Description
Subcultures are defined in such a way that a person may belong to many at the same time. What in the definition allows any given person to belong to multiple groups, and what subcultures would apply to almost everyone?
*The five-paragraph essay. Introductory paragraph, three body paragraphs and concluding paragraph.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Module 05 Course Project - Performance Management Proposal
Conduct academic research using the library's databases, like Business Source Complete via EBSCO and Business via ProQuest ...
Module 05 Course Project - Performance Management Proposal
Conduct academic research using the library's databases, like Business Source Complete via EBSCO and Business via ProQuest,
as well as reliable webpages and create a minimum 4 page proposal to
the CEO in which you complete the following for approval of a
performance management system for the new position, Claims Supervisor:Description of the categories to be measured.Description of ratings to be used.Example of performance evaluation form.Explanation for each of your recommendations.Remember
that this is a proposal. Make sure to format your paper properly for
your proposal. A proposal is a persuasive document, so make sure to use
proper language and tone. Remember, you are the HR Manager and you are
writing to the CEO so use a tone in your proposal that is specific to
your audience (the CEO). Include an APA formatted reference page with at least 2 credible sources. Make sure to include APA in-text citations for any information used from outside sources.
OPS400 CSU Global Operation Supply Chain Management Paper
Once selected as a tutor I will give detailed instructions as to how to access the lab. FILLER TEXT
FILLER TEXT
FILLER TEX ...
OPS400 CSU Global Operation Supply Chain Management Paper
Once selected as a tutor I will give detailed instructions as to how to access the lab. FILLER TEXT
FILLER TEXT
FILLER TEXT
Recommended
Yadavalli, V. S., & Balcou, C. (2017). A supply chain management model to optimise the sorting capability of a 'third party logistics' distribution centre. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(1), 77-84. Retrieved from https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/61749/Yadavalli_Supply_2017.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Ivanov, D., Mason, S. J., & Hartl, R. (2016). Supply chain dynamics, control and disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 1-7. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1114186
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031-5069. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467
Additional Resources
American Supplier Institute (ASI)
Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals
Institute for Supply Management
Operations Management textbook companion website for the 11th and 12th editions
References
Heizer, J. Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). FILLER TEXTSustainability and supply chain management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Critical Thinking Assignment (100 Points)
Important! Read First
Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.
Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management
Access the Pearson MyOMLab per the instructions located in the Course Information folder, titled: MyOMLab Student Guide. Carefully review the simulation’s introductory information and instructions, as these results will influence your grade by 10%.FILLER TEXTFILLER TEXTAfter completing the simulation, capture a screen image of your final simulation results, which are to be included in your critical thinking operations management assignment as an appendix item.FILLER TEXTFILLER TEXTThe operations supply chain management assignment content must include the following:
Introduction: Explain the purpose or thesis of the paper and explain how the body of the paper is arranged to support the purpose of the paper.
Provide a brief definition of supply chain management and identify why it is important in an organization’s operations.
Provide a brief overview description of the supply chain management simulation.
Describe your strategy for performing the supply chain management simulation.
Describe at least three operations supply chain management methods, principles, or techniques experienced in the supply chain management simulation.
Itemize at least three lessons learned from the supply chain management simulation.
Conclusion: Present a recap of key points and summary of main emphasis without repeating verbatim and exclusive of new information.
References: Include at least two current scholarly references (published within the past five years) in addition to the course text.
Appendix: Supply chain management simulation results. The appendix page should be its own page after your reference page, with the header: Appendix—with your screenshot below.
Submit your Critical Thinking assignment document(s) to the module submissions area established for this purpose. Per the assignment rubric, a portion of your evaluation is based on your simulation results.
Option #1: Operations Supply Chain Management PaperFILLER TEXT
This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:
Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Supply Chain Management Simulation.
Writing an operations supply chain management paper.
Your paper will require a structure that includes a strong title, followed by an introductory paragraph which generates interest and includes a thesis and mapping of what is to come.
Each of the sections should use appropriate APA headings, including a conclusion section.
Make sure that the body sections address each of the previous bullets.
Submission Requirements:
Your well-written paper should be four to six pages in length, not including the required cover and references pages.
Support your paper with at least four to six scholarly references (excluding all textbooks). Use current sources, not older than five years. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.
Format your paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management section above.
Option #2: Operations Supply Chain Management PresentationFILLER TEXT
This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:
Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Supply Chain Management Simulation.
Creating a multimedia-rich operations supply chain management presentation.
Your multimedia-rich operations supply chain management presentation must contain logically cohesive flow including audio, video, and graphical content.
The length of the presentation, in addition to the title and reference portions, should be 10-12 slides (must include speaker notes), or five to seven minutes of narrated presentation (must include a transcript).
Please present your content clearly, concisely, and cohesively.
The presentation may be submitted as a completely self-contained file (e.g., PowerPoint, Prezi, Screencast-o-matic, Knovio, or Loom) or as a link to a hosted internet site.
Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management section above.
Rubric
OPS400 Mod 7 CT
OPS400 Mod 7 CT
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
10.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis
20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Operations Supply Chain Management Simulation Performance
20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,002,000.
16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,008,000 and above $1,002,000.
12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,012,000 and above $1,008,000.
8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost above $1,012,000.
20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples
15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less?than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
15.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
10.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style.
5.0 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
4.0 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
3.0 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
2.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
5.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
Total Points: 100.0
QuickBooks Sample of Apple Inc Company Portfolio Project
Portfolio Project part 1: you must review a QuickBooks sample company profile located in Quickbooks and develop a 2-3 page ...
QuickBooks Sample of Apple Inc Company Portfolio Project
Portfolio Project part 1: you must review a QuickBooks sample company profile located in Quickbooks and develop a 2-3 page report based on your review. What type of company did you choose? What product or service does the company offer? Will the company have sales invoices, purchase orders, and/or payroll data? Is this company profitable? How could you use QuickBooks to aid in human resource management and other business processes (be specific)?Assignment should follow APA guidelines with respect to use of subheadings, 1” margins, and double-spaced. Page length requirements exclude title and reference page Portfolio Project part 1: For this Portfolio Project option, you must use a QuickBooks sample company and develop a report based on your review. Choose a sample QuickBooks company through QuickBooks and create the tasks following the outline. Include screenshots and descriptions as needed. Ensure that your analyses differ from those provided in Lynda.com or other online sites (conduct your own unique analyses).Section I: OverviewProvide a general overview of QuickBooks. Make sure the overview provides the reader with a general understanding of the application, including costs, functionality, and minimum system requirements. How does it track the primary information flows within a business?Section II: Transactional Processing and Data ManagementDescribe how QuickBooks handles processing the accounting transactions and recording business activities for the revenue, expenditure and financing cycles. You should provide at least one detailed example of how one would record a specific accounting transaction/ business activity for each of the three transaction cycles. Complete each of the three sections:Revenue CycleCreate a new invoiced customer and create a new customer invoice.Create a new pre-paying customer (i.e., paying with credit card)Apply a customer payment.Run a customer report.Run reports to provide information regarding key revenue cycle information—sales, accounts receivable, cash.Expenditure CycleCreate two or more new vendors.Create an inventory item.Generate a payment to a vendor.Run a report to provide information regarding vendors and accounts payable.Run reports to provide information regarding key expenditure cycle information—purchases, inventory, and cash.Create two or more employees with after the fact payroll module in QuickBooks determine pay and federal income tax, Social security and Medicare deductionsRun a monthly or weekly payroll report with all payroll related accounts.Financing CycleEnter a new account in the chart of accounts.Post journal entries for rent, insurance, accounts receivable and accounts payable.Run the key financial statements that are available and relevant for your company and data. Explain the performance reports—what do they say about your company's performance. Include the type of analysis meaningful for your company and data (vertical vs. horizontal).Run key reports to measure the firm's financial performance.Section III: Internal ControlsHow can you as an accountant use QuickBooks enhance internal controls in the company you chose?How can you secure the system and files?What potential security weaknesses exist for QuickBooks?Section IV: Charts and GraphsHow are visualizations formatted and used?Create a chart.Create a data diagram.Section V: Conclusion and RecommendationGive your overall impression and recommendation for QuickBooks' use in accounting.Assignment should follow APA guidelines with respect to use of subheadings, 1" margins, and double-spaced. Prepare any 8-10 page report in length (excluding title page and reference page) References need to include at least three additional credible academic references.
BBA 4751 Columbia Southern University Ambush Marketing Essay
Note: I have attached the case study that is referenced as well as the unit study guide.InstructionsFor this assignment, ...
BBA 4751 Columbia Southern University Ambush Marketing Essay
Note: I have attached the case study that is referenced as well as the unit study guide.InstructionsFor this assignment, you will read a case and answer a series of questions
concerning an analysis of ethical considerations governing marketing
practices, as leaders are responsible for such endeavors. Begin by reading
the following case, which can be located within the Business Source
Ultimate database of the CSU Online Library.Datamonitor. (2010, July). Ambush marketing case
study: Successfully leveraging high-profile events to raise brand
profile. Retrieved from https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=59543529&site=ehost-live&scope=siteThen, draft a two-page paper by addressing each of the following items:
In your own words, how would you describe "ambush marketing"?
Include two examples with your description.
What are the advantages and disadvantages (risks and consequences)
of ambush marketing?
What was Bavaria Beer hoping to achieve through its ambush marketing
tactics?
Would you consider Bavaria Beer's ambush marketing an unethical
practice or simply a competitive strategy?
Explain.
Can ambush marketing be both intentional and unintentional?
Explain.
As a leader of an organization, would you allow the practice of
ambush marketing? Explain.Be sure to demonstrate a clear analysis as you address each question. Use
APA style to format your assignment. For assistance in formatting your
paper, refer to the Citation Guide. You are not required to complete
additional research for this assignment; however, if you do, use APA Style
to cite your sources.
Gender Communication Artifact discussion
I have a paper written, but it needs to be more refined.NEED TO HAVE 4 SCHOLARLY ARTICLES FROM CURRENT ONLINE SCHOOL LIBRA ...
Gender Communication Artifact discussion
I have a paper written, but it needs to be more refined.NEED TO HAVE 4 SCHOLARLY ARTICLES FROM CURRENT ONLINE SCHOOL LIBRARYInvestigate: Who? What? When? Where? Why? How? And then, Analyze! (25%)Keep in mind stronger (“A”) paper will exceed the minimum requirements noted below. For specifics see the grading rubric below. You will write a 4 page, single-spaced (specifically 2,400 words minimum) paper in which you examine a form of a tangible gender communication (an artifact) i.e. TV episode, newspaper article, movie, song/music video, photograph, magazine, exhibit, advertisement, social media group or exchange, interview etc. You will give a clear description of your artifact answering thoroughly Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How. You will then analyze your example employing AT LEAST 4 concepts from our weekly readings, modules (commentaries), and/or discussions.Introduction (1/3 of a page minimum/specifically 200 words minimum):A creative opening and attention getterA strong thesis statement that clearly articulates your major claim of the paperA clear preview statement that shows how you will organize your paperBody (3 page single-spaced minimum/specifically 1,800 words minimum see the breakdown for each of the three sections of the body below):You should thoroughly introduce your artifact using who, what, where, when, and how (400 words minimum).oPlease give any background information you have about it such as when did it appear, how was it delivered, what is it about, why was it made, when was it made, what was the context in which the artifact emerged – controversy, situation, audience?oAfter this description, your reader should clearly understand it as a piece of gender communication.Definitions of at least 4 concepts (minimum) you have chosen (use scholarly sources specific to the discipline of communication to define your concepts) (400 words minimum).A discussion that connects your chosen concepts to your artifact (1,000 words minimum).oQuestions to answer for each concept in your analysis (you may add additional questions as well):§ Why/How does the concept relate to your artifact?§ How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? (Use peer reviewed journal articles)§ What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found? Implications/Conclusion (2/3 page minimum/specifically 400 word minimum):A brief restatement of what you did in the paper.Most importantly here is the discussion of so what? Why does your analysis matter? To gender communication studies? As part of larger implications for society? Bring closure to your submissionSources: You should have a MINIMUM of six current sources (stronger papers will have more):One must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two can be popular press sourcesThree MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Proper APA in-text citations should be provided in addition to a reference page with full APA source citations.Deductions for not meeting the following requirements are noted below:Meet or exceed the word count for each individual sectionbe typed using a 12-point Times New Roman fontbe single-spaced (nothing should be double spaced)have one-inch margins on all sideshave a title page (that contains only the title, student's name, and UMUC) –the title page is numbered page 1 in the upper right hand corneruse the American Psychological Association (APA) format for citations (both in-text and/or reference list)be well organized with the required subheadings for each section (as noted below)be free of typos, grammatical errors, etc.be submitted to both turnitin.com and your assignment folder by the due date. There is a 20 point deduction for submitting your artifact paper late and it is only accepted up until one week after the original due date.be informative and provide solid support for the thesisuse quotations sparinglyall sources found on the reference page must be cited in the body of the paper with proper in-text citationsUse the required subheadings in your submission:IntroductionWho, What, When, Where, Why, & HowDefinitionsDiscussionImplications/Conclusion Be sure to read the sample artifact paper below by Tepy Berriman entitled Legally Blonde. It is a wonderful example of a quality paper. Here is the grading rubric for the Artifact paper:Artifact PaperCriteriaExemplaryAccomplishedAdequateUnderdevelopedInadequateIntroduction/Paper Format -Attention getter - Thesis statement - Preview -Formatting requirements10 points10-9 pointsOffers an engaging, original introductory paragraph with a creative attention getter, a clear, well-written thesis statement, and an explicitpreviewSignificantly exceeds 250 wordsFully adheres to format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, etc.)8 points8 pointsProvides a sound introductory paragraph with a good attention getter, a clear thesis statement, and a preview.Exceeds 225 wordsAdheres to format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, etc.)7 points7 pointsProvides an adequate introductory paragraph with an attention getter, a thesis statement, and a preview. One element of the preview may be inadequate.Achieves 200 words minimum requirementMay not adhere to all format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, etc.)6 points6 pointsThe introduction lacks one or more of the following: an attention getter, a thesis statement, and/or preview orall elements are provided, but they are not adequate.May not adhere to all format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, 200 word minimum requirement for the introduction, etc.)5 points5-0 pointsThe introduction is either not provided or inadequate.Does not meet some of the format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, 200 word minimum for the introduction section, etc.)1st Section of the Body -Introduction of your Artifact -using who, what, where, when, and how -Relevant background information -Clearly identified as a piece of gender communication15 points15-14 pointsAn exceptional artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented/introduced in a very descriptive manner.A significant amount of relevant background information is presented (when did it appear, how was it delivered, what is it about, why was it made, when was it made, what was the context in which the artifact emerged – controversy, situation, audience?).The description explicitly addresses how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. 500+ words13 points13-12 pointsA sound artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented/introduced in a descriptive manner.A good amount of relevant background information is presented (when did it appear, how was it delivered, what is it about, why was it made, when was it made, what was the context in which the artifact emerged – controversy, situation, audience?).The description addresses how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. 450+ words11 points11-10 pointsAn acceptable artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented/introduced.Sufficient background information is presentedThe description explains how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. 400+ words9 points9-8 pointsAn artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented/introduced.Minimal background information is presented.The description does not fully explains how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. 400 words or less7 points7-0 pointsThe paper may have experienced two or more of the following problems:A weak artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented, but a more thorough introduction was needed.Sufficient background information was not presentedThe description doses not adequately explain how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. Less than 400 words2nd Section of the Body - Definitions of Course Concepts - Signficance and relevance of concepts selected -# of concepts -quality of definitions15 points15-14 points5-6 significant and relevant course concepts are selected.A variety of scholarly definitions from communication sources are shared for each. You are very descriptive in your approach and use proper APA citations. 500+ words13 points13-12 pointsAt least 5 pertinent course concepts are selected.Scholarly definitions from communication sources are shared for each. You are descriptive in your approach and use proper APA citations. 450+ words11 points11-10 pointsAt least 4 pertinent course concepts are selected.Scholarly definitions from communication sources are shared for each. You use proper APA citations. 400+ words9 points9-8 points4 course concepts are selected, but they are not the most important or relevant to the artifact.Definitions are provided, but they may not all be scholarly. You attempt to use APA citations. May be under 400 words7 points7-0 pointsLess than 4 concepts are selected and those selected may not be the most important or relevant to the artifact.Definitions are provided, but they may not all be scholarly. A minimal attempt at proper APA citationsUnder 400 words3rd Section of the Body -Discussion that Connects Your Chosen Concepts to Your Artifact30 points30-27 pointsA very descriptive and thought provoking discussion is presented that explicitly ties each of your chosen concepts to your artifact in a meaningful manner. Explicitly and descriptively answers all of the following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?1150+ words26 points26-23 pointsA descriptive discussion is presented that explicitly ties each of your chosen concepts to the artifact in a meaningful manner. Answers all or most of the following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?1100+ words22 points22-19 pointsAn adequate discussion is presented that ties each of your chosen concepts to the artifact. Answers most of the following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?1000+ words18 points18-15 pointsAn underdeveloped discussion is presented that attempts to tie the concepts to the artifact. Answers some of the following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?1000 words14 points14-0 pointsAn inadequate discussion is presented that attempts to tie the concepts to the artifact. Answers few of following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?Lacks depth, insight, and understanding. Less than 1000 wordsConclusion - Restatement -Justification for analysis and why it matters to gender comm. studies and society -Closure10 points10-9 pointsThe conclusion (final paragraph) is insightful. It includes a well-written restatement of what you did in the paper. A strong argument is made for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and what the larger implications are for society. The conclusion provides the reader with closure.Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion Exceeds 500 words8 pointsThe conclusion (final paragraph) is sound. It includes a well-written restatement of what you did in the paper. A reasonable argument is made for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and what the larger implications are for society. The conclusion provides the reader with closure.Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion Exceeds 450 words7 pointsThe conclusion (final paragraph) is adequate. It includes a restatement of what you did in the paper. An argument is made for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and what the larger implications are for society. The conclusion provides the reader with some closure.Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion Achieves at least the 400 word minimum requirement6 pointsThe conclusion is abrupt and does not provide closure. It may be missing one of the following: restatement of what you did in the paper, an argument for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and/or what the larger implications are for society. Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion May not achieve the 400 word minimum.5 points5-0 pointThe conclusion is poorly written and missing two or more of the required elements (restatement of what you did in the paper, an argument for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and what the larger implications are for society). Closure is not achieved. Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion Does not achieve the 400 word minimum.Or the paper neglects to include a conclusion. Writing Abilities/Style10 points10-9 pointsVery well -written college level paper, engages the reader, clearly organized, detailed, coherent, written in the 3rd person, with clear sentences and paragraphs.Paper has no errors.8 pointsWell-written college level paper, engages the reader, but may have problems with one of the following: organization, details, coherence, written in the 3rdperson, clarity of sentences and paragraphs, or errors.May have 1-3 error7 pointsAdequately written, interests the reader, but may have problems with two of the following: organization, details, coherence, written in the 3rd person, clarity of sentences and paragraphs, or errors.May have 4-6 errors.6 pointsPoorly written, generates little interest for the reader, and demonstrates very limited understanding. Has problems with some of the following: organization, details, coherence, written in the 3rd person, clarity of sentences and paragraphs, or errors.May have 7-10 errors.5 points5-0 pointsVery poorly written, generates no interest for the reader, and provides very little understanding.Has problems with several of the following: organization, details, coherence, written in the 3rd person, clarity of sentences and paragraphs, or errors.May have 10+ errorsSources: Strength/Scholarly -Meets Source Type/s Requirements -Correct in-text and Reference Page Citations, and APA format 10 Points Possible10 points9-10 pointsUses 9+ relevant, scholarly sources in the construction of the paperMeets all of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Proper APA in-text citations should be provided in addition to full APA citations of sources on the reference page. Every source cited on the reference page is cited in the body of the paper. Sources are clearly attributed consistently throughout paper; uses APA format accurately and consistently.8 points8 pointsUses 7+ relevant, scholarly sources in the construction of the paperMeets all or most of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Sources are clearly attributed for in-text and reference page citations, yet "generally" supported; uses proper formatting with minor or no violations.Every source cited on the reference page is cited in the body of the paper. 7 points7 pointsUses 6+ relevant, scholarly sources in the construction of the paperMeets most of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Although attribution is present and many sources seem to be legitimate, some statements are unsubstantiated or generalized and the source of some ideas is unclear or some claims are made without support.Every source cited on the reference page is cited in the body of the paper. 6 points6 pointsMay use less than 6 sources in the construction of the paper or if 6 sources are used they are not all scholarly.Meets some of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Sources may not be relevant and/or scholarlyLimited attribution is provided, some statements are unsubstantiated, the source of many ideas is unclear, and lacks a clear understanding of APA format. Every source cited on the reference page may not be cited in the body of the paper. 5 points5-0 pointsUses less than 6 relevant, scholarly sources in the construction of the paperMay not meet many of all of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Attribution is missing, or sources given are poorly chosen; claims are consistently made without support; reflects little knowledge of APA format. Every source cited on the reference page may not be cited in the body of the paper.
Similar Content
Hello everyone, i am working on my presentation and i need someone to give me more ideas about the topic
Employer Data on Personal Devices
Thinking Ethically
HOW SHOULD EMPLOYERS PROTECT THEIR DATA ON EMPLOYEES’
DEVICES?
One ...
OD Consultant
Write a two- to three-page paper (excluding the title and reference pages) defining the various components of the roles an...
Short and Simple Paper
Locate an article specifically related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX Act) of 2002.Write a 350- to 700-word revi...
University of Maryland Compensation Plans Discussion
Discuss some of the problems that companies are likely to face when designing compensation plans that include both conting...
Individual Project forecasting, management homework help
500-750 words plus a chart/time line (1 document) The forecasting department, traditionally reporting to the sale manager,...
Project Management process Powerpoint presentation, homework help
For this final assignment, you are to create a PowerPoint Presentation that discusses the project management process with ...
IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY ON TOURISM
Tourism is an important sector in the economy contributing around 10% to worldwide GDP, projected to rise to nearly 11% by...
Qrb501
As we have been talking about "Math and the MBA" many of you have mentioned the importance of understanding profit/loss, b...
Periodicity Assumption
Periodicity assumption is an accounting practice where an organization reports the financial results in a regular interval...
Related Tags
Book Guides
The BFG
by Roald Dahl
The Red Badge of Courage
by Stephen Crane
The Nightingale
by Kristin Hannah
Don Quixote
by Miguel de Cervantes
I Cant Make This Up - Life Lessons
by Kevin Hart
Black Beauty
by Anna Sewell
Extreme Ownership - How US Navy SEALs Lead and Win
by Jocko Willink and Leif Babin
Fast Food Nation
by Eric Schlosser
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Module 05 Course Project - Performance Management Proposal
Conduct academic research using the library's databases, like Business Source Complete via EBSCO and Business via ProQuest ...
Module 05 Course Project - Performance Management Proposal
Conduct academic research using the library's databases, like Business Source Complete via EBSCO and Business via ProQuest,
as well as reliable webpages and create a minimum 4 page proposal to
the CEO in which you complete the following for approval of a
performance management system for the new position, Claims Supervisor:Description of the categories to be measured.Description of ratings to be used.Example of performance evaluation form.Explanation for each of your recommendations.Remember
that this is a proposal. Make sure to format your paper properly for
your proposal. A proposal is a persuasive document, so make sure to use
proper language and tone. Remember, you are the HR Manager and you are
writing to the CEO so use a tone in your proposal that is specific to
your audience (the CEO). Include an APA formatted reference page with at least 2 credible sources. Make sure to include APA in-text citations for any information used from outside sources.
OPS400 CSU Global Operation Supply Chain Management Paper
Once selected as a tutor I will give detailed instructions as to how to access the lab. FILLER TEXT
FILLER TEXT
FILLER TEX ...
OPS400 CSU Global Operation Supply Chain Management Paper
Once selected as a tutor I will give detailed instructions as to how to access the lab. FILLER TEXT
FILLER TEXT
FILLER TEXT
Recommended
Yadavalli, V. S., & Balcou, C. (2017). A supply chain management model to optimise the sorting capability of a 'third party logistics' distribution centre. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(1), 77-84. Retrieved from https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/61749/Yadavalli_Supply_2017.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Ivanov, D., Mason, S. J., & Hartl, R. (2016). Supply chain dynamics, control and disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 1-7. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1114186
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031-5069. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467
Additional Resources
American Supplier Institute (ASI)
Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals
Institute for Supply Management
Operations Management textbook companion website for the 11th and 12th editions
References
Heizer, J. Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). FILLER TEXTSustainability and supply chain management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Critical Thinking Assignment (100 Points)
Important! Read First
Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.
Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management
Access the Pearson MyOMLab per the instructions located in the Course Information folder, titled: MyOMLab Student Guide. Carefully review the simulation’s introductory information and instructions, as these results will influence your grade by 10%.FILLER TEXTFILLER TEXTAfter completing the simulation, capture a screen image of your final simulation results, which are to be included in your critical thinking operations management assignment as an appendix item.FILLER TEXTFILLER TEXTThe operations supply chain management assignment content must include the following:
Introduction: Explain the purpose or thesis of the paper and explain how the body of the paper is arranged to support the purpose of the paper.
Provide a brief definition of supply chain management and identify why it is important in an organization’s operations.
Provide a brief overview description of the supply chain management simulation.
Describe your strategy for performing the supply chain management simulation.
Describe at least three operations supply chain management methods, principles, or techniques experienced in the supply chain management simulation.
Itemize at least three lessons learned from the supply chain management simulation.
Conclusion: Present a recap of key points and summary of main emphasis without repeating verbatim and exclusive of new information.
References: Include at least two current scholarly references (published within the past five years) in addition to the course text.
Appendix: Supply chain management simulation results. The appendix page should be its own page after your reference page, with the header: Appendix—with your screenshot below.
Submit your Critical Thinking assignment document(s) to the module submissions area established for this purpose. Per the assignment rubric, a portion of your evaluation is based on your simulation results.
Option #1: Operations Supply Chain Management PaperFILLER TEXT
This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:
Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Supply Chain Management Simulation.
Writing an operations supply chain management paper.
Your paper will require a structure that includes a strong title, followed by an introductory paragraph which generates interest and includes a thesis and mapping of what is to come.
Each of the sections should use appropriate APA headings, including a conclusion section.
Make sure that the body sections address each of the previous bullets.
Submission Requirements:
Your well-written paper should be four to six pages in length, not including the required cover and references pages.
Support your paper with at least four to six scholarly references (excluding all textbooks). Use current sources, not older than five years. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.
Format your paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management section above.
Option #2: Operations Supply Chain Management PresentationFILLER TEXT
This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:
Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Supply Chain Management Simulation.
Creating a multimedia-rich operations supply chain management presentation.
Your multimedia-rich operations supply chain management presentation must contain logically cohesive flow including audio, video, and graphical content.
The length of the presentation, in addition to the title and reference portions, should be 10-12 slides (must include speaker notes), or five to seven minutes of narrated presentation (must include a transcript).
Please present your content clearly, concisely, and cohesively.
The presentation may be submitted as a completely self-contained file (e.g., PowerPoint, Prezi, Screencast-o-matic, Knovio, or Loom) or as a link to a hosted internet site.
Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management section above.
Rubric
OPS400 Mod 7 CT
OPS400 Mod 7 CT
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
10.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis
20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Operations Supply Chain Management Simulation Performance
20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,002,000.
16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,008,000 and above $1,002,000.
12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,012,000 and above $1,008,000.
8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost above $1,012,000.
20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples
15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less?than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
15.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
10.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style.
5.0 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
4.0 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
3.0 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
2.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
5.0 ptsFILLER TEXT
Total Points: 100.0
QuickBooks Sample of Apple Inc Company Portfolio Project
Portfolio Project part 1: you must review a QuickBooks sample company profile located in Quickbooks and develop a 2-3 page ...
QuickBooks Sample of Apple Inc Company Portfolio Project
Portfolio Project part 1: you must review a QuickBooks sample company profile located in Quickbooks and develop a 2-3 page report based on your review. What type of company did you choose? What product or service does the company offer? Will the company have sales invoices, purchase orders, and/or payroll data? Is this company profitable? How could you use QuickBooks to aid in human resource management and other business processes (be specific)?Assignment should follow APA guidelines with respect to use of subheadings, 1” margins, and double-spaced. Page length requirements exclude title and reference page Portfolio Project part 1: For this Portfolio Project option, you must use a QuickBooks sample company and develop a report based on your review. Choose a sample QuickBooks company through QuickBooks and create the tasks following the outline. Include screenshots and descriptions as needed. Ensure that your analyses differ from those provided in Lynda.com or other online sites (conduct your own unique analyses).Section I: OverviewProvide a general overview of QuickBooks. Make sure the overview provides the reader with a general understanding of the application, including costs, functionality, and minimum system requirements. How does it track the primary information flows within a business?Section II: Transactional Processing and Data ManagementDescribe how QuickBooks handles processing the accounting transactions and recording business activities for the revenue, expenditure and financing cycles. You should provide at least one detailed example of how one would record a specific accounting transaction/ business activity for each of the three transaction cycles. Complete each of the three sections:Revenue CycleCreate a new invoiced customer and create a new customer invoice.Create a new pre-paying customer (i.e., paying with credit card)Apply a customer payment.Run a customer report.Run reports to provide information regarding key revenue cycle information—sales, accounts receivable, cash.Expenditure CycleCreate two or more new vendors.Create an inventory item.Generate a payment to a vendor.Run a report to provide information regarding vendors and accounts payable.Run reports to provide information regarding key expenditure cycle information—purchases, inventory, and cash.Create two or more employees with after the fact payroll module in QuickBooks determine pay and federal income tax, Social security and Medicare deductionsRun a monthly or weekly payroll report with all payroll related accounts.Financing CycleEnter a new account in the chart of accounts.Post journal entries for rent, insurance, accounts receivable and accounts payable.Run the key financial statements that are available and relevant for your company and data. Explain the performance reports—what do they say about your company's performance. Include the type of analysis meaningful for your company and data (vertical vs. horizontal).Run key reports to measure the firm's financial performance.Section III: Internal ControlsHow can you as an accountant use QuickBooks enhance internal controls in the company you chose?How can you secure the system and files?What potential security weaknesses exist for QuickBooks?Section IV: Charts and GraphsHow are visualizations formatted and used?Create a chart.Create a data diagram.Section V: Conclusion and RecommendationGive your overall impression and recommendation for QuickBooks' use in accounting.Assignment should follow APA guidelines with respect to use of subheadings, 1" margins, and double-spaced. Prepare any 8-10 page report in length (excluding title page and reference page) References need to include at least three additional credible academic references.
BBA 4751 Columbia Southern University Ambush Marketing Essay
Note: I have attached the case study that is referenced as well as the unit study guide.InstructionsFor this assignment, ...
BBA 4751 Columbia Southern University Ambush Marketing Essay
Note: I have attached the case study that is referenced as well as the unit study guide.InstructionsFor this assignment, you will read a case and answer a series of questions
concerning an analysis of ethical considerations governing marketing
practices, as leaders are responsible for such endeavors. Begin by reading
the following case, which can be located within the Business Source
Ultimate database of the CSU Online Library.Datamonitor. (2010, July). Ambush marketing case
study: Successfully leveraging high-profile events to raise brand
profile. Retrieved from https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=59543529&site=ehost-live&scope=siteThen, draft a two-page paper by addressing each of the following items:
In your own words, how would you describe "ambush marketing"?
Include two examples with your description.
What are the advantages and disadvantages (risks and consequences)
of ambush marketing?
What was Bavaria Beer hoping to achieve through its ambush marketing
tactics?
Would you consider Bavaria Beer's ambush marketing an unethical
practice or simply a competitive strategy?
Explain.
Can ambush marketing be both intentional and unintentional?
Explain.
As a leader of an organization, would you allow the practice of
ambush marketing? Explain.Be sure to demonstrate a clear analysis as you address each question. Use
APA style to format your assignment. For assistance in formatting your
paper, refer to the Citation Guide. You are not required to complete
additional research for this assignment; however, if you do, use APA Style
to cite your sources.
Gender Communication Artifact discussion
I have a paper written, but it needs to be more refined.NEED TO HAVE 4 SCHOLARLY ARTICLES FROM CURRENT ONLINE SCHOOL LIBRA ...
