. Your well-written essay should be 2-3 pages in length and should incorporate at least four academic sources
JS 151 San Jose State University Justice Studies Questions
Each answer must be detail and as long as they needed to be At approximately 3:10 a.m. on November 5, 2017, in San ...
JS 151 San Jose State University Justice Studies Questions
Each answer must be detail and as long as they needed to be At approximately 3:10 a.m. on November 5, 2017, in San José, California, police officers responded to a radio dispatch indicating that a man had hit his girlfriend with with a baseball bat. The woman had called 911 screaming into the phone, "My boyfriend is attacking me with a Louisville Slugger!" Because the girlfriend refuses to testify. At trial, the prosecution attempts to admit the 911 statement into evidence over the objections of the defense attorney. Does the 911 statement constitute hearsay? Is there an exception to the hearsay rule? If the trial judge declares the statement NOT hearsay, what will the defense ague? What will the prosecution argue? (hint: Crawford (attached)) How should the judge decide? (50 points) "Fast" Eddie Jones is cruising down the highway in his tricked-out Honda when he is pulled over by a police officer. The officer runs the plates and discovers an outstanding warrant for Eddie's arrest. The policeman immediately detains Eddie and conducts a search incident to arrest and finds a small amount of meth-amphetamine on Eddie's person. The database used by the policeman was out-of-date and needed to be updated. Had it been updated; the database would have NOT shown any outstanding warrants for Eddie. Eddie's lawyers file a motion to suppress the drugs found by the policeman. What will they argue? How will the prosecution likely respond? If you were the judge, how would you decide? (30 Points) When Khloe Kardashian was married to Lamar Odom, she witnessed a telephone conversation between Lamar and a well-known prostitute. She overheard Lamar make several incriminating statements concerning his "professional" relationship with the prostitute and the protestation ring she was involved. Khloe divorced Lamar shortly thereafter. Police, relying on information received from an unrelated witness, lawfully raided a popular Beverly Hills hotel and legally arrested several call-girls and several of their clients, including Lamar Odom. Prosecutors attempt to introduce the incriminating statements (communications) made by Lamar. Should the incriminating statements be allowed? Khloe is ready and willing to testify against Lamar. Pursuant to the California Spousal Privilege Statutes (Links to an external site.), should the judge allow it? (20 points)4. Chester led a youth-group that provided church sponsored recreational activities. He occasionally drove the church bus that transported the children to and from the church. In addition, Chester was one of several church staff members who monitored sleep-overs at the church. He also hosted sleep-overs at his home in Lodi. Each of the three victims testified to having been approximately seven to ten years old when they first met Chester at church, and to having become close to him through the youth-group. Each rode the bus with Chester, and spent the night at the church or at his home in Lodi. All remembered sitting on Chester’s lap while he touched them inappropriately, and some remembered performing fellatio on him, while others remembered him performing cunnilingus on them, and having sexual intercourse. Chester was charged with several counts of sexual assault of the Lodi-house girls. Before trial, Chester moved to suppress evidence of two other girls (now adults) that would testify that Chester began to sexually assault them when they were approximately eight years old. The assaults ranged from touching their breasts and vaginal area to sexual intercourse, which occurred at Chester’s then home in Oakley. According to the girls, they had been shown pornographic movies, and Chester had photographed the girls in the nude. One of the girls testified that she was fourteen years old the last time Chester had sexual intercourse with her at his Oakley residence. The other girl testified that at his Oakley home, when she was ten or eleven years old, Chester had undressed her and digitally penetrated her, performed cunnilingus on her and had her perform fellatio. Chester was never charged with any crime associated with the Oakley-house girls. The trial court allowed the testimony of the two Oakley-house girls pursuant to Rule 404(b), which provides: Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person to show that the person acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident. Chester was convicted on all counts of sexual assault regarding the Lodi-house girls. On appeal, Chester’s attorneys argue that the trial court errored in allowing the testimony of the Oakley-house girls. If you were a justice on the appellate court, would you have allowed this testimony? Why or why not?
Developing PICO Questions
In this Discussion, you generate a PICO question that corresponds to the Evaluation Plan Focus you developed last week.To ...
Developing PICO Questions
In this Discussion, you generate a PICO question that corresponds to the Evaluation Plan Focus you developed last week.To prepare:Develop a PICO question based on the Evaluation Plan Focus Assignment completed last week.Reflect on why it is important that this question be answered. Identify the “who cares?” factor.By Day 3Post a summary of key points (evaluation goal, viewpoint, and model) from your Evaluation Plan Focus Assignment. Post your PICO question. Explain why you developed this question, and why it is important to be considered.
Integration of Faith and Learning Critical Thinking Discussion
Integration of Faith & Learning 5 – Critical Thinking
“Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants i ...
Integration of Faith and Learning Critical Thinking Discussion
Integration of Faith & Learning 5 – Critical Thinking
“Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants in evil, but in your thinking be mature.” I Corinthians 14:20 (ESV)
On the doctoral journey, you will need to adjust your thinking and perspective. It is inevitable that your world view will be challenged. How you respond to those instances of challenging remains in your control. This may sound daunting and even seem to be unacceptable, but it is the inexorable result of engaging in "deep thinking" while becoming an academic. Remember, you are not just becoming a researcher, but you are also becoming a learned person (an academic) who will be charged with the responsibility of acting as a gatekeeper of knowledge and knowledge development. What distinguishes an infant academic from a mature academic? Explain. How does the above biblical challenge to move toward mature thinking parallel the increased responsibility for knowledge and knowledge development that comes with the earning of a doctoral degree? Explain.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents