Description
"Alternative Pay Structures" Please respond to the following:
- From the e-Activity, determine how a person-focused pay program could benefit your current (or future) place of employment. Provide specific examples to support your response.
- Determine ways that broadbanding or two-tier wage plans could benefit your current (or future) place of employment. Provide specific examples to support your response.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Awesome! Perfect study aid.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
4 pages
Cultural Considerations When Interacting With Diverse People
Cultural differences can be a huge offset to effective communication, especially in a business arena. Certain miscommunica ...
Cultural Considerations When Interacting With Diverse People
Cultural differences can be a huge offset to effective communication, especially in a business arena. Certain miscommunication and confusion that may ...
6 pages
Courtroom Tv Paper
The murder instance of Nicole prompted to the detainment of his better half O.J. Simpson together with companion Ronald Go ...
Courtroom Tv Paper
The murder instance of Nicole prompted to the detainment of his better half O.J. Simpson together with companion Ronald Goldman. His capture was truly ...
USUniversity Competition Strategies Leadership And Management In Organisations
you are the CEO of a historically successful company. However, due to the globalized economy and the Internet, many compet ...
USUniversity Competition Strategies Leadership And Management In Organisations
you are the CEO of a historically successful company. However, due to the globalized economy and the Internet, many competitors have successfully entered the marketplace. Your analysists predict that if the company doesn't reinvent itself, it will rapidly lose market-share. This is a very difficult undertaking since the organization operates under traditional frameworks; your workforce is resistant to change, creativity, and innovation. Using at least one concept from each of the chapters covered thus far, and develop a plan to move your organization into the 21st century as to compete and maintain its marketshare. You have much flexibility in this assignment; the company can be whatever you want it to be. Be sure to provide examples and justification for your plan. need a 3 page paper with 8 references atleast
Ethical issues at Apple
Purpose of Assignment At times, multinational corporations encounter in-country issues that if not properly addressed, cou ...
Ethical issues at Apple
Purpose of Assignment At times, multinational corporations encounter in-country issues that if not properly addressed, could place the viability of the company at risk. Thus, it is important to promptly recognize and understand these threats so management can employ an effective solution to the problem. An in-depth analysis of this assignment will provide students with a good understanding of the potential issues involved. Assignment Steps Select one of the following cases from the textbook:
Starbucks Wins Key Trademark Case in China (Ch. 2, p. 56)
Ethical Issues at Apple (Ch. 5, p. 132)
Corruption At Daimler (Ch. 5, p. 136)
Prepare a minimum 700-word analysis addressing the following:
Analyze the legal, cultural, and ethical challenges encountered by the global business case you selected.
Determine the various roles host governments played in this particular global business operation.
Summarize the operational challenges global managers faced as illustrated in your selected case.
Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.Ethical Issues at AppleIn mid-2006, news reports surfaced suggesting there were systematic labor abuses at a factory in China that makes the iPhone and iPod for Apple, Inc. According to the reports, workers at Hongfujin Precision Industry were paid as little as $50 a month to work 15-hour shifts making Apple products. There were also reports of forced overtime and poor living conditions for the workers, many of them young women who had migrated from the countryside to work at the plant and lived in company-owned dormitories.The 2006 articles were the work of two Chinese journalists, Wang You and Weng Bao, employed by China Business News, a state-run newspaper. The target of the reports, Hongfujin Precision Industry, was reportedly China’s largest export manufacturer with overseas sales totaling $14.5 billion. Hongfujin is owned by Foxconn, a large Taiwanese conglomerate, whose customers (in addition to Apple) include Intel, Dell, and Sony Corporation. The Hongfujin factory is a small city in its own right, with clinics, recreational facilities, buses, and 13 restaurants that serve the 200,000 employees.Upon hearing the news, Apple management responded quickly, pledging to audit the operations to make sure Hongfujin was complying with Apple’s code on labor standards for subcontractors. Managers at Hongfujin took a somewhat different tack; they filed a defamation suit against the two journalists, suing them for $3.8 million in a local court, which promptly froze the journalists’ personal assets pending a trial. Clearly, the management of Hongfujin was trying to send a message to the journalist community—criticism would be costly. The suit sent a chill through the Chinese journalist community because Chinese courts have shown a tendency to favor powerful, locally based companies in legal proceedings.Within six weeks, Apple had completed its audit. The company’s report suggested that although workers had not been forced to work overtime and were earning at least the local minimum wage, many had worked more than the 60 hours a week allowed for by Apple, and their housing was substandard. Under pressure from Apple, management at Hongfujin agreed to bring practices in line with Apple’s code, committing to building new housing for employees and limiting work to 60 hours a week.However, Hongfujin did not immediately withdraw the defamation suit. In an unusually bold move in a country where censorship is still common, China Business News gave its unconditional backing to Wang and Weng. The Shanghai-based news organization issued a statement arguing that what the two journalists did “was not a violation of any rules, laws, or journalistic ethics.” The Paris-based Reporters Without Borders also took up the case of Wang and Weng, writing a letter to Apple’s then CEO, the late Steve Jobs, stating, “We believe that all Wang and Weng did was to report the facts and we condemn Foxconn’s reaction. We therefore ask you to intercede on behalf of these two journalists so that their assets are unfrozen and the lawsuit is dropped.”Once again, Apple moved quickly, pressuring Foxconn behind the scenes to drop the suit. Foxconn agreed to do so and issued a “face-saving” statement saying the two sides had agreed to end the dispute after apologizing to each other “for the disturbances brought to both of them by the lawsuit.” The experience shed a harsh light on labor conditions in China. At the same time, the response of the Chinese media, and China Business News in particular, point toward the emergence of some journalistic freedoms in a nation that has historically seen news organizations as a mouthpiece for the state.More recent news may indicate new ethical concerns at Apple's production facilities in China. In a 2014 story by BBC News, Apple is again the center of issues related to workers' hours, ID cards, housing arrangements, work meetings, and juvenile workers at its Pegatron facilities on the outskirts of Shanghai. Apple disagreed strongly with the portray of the Pegatron factory's working conditions, and stated in the BBC News article that "We are aware of no other company doing as much as Apple to ensure fair and safe working conditions."
DePaul University Pat Dunn v Chris Davies Mock Trial Case Discussion
Hey, I need help answering this business law question. In the materials for yourc case under Mock Trial Argument, do the f ...
DePaul University Pat Dunn v Chris Davies Mock Trial Case Discussion
Hey, I need help answering this business law question. In the materials for yourc case under Mock Trial Argument, do the following:Read the remaining 2 Witness Statements for Plaintiff and the remaining 2 Witness Statements for Defendant in your Mock Trial Material and provide a summary of the three (3) key facts that each Witness can testify to.
Rutgers University Code of Ethics & Healthcare Quality Questions
Developing a code of ethics is a way for a company to share its core values and practice ethical business. For example, th ...
Rutgers University Code of Ethics & Healthcare Quality Questions
Developing a code of ethics is a way for a company to share its core values and practice ethical business. For example, the National Association for Healthcare Quality has formulated a code of ethics that can be found at https://nahq.org/about/code-of-ethics (Links to an external site.).Think about a company or organization you currently work for or do business with. Find the code of ethics for the company or organization and post the link for the class.Using the code of ethics you found, give an example that you are familiar with in which the company has stayed true to the code of ethics and demonstrated ethical business practices.Discussion Grading Rubric - 25 ptsDiscussion Grading Rubric - 25 ptsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Content7.0 ptsAddresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.5.0 ptsAddresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.3.0 ptsAddresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.0.0 ptsMinimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).7.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Evidence & Sources4.0 ptsIntegrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.3.0 ptsIntegrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons. Sources are credited.2.0 ptsIntegrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.0.0 ptsDoes not integrate any evidence.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Post 14.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.3.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.2.0 ptsResponse does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion.0.0 ptsDoes not respond to another student or instructor.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Post 24.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.3.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.2.0 ptsResponse does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion.0.0 ptsDoes not respond to another student or instructor.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication4.0 ptsPresents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).3.0 ptsPresents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).2.0 ptsPresents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).0.0 ptsPresents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness of Responses1.0 ptsStudent posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.0.0 ptsStudent does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrequency of Responses1.0 ptsPosts in the discussion on two different days.0.0 ptsPosts fewer than two different days OR does not participate at all.1.0 ptsTotal Points: 25.0
Similar Content
Watch and answer
1) Watch the videos, then answer these in a 150 word paragraph. What are the acts of a crime? What is the mens rea? Why i...
Unit 1 DB Marketing Research
Marketing ResearchProfessional organizations, societies, and associations play an invaluable role in industry. Many offer ...
MBA Strategic Marketing J-4 - 300 words
You work for a major clothing retailer that is on track to miss its financial targets this year, and your CEO wants to cut...
The Global Financial Crisis and Protectionism, management assignment help
The Global Financial Crisis and Protectionism2 pages, APA style.1. Why do you think calls for protectionism are grea...
Business Statistics Kaplan University
The Assignment should be prepared using Microsoft Word and be at least two paragraphs in length (12 poi...
