Review the data your coworker collected in the Analysis of t-Test Data Spreadsheet.First, plan your analysis. Second, conduct your analysis.Explain the followings:Part 1: PlanningWhat are the null and alternative hypotheses?Where did you obtain your data or who obtained it for you?Part 2: AnalysisWhat are the descriptive statistics for your sample? Include:Sample sizeMeanMedianModeStandard deviationPost a response to your classmate. Be constructive and professional.This is an answer from another student. I need a reply to their answer with a minimum of 100 words and without any references."The null hypothesis would be that there is no difference in contribution between managers or individual employees. The alternative hypothesis would be that there is a difference in contribution between managers and individual employees. The data for this analysis was obtained by a coworker, not sure the method that was used.The sample size is 53 individuals which consists of 25 managers and 28 individual contributors.The mean for managers is 59.24.The mean for individual contributors is 42.39The overall mean is 50.33The median for managers is 67.The mode for managers is 78, 54, 56, 67, 23.The median for individual contributors is 35.The mode for individual contributors is 23.The overall median is 45.The overall mode is 23.The standard deviation for this data group is 28.7According to the results, the null hypothesis is wrong since there is a difference in contribution between managers and individual employees."

Identify a quality improvement opportunity in your organization or practice. In a 1,250-1,500 word paper, describe the problem or issue and propose a quality improvement initiative based on evidence-based practice. Apply "The Road to Evidence-Based Practice" process, illustrated in Chapter 4 of your textbook, to create your proposal.Include the following: Provide an overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs.Explain why a quality improvement initiative is needed in this area and the expected outcome.Discuss how the results of previous research demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes. Include a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years, not included in the course materials or textbook, that establish evidence in support of the quality improvement proposed.Discuss steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative. Provide evidence and rationale to support your answer.Explain how the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated to determine whether there was improvement.Support your explanation by identifying the variables, hypothesis test, and statistical test that you would need to prove that the quality improvement initiative succeeded. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.