Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Concept Analysis
Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose:
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to conduct a formal concept analysis of one concept found in a nursing theory
using an identified framework.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
(CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of
the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
(CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
(CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4
Total Points Possible: 200
Requirements:
Description of the Assignment
The purpose of this 6-8 page paper (not including the title page or reference page in the page count) is a formal concept analysis of one
concept found in a nursing theory, adapting the methodology of Walker and Avant (2010, pp. 157 - 179). The book by Walker and Avant is
not available electronically. This book is not needed in order to succeed with this assignment. A summary of the steps in this
method is found at the end of this document.
Any nursing theory may be used to find a concept for analysis. Only one concept is analyzed.
1
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
As part of the concept analysis, a focused review of scholarly literature is conducted, using a minimum of 3(three) scholarly
sources related to the selected concept. A formal literature review can be extensive in critiquing all the relevant literature about a
specific topic or area of knowledge. In this assignment, that level of effort is not required. What is expected is an integrated discussion
of at least three articles on the concept selected for this assignment. Themes, ideas, or facts about the concept found in the
reviewed literature are presented in an organized fashion. Note: research articles about the concept are the best kind of article for a
literature review.
The steps in a concept analysis include:
1. selection of a concept used in a nursing theory
2. identification of the aims or purposes of the analysis
3. a review of selected scholarly literature on the concept
4. identification of possible use of the selected concept
5. determination of defining attributes
6. identification of model cases
7. identification of alternate cases (borderline, related, contrary, invented, and illegitimate cases)
8. identification of antecedents and consequences
9. definition of empirical referents
The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated
throughout the analysis.
Criteria for Content
1. Introduction includes statements on the process of concept analysis, identifies the nursing concept and nursing theory from
which it was obtained, and relates the main topics of the paper. A list of possible concepts is provided below. A substantive
discussion of each of the following elements is present. All elements are supported by scholarly literature
a. One aim or purpose of the analysis
b. A review of scholarly literature (minimum of three articles)
c. Two possible uses of the concept
d. Two defining attributes
e. Two model cases
f. Two of the following alternative cases: borderline, related, contrary, invented, or illegitimate
g. One antecedent and one consequence
h. Two empirical referents
2. Concluding statements present the writer’s new knowledge on the concept acquired as a result of writing the paper
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
1. One of the textbooks required for this course may be used as one of the required references for this assignment.
2. Title page, body of paper, and reference page must be in APA format (6th edition)
3. A minimum of 3 scholarly sources on the concept are required.
2
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
4. The paper (excludes the title page and reference page) must be a minimum of 6 pages and no longer than 8 pages.
5. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.
6. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and citations are consistent with the writing style specified in the 6th edition of the APA manual.
Walker, L. O & Avant, K. C. (2010). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
Possible Concepts (These concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept in any
nursing theory)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Noise
Cleanliness of environment
Patient Assessment
Self-care deficit
Self-care
Homeostasis
Behavioral system
Boundary lines
Open system
Patient Centered Care
Empowerment
Resources
Caring
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Adaptation
Energy conservation
Meaningfulness
Modeling
Transaction
Activities of living
Actual caring occasion
Energy field
Pain
Pattern
Leadership
Engagement
Comfort
All of these concepts were selected from grand and middle-range theories presented in the course texts.
3
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Directions and Grading Criteria
Category
Points
%
Description
Introduction clearly includes all three elements: statements on
the process of concept analysis, identifies the selected nursing
concept and nursing theory from which it was obtained, and
names the sections of the paper
One aim or purpose of the concept analysis is substantively
discussed and is supported by scholarly literature
Introduction
12
6
Aims or Purpose
18
9.0
Literature Review
24
12.0
Uses
18
9.0
Defining Attributes
18
9.0
Model Cases
20
10.0
Alternative Cases
20
10.0
2 alternative cases are discussed substantively (borderline,
related, contrary, invented, or illegitimate), and each case has
support from the scholarly literature
Antecedents & Consequences
18
9.0
1 antecedent and 1 consequence of the selected concept are
discussed substantively and supported by the scholarly literature
Empirical Referents
18
9.0
2 empirical referents for the selected concept are discussed
substantively and supported with scholarly literature
A substantive integrated discussion of at least three scholarly
sources on the selected concept:
• themes, ideas, or facts about the concept found in the
reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion;
• Student’s new knowledge on validity of the methods used by
the different sources’ authors to learn about the concept
• Strengths and weaknesses of those authors’ conclusions
2 possible uses of the selected concept are substantively
discussed and supported by scholarly literature
2 defining attributes of the selected concept are discussed
substantively and supported by the scholarly literature
2 model cases are discussed substantively and supported by
the scholarly literature
4
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Conclusion
12
6.0
Concluding content includes clear presentation of the writer’s
new knowledge gained from writing the paper
Paper Specifications
12
6.0
Paper is at least 6 pages and not more than 8 pages in length
AND
3scholarly citations are used
APA Format (6th edition)
4
2
Citations in Text
3
1.5
Citation of ideas and information
Writing Mechanics
3
1.5
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation and the
writing style of the APA 6th edition
Total
200
100
APA format used for the text, title page and reference page(s).