Prime location--discussion question
Is the business close to public transportation, expressways, can you see the business from several intersections of road? ...
P652 Job Analysis
A job analysis entails gathering and examining information regarding a specific job, including the responsibilities, knowl...
Read All Requirements Very Carefully And Write 300words Paper
The series I have chosen is The Office. The particular episode is the episode where Michael Scott carries out sensitivity ...
gold_in_bahrain.docx
Gold in Bahrain: how to make a profit on your jewelry Many people ask themselves if it is possible to make in it the Gold ...
Related Tags
Book Guides
A Farewell To Arms
by Ernest Hemingway
The BFG
by Roald Dahl
A Wrinkle as Time
by Madeleine L'Engle
The Da Vinci Code
by Dan Brown
Notes from Underground
by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
1984
by George Orwell
How to Win Friends and Influence People
by Dale Carnegie
The Underground Railroad
by Colson Whitehead
The Age Of Light
by Whitney Scharer
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
4 pages
Cultural Considerations When Interacting With Diverse People
Cultural differences can be a huge offset to effective communication, especially in a business arena. Certain miscommunica ...
Cultural Considerations When Interacting With Diverse People
Cultural differences can be a huge offset to effective communication, especially in a business arena. Certain miscommunication and confusion that may ...
6 pages
Courtroom Tv Paper
The murder instance of Nicole prompted to the detainment of his better half O.J. Simpson together with companion Ronald Go ...
Courtroom Tv Paper
The murder instance of Nicole prompted to the detainment of his better half O.J. Simpson together with companion Ronald Goldman. His capture was truly ...
USUniversity Competition Strategies Leadership And Management In Organisations
you are the CEO of a historically successful company. However, due to the globalized economy and the Internet, many compet ...
USUniversity Competition Strategies Leadership And Management In Organisations
you are the CEO of a historically successful company. However, due to the globalized economy and the Internet, many competitors have successfully entered the marketplace. Your analysists predict that if the company doesn't reinvent itself, it will rapidly lose market-share. This is a very difficult undertaking since the organization operates under traditional frameworks; your workforce is resistant to change, creativity, and innovation. Using at least one concept from each of the chapters covered thus far, and develop a plan to move your organization into the 21st century as to compete and maintain its marketshare. You have much flexibility in this assignment; the company can be whatever you want it to be. Be sure to provide examples and justification for your plan. need a 3 page paper with 8 references atleast
Ethical issues at Apple
Purpose of Assignment At times, multinational corporations encounter in-country issues that if not properly addressed, cou ...
Ethical issues at Apple
Purpose of Assignment At times, multinational corporations encounter in-country issues that if not properly addressed, could place the viability of the company at risk. Thus, it is important to promptly recognize and understand these threats so management can employ an effective solution to the problem. An in-depth analysis of this assignment will provide students with a good understanding of the potential issues involved. Assignment Steps Select one of the following cases from the textbook:
Starbucks Wins Key Trademark Case in China (Ch. 2, p. 56)
Ethical Issues at Apple (Ch. 5, p. 132)
Corruption At Daimler (Ch. 5, p. 136)
Prepare a minimum 700-word analysis addressing the following:
Analyze the legal, cultural, and ethical challenges encountered by the global business case you selected.
Determine the various roles host governments played in this particular global business operation.
Summarize the operational challenges global managers faced as illustrated in your selected case.
Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.Ethical Issues at AppleIn mid-2006, news reports surfaced suggesting there were systematic labor abuses at a factory in China that makes the iPhone and iPod for Apple, Inc. According to the reports, workers at Hongfujin Precision Industry were paid as little as $50 a month to work 15-hour shifts making Apple products. There were also reports of forced overtime and poor living conditions for the workers, many of them young women who had migrated from the countryside to work at the plant and lived in company-owned dormitories.The 2006 articles were the work of two Chinese journalists, Wang You and Weng Bao, employed by China Business News, a state-run newspaper. The target of the reports, Hongfujin Precision Industry, was reportedly China’s largest export manufacturer with overseas sales totaling $14.5 billion. Hongfujin is owned by Foxconn, a large Taiwanese conglomerate, whose customers (in addition to Apple) include Intel, Dell, and Sony Corporation. The Hongfujin factory is a small city in its own right, with clinics, recreational facilities, buses, and 13 restaurants that serve the 200,000 employees.Upon hearing the news, Apple management responded quickly, pledging to audit the operations to make sure Hongfujin was complying with Apple’s code on labor standards for subcontractors. Managers at Hongfujin took a somewhat different tack; they filed a defamation suit against the two journalists, suing them for $3.8 million in a local court, which promptly froze the journalists’ personal assets pending a trial. Clearly, the management of Hongfujin was trying to send a message to the journalist community—criticism would be costly. The suit sent a chill through the Chinese journalist community because Chinese courts have shown a tendency to favor powerful, locally based companies in legal proceedings.Within six weeks, Apple had completed its audit. The company’s report suggested that although workers had not been forced to work overtime and were earning at least the local minimum wage, many had worked more than the 60 hours a week allowed for by Apple, and their housing was substandard. Under pressure from Apple, management at Hongfujin agreed to bring practices in line with Apple’s code, committing to building new housing for employees and limiting work to 60 hours a week.However, Hongfujin did not immediately withdraw the defamation suit. In an unusually bold move in a country where censorship is still common, China Business News gave its unconditional backing to Wang and Weng. The Shanghai-based news organization issued a statement arguing that what the two journalists did “was not a violation of any rules, laws, or journalistic ethics.” The Paris-based Reporters Without Borders also took up the case of Wang and Weng, writing a letter to Apple’s then CEO, the late Steve Jobs, stating, “We believe that all Wang and Weng did was to report the facts and we condemn Foxconn’s reaction. We therefore ask you to intercede on behalf of these two journalists so that their assets are unfrozen and the lawsuit is dropped.”Once again, Apple moved quickly, pressuring Foxconn behind the scenes to drop the suit. Foxconn agreed to do so and issued a “face-saving” statement saying the two sides had agreed to end the dispute after apologizing to each other “for the disturbances brought to both of them by the lawsuit.” The experience shed a harsh light on labor conditions in China. At the same time, the response of the Chinese media, and China Business News in particular, point toward the emergence of some journalistic freedoms in a nation that has historically seen news organizations as a mouthpiece for the state.More recent news may indicate new ethical concerns at Apple's production facilities in China. In a 2014 story by BBC News, Apple is again the center of issues related to workers' hours, ID cards, housing arrangements, work meetings, and juvenile workers at its Pegatron facilities on the outskirts of Shanghai. Apple disagreed strongly with the portray of the Pegatron factory's working conditions, and stated in the BBC News article that "We are aware of no other company doing as much as Apple to ensure fair and safe working conditions."
DePaul University Pat Dunn v Chris Davies Mock Trial Case Discussion
Hey, I need help answering this business law question. In the materials for yourc case under Mock Trial Argument, do the f ...
DePaul University Pat Dunn v Chris Davies Mock Trial Case Discussion
Hey, I need help answering this business law question. In the materials for yourc case under Mock Trial Argument, do the following:Read the remaining 2 Witness Statements for Plaintiff and the remaining 2 Witness Statements for Defendant in your Mock Trial Material and provide a summary of the three (3) key facts that each Witness can testify to.
Rutgers University Code of Ethics & Healthcare Quality Questions
Developing a code of ethics is a way for a company to share its core values and practice ethical business. For example, th ...
Rutgers University Code of Ethics & Healthcare Quality Questions
Developing a code of ethics is a way for a company to share its core values and practice ethical business. For example, the National Association for Healthcare Quality has formulated a code of ethics that can be found at https://nahq.org/about/code-of-ethics (Links to an external site.).Think about a company or organization you currently work for or do business with. Find the code of ethics for the company or organization and post the link for the class.Using the code of ethics you found, give an example that you are familiar with in which the company has stayed true to the code of ethics and demonstrated ethical business practices.Discussion Grading Rubric - 25 ptsDiscussion Grading Rubric - 25 ptsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Content7.0 ptsAddresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.5.0 ptsAddresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.3.0 ptsAddresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.0.0 ptsMinimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).7.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Evidence & Sources4.0 ptsIntegrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.3.0 ptsIntegrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons. Sources are credited.2.0 ptsIntegrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.0.0 ptsDoes not integrate any evidence.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Post 14.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.3.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.2.0 ptsResponse does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion.0.0 ptsDoes not respond to another student or instructor.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Post 24.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.3.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.2.0 ptsResponse does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion.0.0 ptsDoes not respond to another student or instructor.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication4.0 ptsPresents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).3.0 ptsPresents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).2.0 ptsPresents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).0.0 ptsPresents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness of Responses1.0 ptsStudent posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.0.0 ptsStudent does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrequency of Responses1.0 ptsPosts in the discussion on two different days.0.0 ptsPosts fewer than two different days OR does not participate at all.1.0 ptsTotal Points: 25.0
Earn money selling
your Study Documents