Gender Communication Artifact discussion
I have a paper written, but it needs to be more refined.NEED TO HAVE 4 SCHOLARLY ARTICLES FROM CURRENT ONLINE SCHOOL LIBRARYInvestigate: Who? What? When? Where? Why? How? And then, Analyze! (25%)Keep in mind stronger (“A”) paper will exceed the minimum requirements noted below. For specifics see the grading rubric below. You will write a 4 page, single-spaced (specifically 2,400 words minimum) paper in which you examine a form of a tangible gender communication (an artifact) i.e. TV episode, newspaper article, movie, song/music video, photograph, magazine, exhibit, advertisement, social media group or exchange, interview etc. You will give a clear description of your artifact answering thoroughly Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How. You will then analyze your example employing AT LEAST 4 concepts from our weekly readings, modules (commentaries), and/or discussions.Introduction (1/3 of a page minimum/specifically 200 words minimum):A creative opening and attention getterA strong thesis statement that clearly articulates your major claim of the paperA clear preview statement that shows how you will organize your paperBody (3 page single-spaced minimum/specifically 1,800 words minimum see the breakdown for each of the three sections of the body below):You should thoroughly introduce your artifact using who, what, where, when, and how (400 words minimum).oPlease give any background information you have about it such as when did it appear, how was it delivered, what is it about, why was it made, when was it made, what was the context in which the artifact emerged – controversy, situation, audience?oAfter this description, your reader should clearly understand it as a piece of gender communication.Definitions of at least 4 concepts (minimum) you have chosen (use scholarly sources specific to the discipline of communication to define your concepts) (400 words minimum).A discussion that connects your chosen concepts to your artifact (1,000 words minimum).oQuestions to answer for each concept in your analysis (you may add additional questions as well):§ Why/How does the concept relate to your artifact?§ How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? (Use peer reviewed journal articles)§ What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found? Implications/Conclusion (2/3 page minimum/specifically 400 word minimum):A brief restatement of what you did in the paper.Most importantly here is the discussion of so what? Why does your analysis matter? To gender communication studies? As part of larger implications for society? Bring closure to your submissionSources: You should have a MINIMUM of six current sources (stronger papers will have more):One must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two can be popular press sourcesThree MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Proper APA in-text citations should be provided in addition to a reference page with full APA source citations.Deductions for not meeting the following requirements are noted below:Meet or exceed the word count for each individual sectionbe typed using a 12-point Times New Roman fontbe single-spaced (nothing should be double spaced)have one-inch margins on all sideshave a title page (that contains only the title, student's name, and UMUC) –the title page is numbered page 1 in the upper right hand corneruse the American Psychological Association (APA) format for citations (both in-text and/or reference list)be well organized with the required subheadings for each section (as noted below)be free of typos, grammatical errors, etc.be submitted to both turnitin.com and your assignment folder by the due date. There is a 20 point deduction for submitting your artifact paper late and it is only accepted up until one week after the original due date.be informative and provide solid support for the thesisuse quotations sparinglyall sources found on the reference page must be cited in the body of the paper with proper in-text citationsUse the required subheadings in your submission:IntroductionWho, What, When, Where, Why, & HowDefinitionsDiscussionImplications/Conclusion Be sure to read the sample artifact paper below by Tepy Berriman entitled Legally Blonde. It is a wonderful example of a quality paper. Here is the grading rubric for the Artifact paper:Artifact PaperCriteriaExemplaryAccomplishedAdequateUnderdevelopedInadequateIntroduction/Paper Format -Attention getter - Thesis statement - Preview -Formatting requirements10 points10-9 pointsOffers an engaging, original introductory paragraph with a creative attention getter, a clear, well-written thesis statement, and an explicitpreviewSignificantly exceeds 250 wordsFully adheres to format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, etc.)8 points8 pointsProvides a sound introductory paragraph with a good attention getter, a clear thesis statement, and a preview.Exceeds 225 wordsAdheres to format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, etc.)7 points7 pointsProvides an adequate introductory paragraph with an attention getter, a thesis statement, and a preview. One element of the preview may be inadequate.Achieves 200 words minimum requirementMay not adhere to all format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, etc.)6 points6 pointsThe introduction lacks one or more of the following: an attention getter, a thesis statement, and/or preview orall elements are provided, but they are not adequate.May not adhere to all format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, 200 word minimum requirement for the introduction, etc.)5 points5-0 pointsThe introduction is either not provided or inadequate.Does not meet some of the format requirements (font, spacing, title page, required heading, margins, proper APA citations, turnitin.com, 200 word minimum for the introduction section, etc.)1st Section of the Body -Introduction of your Artifact -using who, what, where, when, and how -Relevant background information -Clearly identified as a piece of gender communication15 points15-14 pointsAn exceptional artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented/introduced in a very descriptive manner.A significant amount of relevant background information is presented (when did it appear, how was it delivered, what is it about, why was it made, when was it made, what was the context in which the artifact emerged – controversy, situation, audience?).The description explicitly addresses how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. 500+ words13 points13-12 pointsA sound artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented/introduced in a descriptive manner.A good amount of relevant background information is presented (when did it appear, how was it delivered, what is it about, why was it made, when was it made, what was the context in which the artifact emerged – controversy, situation, audience?).The description addresses how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. 450+ words11 points11-10 pointsAn acceptable artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented/introduced.Sufficient background information is presentedThe description explains how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. 400+ words9 points9-8 pointsAn artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented/introduced.Minimal background information is presented.The description does not fully explains how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. 400 words or less7 points7-0 pointsThe paper may have experienced two or more of the following problems:A weak artifact representing gender is selected. The artifact is presented, but a more thorough introduction was needed.Sufficient background information was not presentedThe description doses not adequately explain how your artifact is a piece of gender communication. Less than 400 words2nd Section of the Body - Definitions of Course Concepts - Signficance and relevance of concepts selected -# of concepts -quality of definitions15 points15-14 points5-6 significant and relevant course concepts are selected.A variety of scholarly definitions from communication sources are shared for each. You are very descriptive in your approach and use proper APA citations. 