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above
requirements.
5
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Grading Rubric
Assignment
Criteria
A
(100 - 92%)
Outstanding or
highest level of
performance
B
(91-84%)
Very good or high level of
performance
C
(83-76%)
Competent or satisfactory
level of performance
F
(75-0%)
Poor or failing or
unsatisfactory level of
performance
Content
Possible Points =
190
Introduction
Aims or
Purposes of
Analysis
Literature Review
12-11 Points
10 Points
9 Points
8-0 Points
Introduction clearly
includes all 3
elements:
statements on the
process of concept
analysis, identifies
the selected nursing
concept and nursing
theory from which it
was obtained, and
names the sections
of the paper
Introduction clearly
includes only 2 of the
required elements:
statements on the process
of concept analysis,
identifies the selected
nursing concept and
nursing theory from which
it was obtained, and
names the sections of the
paper
Introduction clearly
includes only 1 of the
required elements:
statements on the process
of concept analysis,
identifies the selected
nursing concept and
nursing theory from which
it was obtained, and
names the sections of the
paper.
Introduction includes none of
the required elements
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
13-0 Points
One aim or purpose
of the concept
analysis is
substantively
discussed and is
supported by
scholarly literature
One aim or purpose of the
concept analysis is
superficially discussed and
is supported by scholarly
literature
One aim or purpose of the
concept analysis is
superficially discussed and
lacks scholarly support
24-22 Points
21-20 Points
19-18 Points
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
OR
Introduction is absent (0
points)
An aim or purpose of the
concept analysis is missing
17-0 Points
6
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Possible Uses of
Concept
Defining
A substantive
integrated discussion
of at least three
scholarly sources
on the selected
concept:
• themes, ideas, or
facts about the
concept found in
the reviewed
sources are
presented in an
organized
fashion;
• Student’s new
knowledge on
validity of the
methods used by
the different
sources’ authors
to learn about the
concept
• Strengths and
weaknesses of
those authors’
conclusions
A superficial or nonintegrated discussion of at
least three scholarly
sources on the selected
concept:
• themes, ideas, or facts
about the concept
found in the reviewed
sources are presented
in an organized
fashion;
• Student’s new
knowledge on validity
of the methods used by
the different sources’
authors to learn about
the concept
• Strengths and
weaknesses of those
authors’ conclusions
A superficial or nonintegrated discussion of at
least three scholarly
sources on the selected
concept is missing one or
more of the following:
• themes, ideas, or facts
about the concept
found in the reviewed
sources are presented
in an organized
fashion;
• Student’s new
knowledge on validity
of the methods used by
the different sources’
authors to learn about
the concept
• Strengths and
weaknesses of those
authors’ conclusions
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
13-0 Points
2 possible uses of
the selected concept
are substantively
discussed and
supported by
scholarly literature
Only 1 possible use of the
selected concept is
substantively discussed
and supported by scholarly
literature
Only 1 possible use of the
selected concept is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
No possible uses of the
selected concept are
discussed (naming a
possible use without
discussion is included here)
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
13-0 Points
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
Fewer than 3sourcesare
included in the literature
review
OR
No literature review is
present
7
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Attributes
Model Cases
2 defining attributes
of the selected
concept are
discussed
substantively and
supported by the
scholarly literature
Only 1 defining attribute of
the selected concept is
substantively discussed
and supported by scholarly
literature
Only 1 defining attribute of
the selected concept is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
No possible uses of the
selected concept are
discussed (naming a
possible use without
discussion is included here)
20-18 Points
17 Points
16-15 Points
14-0 Points
Only 1 model case is
discussed substantively
and supported by scholarly
literature
Only 1 model case is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
20-18 Points
17 Points
16-15 Points
2 alternative cases
are discussed
substantively
(borderline, related,
contrary, invented, or
illegitimate), and
each case has
support from the
scholarly literature
Only one alternative case
is discussed substantively
(borderline, related,
contrary, invented, or
illegitimate) and has
support from the scholarly
literature
One or two alternative
cases are discussed
superficially (borderline,
related, contrary, invented,
or illegitimate)
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
13-0 Points
1 antecedent and 1
consequence of the
selected concept are
discussed
substantively and
supported by the
scholarly literature
1 antecedent or 1
consequence of
selected concept is
substantively discussed
and supported by scholarly
literature
1 antecedent or 1
consequence of the
selected concept is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
Antecedent and
consequence are not
discussed (naming a
possible use without
discussion is included here)
2 model cases are
discussed
substantively and
supported by the
scholarly literature
Alternative
Cases
Antecedents and
consequences
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
No model cases are
provided (naming a case
without discussion is
included here)
14-0 Points
No alternative cases are
discussed (naming a case
without discussion is
included here)
8
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Empirical
Referents
Conclusion
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
2 empirical
referents for the
selected concept are
discussed
substantively and
supported with
scholarly literature
1 empirical referent for the
selected concept is
discussed substantively
and supported with
scholarly literature
1 empirical referent for the
selected concept is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
12-11 Points
10 Points
9 Points
8-0 Points
------
Conclusion content lacks
presentation of identifiable
new knowledge gained
from writing the paper
No conclusion is identifiable
10 Points
9 Points
8-0 Points
Concluding content
includes clear
presentation of the
writer’s new
knowledge gained
from writing the
paper
12-11 Points
Paper
Specifications
Paper is at least 6
pages and not more
than 8 pages in
length
Paper is less than or
exceeds the page
limitations
Paper is less than or
exceeds the page
limitations
AND
OR
3scholarly citations are
used
Fewer than 3scholarly
citations are used
No empirical referents are
discussed (naming a
possible use without
discussion is included here
Paper is less than or
exceeds the page limitations
AND
AND
3scholarly citations
are used
13-0 Points
Content Subtotal
Fewer than 3but at least 1
scholarly citations are used
_____of 190 points
Format
Possible Points =
10 Points
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
9
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
APA Format
.
Citations
4-3 Points
2 Points
There are 0 - 2
APA format errors
in the text, title
page and reference
page(s).
There are 3 - 4 APA
format errors in the
text, title page
and/or reference
page(s).
3 Points
2 Points
There are 0 - 1
errors or absences
in the citation of
ideas and
information
Writing
Mechanics
There are 2 - 4
errors or absences
in the citation of
ideas and
information
1 Point
There are 5 - 6 APA
format errors in the title
page, text, or reference
page (s).
0 Points
There are 7 or more APA format errors
in the text, title page and/or reference
page(s).
1 Point
There are 5-6 errors or
absences in the citation
of ideas and information
sources
0 Points
There are 7 or more errors or
absences in the citation of ideas and
information from sources
3 Points
2 Points
1 Point
0 Points
O-1 exceptions to
the rules of
grammar, spelling,
word usage, and
punctuation and
the writing style of
the APA 6th edition
2-4 exceptions to
the rules of
grammar, spelling,
word usage, and
punctuation and the
writing style of the
APA 6th edition
5-7 exceptions to the
rules of grammar,
spelling, word usage,
and punctuation and the
writing style of the APA
6th edition
8 or more exceptions to the rules of
grammar, spelling, word usage, and
punctuation and the writing style of the
APA 6th edition
Format Subtotal
Total Points
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
_____of 10 points
_____of 200 points
10
Chamberlain College of NursingNR 501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Walker & Avant’s Steps for Concept Analysis
These steps for conducting a concept analysis are listed in the assignment guidelines for the
Concept Paper. Walker and Avant (2011) provide extensive descriptions and discussion of
these steps. If you are interested in exploring theory and concept development further, their
book is highly recommended.
For the Concept Analysis assignment, a brief discussion of each step is provided here. Reading
concept-analysis articles from the scholarly literature can provide examples and further
information on the steps. The text by McEwen and Willis provides some article references.
The steps are:
1. Select a concept;
2. Determine the purposes of the analysis;
3. Identify all uses of the concept;
4. Identify a model case of the concept; identify each of the following cases: borderline,
related, contrary, invented, and illegitimate;
5. Identify consequences and antecedents of the concept;
6. Define empirical references of the concept (Walker & Avant, 2011).
Concept Selection
There is a list of concepts provided in the guidelines and scoring rubric for Week 4. You may
select a concept from this list or find one on your own. The concept must come from a nursing
theory.
Aims of the Analysis
While one aim of this concept analysis is to meet the requirements of an assignment, think
further on this step. Are there purposes in your nursing practice for a concept analysis? You
might want to differentiate between jargon, casual use, and scientific discourse on your concept
(Walker & Avant, 2011). If you have a research interest, how would a concept analysis help you
in designing a study?
Concept Uses
Ways to identify all the uses of a concept include using dictionaries and scholarly
literature. Keep an open mind at this point and avoid limiting yourself to only one perspective on
the concept (Walker & Avant, 2011). Go beyond healthcare resources. Read widely in the
scholarly literature for various domains of knowledge and professions. Explore some slang or
non-scholarly sources (but not extensively). Write down all the uses you find.
Now is when you use the purposes of the analysis. If you have many uses and a lot of variation,
reflecting again on the aims and purposes of your concept analysis will help you decide a
specific focus. For example, you might need to decide between considering casual uses of the
concept and scientific uses (Walker & Avant, 2011). This decision is yours to make. Keep in
mind your purpose and the scope of the assignment.
Determine Defining Attributes
Chamberlain College of NursingNR 501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Think of attributes as characteristics or descriptors. This is one of the most important parts of
your analysis. Remember this process is not rigidly sequential. Take notes on attributes for the
various concept uses – attributes that capture your attention. Look for attributes that begin to
appear frequently. Your goal is to nail down a minimum set of attributes that enable you to
distinguish this concept from similar concepts (Walker & Avant, 2011).
Identify Model Cases
A model case illustrates or exemplifies the concept, including demonstration of all defining
attributes (Walker & Avant, 2010). This model case can be a nursing model, but that is not
required. Basically, you are aiming for an example that clearly shows the concept, without
confusing or distracting elements. Get a colleague to review your model case – this can help
you focus the statements, identify new attributes, or eliminate attributes (Walker & Avant, 2011).
Perfection is not the goal. Do your best.
Identify Additional Cases
As you explore uses of your concept and possible defining attributes, you may find some
attributes of your concept that belong to related, borderline, contrary, invented, or illegitimate
model cases. In other words, these are models of not-being your concept.
•
•
•
•
Borderline cases – most but not all of the same attributes as your concept; there is some
inconsistency or difference in some, if not all of the attributes.
Related cases – have some, but not all of the same attributes; they are connected in
some way.
Contrary cases – these are the complete opposite of your concept; what your concept is
not stated to be.
Invented cases – applying your imagination, fantasy, or science-fiction leanings, you can
get an interesting ‘other’ view of your concept; how would someone from the past, the
future, or outer space demonstrate your concept’s attributes?
Identify Antecedents and Consequences
An antecedent takes place or precedes an instance of a concept. A defining attribute cannot be
an antecedent or a consequence of the target concept (Walker & Avant, 2011). Consider
situations, events, environments, or other contexts that must exist before a concept can be
present. What must exist before attachment occurs?
The outcomes or results of an instance of a concept are the consequences. Again, consider the
context, social or otherwise (Walker & Avant, 2011). What results, for example, from hope?
Define Empirical Referents
You have reached the final step – how do you measure this concept? How do you demonstrate
the concept exists or is present? An empirical referent serves as a way to establish this
existence. This is done through measuring the defining attributes. Often, the attributes and
referents are the same thing. With more abstract concepts, defining attributes are more abstract
and harder to capture empirically. When a defining attribute is abstract, you need an empirical
referent – something measurable that can serve to identify or recognize the attribute.
Reference
Chamberlain College of NursingNR 501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Walker, L.O., & Avant, K.C. (2011). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (5th ed.).
Norwalk, CT: Appleton, Lange.
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Concept Analysis
Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose:
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to conduct a formal concept analysis of one concept found in a nursing theory
using an identified framework.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
(CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of
the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
(CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
(CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4
Total Points Possible: 200
Requirements:
Description of the Assignment
The purpose of this 6-8 page paper (not including the title page or reference page in the page count) is a formal concept analysis of one
concept found in a nursing theory, adapting the methodology of Walker and Avant (2010, pp. 157 - 179). The book by Walker and Avant is
not available electronically. This book is not needed in order to succeed with this assignment. A summary of the steps in this
method is found at the end of this document.
Any nursing theory may be used to find a concept for analysis. Only one concept is analyzed.
1
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
As part of the concept analysis, a focused review of scholarly literature is conducted, using a minimum of 3(three) scholarly
sources related to the selected concept. A formal literature review can be extensive in critiquing all the relevant literature about a
specific topic or area of knowledge. In this assignment, that level of effort is not required. What is expected is an integrated discussion
of at least three articles on the concept selected for this assignment. Themes, ideas, or facts about the concept found in the
reviewed literature are presented in an organized fashion. Note: research articles about the concept are the best kind of article for a
literature review.
The steps in a concept analysis include:
1. selection of a concept used in a nursing theory
2. identification of the aims or purposes of the analysis
3. a review of selected scholarly literature on the concept
4. identification of possible use of the selected concept
5. determination of defining attributes
6. identification of model cases
7. identification of alternate cases (borderline, related, contrary, invented, and illegitimate cases)
8. identification of antecedents and consequences
9. definition of empirical referents
The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated
throughout the analysis.
Criteria for Content
1. Introduction includes statements on the process of concept analysis, identifies the nursing concept and nursing theory from
which it was obtained, and relates the main topics of the paper. A list of possible concepts is provided below. A substantive
discussion of each of the following elements is present. All elements are supported by scholarly literature
a. One aim or purpose of the analysis
b. A review of scholarly literature (minimum of three articles)
c. Two possible uses of the concept
d. Two defining attributes
e. Two model cases
f. Two of the following alternative cases: borderline, related, contrary, invented, or illegitimate
g. One antecedent and one consequence
h. Two empirical referents
2. Concluding statements present the writer’s new knowledge on the concept acquired as a result of writing the paper
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
1. One of the textbooks required for this course may be used as one of the required references for this assignment.
2. Title page, body of paper, and reference page must be in APA format (6th edition)
3. A minimum of 3 scholarly sources on the concept are required.
2
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
4. The paper (excludes the title page and reference page) must be a minimum of 6 pages and no longer than 8 pages.
5. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.
6. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and citations are consistent with the writing style specified in the 6th edition of the APA manual.
Walker, L. O & Avant, K. C. (2010). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
Possible Concepts (These concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept in any
nursing theory)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Noise
Cleanliness of environment
Patient Assessment
Self-care deficit
Self-care
Homeostasis
Behavioral system
Boundary lines
Open system
Patient Centered Care
Empowerment
Resources
Caring
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Adaptation
Energy conservation
Meaningfulness
Modeling
Transaction
Activities of living
Actual caring occasion
Energy field
Pain
Pattern
Leadership
Engagement
Comfort
All of these concepts were selected from grand and middle-range theories presented in the course texts.
3
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Directions and Grading Criteria
Category
Points
%
Description
Introduction clearly includes all three elements: statements on
the process of concept analysis, identifies the selected nursing
concept and nursing theory from which it was obtained, and
names the sections of the paper
One aim or purpose of the concept analysis is substantively
discussed and is supported by scholarly literature
Introduction
12
6
Aims or Purpose
18
9.0
Literature Review
24
12.0
Uses
18
9.0
Defining Attributes
18
9.0
Model Cases
20
10.0
Alternative Cases
20
10.0
2 alternative cases are discussed substantively (borderline,
related, contrary, invented, or illegitimate), and each case has
support from the scholarly literature
Antecedents & Consequences
18
9.0
1 antecedent and 1 consequence of the selected concept are
discussed substantively and supported by the scholarly literature
Empirical Referents
18
9.0
2 empirical referents for the selected concept are discussed
substantively and supported with scholarly literature
A substantive integrated discussion of at least three scholarly
sources on the selected concept:
• themes, ideas, or facts about the concept found in the
reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion;
• Student’s new knowledge on validity of the methods used by
the different sources’ authors to learn about the concept
• Strengths and weaknesses of those authors’ conclusions
2 possible uses of the selected concept are substantively
discussed and supported by scholarly literature
2 defining attributes of the selected concept are discussed
substantively and supported by the scholarly literature
2 model cases are discussed substantively and supported by
the scholarly literature
4
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Conclusion
12
6.0
Concluding content includes clear presentation of the writer’s
new knowledge gained from writing the paper
Paper Specifications
12
6.0
Paper is at least 6 pages and not more than 8 pages in length
AND
3scholarly citations are used
APA Format (6th edition)
4
2
Citations in Text
3
1.5
Citation of ideas and information
Writing Mechanics
3
1.5
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation and the
writing style of the APA 6th edition
Total
200
100
APA format used for the text, title page and reference page(s).
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above
requirements.
5
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Grading Rubric
Assignment
Criteria
A
(100 - 92%)
Outstanding or
highest level of
performance
B
(91-84%)
Very good or high level of
performance
C
(83-76%)
Competent or satisfactory
level of performance
F
(75-0%)
Poor or failing or
unsatisfactory level of
performance
Content
Possible Points =
190
Introduction
Aims or
Purposes of
Analysis
Literature Review
12-11 Points
10 Points
9 Points
8-0 Points
Introduction clearly
includes all 3
elements:
statements on the
process of concept
analysis, identifies
the selected nursing
concept and nursing
theory from which it
was obtained, and
names the sections
of the paper
Introduction clearly
includes only 2 of the
required elements:
statements on the process
of concept analysis,
identifies the selected
nursing concept and
nursing theory from which
it was obtained, and
names the sections of the
paper
Introduction clearly
includes only 1 of the
required elements:
statements on the process
of concept analysis,
identifies the selected
nursing concept and
nursing theory from which
it was obtained, and
names the sections of the
paper.
Introduction includes none of
the required elements
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
13-0 Points
One aim or purpose
of the concept
analysis is
substantively
discussed and is
supported by
scholarly literature
One aim or purpose of the
concept analysis is
superficially discussed and
is supported by scholarly
literature
One aim or purpose of the
concept analysis is
superficially discussed and
lacks scholarly support
24-22 Points
21-20 Points
19-18 Points
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
OR
Introduction is absent (0
points)
An aim or purpose of the
concept analysis is missing
17-0 Points
6
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Possible Uses of
Concept
Defining
A substantive
integrated discussion
of at least three
scholarly sources
on the selected
concept:
• themes, ideas, or
facts about the
concept found in
the reviewed
sources are
presented in an
organized
fashion;
• Student’s new
knowledge on
validity of the
methods used by
the different
sources’ authors
to learn about the
concept
• Strengths and
weaknesses of
those authors’
conclusions
A superficial or nonintegrated discussion of at
least three scholarly
sources on the selected
concept:
• themes, ideas, or facts
about the concept
found in the reviewed
sources are presented
in an organized
fashion;
• Student’s new
knowledge on validity
of the methods used by
the different sources’
authors to learn about
the concept
• Strengths and
weaknesses of those
authors’ conclusions
A superficial or nonintegrated discussion of at
least three scholarly
sources on the selected
concept is missing one or
more of the following:
• themes, ideas, or facts
about the concept
found in the reviewed
sources are presented
in an organized
fashion;
• Student’s new
knowledge on validity
of the methods used by
the different sources’
authors to learn about
the concept
• Strengths and
weaknesses of those
authors’ conclusions
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
13-0 Points
2 possible uses of
the selected concept
are substantively
discussed and
supported by
scholarly literature
Only 1 possible use of the
selected concept is
substantively discussed
and supported by scholarly
literature
Only 1 possible use of the
selected concept is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
No possible uses of the
selected concept are
discussed (naming a
possible use without
discussion is included here)
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
13-0 Points
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
Fewer than 3sourcesare
included in the literature
review
OR
No literature review is
present
7
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Attributes
Model Cases
2 defining attributes
of the selected
concept are
discussed
substantively and
supported by the
scholarly literature
Only 1 defining attribute of
the selected concept is
substantively discussed
and supported by scholarly
literature
Only 1 defining attribute of
the selected concept is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
No possible uses of the
selected concept are
discussed (naming a
possible use without
discussion is included here)
20-18 Points
17 Points
16-15 Points
14-0 Points
Only 1 model case is
discussed substantively
and supported by scholarly
literature
Only 1 model case is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
20-18 Points
17 Points
16-15 Points
2 alternative cases
are discussed
substantively
(borderline, related,
contrary, invented, or
illegitimate), and
each case has
support from the
scholarly literature
Only one alternative case
is discussed substantively
(borderline, related,
contrary, invented, or
illegitimate) and has
support from the scholarly
literature
One or two alternative
cases are discussed
superficially (borderline,
related, contrary, invented,
or illegitimate)
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
13-0 Points
1 antecedent and 1
consequence of the
selected concept are
discussed
substantively and
supported by the
scholarly literature
1 antecedent or 1
consequence of
selected concept is
substantively discussed
and supported by scholarly
literature
1 antecedent or 1
consequence of the
selected concept is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
Antecedent and
consequence are not
discussed (naming a
possible use without
discussion is included here)
2 model cases are
discussed
substantively and
supported by the
scholarly literature
Alternative
Cases
Antecedents and
consequences
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
No model cases are
provided (naming a case
without discussion is
included here)
14-0 Points
No alternative cases are
discussed (naming a case
without discussion is
included here)
8
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
Empirical
Referents
Conclusion
18-17 Points
16-15 Points
14 Points
2 empirical
referents for the
selected concept are
discussed
substantively and
supported with
scholarly literature
1 empirical referent for the
selected concept is
discussed substantively
and supported with
scholarly literature
1 empirical referent for the
selected concept is
discussed. The discussion
is superficial or lacks
scholarly support
12-11 Points
10 Points
9 Points
8-0 Points
------
Conclusion content lacks
presentation of identifiable
new knowledge gained
from writing the paper
No conclusion is identifiable
10 Points
9 Points
8-0 Points
Concluding content
includes clear
presentation of the
writer’s new
knowledge gained
from writing the
paper
12-11 Points
Paper
Specifications
Paper is at least 6
pages and not more
than 8 pages in
length
Paper is less than or
exceeds the page
limitations
Paper is less than or
exceeds the page
limitations
AND
OR
3scholarly citations are
used
Fewer than 3scholarly
citations are used
No empirical referents are
discussed (naming a
possible use without
discussion is included here
Paper is less than or
exceeds the page limitations
AND
AND
3scholarly citations
are used
13-0 Points
Content Subtotal
Fewer than 3but at least 1
scholarly citations are used
_____of 190 points
Format
Possible Points =
10 Points
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
9
Chamberlain College of NursingNR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice
APA Format
.
Citations
4-3 Points
2 Points
There are 0 - 2
APA format errors
in the text, title
page and reference
page(s).
There are 3 - 4 APA
format errors in the
text, title page
and/or reference
page(s).
3 Points
2 Points
There are 0 - 1
errors or absences
in the citation of
ideas and
information
Writing
Mechanics
There are 2 - 4
errors or absences
in the citation of
ideas and
information
1 Point
There are 5 - 6 APA
format errors in the title
page, text, or reference
page (s).
0 Points
There are 7 or more APA format errors
in the text, title page and/or reference
page(s).
1 Point
There are 5-6 errors or
absences in the citation
of ideas and information
sources
0 Points
There are 7 or more errors or
absences in the citation of ideas and
information from sources
3 Points
2 Points
1 Point
0 Points
O-1 exceptions to
the rules of
grammar, spelling,
word usage, and
punctuation and
the writing style of
the APA 6th edition
2-4 exceptions to
the rules of
grammar, spelling,
word usage, and
punctuation and the
writing style of the
APA 6th edition
5-7 exceptions to the
rules of grammar,
spelling, word usage,
and punctuation and the
writing style of the APA
6th edition
8 or more exceptions to the rules of
grammar, spelling, word usage, and
punctuation and the writing style of the
APA 6th edition
Format Subtotal
Total Points
NR501 Concept Paper Guidelines & Rubric.docx
Revised 1/23/13 VU
_____of 10 points
_____of 200 points
10
Purchase answer to see full
attachment