500+ words13 points13-12 pointsAt least 5 pertinent course concepts are selected.Scholarly definitions from communication sources are shared for each. You are descriptive in your approach and use proper APA citations. 450+ words11 points11-10 pointsAt least 4 pertinent course concepts are selected.Scholarly definitions from communication sources are shared for each. You use proper APA citations. 400+ words9 points9-8 points4 course concepts are selected, but they are not the most important or relevant to the artifact.Definitions are provided, but they may not all be scholarly. You attempt to use APA citations. May be under 400 words7 points7-0 pointsLess than 4 concepts are selected and those selected may not be the most important or relevant to the artifact.Definitions are provided, but they may not all be scholarly. A minimal attempt at proper APA citationsUnder 400 words3rd Section of the Body -Discussion that Connects Your Chosen Concepts to Your Artifact30 points30-27 pointsA very descriptive and thought provoking discussion is presented that explicitly ties each of your chosen concepts to your artifact in a meaningful manner. Explicitly and descriptively answers all of the following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?1150+ words26 points26-23 pointsA descriptive discussion is presented that explicitly ties each of your chosen concepts to the artifact in a meaningful manner. Answers all or most of the following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?1100+ words22 points22-19 pointsAn adequate discussion is presented that ties each of your chosen concepts to the artifact. Answers most of the following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?1000+ words18 points18-15 pointsAn underdeveloped discussion is presented that attempts to tie the concepts to the artifact. Answers some of the following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?1000 words14 points14-0 pointsAn inadequate discussion is presented that attempts to tie the concepts to the artifact. Answers few of following questions for each concept:Why/How does the concepts relate to your artifact?How does the artifact fit in, further, or work against other scholarly work you found? Peer reviewed journal articles are used to answers this question for each concept.What were the responses to this artifact and how does that relate to the concepts/research you have found?Lacks depth, insight, and understanding. Less than 1000 wordsConclusion - Restatement -Justification for analysis and why it matters to gender comm. studies and society -Closure10 points10-9 pointsThe conclusion (final paragraph) is insightful. It includes a well-written restatement of what you did in the paper. A strong argument is made for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and what the larger implications are for society. The conclusion provides the reader with closure.Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion Exceeds 500 words8 pointsThe conclusion (final paragraph) is sound. It includes a well-written restatement of what you did in the paper. A reasonable argument is made for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and what the larger implications are for society. The conclusion provides the reader with closure.Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion Exceeds 450 words7 pointsThe conclusion (final paragraph) is adequate. It includes a restatement of what you did in the paper. An argument is made for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and what the larger implications are for society. The conclusion provides the reader with some closure.Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion Achieves at least the 400 word minimum requirement6 pointsThe conclusion is abrupt and does not provide closure. It may be missing one of the following: restatement of what you did in the paper, an argument for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and/or what the larger implications are for society. Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion May not achieve the 400 word minimum.5 points5-0 pointThe conclusion is poorly written and missing two or more of the required elements (restatement of what you did in the paper, an argument for why your analysis matters to gender communication studies and what the larger implications are for society). Closure is not achieved. Uses the subheading: Implications/Conclusion Does not achieve the 400 word minimum.Or the paper neglects to include a conclusion. Writing Abilities/Style10 points10-9 pointsVery well -written college level paper, engages the reader, clearly organized, detailed, coherent, written in the 3rd person, with clear sentences and paragraphs.Paper has no errors.8 pointsWell-written college level paper, engages the reader, but may have problems with one of the following: organization, details, coherence, written in the 3rdperson, clarity of sentences and paragraphs, or errors.May have 1-3 error7 pointsAdequately written, interests the reader, but may have problems with two of the following: organization, details, coherence, written in the 3rd person, clarity of sentences and paragraphs, or errors.May have 4-6 errors.6 pointsPoorly written, generates little interest for the reader, and demonstrates very limited understanding. Has problems with some of the following: organization, details, coherence, written in the 3rd person, clarity of sentences and paragraphs, or errors.May have 7-10 errors.5 points5-0 pointsVery poorly written, generates no interest for the reader, and provides very little understanding.Has problems with several of the following: organization, details, coherence, written in the 3rd person, clarity of sentences and paragraphs, or errors.May have 10+ errorsSources: Strength/Scholarly -Meets Source Type/s Requirements -Correct in-text and Reference Page Citations, and APA format 10 Points Possible10 points9-10 pointsUses 9+ relevant, scholarly sources in the construction of the paperMeets all of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Proper APA in-text citations should be provided in addition to full APA citations of sources on the reference page. Every source cited on the reference page is cited in the body of the paper. Sources are clearly attributed consistently throughout paper; uses APA format accurately and consistently.8 points8 pointsUses 7+ relevant, scholarly sources in the construction of the paperMeets all or most of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Sources are clearly attributed for in-text and reference page citations, yet "generally" supported; uses proper formatting with minor or no violations.Every source cited on the reference page is cited in the body of the paper. 7 points7 pointsUses 6+ relevant, scholarly sources in the construction of the paperMeets most of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Although attribution is present and many sources seem to be legitimate, some statements are unsubstantiated or generalized and the source of some ideas is unclear or some claims are made without support.Every source cited on the reference page is cited in the body of the paper. 6 points6 pointsMay use less than 6 sources in the construction of the paper or if 6 sources are used they are not all scholarly.Meets some of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Sources may not be relevant and/or scholarlyLimited attribution is provided, some statements are unsubstantiated, the source of many ideas is unclear, and lacks a clear understanding of APA format. Every source cited on the reference page may not be cited in the body of the paper. 5 points5-0 pointsUses less than 6 relevant, scholarly sources in the construction of the paperMay not meet many of all of the requirements below:One source must be your readings or modules/commentaries (you may use more but you still must meet the other source requirements as well)Two sources may be popular press sourcesThree sources MUST BE peer reviewed journal articles on communication Four of your sources must come from UMUC's online library Attribution is missing, or sources given are poorly chosen; claims are consistently made without support; reflects little knowledge of APA format. Every source cited on the reference page may not be cited in the body of the paper.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents